+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 69

Thread: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,061
    Thanks
    84,330
    Thanked 69,400 times in 10,490 posts

    Default Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Tongue in cheek of course but have a look:

    (take note of the comet comment ... I believe this will become clear in the coming days)


    https://youtube.com/watch?v=V2XAk...eature=related
    Last edited by Calz; 17th September 2011 at 16:25.

  2. The Following 24 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), bonnyhut (18th September 2011), Bridey (19th September 2011), crosby (18th September 2011), Davidallany (21st September 2011), Dawn (19th September 2011), golden lady (19th September 2011), HURRITT ENYETO (22nd September 2011), Ineffable Hitchhiker (19th September 2011), jcocks (18th September 2011), kathymarie (20th September 2011), loveandgratitude (19th September 2011), Maia Gabrial (17th September 2011), math330 (22nd September 2011), Muzz (18th September 2011), nearing (20th September 2011), Ontarioguy (18th September 2011), Operator (16th September 2011), prometheus (18th September 2011), Ria (16th September 2011), Terra (16th September 2011), toothpick (19th September 2011), Woody (18th September 2011), yaksuit (22nd September 2011)

  3. Link to Post #2
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,061
    Thanks
    84,330
    Thanked 69,400 times in 10,490 posts

    Default Re:Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Hmmmmm.

    No one else found this interesting enough to comment on???

    Our binary star coming into the solar system announced on mainstream television ... ho hum.

    Guess we got burned out talking about elenin.

  4. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), crosby (18th September 2011), Davidallany (21st September 2011), HURRITT ENYETO (22nd September 2011), kathymarie (20th September 2011), loveandgratitude (19th September 2011), Marianne (18th September 2011), Ontarioguy (18th September 2011)

  5. Link to Post #3
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    8th February 2011
    Posts
    2,960
    Thanks
    25,289
    Thanked 13,807 times in 2,657 posts

    Default Re:Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    sorry Calz_Avaretard, between work and other stuff didn't have enough time to go through all of the new threads posted...... and you are right on the money..... notice the comparison with the fact that it was overlooked here; compare that to the mass of humanity that watches television....... i am as surprised as you that there has been nothing of note documented. was this on t.v. on the 16th? i don't have access to television so i totally missed it on there; and many apologies for missing it on here. major subject with major implications. if the msm is talking about this, even a 33 second clip, i say there is much more too come. i call it "dip the toes in the water and see how cold it is", function. apparently, people are still snoozing.......... they do not realize that the ptw are testing the waters to see if anyone else is awake.
    warmest regards, corson

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to crosby For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (18th September 2011), Marianne (18th September 2011), Ontarioguy (18th September 2011)

  7. Link to Post #4
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,061
    Thanks
    84,330
    Thanked 69,400 times in 10,490 posts

    Default Re:Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by corson (here)
    sorry Calz_Avaretard, between work and other stuff didn't have enough time to go through all of the new threads posted...... and you are right on the money..... notice the comparison with the fact that it was overlooked here; compare that to the mass of humanity that watches television....... i am as surprised as you that there has been nothing of note documented. was this on t.v. on the 16th? i don't have access to television so i totally missed it on there; and many apologies for missing it on here. major subject with major implications. if the msm is talking about this, even a 33 second clip, i say there is much more too come. i call it "dip the toes in the water and see how cold it is", function. apparently, people are still snoozing.......... they do not realize that the ptw are testing the waters to see if anyone else is awake.
    warmest regards, corson
    Thanks corson.

    I rarely watch tv and only for sports and watching movies so I missed it as well.

    James Gilliland emailed it and that is the only way I knew.

    What puzzles me is elenin has 75+ threads and the biggest 66+ pages ... yet you were the first (and only thus far) to comment on the fact that it is being announced on msm tv that our binary star, brown dwarf, nibiru, plantet x, wormwood, red kachina ... whatever the heck you want to call it has entered the outer reaches of our solar system.

    Regardless ... you are correct in that it seems to be "dipping of the toe" since I have not heard of any follow up. If "they" *really* wanted to get the word out they would lead with it as the top news story (as they should).

    Cal

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), crosby (19th September 2011), Marianne (18th September 2011), Ontarioguy (18th September 2011)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Canada Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    16th March 2010
    Posts
    204
    Thanks
    6,054
    Thanked 815 times in 177 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Okay..what gets me even more now is that it is now the 18th of September, 2 days after this was first posted...andddddddd Stilllllllllll nobody else has replied to this post ?????? What is wrong with this picture? This clip is worth commenting on indeed!!!! For Main Stream Media to be commenting on this thing....well I hate to tell ya folks, but it sure seems that the time is upon us where there will be no turning back. Full steam ahead I say. Very Interesting and great catch and post Cal !!! Thanks for this. Once again I am somewhat shocked at the extremely low response to this post!! you are not alone in that thinking Cal.

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ontarioguy For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (18th September 2011), Marianne (18th September 2011)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Avalon Member Lettherebelight's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th December 2010
    Location
    Southern England
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,010
    Thanks
    9,549
    Thanked 4,710 times in 915 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    I think we're all in shock, and processing the information.

    Thanks for putting it up here. Like you, Calz, most of us here probably don't catch mainstream news regularly. I would have missed this for sure.

    After hearing so much about in-coming celestial bodies, the continuing for and against arguments, I admit, I'm flummoxed.

    Now CNN is presenting the story...I'm trying to work out...what is really going on!!!

  12. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Lettherebelight For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (18th September 2011), golden lady (19th September 2011), Holly Lindin (19th September 2011), Ineffable Hitchhiker (19th September 2011), Marianne (18th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011)

  13. Link to Post #7
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    23rd March 2010
    Posts
    1,123
    Thanks
    127
    Thanked 1,502 times in 431 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    So, is CNN jumping on the Elenin/Nibiru bandwagon or are they merely confirming it?

    I'm tired of hearing about this object because it's always treated as the DOOM DU JOUR by some people.

  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Humble Janitor For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (18th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011), Rog (19th September 2011)

  15. Link to Post #8
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    28th January 2011
    Location
    Park Ridge Illinois
    Age
    61
    Posts
    839
    Thanks
    27,782
    Thanked 5,819 times in 790 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    This appeared on CNN back in late February 2011. I believe that it has been posted on Avalon before.

  16. Link to Post #9
    United States Moderator Marianne's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th July 2011
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    3,649
    Thanks
    30,018
    Thanked 18,034 times in 2,327 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Cal, sorry I missed this thread until just now. I will try to watch some MS news and see what they are saying, and check out some websites too. After all we've heard, it does take some mental processing at this point.

    Thanks for keeping us in the loop.

    --Junebug

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Marianne For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (18th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011)

  18. Link to Post #10
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,061
    Thanks
    84,330
    Thanked 69,400 times in 10,490 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by Jean-Marie (here)
    This appeared on CNN back in late February 2011. I believe that it has been posted on Avalon before.
    I was not aware of that.

    Thanks.

    If that is the case there has certainly been little or no follow through by msm.

  19. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), DoubleHelix (19th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011)

  20. Link to Post #11
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    24,635
    Thanks
    52,617
    Thanked 132,883 times in 23,091 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    I found it quite interesting and posted it on my Facebook page, but I guess I thought members would be all over this thread, so didn't bother to comment myself.
    I agree, though, it's significant.

  21. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Calz (18th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011)

  22. Link to Post #12
    United States Avalon Member ghostrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Location
    Sand Springs Ok
    Age
    60
    Posts
    7,427
    Thanks
    9,893
    Thanked 28,836 times in 6,635 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    I been tracking an object since summer of last year, nobody, no news, no radio , no threads no nothing was talking about it. I got frustrated and kept it to myself, people only believe what they want to hear. all the problems of the earth with sinkholes, weather, animal death and such , once again gamma radiation, and the pull from the dwarf, tipping the earth and moon and saturn and changing our world, now that cnn and others are talking about it I say welcome to the party. the d.u.m.b.s. have a purpose, the surface of the earth will change, CONSIDER ... the government has spent trillions building two bases a year for fifty years, and connected them ALL BY RAILCAR. they plan to be underground for a long time. reason ? they know whats coming..... being topside won't be a very good place to be......
    Raiding the Matrix One Mind at a Time ...

  23. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ghostrider For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (18th September 2011), Davidallany (21st September 2011), golden lady (19th September 2011), Jean-Marie (19th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011)

  24. Link to Post #13
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,795
    Thanks
    38,346
    Thanked 55,023 times in 9,097 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    My first question Calz is

    What is wrong with Avalon. This thread has sunk amongst tens of other trivial flooding threads, as some of us have been complaining for a while. This is an important thread right here, officially, humanity faces extinction or at the least something dramatic. How come most of Avalon is not on it?

    Second: where are the scientific body Avalon used to host in its members? How come they are not on this? Oh, do I remember some of them that are now away! We may have to get news elsewhere now.

    Third, ghostrider, keep us posted. It is people like you that finally give the right news, with Calz of course.

    I wish our more science inclined individuals are on it by now to give us a hand in understanding.

  25. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), aranuk (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Hervé (19th September 2011), loveandgratitude (19th September 2011), toothpick (19th September 2011)

  26. Link to Post #14
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    24,635
    Thanks
    52,617
    Thanked 132,883 times in 23,091 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    If you haven't read it yet, Bill Ryan commented on the Elenin thread and elsewhere too, I think, saying that the brown dwarf is still coming this way and he expected it would be causing some severe weather in a few years, but no planet wide cataclysm. I agree.
    No special scientific basis for my opinion, just my gut feeling.
    Bill may have more science behind his statement, so I would think he would be a good person to ask.

  27. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Calz (19th September 2011), golden lady (19th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011)

  28. Link to Post #15
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,061
    Thanks
    84,330
    Thanked 69,400 times in 10,490 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    It was, of course, in the msm when first discovered then quickly suppressed.

    I am considering an email to CNN (hey ... first time for everything) to see if I can get a "rise" out of them on the subject.


    Name:  post_sm.jpg
Views: 553
Size:  24.0 KB

    Washington Post 1983 – Planet X Discovered


    Possibly as Large as Jupiter;
    Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered

    By Thomas O’Toole, Washington Post Staff Writer
    Friday, December 30, 1983
    ; Page A1

    A heavenly body possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it would be part of this solar system has been found in the direction of the constellation Orion by an orbiting telescope aboard the U.S. infrared astronomical satellite.

    So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a nearby “protostar” that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through.

    “All I can tell you is that we don’t know what it is,” Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, IRAS chief scientist for California’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and director of the Palomar Observatory for the California Institute of Technology, said in an interview.

    The most fascinating explanation of this mystery body, which is so cold it casts no light and has never been seen by optical telescopes on Earth or in space, is that it is a giant gaseous planet as large as Jupiter and as close to Earth as 50 trillion miles. While that may seem like a great distance in earthbound terms, it is a stone’s throw in cosmological terms, so close in fact that it would be the nearest heavenly body to Earth beyond the outermost planet Pluto.

    “If it is really that close, it would be a part of our solar system,” said Dr. James Houck of Cornell University’s Center for Radio Physics and Space Research and a member of the IRAS science team. “If it is that close, I don’t know how the world’s planetary scientists would even begin to classify it.”

    The mystery body was seen twice by the infrared satellite as it scanned the northern sky from last January to November, when the satellite ran out of the supercold helium that allowed its telescope to see the coldest bodies in the heavens. The second observation took place six months after the first and suggested the mystery body had not moved from its spot in the sky near the western edge of the constellation Orion in that time.

    “This suggests it’s not a comet because a comet would not be as large as the one we’ve observed and a comet would probably have moved,” Houck said. “A planet may have moved if it were as close as 50 trillion miles but it could still be a more distant planet and not have moved in six months time.”

    Whatever it is, Houck said, the mystery body is so cold its temperature is no more than 40 degrees above “absolute” zero, which is 456 degrees Fahrenheit below zero. The telescope aboard IRAS is cooled so low and is so sensitive it can “see” objects in the heavens that are only 20 degrees above absolute zero.

    When IRAS scientists first saw the mystery body and calculated that it could be as close as 50 trillion miles, there was some speculation that it might be moving toward Earth.

    “It’s not incoming mail,” Cal Tech’s Neugebauer said. “I want to douse that idea with as much cold water as I can.”

    Then, what is it? What if it is as large as Jupiter and so close to the sun it would be part of the solar system? Conceivably, it could be the 10th planet astronomers have searched for in vain. It also might be a Jupiter-like star that started out to become a star eons ago but never got hot enough like the sun to become a star.

    While they cannot disprove that notion, Neugebauer and Houck are so bedeviled by it that they do not want to accept it. Neugebauer and Houck “hope” the mystery body is a distant galaxy either so young that its stars have not begun to shine or so surrounded by dust that its starlight cannot penetrate the shroud.

    “I believe it’s one of these dark, young galaxies that we have never been able to observe before,” Neugebauer said.

    “If it is, then it is a major step forward in our understanding of the size of the universe, how the universe formed and how it continues to form as time goes on.”

    The next step in pinpointing what the mystery body is, Neuegebauer said, is to search for it with the world’s largest optical telescopes. Already, the 100-inch diameter telescope at Cerro del Tololo in Chile has begun its search and the 200-inch telescope at Palomar Mountain in California has earmarked several nights next year to look for it. If the body is close enough and emits even a hint of light, the Palomar telescope should find it since the infrared satellite has pinpointed its position.

    (ITEM 123)December 31, 1983, Saturday, Final Edition

    (ITEM 127)The distance from earth of a mysterious object in space was reported incorrectly in some editions yesterday. The correct figure is 50 billion miles.

    Articles appear as they were originally printed in The Washington Post and may not include subsequent corrections.

    http://theintelhub.com/2011/07/09/wa...-x-discovered/

  29. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Aquai (19th September 2011), Dawn (19th September 2011), Ellisa (19th September 2011), Flash (19th September 2011), golden lady (19th September 2011), Ineffable Hitchhiker (19th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011), toothpick (19th September 2011)

  30. Link to Post #16
    Scotland Avalon Member aranuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd March 2011
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    78
    Posts
    2,276
    Thanks
    17,648
    Thanked 8,377 times in 1,941 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Yes what is going on with the MMS when they are telling us the truth that something is up there and heading our way. Was it One the other day that posted a very good uadio interview with Tolec a young American man who is in communication with the Adromeda Council. I will return with more info after I post this.

    Stan
    If you don't follow your spirit without hesitation, you end up following your hesitation without spirit.

  31. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to aranuk For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), golden lady (19th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011)

  32. Link to Post #17
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,061
    Thanks
    84,330
    Thanked 69,400 times in 10,490 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    If you haven't read it yet, Bill Ryan commented on the Elenin thread and elsewhere too, I think, saying that the brown dwarf is still coming this way and he expected it would be causing some severe weather in a few years, but no planet wide cataclysm. I agree.
    No special scientific basis for my opinion, just my gut feeling.
    Bill may have more science behind his statement, so I would think he would be a good person to ask.
    Bob Dean had one of his Camelot interviews focused on the subject (suggesting a 2016/17 timeframe):

    Quote Bob Dean : The Coming of Nibiru

    Phoenix, Arizona, September 2008


    When we asked Bob what he wanted to discuss, he told us that he had important news, from his own inside sources, about Nibiru: the highly controversial Planet X. This video contains extremely important information for all students of Planet X to consider.

    http://projectcamelot.org/bob_dean.html

    Does that timeframe match up with anyone who has been following???
    Last edited by Calz; 19th September 2011 at 00:53.

  33. The Following User Says Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011)

  34. Link to Post #18
    Portugal Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    11th July 2010
    Location
    Planet Earth
    Posts
    2,322
    Thanks
    1,009
    Thanked 3,774 times in 1,173 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN


  35. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to MariaDine For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011)

  36. Link to Post #19
    France Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,763
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 96,047 times in 15,482 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)
    [...]
    What puzzles me is elenin has 75+ threads and the biggest 66+ pages ... yet you were the first (and only thus far) to comment on the fact that it is being announced on msm tv that our binary star, brown dwarf, nibiru, plantet x, wormwood, red kachina ... whatever the heck you want to call it has entered the outer reaches of our solar system.

    [...]
    Cal
    How's that even possible?

    Meaning: That binary star IS PART OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM! It's always been! That's why it's a binary system/star!

    Remember:

    Quote Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)
    Quote Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
    Now, that said, Elenin being ascertained as no dwarf star (Phewwtttffff!); the interest directed at that comet is because it came out of a sector of the sky where a dwarf star was expected to be detected.

    The dwarf star or brown dwarf, the Sun's binary companion in short, hasn't been ruled out at all! To the contrary!

    This article is about the clearest layman's terms arguments for the existence of such a stellar body:

    Is the Sun Part of a Binary Star System? - Six Reasons to Consider

    Amongst other things, it clearly shows how a sheared off Oort cloud occurs. That is, no "Flying objects" beyond but a lot within.

    And lots of 'em flying objects when the brush off happens!
    Agreed.

    Bob Dean suggested 2016 or 2017 time frame correct???

  37. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Bridey (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011)

  38. Link to Post #20
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,061
    Thanks
    84,330
    Thanked 69,400 times in 10,490 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
    Meaning: That binary star IS PART OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM! It's always been! That's why it's a binary system/star!
    With a highly elliptical orbit.

    I agree that a binary star would be considered part of the same solar system as it's twin star.

    What I was trying to imply was it is being suggested as coming into what most of us non-atronomers (the 99.999% of the world population) would recognize as "our solar system".

    Forgive me if that was too vague.
    Last edited by Calz; 19th September 2011 at 08:45.

  39. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Bridey (19th September 2011), Hervé (19th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts