Chicago Sky’s DiJonai Carrington finally responded to those criticizing her for posting "WHITE PRIVILEGE @indianafever" after being ejected for clotheslining Indiana Fever star Sophie Cunningham.
But her response still doesn’t explain why she chose those specific words to post on her Threads account (from the locker room) immediately following her ejection during Saturday’s loss to the Fever.
Carrington tweeted a retort to ex-NFL player and sports personality Emmanuel Acho, who said on his "Speakeasy" show that Carrington could not call her foul on Cunningham "White privilege."
So, if Carrington’s Threads post wasn’t about the assessment of the foul, then what exactly did her Threads post refer to on Saturday night following her ejection?
Fox News Digital didn't immediately receive a response from Carrington’s rep after asking that exact question.
https://www.foxnews.com/outkick-spor...eaning-unclear
https://x.com/DijonaiVictoria/status...12218457862229
“I’ve never once claimed that the assessment of the foul was white privilege (that was your assumption). Try exercising your critical thinking skills, I know you studied psych. Furthermore, I’m the LAST thing from ignorant or asinine when it comes to speaking on ‘white privilege,’ do ya research on that one.
I actually went to school, one of the top universities might I add, to educate myself on this exact subject. I would never use that term as a rhetorical weapon knowing the historical and social weight it holds without having the proper evidence to substantiate it.”
League rules state that, “An ejected player or coach must immediately retreat to the team’s dressing room (locker room) or leave the building entirely. However, because league policy prohibits players from using personal electronic devices or posting online until all post-game media obligations are fulfilled, they cannot use their phones while waiting in the locker room.”
Bookmarks