+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 69

Thread: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

  1. Link to Post #21
    Canada Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    11th April 2011
    Posts
    74
    Thanks
    613
    Thanked 268 times in 64 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Ya I started a thread about a binary system a week ago and it had no interest whatsoever( except for Amzer Zo thankyou). Disappointing because of all the science behind the theory. This is a good website with lots of info as well if your interested. I believe that Amzer Zo posted this website as well on another very important thread suggesting this theory.

    http://www.binaryresearchinstitute.o...n/theory.shtml

    Thanks for posting! I found it interesting. I especially liked the "six reasons to consider" link. Very very good!

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bridey For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Hervé (19th September 2011), seko (19th September 2011)

  3. Link to Post #22
    France Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,763
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 96,047 times in 15,482 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)
    Quote Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
    Meaning: That binary star IS PART OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM! It's always been! That's why it's a binary system/star!
    With a highly eliptical orbit.

    I agree that a binary star would be considered part of the same solar system as it's twin star.

    What I was trying to imply was it is being suggested as coming into what most of us non-atronomers (the 99.999% of the world population) would recognize as "our solar system".

    Forgive me if that was too vague.
    Yeah... that may be why things like this:

    Quote Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
    Now let's dispel some of the spells the gloom & doom propagandists are casting all over the place.

    The most accurate description of that mysterious (there it is that propaganda... "mysterious") body is that it is cold, hence not radiating much energy, and does not reflect light as a planet does (see the articles referenced in that PDF). Also, it does not perceptibly move as a planet or a comet would.

    Hence:
    A comet? NIET!

    A planet? NIET!

    So, why call it "Planet X," "Tyche," etc?

    [...]
    ... kept getting buried under sensationalizing videos and other things, no matter how many times and ways I offered to demonstrate it as an impossibility in that thread.

    Sensationalism using the same twist as the OP CNN video: "It's entering our solar system..." boy did that ever caught on like a wild fire...

    Unless I change my mind, the only thing I am gonna add on this thread about the subject is this:

    If this large body is a binary star to our system, then it has an established revolution/orbit around our solar system; hence determining a cycle. Therefore, if at each cycle it were to barrel down through our "solar system" like it were a bowling alley, this current solar system wouldn't exist as it is and we wouldn't be occupying one of its planets.

    Under all apparency, we are occupying one of its planets and apparently this "solar system" has been stable like it is for a lot longer than the 24,000 years orbital period of this cycle.

    Oort cloud comets and asteroids bombings may be, however, a result of this orbital period; hence the need for a reliable calendar...

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Fred Steeves (19th September 2011), seko (19th September 2011)

  5. Link to Post #23
    Botswana Deactivated
    Join Date
    27th May 2010
    Location
    byron bay
    Posts
    1,480
    Thanks
    5,331
    Thanked 5,209 times in 1,243 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    I think that Comet Elenin simply bamboozled most of us into a state of confusion. I believe that most people have taken a step back to gather their senses and perspective and missed this one. Any more info about it, what it is and where is it going?
    Last edited by loveandgratitude; 19th September 2011 at 07:17.

  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to loveandgratitude For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Marianne (19th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011), steveofengland (19th September 2011)

  7. Link to Post #24
    France Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,763
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 96,047 times in 15,482 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    [...]

    Second: where are the scientific body Avalon used to host in its members? How come they are not on this? Oh, do I remember some of them that are now away! We may have to get news elsewhere now.
    [...]
    Flash... they quit posting in the face of virulent ignorance that was more akin to firmly held beliefs of inquisitors... Chuck is an example of that.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011)

  9. Link to Post #25
    Sweden Avalon Member <8>'s Avatar
    Join Date
    21st June 2011
    Age
    53
    Posts
    962
    Thanks
    6,618
    Thanked 3,697 times in 822 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Hi Calz..


    My thoughts on this....


    The fastest rocket to leave the Earth’s atmosphere, officials said. With about 2.5 million pounds of thrust at launch, it’s traveling to Pluto at 36,000 mph.
    Yet it will still take 9 1/2 years to reach Pluto.

    As passengers on Earth we are all carried around the sun at a mean velocity of 66,600 mph.
    If nibiru have a speed like earth, and let's say they travels straight for each other, Let's say they meet up in about 4 years if all conditions are perfect.
    If either of us got slightest trajectory wrong OR if we are headed for each other at all, we never gonna get the first row seat are we ?
    Either way, it's missing 21 dec 2012 deadline i heard many have talkt about..


    Much love and keep it real....

    p.s...it was beyond pluto, that's why i used pluto as a refrence..it's past 4 in the morning here, so my calculations might me wrong.. sorry for that, but i hope you get my point..
    Last edited by <8>; 19th September 2011 at 02:24.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to <8> For This Post:

    Calz (19th September 2011), Lord Sidious (19th September 2011)

  11. Link to Post #26
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    77
    Posts
    29,887
    Thanks
    35,139
    Thanked 149,202 times in 22,809 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
    Flash... they quit posting in the face of virulent ignorance that was more akin to firmly held beliefs of inquisitors... Chuck is an example of that.
    Any suggestions for how to improve matters (sorry - guess I'm off topic )?
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Hervé (19th September 2011), seko (19th September 2011)

  13. Link to Post #27
    Canada Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    16th March 2010
    Posts
    204
    Thanks
    6,054
    Thanked 815 times in 177 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    On another note, not sure if anyone else is aware of the so called "Dead Satellite" that is going to be dropping to earth next Friday the 23rd....give or take a day or so?? Found this article online today....and just had to post it here...sorry to change the subject for a sec....but thought this might be of interest. I got to thinking that a 350lb. chunk of satellite debris hitting anyone....they would not feel a thing!

    http://sync.sympatico.ca/news/nasa_s..._week/9528285f

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ontarioguy For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Art (21st September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011)

  15. Link to Post #28
    France Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,763
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 96,047 times in 15,482 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by Paul (here)
    Quote Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
    Flash... they quit posting in the face of virulent ignorance that was more akin to firmly held beliefs of inquisitors... Chuck is an example of that.
    Any suggestions for how to improve matters (sorry - guess I'm off topic )?
    I have no idea how that could be done from a mod point of view as it's a matter of each individual discernmemt capabilities of weighing rationality versus beliefs. I guess that's why Bill started his new "...return to rationality" thread?

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), loveandgratitude (19th September 2011)

  17. Link to Post #29
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    77
    Posts
    29,887
    Thanks
    35,139
    Thanked 149,202 times in 22,809 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote I have no idea how that could be done from a mod point of view as it's a matter of each individual discernment capabilities of weighing rationality versus beliefs. I guess that's why Bill started his new "...return to rationality" thread?
    Clear thinking, grounded both rationally and intuitively in firm understanding all the way down to the conceptual foundations, is valuable (in my view, at least) and precious.

    One can become frustrated by its frequent absence, or delighted by its occasional presence. I find occasional delightful moments here (on this forum) and in my current (the list keeps changing) readings - Paul LaViolette and Judy Wood.

    (sorry - not really an answer - and further off topic ...)
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  18. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Hervé (19th September 2011), toothpick (19th September 2011)

  19. Link to Post #30
    Canada Deactivated
    Join Date
    8th August 2011
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    1,349
    Thanks
    1,868
    Thanked 6,464 times in 1,156 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by Calz_Avaretard (here)
    Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN
    Now I know it is not a real threat, just propaganda.
    I am turning my attention to the War and attacking that NATO is doing.

    The only thing I believe is important is for the folks of the world to UNITE and RIOT and PROTEST and STOP what NATO is doing.

    For the love of humanity, lets stop the madness
    Have not we seen enough of this ???????


    Lets not repeat history

    Canada as well as the rest of us in NATO have this blood on our hands. Silence is consent.


    NATO get OUT OF THE MIDDLE EAST:

    Irag
    Afghanistan
    Libya
    Last edited by Vitalux; 19th September 2011 at 03:25.

  20. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Vitalux For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), golden lady (19th September 2011), Lord Sidious (19th September 2011), loveandgratitude (19th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011), sandy (19th September 2011), seko (19th September 2011), toothpick (19th September 2011)

  21. Link to Post #31
    Avalon Member Sidney's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th April 2010
    Location
    down the Rabbit Hole
    Posts
    5,040
    Thanks
    14,238
    Thanked 20,945 times in 4,419 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    I spotted this while looking at the weekend solar activity. Check it out. You cannot deny this. Notice time stamp.

    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/atta...6&d=1316403494


    Attachment 9946
    Last edited by Sidney; 19th September 2011 at 13:07.

  22. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Sidney For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Art (21st September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Ontarioguy (19th September 2011)

  23. Link to Post #32
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,061
    Thanks
    84,330
    Thanked 69,400 times in 10,490 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by <8> (here)

    The fastest rocket to leave the Earth’s atmosphere, officials said. With about 2.5 million pounds of thrust at launch, it’s traveling to Pluto at 36,000 mph.
    Yet it will still take 9 1/2 years to reach Pluto.

    As passengers on Earth we are all carried around the sun at a mean velocity of 66,600 mph.
    If nibiru have a speed like earth, and let's say they travels straight for each other, Let's say they meet up in about 4 years if all conditions are perfect.
    If either of us got slightest trajectory wrong OR if we are headed for each other at all, we never gonna get the first row seat are we ?
    Either way, it's missing 21 dec 2012 deadline i heard many have talkt about..
    Thanks for that.

    Aside from my reference to Bob Dean's suggested 2016/17 (and query if others were on board with that) I made no connections with dates. Your calculations would put it in that range.

    2012 for most people is linked to the mayan calandar (of course) and that is subject to speculation (aside from it's remarkable accuracy).
    Last edited by Calz; 19th September 2011 at 04:30.

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011)

  25. Link to Post #33
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,061
    Thanks
    84,330
    Thanked 69,400 times in 10,490 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by Paul (here)
    Paul LaViolette and Judy Wood.
    On board on those two accounts.

    LaViolette I have referenced in several threads regarding his work on the "superwave" eminating from the galactic core.

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011)

  27. Link to Post #34
    UK Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd April 2011
    Location
    Cambridgshire
    Age
    47
    Posts
    82
    Thanks
    173
    Thanked 138 times in 54 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Maybe i can point people to this direction http://rabbithole2.com/presentation/...cyclopedia.htm

  28. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Thefrenzy1978 For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Coaxial (19th September 2011), Hervé (19th September 2011), Lord Sidious (19th September 2011), Muzz (19th September 2011), Samsara (25th September 2011)

  29. Link to Post #35
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    24,589
    Thanks
    52,540
    Thanked 132,626 times in 23,045 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    I miss those pre-Charles days too. Now it's up to those of us who are left on PA to stay on target.

    Quote Posted by Amzer Zo (here)
    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    [...]
    Second: where are the scientific body Avalon used to host in its members? How come they are not on this? Oh, do I remember some of them that are now away! We may have to get news elsewhere now.
    [...]
    Flash... they quit posting in the face of virulent ignorance that was more akin to firmly held beliefs of inquisitors... Chuck is an example of that.
    I just watched several of the Camelot interviews with Bob Dean again, and I'm really glad I did.
    A lot of what seemed very clear when I first watched them years ago has perhaps been slowly obfuscated over the past few years , and possibly the brouhaha over Elenin is just the most recent camouflage.
    Listening to Bob Dean again reminded me of just how much those in the know have wanted to keep the existence of Nibiru secret, and all that it involves.
    I have a feeling that may be one reason why we have gone off on so many sidetracks.

    Although looked at in another way, Elenin may have been a great reminder of what a few years ago we were hot on the trail of.
    And no matter how much it has been debunked, I think there may still be something to the info about Nibiru, especially since it's pretty obvious now that the binary star really is there.

    Many whisteleblowers have told us that the Annunaki are still around. They're on Mars and on Earth in ancient underground bases.
    Presumably they do still have a planet home of their own.
    According to Bob Dean, Sitchin's take on it was quite accurate.
    So when did the information we were given about Nibiru from whistleblowers like Bob Dean, Van Flandern, Robert Harrington, Neil Freer and others become discredited?
    Or have we just been diverted?
    Did those in the top secret ops decide to do everything they could to make us forget it, since they still don't know what to do about it?

    Here are some of the highlights from the Bob Dean interviews:
    He was a friend of Sitchin and said that according to Sitchin, Nibiru comes around every 3600 years and the last time it was around was in 1600 BC.
    Dean said a couple of different things about when it will be here next, but the last thing he said is that it will start to be felt around 2017. In another place in the interview, he said it will be at it's closest in 2060.
    He said that according to ETs and humans working with them, it will be on the same side of the Sun as the Earth this time around, which means the effects can be severe.

    The Annunaki have technology to protect Nibiru during the crossing, and there is a possibility that something similar could be used to protect Earth, but presumably that would seem to be dependent on how we handle things between now and then.
    Nothing was mentioned in the interview about the binary star, but from what I understand, Nibiru is one of it's moons, and comes closer to Earth and so has more of an effect on us. But it is presumably a sign that Nibiru is coming.

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=AbgHy...feature=relmfu


    and the 3 part interview here:






    https://youtube.com/watch?v=a3Ada...eature=related


    Part 3, this last one, is focused more on Bob Dean's wife Marcia, and doesn't really go into the Nibiru issue.
    Last edited by onawah; 19th September 2011 at 06:12.

  30. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Samsara (25th September 2011)

  31. Link to Post #36
    France Honored, Retired Member. Hervé passed on 13 November 2024.
    Join Date
    7th March 2011
    Location
    Brittany
    Posts
    16,763
    Thanks
    60,315
    Thanked 96,047 times in 15,482 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    To give one an idea on the length to which an organization can go to, to convince a certain group of people of something, watch (or rewatch) the beginning of this video where Stan Deyo recounts the outline of "Noise Level."
    Last edited by Hervé; 2nd May 2016 at 14:13.

  32. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Hervé For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Bridey (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Lord Sidious (19th September 2011)

  33. Link to Post #37
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    57
    Posts
    7,236
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,275 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by Thefrenzy1978 (here)
    Maybe i can point people to this direction http://rabbithole2.com/presentation/...cyclopedia.htm
    Thanks for that site man, much appreciated.

  34. Link to Post #38
    Australia Avalon Member
    Join Date
    9th April 2010
    Location
    Bunbury, Western Australia
    Age
    47
    Posts
    1,246
    Thanks
    2,003
    Thanked 3,200 times in 838 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Is it possible, perhaps that they sent the pioneer probes 10 and 11 out into "interstellar" space knowing full well what they would encounter?


    Naaahh.....That'd be crazy......


  35. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jcocks For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Coaxial (19th September 2011), Lord Sidious (19th September 2011)

  36. Link to Post #39
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    57
    Posts
    7,236
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,275 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Quote Posted by jcocks (here)
    Is it possible, perhaps that they sent the pioneer probes 10 and 11 out into "interstellar" space knowing full well what they would encounter?


    Naaahh.....That'd be crazy......

    I think they did do that, with the intention of checking to see where things were, more than discovering them.

  37. Link to Post #40
    Australia Avalon Member
    Join Date
    9th April 2010
    Location
    Bunbury, Western Australia
    Age
    47
    Posts
    1,246
    Thanks
    2,003
    Thanked 3,200 times in 838 posts

    Default Re: Binary Star Isn't "Real" Until it is on CNN

    Seems a little low-tech way of doing that, but it could be a case of "we heard runours from our black-ops sources that these exist, so we'll send out some probes to check"....

    Also wonder if they really lost contact with the probes like they said they did.... Sounds like a question for bob dean...

  38. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jcocks For This Post:

    <8> (19th September 2011), Calz (19th September 2011), Lord Sidious (19th September 2011), seko (19th September 2011)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts