Conspiracy Theories About the Death of David Wilcock

[GroovieBean]

Posted by Raskolnikov (here)
I was wondering what James Gilliland's view was on the Wilcock suicide. He failed to cover it last week but got around to it this week. He appears to believe that David did indeed commit suicide because of the relentless targeting and from the added stress of completely isolating himself and not accepting help when it was offered. James said he offered to take David in at the Ranch, but David declined. It's also interesting to note that James still backs Corey Goode and still does conferences with him. I personally have no opinion on Corey as I quickly lost interest in Wilcock's work the moment he arrived, something didn't feel right anymore, on second thought, that could be taken as my opinion.

But wanted to add this in case others were interested in Gilliland's take. For some reason I can't attach the Rumble video so will add the link to Eceti. It was posted yesterday and is titled: "David Wilcock, a 20,000 foot perspective, Earth Changes, Real Disclosure."

https://rumble.com/c/ECETISTARGATEOF...e9s=src_v1_cmd

P.s. Thanks for your words Bill. I was always curious why you stopped making videos. Wise words, we could all use a break from the Reality Show.

*********************************************************************

UH OH.. ME AGAIN... if my format is bad, I apologize. Sometimes my brain works it out that way.

SOME REFRESHER of many:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=OobZtnmXTs0

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=M6WRnA17OrM

The following reflects my personal opinions, firsthand experiences, education, observations, and analysis.
THERE IS STILL A MASSIVE AMOUNT OF INFORMATION that has never been publicly discussed.

I may need to start an entirely separate thread: “How manipulation behind the scenes operates through the Dark Alliance (GG label), the self-appointed ‘elite’ speakers/producers of UFO-New Age culture, and the interconnected ecosystem surrounding them.” The irony is impossible to miss. These personalities constantly condemn the “elite” in mainstream systems, while simultaneously building their own hierarchy of untouchable elites within ufology and New Age circles.

What continues to amaze me is how many podcasts, YouTube “shows,” self-described journalists, and content creators exist in this genre, yet almost none will seriously interview the underdogs from 2017. Think carefully about that.
To every whistleblower from 2017 who spoke out, did the right thing, lost friendships, reputations, opportunities, or endured targeting because they refused to stay silent: there are some of us who understand exactly what that took. We see you. We validate you. Most importantly, we thank you.
What is even more disturbing is seeing people now fabricate stories online simply to insert themselves into the Dark Alliance narrative. Some are outright lying on social media just to feel connected to the mythology. I have literally seen people posting “star language” connected to Blue Birds and other fantasy-roleplay behavior while attaching themselves to very real situations that harmed actual people.
There are blog posts circulating with outright falsehoods, revisionist storytelling, and attention-seeking nonsense.
It is sad.
And honestly, it mocks the people who were genuinely hurt.
If people truly care about supporting victims or whistleblowers, then misinformation and fabricated stories should be called out immediately instead of rewarded with clicks and attention.

People often ask why I continue speaking about this.
I constantly hear: “Let it go.” “Move on.” “Why revisit any of this?” "Professional victim"
The reality is, I did move on. I stayed offline for years. But while sorting through old files and archived material recently, everything resurfaced again. Screenshots. Conversations. Evidence. Patterns. Events. Once you reconnect those threads, it becomes impossible to ignore how large the entire structure really was.
And frankly, it is not in my character to stay silent about abusive systems, cult-like behavior, manipulation, targeting, or psychological conditioning that continues affecting people today, especially younger audiences entering these spaces through social media.
A four-minute TikTok video or surface-level social media breakdown is not enough to explain what actually occurred behind the scenes.
When death threats become involved, especially threats referencing a picture of a child being kidnapped, and I have a child, silence no longer feels honorable.
Information becomes education.
Speaking becomes survival.

One of the most laughable things I experienced nonstop was the weaponized use of “attack” rhetoric whenever someone disagreed with them.
Since when did disagreement become an “attack”?
Since when did criticism, opposing opinions, or exposing contradictions become violence?
That rhetorical shift spread heavily through CG’s messaging and eventually infected nearly everyone around him, including David. Even many people who now position themselves as “the good side” still use identical language patterns.
Real attacks are physical intimidation, stalking, threats, harassment, or direct endangerment.

But what emerged around the Dark Alliance era was constant framing that criticism itself was evidence of some organized “cabal campaign.” That narrative became deeply embedded into the culture and is now being endlessly recycled again across videos and social media content.
One thing people should understand clearly is how women are often utilized within these spaces.
Validation, grooming, promises of documentaries, promises of platforms, promises of visibility, promises of “big opportunities,” emotional feeding, ego reinforcement, and idealization become tools for influence and recruitment.
I experienced this myself.
Promises of major documentaries, HBO-level discussions, future opportunities, exposure, and “important projects” were constantly floated around to keep people emotionally invested and compliant.

David, in my opinion, became both an abuser and a deeply manipulated individual inside multiple overlapping cult-like systems. He was handled by influential personalities, psychologically controlled, emotionally manipulated, blackmailed to prevent defection, used financially and socially, and fed endless paranoia and toxic belief systems.
He genuinely appeared convinced he was under attack constantly: tires, brakes, sabotage narratives, spiritual warfare, cosmic targeting, and endless reinforcement that enemies were everywhere.
The amount of pressure surrounding supplements, fasting, medications, rituals, spiritual performance, and “earning” acceptance into higher cosmic narratives further destabilized him psychologically over time. He appeared fully convinced by CG’s mythology, including beliefs surrounding Blue Avians and future salvation narratives.
At some point, the handling consumed his logic, emotional stability, identity, judgment, and sovereignty.
I suspect he eventually realized how many people he had harmed directly and indirectly, how deeply manipulated he himself had become, how much money disappeared around him, and how trapped he truly was within the machine.
In my opinion, parts of him were already psychologically gone long before the final tragedies unfolded.

JAMES Gilliland, in my opinion, has always represented another dangerous guru archetype: narcissistic, performative, manipulative, and deeply embedded in the culture surrounding these movements.
There are always reasons behind reactions and the actions that follow them. David was invited to ECETI and declined. That alone speaks volumes to me. People should carefully research the timelines, affiliations, and fallout surrounding those events.
There is also still a lengthy YouTube video publicly available detailing James’s actions and behavior extensively.
Reaction to invitation, then reaction afterward. Patterns matter.
James heavily utilized “real disclosure” rhetoric, which should have been a giant red flag from the beginning, just as similar rhetoric repeatedly emerged through Corey, David, JS, RR, LE, and others.

NOTE* with any person speaking on a stage, a video, whatever , research.

How many failed predictions have circulated through these circles?
How many disclosure dates failed?
How many prophecies collapsed?
How many salvation narratives never materialized?
And yet the cycle continues.

That is because, in my opinion, it functions as cyclical psychological conditioning happening in real time while most followers fail to recognize it.
Real research requires independent critical thinking, direct interviews with sources, examination of opposing information, and resistance to emotionally manipulative clickbait narratives.
Instead, online spaces became mirrors reflecting the same talking points endlessly:

Video after video.
Blog after blog.
Account after account.
Everyone repeating everyone else.
Groupthink. Gaslighting. Narrative reinforcement.
That is not journalism.

Especially when many of these accounts emerged only within the last several years and function more like influence amplifiers than investigators. Not even know who these people were until a buzz.
Knowledge is not found in whispers circulating through circus tents built around online personalities.

ECETI, in my opinion, became a visible example of multiple cult-like ecosystems reinforcing one another. Conferences repeatedly platformed overlapping personalities, belief systems, and influence structures.
Not every speaker involved is fraudulent. They are laced in as to deter from recognizing the scams.
However, I personally believe a very large percentage operate through branding psychology, persuasion tactics, emotional manipulation, and soft psychological operations.
Books, conferences, podcasts, documentaries, livestreams, and social media ecosystems all became interconnected components of a much larger machine.
This infinite combined CULT ecosystem was carefully staged, reinforced, and performed over many years.
A circus with many ring leaders guiding countless side shows.
And audiences received free tickets to the spectacle.

In all my years researching, interviewing verified contacts, receiving emails, reviewing evidence, and hearing firsthand accounts of targeting and abuse, I honestly believe the scope of this ecosystem became larger and more psychologically invasive than most people can imagine.
My personal conclusion is that this represents a newer form of cult structure adapted perfectly for internet culture and parasocial media environments.
And strangely, almost nobody has asked why I reached that conclusion.
Nobody asked why I was removed from speaking opportunities discussing UFO/New Age cults.
Nobody asked why I was locked out of “Reality Check.”
Nobody asked How I came up with that channels name.
Nobody asked who financially benefited from interviews, productions, or narrative control surrounding these productions on various platforms.
Nobody pointed out those who conducted key early interviews or how difficult obtaining those interviews actually was.
So yes, I will toot my own horn for a second.
TOOOOOT.
Then high five all the others amongst me 2017

If a man had uncovered and organized some of this information, there is a good chance he would already be touring conferences as “the whistleblower who exposed alien cult manipulation tactics.” LOL.... it is so true!!
The “Reality Check” videos were not produced by some polished professional operation. At the time, much of it was improvised. And thankfully, when I was abruptly locked out, I still had enough time to recover archived files, recordings, bloopers, and evidence before access disappeared entirely.
He did NOT know the password.
Everything remains archived.


Current observations and frustrations:
Jay is now doing podcast tours discussing parts of these events, omitting major Dark Alliance details and occasionally presenting information as though it originated independently.
Remember, he was NOT any part of 2017 whistleblowers. He was producing 'cosmic disclosure' Video Production Development Director, all the while Dark Alliance abuse was going on via DW/CG and then the inner circle.
Money making. He did not get fired for nothing.

Where did the “black powder” story originate? What purpose did it serve?
Why are attractive women repeatedly elevated, utilized, emotionally validated, or ego-stroked inside these circles?
Because that is often how outcomes are engineered:
Feed vulnerability.
Shape identity.
Guide emotion.
Mold the clay.
Achieve the desired outcome.

Why was David targeted?
Why were so many witnesses to his mental decline suddenly nowhere to be found?
Because, in my opinion, many people around him already extracted what they needed: access, validation, influence, proximity, status, money.
It is disgusting- HOWEVER, LOVE AND LIGHT..... puffy clouds, star seed missions, grey bars, Divine Masculine hugging, and Yoni Forest dances.... LOL

If anyone wants more context, read my recent posts. Together, many of us hold different fragments of the same larger story.
Someday, maybe a legitimate producer, journalist, or documentary director will finally step forward and tell the complete story honestly.
If people truly understood how orchestrated much of this world can become behind the scenes, they would be stunned.

Women, especially, are deeply used emotionally, socially, symbolically, and strategically.
The level of manipulation operating behind the scenes among certain “big names,” producers, organizers, and influencers seeking clout would shock many people to their core. (most defectors left the cult when the jig was up)
Looks like the jig is back in, lol.....
Hey Gaia, think you can finally admit and apologize for the absolute monsters you gave birth too???

Another example:
Leon publicly stated in an interview on YouTube with an inner circle cult useful idiot defector, that victims should reach out for help.
I called.
I emailed.
No response.
Anything to paint a pure picture. Anything to make that money. Anything.

Sorry if this moves in multiple directions, but to me it all stitches together into one enormous quilt.

G.B.

[GroovieBean]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Raskolnikov (here)
I was wondering what James Gilliland's view on the Wilcock suicide. He failed to cover it last week but got around to it this week. He appears to believe that David did indeed commit suicide because of the relentless targeting and from the added stress of completely isolating himself and not accepting help when it was offered. James said he offered to take David in at the Ranch but David declined. It's also interesting to note that James still backs Corey Goode and still does conferences with him. I personally have no opinion on Corey as I quickly lost interest in Wilcock's work the moment he arrived, something didn't feel right anymore, on second thought, that could be taken as my opinion.

But wanted to add this in case others were interested in Gilliland's take. For some reason I can't attach the Rumble video so will add the link to Eceti. It was posted yesterday and is titled: "David Wilcock, a 20,000 foot perspective, Earth Changes, Real Disclosure."

https://rumble.com/c/ECETISTARGATEOF...e9s=src_v1_cmd

P.s. Thanks for your words Bill. I was always curious why you stopped making videos. Wise words, we could all use a break from the Reality Show.

Here's the video. (... And after all this time, James Gilliland can't spell 'Wilcock')

https://rumble.com/v79aaqa-david-wil...sclosure..html

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v773mq2

CREEP FACTOR UNPRECEDENTED, emails rec'd while researching ECETI-unsettling. just like gangs, watch who hangs around with whom.

Bill!!!! we should do a roundtable discussion........................

[Kryztian]

Posted by GroovieBean (here)
CREEP FACTOR UNPRECEDENTED, emails rec'd while researching ECETI-unsettling. just like gangs, watch who hangs around with whom.

When it comes to creepy new-age charlatans, ufological snake-oil salesmen, and esoteric pyramid-scheming hoaxsters, Project Avalon has a thread about each and everyone of them:

Is James Gilliland a Cosmic Conman?

[Raskolnikov]

Posted by Kryztian (here)

Posted by GroovieBean (here)
CREEP FACTOR UNPRECEDENTED, emails rec'd while researching ECETI-unsettling. just like gangs, watch who hangs around with whom.

When it comes to creepy new-age charlatans, ufological snake-oil salesmen, and esoteric pyramid-scheming hoaxsters, Project Avalon has a thread about each and everyone of them:

Is James Gilliland a Cosmic Conman?

All due respect Kryztian, as I respect your knowledge and the well-researched posts you put out most of the time, but there's nothing in the above thread that paints Gilliland as the creepy new-age charlatan, ufological snake-oil salesman, or esoteric pyramid scheming hoaxster you imply him to be except for the random female overture. Most in that thread are defending him or at least feel him to be genuine in his overall intention and purpose. If you have information we are not aware of please fill us in.

It pains me to say that I don't see much hope for positive change in this so-called truth movement and community if we continue to tear each other down this way.

[Kryztian]

Posted by Raskolnikov (here)
All due respect Kryztian, as I respect your knowledge and the well-researched posts you put out most of the time, but there's nothing in the above thread that paints Gilliland as the creepy new-age charlatan, ufological snake-oil salesman, or esoteric pyramid scheming hoaxster you imply him to be except for the random female overture. Most in that thread are defending him or at least feel him to be genuine in his overall intention and purpose. If you have information we are not aware of please fill us in.

Perhaps my description of Gilliland was just a little bit overwrought, but not by that much. If you want to understand who Gilliland really is, (and who David Wilcock really was), you have to understand his friend Corey Goode, who is the Charles Manson of Ufology. Like Manson, he was a cult figure who could manipulate people and get them to do bad and illegal things, especially against innocent people. Some of the people Goode attacked are here on Avalon, and others had been attacked have come to Avalon to share their story, although much of their stories are confidential. In some cases people have been stalked, harassed, given death threats, have been doxxed so that dozens of people call up their employer. I one case, an exceptional person who was a moderator here interviewed some of the people who were in proximity to Corey and was extremely fair minded, was targeted by a secret group of Corey's minions, and he lost his job, and then lost his house. There is also another former Corey associate who came back to the forum recently and mentioned years of having PTSD. I am sure there are many others who have had PTSD too and lost many nights of sleep.

Okay, back to Gilliland. I started the "Is James Gilliland a Cosmic Conman?" with a video from Steve Cambian. The video has been taken down, so all the supporting info is not there. But some detail I remember from the video:

--- Gilliland, at the ranch, would frequently tell people that "he had a feeling" there would be a certain time in the evening when UFOs would be dropping by. He would gather at that time and perpetually look at his watch and keep saying "I feel, it any time now." Sure enough, a light would appear in the sky and continue at the same rate along a straight trajectory. If you had a schedule of the path of the International Space Station, then you would know that was what you were seeing.

--- He would pay people to go into the mountains and turn and and off flickering lights, so that the could be seen from Gilliland's ranch.

--- He was extremely hostile to some Ufologist, those who applied critical thinking to his and Corey Goode's claims. They were banned from the ranch.

I don't doubt that there is a lot of UFO activity in that area (Mt. Adams) but it does not occur on a regular basis. While I imagine Gilliland didn't want to disappoint his visitors, it is still a fraud. I value my time studying ufology because it has taught me to tell the difference between truth and fiction, not because it has turned me into a wondering fool.

--- He complains a lot about being harassed by the town and the neighbors. ( I remember hearing him say that on his radio show --- he never said explicitly why --- I (wrongly) came to the conclusion that they were fundamentalist Christians who didn't like the newagers and "alien lovers" that were arriving in the neighborhood.) It turns out that there are a lot of code violations, poor construction done without town permits, etc.

--- Because of the bad shape of the buildings at the ranch, he has had GoFundMe's and fundraisers, raising tens of thousands of dollars. But no improvements have ever been made.

None of these things makes Gilliland a criminal who deserves time in jail, but on the other hand, it is said that people like him maneuver themselves into positions of leadership in Ufology. The field of Ufology has some outstanding, hardworking people who have done tremendous work and research, which deserve to be heard more. They have one main objective: the truth. But we also have some other people who try to position themselves on the same podiums next to these people and get the same level of love and attention. But their priority isn't the truth, it's commanding attention, it's manipulating people. If it makes people go "Wow. Gee Whiz! Give me more of that!" then they have met their object and who cares if it's true of not.

A few years ago, I saw the great lawyer and ufologist Daniel Sheenan and he gave a rousing speech about how important it is for ufologist to commit to the truth, and to remove the parasitic entities that don't care about the truth from the community. And he called out the liars by name and he called them out by name, and both Corey Goode and David Wilcock were among them. Don't know if Gilliland was, but he is right there in Corey Goode's shadow.

If the ufology community allows liars to come into the community, then a community based on lies will fall apart. If it cleans house however, it will be in great condition. I have sharpened my sword and am ready for a bloodbath to protect and honor the truth and to vanquish the parasites that have diminished it.

(Don't have time to write more now, but there is a lot to say about how Gilliland has enabled Corey Goode in the last few years.)

[Bluegreen]

God bless them all, saints and sinners. Like most of us, they started with good intentions.

[Kryztian]

Posted by Bluegreen (here)
Like most of us, they started with good intentions.

Yes, and certain roads to a certain place are paved with good intentions.

Watching some people go down the wayward path, should make us more appreciative of all the people who do great work in ufology and conspiracy theory and such. These are probably the great majority of people in the field. Some of the qualities that make people stay on track:

1. Good critical thinking and reasoning skills. Being able to come of with ideas and hypothesis while simultaneously being able to question and debunk your own work. Being able to accept ideas that don't fit into your assumptions or ideology.
   
   
2. Humility. Wanting to see your work succeed more than you want to see your name up there in bright lights.
   
   
3. An appreciation for your worst critics.
   
   
4. No expectation of financial renumeration. If you are in these fields it would help to 1) have another job that supports you or 2) having a sugar daddy/mommy that supports you or 3) have a willingness to live in poverty.

[Sue (Ayt)]

Posted by Bluegreen (here)
God bless them all, saints and sinners. Like most of us, they started with good intentions.

Most do, and it's easy to get way-laid. But Corey and some others like him, appear to have ONLY ulterior motives as their original intent from the start.
Intentions like $$, fame, discrediting, and other self-serving intention.

God will still bless them all, I suppose, whatever the Grand Design of His Great Show is about.

[Blastolabs]

Raskolnikov, first of all watch any of James videos, he is clearly a con man, if you cant see this you, or FEEL it, then I don't have anything to say to you.

Second, "Random female overture". What does that mean, I know it offended me, a lot. We don't need any more of your random male overture here

Posted by Raskolnikov (here)

Posted by Kryztian (here)

Posted by GroovieBean (here)
CREEP FACTOR UNPRECEDENTED, emails rec'd while researching ECETI-unsettling. just like gangs, watch who hangs around with whom.

When it comes to creepy new-age charlatans, ufological snake-oil salesmen, and esoteric pyramid-scheming hoaxsters, Project Avalon has a thread about each and everyone of them:

Is James Gilliland a Cosmic Conman?

All due respect Kryztian, as I respect your knowledge and the well-researched posts you put out most of the time, but there's nothing in the above thread that paints Gilliland as the creepy new-age charlatan, ufological snake-oil salesman, or esoteric pyramid scheming hoaxster you imply him to be except for the random female overture. Most in that thread are defending him or at least feel him to be genuine in his overall intention and purpose. If you have information we are not aware of please fill us in.

It pains me to say that I don't see much hope for positive change in this so-called truth movement and community if we continue to tear each other down this way.

[Raskolnikov]

Posted by Blastolabs (here)
Raskolnikov, first of all watch any of James videos, he is clearly a con man, if you cant see this you, or FEEL it, then I don't have anything to say to you.

Second, "Random female overture". What does that mean, I know it offended me, a lot. We don't need any more of your random male overture here

Here we go, now I'm the target for sticking up for Gilliland.

Random female overture:

overture

[oh-ver-cher, -choor]
/ ˈoʊ vər tʃər, -ˌtʃʊər /

1) an opening or initiating move toward negotiations, a new relationship, an agreement, etc.; a formal or informal proposal or offer.

overtures of peace; a shy man who rarely made overtures of friendship.

How can that possibly offend you, a lot, when that was the main complaint by some, that he made advances towards women at the ranch?

[Bill Ryan]

Peace, everyone!

A small intervention re James Gilliland. I've met him a few times, and been to his ranch twice.

• There are UFOs everywhere there, all over the sky, every night. I've seen them myself with my own eyes (both visits), and it was (a) impressive to say the least, and (b) somewhat hard to believe.

• Face to face and in all the conversations I've had with him, he comes over as a very pleasant and sincere person.

• But he did the community a big, naive disservice by supporting Corey publicly for so long. He should have known much much better.

• What his views are about Corey today, I don't know. Just maybe, he could have changed his tune as so very many eventually have. (It still astonishes me how many apparently smart people were 100% duped and never did the simple groundwork to check it all out properly.)

[Denise/Dizi]

The only thing I found odd about the death of David Wilcock was the recordings released from the police department. When the officers arrived on scene, and heard the gunshot, one very prominantly suggested David had fired a "Test Shot"... And as far as I could tell? There were no other shots... So either that was the real shot, and they didn't see the aftermath from where they stood? Or it wasn't recorded loud enough for it to come back on the recording they played.

Perhaps I missed it but there were not two shots as far as I could tell... But then again, I didn't listen to it over and over... Did anyone else hear a second actual shot? Or was the "Test shot" the one that ended his life?