+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 21 FirstFirst 1 9 19 21 LastLast
Results 161 to 180 of 415

Thread: Censorship here?

  1. Link to Post #161
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2010
    Posts
    424
    Thanks
    797
    Thanked 1,130 times in 289 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Hi Paul, please, tell me, have you read the JFK speech included in my post 127? This one:

    Post #127, pag. 7. JFK speech "The President and the Press" (1961)
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post219355

    Paul, do you mind telling Bill Ryan about that speech and about the 2 questions I ask him in that post?

    Thanks.

    If you review my first 3 posts in this thread (#14, #44, #52 in pag 1 and 3) you’ll see that I asked you a couple of questions about the Chicodoodoo incident.

    Please, could you answer them? Thanks.

    And in the meantime, while you think about it, I’ll ask you another question, but this one is EXTREMELLY SIMPLE to answer because it does not even require an elaborate answer from you, but just a very simple choice between the 2 following options, “a” or “b”, which are based on the JFK speech in post #127 (pag7).

    Paul, please, from the following 2 options (based on the JFK speech), which option would you choose, “a” or “b”?

    Option a)
    Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country [and no Internet Forum] can succeed and no republic can survive.

    I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers -- I welcome it.

    This Administration [Internet Forum] intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it."

    We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

    Option b)
    With debate, with criticism, no Administration and no country and no Internet Forum can succeed and no republic and no Internet Forum can survive.

    I not only could stifle controversy among your readers -- I reject it.

    This Forum does not intend to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error becomes a mistake when you admit it."

    We do not intend to accept full responsibility for our errors and we do not expect you to point them out when we miss them.

    Please, Paul, which option do you prefer, “a” or “b”?

    I ask the same question to Bill Ryan, and also to the rest of the Avalon members.

    Thanks.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to qbeac For This Post:

    andywight (16th May 2011), Blacklight43 (15th May 2011), Oxygen (16th May 2011), sandy (16th May 2011)

  3. Link to Post #162
    Costa Rica Avalon Member ulli's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th November 2010
    Posts
    13,863
    Thanks
    67,192
    Thanked 128,073 times in 13,546 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Discussion forums are like a specialist school. They simply cannot be compared to countries.

    If I had a school to teach people to play the violin

    anyone who wants to bring a drum kit would be asked to leave,

    especially if they insist on using it.

  4. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to ulli For This Post:

    Billy (16th May 2011), Caren (16th May 2011), DoubleHelix (16th May 2011), Gaia (15th May 2011), K626 (15th May 2011), karelia (15th May 2011), Lord Sidious (15th May 2011), mondaze (15th May 2011), NancyV (15th May 2011), qbeac (15th May 2011), Seikou-Kishi (15th May 2011), ThePythonicCow (15th May 2011), winnasboy (16th May 2011)

  5. Link to Post #163
    Avalon Member truthseekerdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    18th March 2010
    Location
    Unite and Love One Another
    Posts
    2,375
    Thanks
    1,591
    Thanked 4,625 times in 1,307 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Quote Posted by andywight (here)
    Chico, hope you don't mind me posting this here, PM me if you want me to delete.

    Quote == Post edited ,please abstain from qouting posts from other forums ==

    THANKS
    Unity Consciousness
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Free your mind, and open your heart to LOVE.
    You'll then become enlightened able to just BE.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to truthseekerdan For This Post:

    NancyV (15th May 2011)

  7. Link to Post #164
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2010
    Posts
    424
    Thanks
    797
    Thanked 1,130 times in 289 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Quote Posted by ulli (here)
    Discussion forums are like a specialist school. They simply cannot be compared to countries....
    Hi ulli, the key point in my post 161 (pag9) does not have to do with countries versus forums, but with the general concepts of tolerating or not criticism, dissent, admitting having made an error, etc.

    But if you prefer not to mix Forums with countries (or republics, administrations, etc.), no problem, let’s forget for a minute about the JFK speech and let’s change the two options just for you so that they refer specifically to Internet Forums and nothing else, and, therefore, they will read as:

    Option c)
    Without debate, without criticism, no Internet Forum can succeed and no Internet Forum can survive.

    I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers -- I welcome it.

    This Internet Forum intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it."

    We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

    Option d)
    With debate, with criticism, no Internet Forum can succeed and no Internet Forum can survive.

    I not only could stifle controversy among your readers -- I reject it.

    This Forum does not intend to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error becomes a mistake when you admit it."

    We do not intend to accept full responsibility for our errors and we do not expect you to point them out when we miss them.
    Please, ulli, which option do you prefer, “c” or “d”?

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to qbeac For This Post:

    sandy (16th May 2011)

  9. Link to Post #165
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th January 2011
    Posts
    1,974
    Thanks
    6,132
    Thanked 9,515 times in 1,728 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Quote Posted by Limor (here)
    ~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~
    I believe that the aim of moderating,is to serve the community and not the other way around. we have a virtual commune of like minded people here with a shared purpose and it desreves all we can do to keep it like that.we are mostly centered around Camelot/Avalon/Bill ryan's work (wich I wholeheartedly believe in and support) also we are gathered around the world situation and happenings as they transpire infront of our eyes,knowing full well that it was our own creation that brought us and the earth to this place,and now we want to change it.we are the pioneers of change.and on the way we are checking all sorts of ways to start anew.while doing that,old habbits might kick in...

    I believe ALL of us members at forum Avalon,at Nexus2012 (boy,you guys have limited yourselfs The Camelot forum,Open minds,David icke's,etc etc,all have the best intentions at our hearts. ALL of us without exception (paid agents not included). to put it simply (very simply) we want a better world,we think we desreve a better world,we demand a better world its just that we are limping a bit when trying to implement it.lets excuse ourselfs and see how we can try and improve things from now on.

    I believe in adressing things and issues,knowing full well that its not always gonn'a get the solutions in place right away.

    Quote qbeac originally posted: "If a moderator makes a decision (Ex: banning someone), let’s the rest of us vote (with a special button to do so) to say if we agree or disagree with it."
    This will be new at the world of forums not very realistic I am afraid. there has to be a severe enough reason to bann a member but it is impossible to consulte the opinions of almost 3000 members (god Bless,may they come more),remember,this is not about expressing an oppsite oppinion,its either expressing it in a hostile way,giving false information about someone (smearing),raising conflicts for the sake of having a conflict or simply supporting all those.not possible to include all reasons and from my tiny experience so far,not all comunication from banned members are shown upfront. a little trust in the moderation team discretion is needed.

    Quote Aurelius has originally postedand changed the title of the post! (o.k, I couldn't resist this remark
    "we need to keep challenging ourselves to improve and do things in better ways."
    That might be very true

    As Seikou-Kishi has said,'ad hominem' attacks are something that we all agree upon.this is also an easy part to locate,but another consideration for us members to think about is that some things are happening and are not known to to us as a community,and its o.k,not everything should be known.it is clear for everyone with eyes in their heads that a person who deals with sensitive information (whistleblowing,spirituall truths that can advance us forword,etc.) will not get a Large bouquet of flowers everyday right at his door step! guess what he gets..I beg us all to understand that having a peaceful,highly educational and friendly platform from wich all of us as well as Bill can Operate is highly important,therefore the efforts of the mods team is exactly that.

    Can it be done in a different way? it is something to think about.member's opinions does not enter in one ear and go out through the other... but again,there are other considerations that are not always known.If you still dont understand please go back to read a few lines above,I hope it will be a little more clear.

    Volunteers are doing this work to keep the forum a safe environment,if its not always going smoothly,please forgive us.there are some decisions that need to be taken without the consent of everyone,some other things/general suggestions and consideration quite the opposite,and it might be good to share between us all and have a more transperent and holographic nature of moderating.one more thing to keep in mind is :we are all people,individualls (with burning desires and we wish to try and create something different.anyone who will try to put a stick between the wheels of this beautiful speeding train will not find tolerence towords their words and actions.

    Healing and blessings to us all!

    Limor (mod hat on/off red,green and with a feather...as you wish)
    ~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^~*&^
    Well thought and well written views. I had almost forgotten people could write at this level of intelligence

  10. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Gaia For This Post:

    Caren (16th May 2011), DoubleHelix (16th May 2011), Lord Sidious (15th May 2011), NancyV (15th May 2011), Seikou-Kishi (15th May 2011), winnasboy (16th May 2011)

  11. Link to Post #166
    Costa Rica Avalon Member ulli's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th November 2010
    Posts
    13,863
    Thanks
    67,192
    Thanked 128,073 times in 13,546 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    I have NO PROBLEM answering with d to some and c to others.

    Each situation is different.

    If I notice a demand is being made that has a coercive tone

    I consider it manipulative and I refuse to play along with such games.


    I avoid predators.

    If this forum were to give up it's (albeit human, therefore prone to err) moderators,

    I'd be out of here like a flash.

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ulli For This Post:

    DoubleHelix (16th May 2011), Gaia (15th May 2011), NancyV (15th May 2011)

  13. Link to Post #167
    United States Avalon Member NancyV's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    1,066
    Thanks
    31,280
    Thanked 8,155 times in 996 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    My answer to the option question is FORTY TWO!!


  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to NancyV For This Post:

    K626 (15th May 2011), Lord Sidious (15th May 2011), Mad Hatter (15th May 2011), truthseekerdan (15th May 2011), ulli (15th May 2011)

  15. Link to Post #168
    United States Avalon Member Darla Ken Pearce's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th February 2011
    Location
    Sandpoint, Idaho, USA
    Posts
    1,436
    Thanks
    18,303
    Thanked 8,611 times in 1,338 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Well, is there a dead-letter forum on Avalon? We need one desperately.

    All of the negative comments ~ that uplift ~ no one ~ continue to give a sour taste in our mouths. Can you feel it? I look forward to the day when these threads find their way into some dead-letter-box on Avalon, so we can move forward and onward and every time another one appears, I vote that it goes into the dark void, with the others. Everyone is struggling for personal balance and adapting to new energies, as the old tired systems end. This is just another example of one of them.

    Let kindness reign.

    We do not need any negativity here. There is enough of it "out there" in our homes, businesses, playgrounds, and at large in the world.

    We have some beautiful carpeting inside Avalon that needs to be kept clean ~ in thought first, and then it will be made manifest. Some come in here wearing muddy boots ~ with old negative attitudes attached and they mess things up royally for everyone. We ask that they leave their old boots outside and then enter Avalon with hearts open to new ideas.

    This whole censorship, secrecy, stifle-me issue is one of THIRD DIMENSIONAL CONSTUCT and is no longer needed, no longer valid, and certainly not here on Avalon. The 4th and the 5th dimension are at hand now.

    The difference is that this is a sanctuary for the birth of new ideas and new leadership. Those who hold us back, need to either watch, listen, and learn or take it elsewhere. If you will notice even on this thread after so many others wrote in to please ask
    Chicodoodoo to stop, he didn't.

    It didn't even register. He continued getting in the last word dragging us all deeper into this old pit.

    This is why those others have eventually had to go, they didn't get it. They were not listening. A simple attitude adjustment is required of all of us and especially when you've been kindly warned not to continue along this tact.

    Why should the few negative contributors be allowed to distract and cause these arguments over and over. The answer is that they can't be allow to disrupt.


    Please ~ if isn't positive and uplifting in some way and an actual contribution to our greater interests, let it find another home in some far off galaxy. I'm not talking about
    Chicodoodoo being sent far off but his attitude needs adjusting to come back and contribute again.

    Just be kind. Nothing more is required and do it so that you "harm no other being," including yourself in our presence, it's just so hard to witness. Be kind. Rewind your arguments into a better light. Now take a deep breath ; )

    I went looking for an image of "we are a family" and found some elementary kids singing, "We are one big happy family" so cute. If one of them got out of line and caused a problem while they were singing, some adult would have stepped in to take them aside. That's what just happened here.

    Here are the kids singing and although animated no one disturbs the song.

    http://s1001.photobucket.com/albums/...t=SANY0552.mp4

    Much love! xoxoxoxox
    Ep 6:12: For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." Even so, let your light shine and keep it real...

  16. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Darla Ken Pearce For This Post:

    Caren (16th May 2011), Gaia (15th May 2011), K626 (15th May 2011), Lord Sidious (15th May 2011), NancyV (15th May 2011), truthseekerdan (15th May 2011), ulli (15th May 2011), winnasboy (16th May 2011)

  17. Link to Post #169
    France Avalon Member buckminster fuller's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    rennes (britanny), france
    Age
    53
    Posts
    598
    Thanks
    2,230
    Thanked 1,879 times in 475 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Quote Posted by buckminster fuller (here)
    Quote Posted by qbeac (here)
    Note: I am also posting this post in the Project Camelot forum, at link:
    ...
    Clearly and precisely... For anyone aware of what kind of positive energy chico has been bringing to this forum, the decision to simply give up on him is a definite no-go for what I'm concerned about.

    You have my full support. Thanks for stepping in

    Quote Posted by blake (here)
    Hello All,

    So sorry that a man
    ...
    Indeed, dots connecting, synthesis, humanism... Contrary to what some people, in a pretty mean fashion, have been saying, I will certainly not buy that chico was on some ego trip... His level of insights for sure did not come from some individualistic perspective.
    We people need more guys like him.

    Peace
    The above quoted post from me has been edited without even a word from the moderator who did it... It doesn't make sense without the quotes that have been removed. Maybe we, members of this community, deserve more respect than what is shown here.

    Peace
    life is design

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to buckminster fuller For This Post:

    noxon medem (16th May 2011), sandy (16th May 2011)

  19. Link to Post #170
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    57
    Posts
    7,236
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,275 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Quote Posted by buckminster fuller (here)
    Quote Posted by buckminster fuller (here)
    Quote Posted by qbeac (here)
    Note: I am also posting this post in the Project Camelot forum, at link:
    ...
    Clearly and precisely... For anyone aware of what kind of positive energy chico has been bringing to this forum, the decision to simply give up on him is a definite no-go for what I'm concerned about.

    You have my full support. Thanks for stepping in

    Quote Posted by blake (here)
    Hello All,

    So sorry that a man
    ...
    Indeed, dots connecting, synthesis, humanism... Contrary to what some people, in a pretty mean fashion, have been saying, I will certainly not buy that chico was on some ego trip... His level of insights for sure did not come from some individualistic perspective.
    We people need more guys like him.

    Peace
    The above quoted post from me has been edited without even a word from the moderator who did it... It doesn't make sense without the quotes that have been removed. Maybe we, members of this community, deserve more respect than what is shown here.

    Peace
    This is at the bottom of your post nugget.
    I suspect because you quoted half an encyclopaedia.
    Last edited by Paul; Today at 02:30. Reason: trim quoted material

  20. Link to Post #171
    France Avalon Member buckminster fuller's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    rennes (britanny), france
    Age
    53
    Posts
    598
    Thanks
    2,230
    Thanked 1,879 times in 475 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by buckminster fuller (here)
    Quote Posted by buckminster fuller (here)
    Quote Posted by qbeac (here)
    Note: I am also posting this post in the Project Camelot forum, at link:
    ...
    Clearly and precisely... For anyone aware of what kind of positive energy chico has been bringing to this forum, the decision to simply give up on him is a definite no-go for what I'm concerned about.

    You have my full support. Thanks for stepping in

    Quote Posted by blake (here)
    Hello All,

    So sorry that a man
    ...
    Indeed, dots connecting, synthesis, humanism... Contrary to what some people, in a pretty mean fashion, have been saying, I will certainly not buy that chico was on some ego trip... His level of insights for sure did not come from some individualistic perspective.
    We people need more guys like him.

    Peace
    The above quoted post from me has been edited without even a word from the moderator who did it... It doesn't make sense without the quotes that have been removed. Maybe we, members of this community, deserve more respect than what is shown here.

    Peace
    This is at the bottom of your post nugget.
    I suspect because you quoted half an encyclopaedia.
    Last edited by Paul; Today at 02:30. Reason: trim quoted material
    I suspect it is not about the length of what was presented. There actually are questions asked to paul in the first quote that he still hasn't answered to. The second quote was really short, but was in defence of chico.

    Paranoïa anyone ?
    life is design

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to buckminster fuller For This Post:

    andywight (16th May 2011), sandy (16th May 2011)

  22. Link to Post #172
    Avalon Member HORIZONS's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th March 2010
    Age
    65
    Posts
    1,302
    Thanks
    1,441
    Thanked 2,098 times in 604 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Part of the problem is this little paradigm
    There are two types of individual
    a) who is reasonable and tries to fit in with all around him and not rock the boat and
    b) who is unreasonable and tries to change things around him that differ from his beliefs.
    You know what the problem is?
    ALL advancements in history came from b) not a) and that is where we have issues on approaches.
    People who don't take what is given as truth but search for their own then report back are usually not welcomed so much in society.
    You avalonuggets all know that I am b) and there are others here like that too, including this guy
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/member.php?6-Bill-Ryan
    There is also a (c), those that strive to learn and grow, wherever that takes them, and to seek out balance in all things.

    I Can Be The Darkness…

    I can be the darkness and I can be the light
    I’d rather live in kindness and do what’s justly right
    But because of circumstances in my life of pain
    Sometimes I am the darkness so that I might sustain

    No matter what I’m thinking
    No matter where I’ve been
    The darkness does surround me
    The light is within

    The fools of life they come and go
    I can be one too
    Yet I can change from light to dark (and dark to light)
    To deal with the bull**** they throw

    I can be the darkness and I can be the light
    Whatever brings me into Balance
    This is the way I will flow
    ~ If nothing changes then nothing changes ~

  23. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to HORIZONS For This Post:

    Caren (16th May 2011), greybeard (15th May 2011), Lord Sidious (15th May 2011), Mad Hatter (15th May 2011), NancyV (15th May 2011), qbeac (15th May 2011), sandy (16th May 2011)

  24. Link to Post #173
    Avalon Member 3optic's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th March 2010
    Location
    Waltzing between the raindrops
    Posts
    526
    Thanks
    608
    Thanked 724 times in 235 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Quote Posted by loveandgratitude (here)
    FRED -

    Ho'oponopono - Hawaiian Code of Forgiveness


    I LOVE YOU

    I AM SORRY

    PLEASE FORGIVE ME

    THANK YOU
    Hi Loveandgratitude. I'm familiar with this practice and studied with Dr. Hew Len. This internal mantra, or "cleaning" as it's called is meant for oneself. In other words we recite it for ourselves to be cleaned by Divinity, not to impose a belief system on to others.

    This was an excellent opportunity for you to clean (as it is for me). As your disagreeable reaction to Fred236's post arises..

    I LOVE YOU

    I AM SORRY

    PLEASE FORGIVE ME

    THANK YOU

    Out beyond the ideas of right-doing or wrong-doing there is a field- I'll meet you there.

    -Jelaluddin Rumi

  25. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 3optic For This Post:

    buckminster fuller (15th May 2011), qbeac (15th May 2011), sandy (16th May 2011), sheddie (16th May 2011)

  26. Link to Post #174
    Wales Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    1,740
    Thanked 553 times in 146 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    I think this thread has just highlighted the good and bad aspects of the electronic medium commonly known as the 'forum'.



    Question is - what now? Do we just accept it as part and parcel of internet life or is there a lesson here somewhere?

    BTW - I'm not trying to trivialise everyone's contributions (though trivial it may seem to some). There is a sprinkling of moderators going overboard, mixed in with a dash of trouble makers. IMO
    Last edited by MMA_Fan; 15th May 2011 at 20:34.

  27. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MMA_Fan For This Post:

    Intraphase (18th May 2011), truthseekerdan (15th May 2011)

  28. Link to Post #175
    England Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Location
    cheshire
    Age
    65
    Posts
    391
    Thanks
    1,015
    Thanked 1,203 times in 304 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    the sky is blue. well sometimes... point is are we saving the virtual planet or the real one. virtual words in a virtual world solve virtually nothing...

  29. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mondaze For This Post:

    Lord Sidious (15th May 2011), Mad Hatter (15th May 2011), MMA_Fan (15th May 2011), sandy (16th May 2011), sheddie (16th May 2011), shijo (15th May 2011)

  30. Link to Post #176
    Ecuador Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    3rd February 2011
    Location
    California
    Age
    38
    Posts
    1,584
    Thanks
    3,721
    Thanked 10,195 times in 1,429 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    I believe I have a rough grasp on the function of the moderators/administrators and the mechanics of their duties. I am no expert though. This is just in regards to permanently banning other members.

    "Some men see things as they are and say why, I dream of things that never were and say, why not?" -Robert Kennedy

    What if the Avalon Forum introduced a jury? A program selects a certain number of members from the forum based on forum activity, amount of contribution, or by whatever stipulations the community deems fit. Then, the randomly selected (meeting said requirements) jury of Avalonians (peers) is presented with the case for expulsion. After reviewing the material, and with the best interest of Avalon in mind (using their own proper discernment according to their own understandings of the purpose and principle of the forum), they vote. The majority rule of the jury claims 49% stake in the final decision. The other 51% is left to the moderators/administrators and their processes. Seems fair(er)?

    "Letting a maximum number of views be heard regularly is not just a nice philosophical notion. It is the best way any society has yet discovered to detect maladjustments quickly, to correct injustices, and to discover new ways to meet our continuing stream of novel problems that rise in a changing environment." -Ben Bagdikian

    This is just a first draft of the idea. I don't know if this has been done and, again, I am no expert. It is not my intention to create commotion, I'm just sharing the hum of gears turning in my head and wondering if anyone wants to help make music.

    Much Love and Thanks,

    Vivek
    Last edited by Jeffrey; 15th May 2011 at 20:51.

  31. Link to Post #177
    Wales Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    1,740
    Thanked 553 times in 146 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Quote Posted by mondaze (here)
    the sky is blue. well sometimes... point is are we saving the virtual planet or the real one. virtual words in a virtual world solve virtually nothing...
    I agree for the most part. Forums should be a tool for further progression.
    Unfortunately, we sometimes get caught up in the jangle and stay there.

  32. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MMA_Fan For This Post:

    Jeffrey (15th May 2011), Lord Sidious (15th May 2011), mondaze (16th May 2011), sandy (16th May 2011)

  33. Link to Post #178
    Wales Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Posts
    191
    Thanks
    1,740
    Thanked 553 times in 146 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Quote Posted by Vivek (here)
    I believe I have a rough grasp on the function of the moderators/administrators and the mechanics of their duties. I am no expert though. This is just in regards to permanently banning other members.

    "Some men see things as they are and say why, I dream of things that never were and say, why not?" -Robert Kennedy

    What if the Avalon Forum introduced a jury? A program selects a certain number of members from the forum based on forum activity, amount of contribution, or by whatever stipulations the community deems fit. Then, the randomly selected (meeting said requirements) jury of Avalonians (peers) is presented with the case for expulsion. After reviewing the material, and with the best interest of Avalon in mind (using their own proper discernment according to their own understandings of the purpose and principle of the forum), they vote. The majority rule of the jury claims 49% stake in the final decision. The other 51% is left to the moderators/administrators and their processes. Seems fair(er)?

    "Letting a maximum number of views be heard regularly is not just a nice philosophical notion. It is the best way any society has yet discovered to detect maladjustments quickly, to correct injustices, and to discover new ways to meet our continuing stream of novel problems that rise in a changing environment." -Ben Bagdikian

    This is just a first draft of the idea. I don't know if this has been done and, again, I am no expert. It is not my intention to create commotion, I'm just sharing the hum of gears turning in my head and wondering if anyone wants to help make music.

    Much Love and Thanks,

    Vivek
    If the mods have a 51% majority it is still the majority and so negates the 49%. (I think lol)

  34. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MMA_Fan For This Post:

    DoubleHelix (16th May 2011), Jeffrey (15th May 2011)

  35. Link to Post #179
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    2nd January 2011
    Posts
    691
    Thanks
    187
    Thanked 2,382 times in 527 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?

    Quote Posted by Darla Ken Jensen Pearce (here)
    Well, is there a dead-letter forum on Avalon? We need one desperately.

    All of the negative comments ~ that uplift ~ no one ~ continue to give a sour taste in our mouths. Can you feel it? I look forward to the day when these threads find their way into some dead-letter-box on Avalon, so we can move forward and onward and every time another one appears, I vote that it goes into the dark void, with the others. Everyone is struggling for personal balance and adapting to new energies, as the old tired systems end. This is just another example of one of them.

    Let kindness reign.

    We do not need any negativity here. There is enough of it "out there" in our homes, businesses, playgrounds, and at large in the world.

    We have some beautiful carpeting inside Avalon that needs to be kept clean ~ in thought first, and then it will be made manifest. Some come in here wearing muddy boots ~ with old negative attitudes attached and they mess things up royally for everyone. We ask that they leave their old boots outside and then enter Avalon with hearts open to new ideas.

    This whole censorship, secrecy, stifle-me issue is one of THIRD DIMENSIONAL CONSTUCT and is no longer needed, no longer valid, and certainly not here on Avalon. The 4th and the 5th dimension are at hand now.

    The difference is that this is a sanctuary for the birth of new ideas and new leadership. Those who hold us back, need to either watch, listen, and learn or take it elsewhere. If you will notice even on this thread after so many others wrote in to please ask
    Chicodoodoo to stop, he didn't.

    It didn't even register. He continued getting in the last word dragging us all deeper into this old pit.

    This is why those others have eventually had to go, they didn't get it. They were not listening. A simple attitude adjustment is required of all of us and especially when you've been kindly warned not to continue along this tact.

    Why should the few negative contributors be allowed to distract and cause these arguments over and over. The answer is that they can't be allow to disrupt.


    Please ~ if isn't positive and uplifting in some way and an actual contribution to our greater interests, let it find another home in some far off galaxy. I'm not talking about
    Chicodoodoo being sent far off but his attitude needs adjusting to come back and contribute again.

    Just be kind. Nothing more is required and do it so that you "harm no other being," including yourself in our presence, it's just so hard to witness. Be kind. Rewind your arguments into a better light. Now take a deep breath ; )

    I went looking for an image of "we are a family" and found some elementary kids singing, "We are one big happy family" so cute. If one of them got out of line and caused a problem while they were singing, some adult would have stepped in to take them aside. That's what just happened here.

    Here are the kids singing and although animated no one disturbs the song.

    http://s1001.photobucket.com/albums/...t=SANY0552.mp4

    Much love! xoxoxoxox
    Hello Ms Pearce,

    I am just a bit curious. If you find this thread upsetting, why are you reading it? We all have a choice on what to spend our time on. There are many daily uplifting posts on Avalon. Why don't you focus on posts that will uplift your soul or intellect if this one drags you down? Is reading this thread or any other required by Avalon members? Since few can speed read or have the time to read all the threads, why not pick threads that meet your individual needs. There is no need to cause unnecessary anguish to yourself by following this thread. It's like a televsion or radio station; if you don't like what is playing you switch the station.

    Sincerely,
    Mr. Davis

  36. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to blake For This Post:

    andywight (16th May 2011), buckminster fuller (15th May 2011), MMA_Fan (15th May 2011), Oxygen (16th May 2011), qbeac (15th May 2011), sandy (16th May 2011), sheddie (16th May 2011)

  37. Link to Post #180
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th January 2011
    Posts
    1,974
    Thanks
    6,132
    Thanked 9,515 times in 1,728 posts

    Default Re: Censorship here?


  38. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gaia For This Post:

    3optic (15th May 2011), Amenjo (15th May 2011), Jeffrey (15th May 2011), MMA_Fan (15th May 2011)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 21 FirstFirst 1 9 19 21 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts