Vaccination Injuries On Record for Covid19

[ExomatrixTV]

source

source

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• The Narrative on Trial: The Press Conference, 22 October 2026:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cFfJw-Br8MM

The Case Against Bill Gates et al. | Leeuwarden, the Netherlands

Following the substantive hearing before the District Court of the Northern Netherlands on 22 October 2026, an international panel of experts, the lead attorney and a plaintiff came together for a landmark press conference to discuss the proceedings, the evidence and what happens next.

Hosted by Fiona Rose Diamond, founder of The Narrative on Trial, the conference brings together Sasha Latypova, Dr Joseph Sansone, Dr Mike Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts, lead attorney Peter W.H. Stassen and plaintiff Reginald Dijkstra.

Together, they address the fundamental questions at the heart of this extraordinary litigation: What is this case really about? What is it not about? Why does it matter, and what is at stake?

The panel examines the significance of the case, the expert evidence, what unfolded inside the courtroom during the substantive hearing, the potential outcomes and the legal steps that may follow.

This is more than a discussion of one court hearing. It is an examination of a legal challenge with implications extending far beyond the Netherlands, and a continuing pursuit of truth, justice and accountability.

Watch the full press conference recording and follow the latest developments.

The Verdict may be delivered on December 9, though due to complexity of the case – it could be delayed until February 2027.

• TheNetherlandsCase.com where you can read about what happens next.

The lawsuit against Bill Gates reached a new phase on October 22: following the substantive hearing at the District Court of Northern Netherlands in Leeuwarden, an international press conference took place where experts, lawyer Peter Stassen, and one of the plaintiffs spoke candidly about what had transpired in the courtroom, the content of the evidence, and what is at stake now. The video of that press conference is now available.

• What is actually at stake?

This is not a criminal case. All those present emphasized this emphatically. It concerns civil proceedings in which seven plaintiffs, harmed by COVID-19 injections, are seeking damages and—perhaps even more importantly—a judicial declaration that what was done to them was indeed unlawful. Two of the seven plaintiffs have since died during the ongoing proceedings. The core of the complaint: COVID-19 is not a disease, but a project. That project, better known as “COVID-19: The Great Reset”, systematically misled the plaintiffs, causing them to take the injection and suffer serious health damage.

• Nine defense lawyers against one

Attorney Stassen was not exactly on an equal footing: nine expensive lawyers on the defense side against one for the plaintiffs. Yet he refused to be intimidated. He physically showed the judges the book COVID-19: The Great Reset by Klaus Schwab, called it a “crime handbook 2.0,” and explicitly referred to Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. The judges’ reaction? Silence. Stassen saw that as telling.

The defense stubbornly clung to the mantra that the vaccines were “safe and effective” — including a reference to 95% effectiveness, a claim that has since been scientifically undermined multiple times. Stassen argues that this does not stem from ignorance, but from the fact that the defendants are implementers of the same project that he is fighting in court.

• Experts: the injections are incompatible with a pharmaceutical product

Four unpaid experts provided written evidence. Sasha Latypova, with 25 years of pharmaceutical experience, explained why the COVID injections are classified as “countermeasures”—military countermeasures—and thus fall outside normal consumer protection law. Her conclusion: countermeasures are indistinguishable from weapons. The defense did not respond substantively to her 107-page report, but claimed that Latypova holds only a bachelor's degree and has no experience in the sector.

Demonstrable lies, according to Latypova herself, which could be factually refuted in court based on the submitted documents. Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice president at Pfizer, pointed out three irrefutable points: the development timeline (normally five to ten years, now less than one year), the design choices that guarantee toxicity, and the lack of regular safety procedures. Albert Bourla called Yeadon “unqualified” in his defense — even though Yeadon holds a degree in biochemistry and toxicology and his achievements were praised in Forbes in 2017 by Bourla’s own predecessor at Pfizer.

• Lipid nanoparticles and fertility: what keeps Yeadon awake

One of the most poignant moments during the press conference was Yeadon's statement regarding the concentration of lipid nanoparticles in women's ovaries. A review published within the pharmaceutical industry as early as 2012 stated that this type of carrier accumulates in reproductive tissue. Pfizer knew this. The Japanese regulator forced Pfizer to conduct a distribution study in animals — which showed that the concentration in the ovaries increased hour after hour, even at the end of the two-day study.

A Canadian journalist in the audience reported that Newfoundland and Labrador — the province with the highest vaccination rate in Canada (96%) — is now struggling with the highest infertility rate in the country. Yeadon called this “exactly what I expected”.

• What follows now: ruling or appeal

The ruling is possibly expected on December 9, but due to the complexity of the case, this could be postponed until February 2027. Stassen emphasized that whatever the outcome, it does not mean the end of the road. In the Netherlands, an appeal offers the opportunity to rebuild the case almost entirely—with new facts, new evidence, and new grounds. Moreover, the Dutch legal system operates with a points system for litigation costs, meaning that a potential loss will not result in astronomical cost awards in favor of Bill Gates or Albert Bourla.

Catherine Austin Fitts, former US Undersecretary of State, called for financial activism: sell shares in Pfizer, Moderna, and Microsoft, use cash, and refuse digital ID systems. “Courts follow the culture,” she stated. “If people exit these stocks en masse, judges will notice.”

• A case that extends beyond the courtroom

In the lawsuit, extensive expert statements directly challenging the official COVID narrative have now been included in the evidence for the first time at the judicial level. Stassen was unable to use his full speaking time — he requested hours but had significantly less — and submitted a 4.5-hour video plea that was initially denied, but later partially admitted following public pressure and repeated objections. Plaintiff Reginald Dijkstra, who underwent open-heart surgery three times within one week of the injection, developed blood clots, and struggles daily with cardiac arrhythmias and brain fog, summed it up succinctly: “This is not just for me. This is for all people worldwide who have suffered harm. Those responsible must be punished.” More information and all case documents can be viewed at TheNetherlandsCase.com . You can support the lawsuit here .

[ExomatrixTV]

• The Bill Gates Trial: What you need to know:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8FSWYzL7ULE

This week on Sunday(?) Update: a Dutch 🇳🇱 civil case puts the Covid criminals on trial; Berenson gets shut down by an appeals court; and the Canadian government is still trying to justify the Emergencies Act.

This week on Sunday(?) Update: a Dutch civil case puts the COVID criminals on trial; Berenson gets shut down by an appeals court; and the Canadian government is still trying to justify the Emergencies Act.

Video player not working? Use these links to watch it somewhere else!

WATCH ON: / / / / / or DOWNLOAD THE MP4

TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES:

Welcome. This is James Corbett of The Corbett Report with your altogether ridiculously named Sunday Update for Friday, October 30, 2026.
And now for the real news.

Billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, the Dutch government and 13 other defendants failed to appear in court last week to attend a substantive merits hearing in a landmark civil case in the Netherlands 🇳🇱. The gaggle of globalists are accused of engaging in a conspiracy to deliberately inflict harm on the world during the COVID-19 scamdemic through the deployment of bioweapon clot shots masquerading as COVID “vaccines.”

PETER W. H. STASSEN: As implementers of the COVID-19: The Great Reset project, the defendants have deliberately and unlawfully misled my clients with the aim of having them receive a COVID-19 injection—an injection that qualifies as a biological weapon, or at the very least cannot be distinguished from one. The evidence supporting this assertion is on the records in these proceedings.

SOURCE: The Narrative On Trial | Full Oral Plea | English Language Version

SASHA LATYPOVA: In my expert opinion, the COVID-19 mRNA injections are not medicinal products in a legal sense, and the appropriate classification is that of a medical countermeasure deployed under militarized biodefense laws and rules. So we can say that this is a biochemical substance that is legally and functionally indistinguishable from a potential biochemical weapon. They’re built on a technology platform that is formally recognized as a dual use and therefore weaponizable.

SOURCE: The Narrative On Trial | Full Oral Plea | English Language Version

JOSEPH SANSONE: Dr. [Francis] Boyle’s analysis proceeds from the technical facts to a legal conclusion. The technical issues are that the mRNA payload, the lipid nanoparticle delivery system, the origin of the payload and the biological effects of the injections, you know, obviously, are causing harm. And the legal issue is whether that payload and delivery system was designed and deployed for peaceful medical purposes or as a biological weapon.

Dr. Boyle’s expert legal opinion is that they were deployed as a biological weapon prohibited under the Biological Weapons Convention and the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, which he lobbied for and drafted.

So, Dr. Boyle’s legal opinion is not just an expert legal opinion. It is in fact a demonstration of legislative intent.

SOURCE: The Narrative On Trial | Full Oral Plea | English Language Version

The case, brought by seven anonymous individuals who were injured by Pfizer’s mRNA injections—two of whom have died of their injuries since the case was first brought—is a civil case suing the defendants for their tortious conduct. Although this is not a criminal prosecution and will result in no prison sentence for any of the defendants, the lawyer arguing the case and the claimants’ expert witnesses are seeking to prove in court that there was a conspiracy to deploy bioweapons on the global population during the scamdemic, and that this deliberate plot resulted in demonstrable harm to the defendants and, by implication, to Pfizer’s victims around the world.

In 2024, Gates attempted to remove himself from the case, arguing that the Dutch 🇳🇱 court did not have jurisdiction over him. That appeal was rejected, with the court citing the Epstein associate and involuntary sterilization enthusiast‘s many public appearances advocating for COVID vaccination, as well as his documented ties to the World Economic Forum and the Great Reset project, as evidence that he is part of the group identified in the suit, and thus that the court does have jurisdiction to hear the case against him.

GATES: We’re gonna have this intermediate period of opening up, and it won’t be normal until we get an amazing vaccine to the entire world.

SOURCE: Watch CNBC’s full interview with Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates on the coronavirus pandemic and his work toward a vaccine

GATES: And then the final solution—which is a year or two years off—is the vaccine. So we’ve got to go full-speed ahead on all three fronts.

COLBERT: Just to head off the conspiracy theorists, maybe we shouldn’t call the vaccine “the final solution.”

GATES: Good point.

COLBERT: Maybe just “the best solution.”

[GATES LAUGHS]

SOURCE: Bill Gates: Global Innovation Is The Key To Achieving A Return To Normal

The merits hearing held last week was not attended by a single defendant. In their stead, the defendants sent their team of attorneys, who spent their time ignoring the facts of the case and attempting to impugn the claimants’ witnesses.

The judges will now weigh the merits of the case and could issue a written judgment as early as December 9th.

PETER W. H. STASSEN: So now this court has a very important role to play: it should choose its side. Let us see if it’s at [sic] the side of the people or at the side of the executors of the COVID-19 project.

I really hope—and that’s also why I’m a lawyer, why I’m an attorney—that I can, on behalf of my clients, which [sic] have the courage to do this litigation, that we can have a court address what’s really, really going on.

SOURCE: Press conference 1:30 PM ET · after the Leeuwarden hearing vs Gates, Bourla & the Dutch State

In related legal news, a federal appeals court in the United States has thrown out a lawsuit against former US President Joe Biden and a team of Pfizer executives by journalist Alex Berenson.

The suit accused the pharma executives of conspiring with the Biden administration to pressure Twitter to censor Berenson’s account because of his opposition to Pfizer’s death jabs. The second circuit ruled that a lower court was right to throw out Berenson’s suit because he had agreed to Twitter’s terms of service, which stipulate that the platform “may suspend or terminate your account or cease providing you with all or part of the Services at any time for any or no reason.”

Asked why any person—let alone any journalist—would agree to let Twitter, a third-party middleman, interfere with their ability to communicate their message to the public, Corbett Report founder James Corbett said “Beats the f@*! out of me. All y’all are crazy for using Twitter in the first place. RSS for the win, yo,” before throwing up a series of increasingly baffling gang signs.

Finally this week, the Supreme Court of Canada has agreed to hear the Canadian government’s appeal of two lower courts’ rulings that its use of the Emergencies Act in February 2022 to deal with the Freedom Convoy protests was not justified.
The case revolves around the Canadian government’s decision to invoke the Emergencies Act—a statute granting extraordinary temporary measures to the government to wield emergency powers during times of insurrection or invasion—to combat a group of peaceful protesters who had gathered in Ottawa to honk their horns, sing “O, Canada,” and let their children play in bouncy castles.

In January 2024, a federal court ruled that the invocation of the Emergencies Act was not justified, a decision that was upheld by a federal appeals court earlier this year.
The extraordinary measures were used to target peaceful Canadian citizens engaged in peaceful protest of the Canadian government’s draconian and coercive COVID vaccination mandates. As Reclaim the Net notes, the federal appeals court noted the egregious nature of the government’s actions, including its order to freeze the bank accounts of those participating in the protests:

“The most egregious problem with the Economic Order, in our view, is that personal banking information belonging to individuals who were suspected of having committed offenses under the Regulations could be shared with the RCMP and CSIS without a warrant or any form of prior authorization,” the Appeal Court ruling reads.

The Canadian government’s decision to continue appealing this ruling, and thus continuing to bring former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s sneering contempt for the Canadian public back into the spotlight, is baffling. But, on that note, here is former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau demonstrating his sneering contempt for the Canadian public:

EVA CHIPIUK: A number of people have testified in this inquiry referencing your widely published comments calling the unvaccinated “racists” and “misogynists,” and we have heard testimony in this inquiry about how some of your officials wanted to label protesters as terrorists. Would you agree with me that one of the most important roles of a prime minister is to unite Canadians and not divide them by engaging in name calling?

JUSTIN TRUDEAU: Uh, I did not call people who were unvaccinated names.

SOURCE: Day 31 – Chipiuk cross-examines Trudeau

TRUDEAU: The small fringe minority of people who are on their way to Ottawa, who are holding unacceptable views that they are expressing [sic], do not represent the views of Canadians who have been there for each other, who know that following the science and stepping up to protect each other is the best way to continue to ensure our freedoms, our rights, our values, as a country. [sick]

SOURCE: Trudeau says “fringe minority” in trucker convoy with “unacceptable views” don’t represent Canadians

As of press time, it’s unclear whether the former Prime Minister and disgraced blackface enthusiast will be personally involved helping the Canadian government with their appeal, or whether he’ll be too busy with his new role as Katy Perry’s backup dancer.

• corbettreport.com/sundayupdate3 (many FASCINATING comments/reactions!)

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

--o-O-o--

• **The Great Missing Engine in The Netherlands Case Against Rutte, Bourla, Gates et al. by Peter Stassen**

Besides the simple fact that it has been proven that the lawsuit made the hearing of witnesses impossible through self-made legal errors by Peter Stassen (see this explanation), there is something far more important going on from which you could easily conclude that the case is nothing more than a show trial. If you study all the documents that have been submitted by those alleged experts (Sasha Latypova, Mike Yeadon, Catherine Austin Fitts, Joseph Sansone), something essential is missing. If you are sold a car without an engine and you start a lawsuit about the scratch in the paint that you discovered upon purchase, are you not focusing your attention on the wrong problem? Are you not focusing on the side issue of the scratch in the paint, while it would have been better to talk about the missing engine? This lawsuit is about vaccines as a bioweapon, but it bypasses the absence of the problem for which the vaccines were deployed.

The real experts that Stassen should have called would have been those who can properly substantiate that infections are a fairy tale. Without infections you would not have needed a vaccine (whether that vaccine has turned out to be a bioweapon or not).

All attention in this process goes to the scratch in the paint, while the engine is missing. If no problem exists (to invent a solution for), the alleged solution is also not needed. The lawsuit should therefore have been about that missing engine. If you read the documents, the lawsuit is almost exclusively about the toxic paint that repaired the scratches in the paint, whereby all attention is diverted from the missing engine. Why do people not see through this simple logic? Because such a show trial is sold by all alternative media as the case of the century – a kind of Nuremberg trial for the covid19 period. I found only a few remarks about the missing engine:

1. Catherine Austin Fitts – The Going Direct Reset: On printed page 162, pdf page 164, the book *The Contagion Myth: Why Viruses (including “Coronavirus”) Are Not the Cause of Disease* by Thomas Cowan and Sally Fallon Morell is recommended. This does bring the contesting of viruses as a cause of disease to attention, but it is nothing more than a positive book review in a book list, not elaborated evidence in the report itself.

2. Mike Yeadon – statement December 2025: On page 3 he uses the formulation “the alleged coronavirus” (het vermeende coronavirus). That suggests distance from the usual representation, but he does not substantiate there that the virus does not exist or that infection is impossible. His argument is about the design choices of the injections that he considers harmful.

3. Sasha Latypova – updated statement October 2026: On page 41 she writes that the attack that set the worldwide corona response in motion could have been real, alleged or invented. That leaves open an invented cause, but is no explicit denial of viruses or infection. On pages 99–100 she furthermore criticises the validation of diagnostic tests; that too is a different assertion.

4. Joseph Sansone – statement December 2025: No such denial found. On pages 3–5 he describes precisely an alleged biological weapon developed through gain-of-function research and claims that vaccine components are transmissible via shedding. Those are claims of his that actually confirm the existence of viruses and contagiousness.

Have we also forgotten that lawyers swear loyalty to the crown? Judges also swear loyalty to the crown. By whom are all laws signed? By the crown. And the institution the crown is formed by the king (transferred by his predecessors). And the king signs every law on behalf of that institution the crown with:

We Willem-Alexander, by the grace of God, King of the Netherlands, Prince of Orange-Nassau, etc. etc. etc.
All who shall see this or hear it read, greet! make known: …

Now that grace of God has turned out to be an unproven assumption. Even the Ministry of Kingdom Relations and the Interior cannot demonstrate that grace of God anywhere (click on the link).

That means nothing more and nothing less than that all laws that the system issues are based on a self-declared authority. A fairy tale. The democratic layer of a First and Second Chamber that is placed in between is nothing more than an extra layer in the self-declared fairy tale. All those politicians also swear loyalty to the crown. And that crown therefore actually has no authority. If you then step towards that system and start a lawsuit about the scratch in the paint, a judge does nothing other than test against what the experts say about the applied paint. He then tests that against the law drawn up by that authority-less system. And in the meantime the judge has sworn loyalty to the signatory of all laws. And the lawyer who brings the case as well. Something with butcher and inspectors.

In a Dutch 🇳🇱 civil procedure for unlawful act the burden of proof lies with the plaintiffs (Article 150 Rv, Code of Civil Procedure – signed by the missing grace of God). If you wanted to talk about the missing engine, you would therefore have to demonstrate that viruses or infection do not exist.

A judge, however, allows himself to be guided in such a question by experts and the virological literature. Then you quickly end up with the extensive industry that has been set up since the Rockefellers. Experts have become experts because they help maintain the accepted storyline. As a result, over the course of decades a mountain of studies and reports has been created that tip the scales with a weighty majority. That something is extensive and weighty does not yet mean that it is correct. If there are thousands of fabricated research reports that show that we have been on the moon, that is still no proof that we have really been there. If all experts and reports start from the same produced basic evidence, you have a mountain of weight of reports and experts that ignored the first falsified burden of proof. A judge, however, always sides with that majority.

And so one could argue that you then have more chance of success to litigate about the scratch in the paint, but that bypasses the simple fact that it should be about the missing engine. If it is impossible to convince a judge that we have never been on the moon, because an enormous mountain of scientific reports and experts say that we have been there, that does not yet mean that you should then talk about the financial damage that all rocket development and NASA have cost the economy (speaking metaphorically). The only thing that counts, is and remains the missing engine; not the scratch in the paint.

A legal system is not suitable for that. The butcher will never have his own meat rejected. A lost lawsuit also leads to case law and that case law then forms the basis for new legislation. That then gives the system more tools again to confirm its self-declared authority.

• source

[petra]

My boyfriend got a flu and covid shot a few days ago but he won't be making that mistake again any time soon because he's been wiped out for days and he said his arm feels like he got hit by a ninja master.

He got it because it was "convenient". I think I'll take my chances without it thanks. I listen to you guys.. sometimes

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[Sue (Ayt)]

I had a friend who was nursing his wife at the same time as I was nursing my husband, and we became friends through our mutual caregiver times. His wife and my Billy both passed around the same time, and we remained friends through our mourning times. We were simply friends... but helped each other out when we could, and sometimes ate out or shopped and stuff. I admired how he had cared so well for his wife, as we were able to commiserate... it's not an easy role, being a caregiver.

Anyway, he was pretty caught up in TDS thinking, and had been prodding me to get my shots for the coming winter. Said he was planning on getting them all - as many as they would give him. At Walmart. Flu, covid, pneumonia - all he could. (UGH) No discussion allowed.

I am not sure if he actually went, but recently, he called me in distress, and asked me to come help. And bring him a walker as he woke up sick and weak. He had previously been pretty healthy, and this was sudden, but he had fallen and was terribly weak and nauseous. When I got there, he looked terrible - beyond my scope to nurse him. Did what I could, but he really needed an ambulance in my opinion, which he objected to at first, but then conceded. I watched and helped where I could as the paramedics loaded him on the stretcher and got an IV going, and the ambulance pulled away. I felt relief that he would be in better hands, what ever was going on with him. But to my shock, I learned he never made it to the hospital.

I have lost so many close to me in the past few years, and most kept getting their covid shots as directed - 3,4,5 of them. There is no way of knowing for sure, and I am not even sure if he went to Walmart for his shots, but just another suspicious possibility as I think of it. And I miss my friend.

[onawah]

Sorry for your loss, Sue. I admire your courage in staying in contact with him, even though he was pro-Vaxx.
I have taken a different path, and essentially became a hermit here in the small town where I've been living for going on 20 years, though I was once very active doing volunteer work here.
It became clear early on in the COVID era how anti-Vaxxers were going to be classified as "the enemy", so I became a drop-out locally and can't say that I've regretted it, but I'm an INFJ, and we are generally well-suited to being loners.
I would not have been able to handle the stress well at all and at my age, it wasn't worth the grief, or the risk.
Before COVID, I was in a local women's group that was started by a journalist who publishes a lot in the local papers.
Her daughter is a nurse and was very programmed to be pro-Vaxx, and when her Mom took that stance as well, her news articles about COVID were very biased.
I encouraged her just once to do more research in those early days, but I could see where it was all going and had no desire for debate, so that was when I just decided to bow out from the local scene.

Posted by Sue (Ayt) (here)
I have lost so many close to me in the past few years, and most kept getting their covid shots as directed - 3,4,5 of them. There is no way of knowing for sure, and I am not even sure if he went to Walmart for his shots, but just another suspicious possibility as I think of it. And I miss my friend.

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by onawah (here)
but I'm an INFJ, and we are generally well-suited to being loners.

Us INTJ's might have it even easier. I was and a remain a loner by preference. I don't even know anyone locally on any regular basis. About 20 years ago, I "retired" from my marriage and job and for the seventh time in my life, moved to yet another state a thousand miles away.

Been a happy hermit ever since, providing a home for first my sister, and now my son. Figuring stuff out, and doing what I can to aid those who depend on me.

May the force, and your hearts, be with you, Sue and Onawah.

[Tintin]

Posted by Sue (Ayt) (here)
I had a friend who was nursing his wife at the same time as I was nursing my husband, and we became friends through our mutual caregiver times. His wife and my Billy both passed around the same time, and we remained friends through our mourning times. We were simply friends... but helped each other out when we could, and sometimes ate out or shopped and stuff. I admired how he had cared so well for his wife, as we were able to commiserate... it's not an easy role, being a caregiver.

Anyway, he was pretty caught up in TDS thinking, and had been prodding me to get my shots for the coming winter. Said he was planning on getting them all - as many as they would give him. At Walmart. Flu, covid, pneumonia - all he could. (UGH) No discussion allowed.

I am not sure if he actually went, but recently, he called me in distress, and asked me to come help. And bring him a walker as he woke up sick and weak. He had previously been pretty healthy, and this was sudden, but he had fallen and was terribly weak and nauseous. When I got there, he looked terrible - beyond my scope to nurse him. Did what I could, but he really needed an ambulance in my opinion, which he objected to at first, but then conceded. I watched and helped where I could as the paramedics loaded him on the stretcher and got an IV going, and the ambulance pulled away. I felt relief that he would be in better hands, what ever was going on with him. But to my shock, I learned he never made it to the hospital.

I have lost so many close to me in the past few years, and most kept getting their covid shots as directed - 3,4,5 of them. There is no way of knowing for sure, and I am not even sure if he went to Walmart for his shots, but just another suspicious possibility as I think of it. And I miss my friend.

So sorry to hear that Sue - so tragic

[Sue (Ayt)]

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
but I'm an INFJ, and we are generally well-suited to being loners.

Us INTJ's might have it even easier. I was and a remain a loner by preference. I don't even know anyone locally on any regular basis. About 20 years ago, I "retired" from my marriage and job and for the seventh time in my life, moved to yet another state a thousand miles away.

Been a happy hermit ever since, providing a home for first my sister, and now my son. Figuring stuff out, and doing what I can to aid those who depend on me.

May the force, and your hearts, be with you, Sue and Onawah.

And also with you, PC, and all here.

Not sure where I stand on the loner scale, being a combo of both of you - INTP. But I kind of remain in it, but not of it... mostly a quiet observer, with a need to contribute what I can, but retreat frequently to my solitude.
And the ability to turn the world off.

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[Raskolnikov]

Posted by Sue (Ayt) (here)
I had a friend who was nursing his wife at the same time as I was nursing my husband, and we became friends through our mutual caregiver times. His wife and my Billy both passed around the same time, and we remained friends through our mourning times. We were simply friends... but helped each other out when we could, and sometimes ate out or shopped and stuff. I admired how he had cared so well for his wife, as we were able to commiserate... it's not an easy role, being a caregiver.

Anyway, he was pretty caught up in TDS thinking, and had been prodding me to get my shots for the coming winter. Said he was planning on getting them all - as many as they would give him. At Walmart. Flu, covid, pneumonia - all he could. (UGH) No discussion allowed.

I am not sure if he actually went, but recently, he called me in distress, and asked me to come help. And bring him a walker as he woke up sick and weak. He had previously been pretty healthy, and this was sudden, but he had fallen and was terribly weak and nauseous. When I got there, he looked terrible - beyond my scope to nurse him. Did what I could, but he really needed an ambulance in my opinion, which he objected to at first, but then conceded. I watched and helped where I could as the paramedics loaded him on the stretcher and got an IV going, and the ambulance pulled away. I felt relief that he would be in better hands, what ever was going on with him. But to my shock, I learned he never made it to the hospital.

I have lost so many close to me in the past few years, and most kept getting their covid shots as directed - 3,4,5 of them. There is no way of knowing for sure, and I am not even sure if he went to Walmart for his shots, but just another suspicious possibility as I think of it. And I miss my friend.

First off, thanks to Exomatrix for the informative updates, keep em coming.

I’m really to sorry to hear about your loss Sue, both your husband and your friend. Your words hit home. It’s so difficult to believe people are still getting these shots and defending them so fervently. It really is a cult at this point, the cult of allopathy. Of course many are realizing their mistake after the fact and are now ashamed or afraid to admit they were deceived. If it means anything my mom died of blood clots shortly after her boosters. My dad’s heart is operating at 30% and he can barely walk anymore after his boosters. He used to ride his bike 10 miles a day and was very active so the change is significant and hard to miss.

I’m curious to know if you and your caregiver friend stopped talking for a period before he called you in distress, at the point there was “no discussion allowed,” or did you manage to remain friends despite that hurdle?

Posted by onawah (here)
I encouraged her just once to do more research in those early days, but I could see where it was all going and had no desire for debate, so that was when I just decided to bow out from the local scene.

My step-mother, who's still with my father, once became very upset when I brought up the connection of vaccines to autism. She taught autistic kids at the time so would not even entertain the possibility. I understood then and there that open dialogue would not be an option. Her daughter, a nurse at the local hospital, recently had two heart attacks. And yes, they all had, and still have, serious TDS. I have pretty much bowed out of that side of the family as well as the local scene.

The havoc that TDS and the plandemic wreaked on families, friends, and work relationships was felt by everyone. It has definitely turned me more into a hermit and a loner as well, which is saying something because I started off more of a loner, steering clear of the crowd, taking the road less traveled.

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
but I'm an INFJ, and we are generally well-suited to being loners.

Us INTJ's might have it even easier. I was and a remain a loner by preference. I don't even know anyone locally on any regular basis. About 20 years ago, I "retired" from my marriage and job and for the seventh time in my life, moved to yet another state a thousand miles away.

Been a happy hermit ever since, providing a home for first my sister, and now my son. Figuring stuff out, and doing what I can to aid those who depend on me.

May the force, and your hearts, be with you, Sue and Onawah.

I'm more an INFJ than INTJ for the sheer fact that I feel things a little too strongly at times which is why the havoc, division and loss witnessed and experienced the last six years has been hard to take. Not even so much for myself personally, but more that intrinsic empathy experienced when witnessing so much suffering and loss the world over, so much meaningless insanity. Probably why I find refuge and solace in a meme now and then, because if you’re not laughing…











Makes me wonder if the majority of PA members fall under the more introverted/loner spectrum. Might be an interesting poll. God bless my fellow loners and introverts.

[onawah]

I think we probably do. See:

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Also see this most interesting thread:

• Free Personality Test and MBTI/Myers-Briggs Type Descriptions

A disproportionate number of Avalon members are INFJs, and NFs in particular. (Sensitive, intuitive souls! ) There's a LOT about all this on that thread.

Posted by Raskolnikov (here)
Makes me wonder if the majority of PA members fall under the more introverted/loner spectrum. Might be an interesting poll. God bless my fellow loners and introverts.

[ExomatrixTV]

source

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• Allison Inquiry UPDATE: The COVID Vaccine Loophole They NEVER WANTED YOU TO SEE!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=dNh_9H0fL-Y

Were Canadian children used as guinea pigs for the COVID-19 vaccines? This morning on Parliament Hill, Conservative MP Dean Allison, Shawn Buckley, and others held a press conference updating the country on the Allison Inquiry, the citizen-driven effort that gave vaccine-injured Canadians a platform in September. Over 1,400 people applied to testify; roughly 50 spoke under oath. The rest of their stories are going into the permanent record. At the press conference, it was pointed out that under the Interim Order used during COVID, pharmaceutical companies could receive approval for their COVID-19 vaccines in Canada without submitting the usual safety or efficacy data to Health Canada. While officials and media pushed the “safe and effective” message and mandates, the regulatory pathway itself required far less of the traditional evidence most Canadians assumed was mandatory. The Inquiry featured testimonies of heart damage, neurological injuries, lost careers, dismissed complaints, and ongoing struggles with the Vaccine Injury Support Program. Many were told their injuries were anxiety, coincidence, or all in their head. This was not a full parliamentary inquiry with subpoena power, but it put injured Canadians and their families on the record in the seat of power. Allison and Buckley made it clear that this is just the beginning, with talk of more town halls so additional MPs can hear these stories directly.

[ExomatrixTV]

source