+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 33

Thread: Our Moon

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member divine_moments_of_truth's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th January 2011
    Age
    34
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    237
    Thanked 247 times in 53 posts

    Default Our Moon

    I've been gobbling up tons of information in the last few months, but I never thought until today to take a serious look at the moon. It doesn't rotate, it has a strange gravitational pull, and there has been many unexplained phenomena on the surface. I know many people know about its unnatural origins but there may be some new information here.

    It has been established beyond all reasonable doubt that the Moon is not what it appears; that it is not just another satellite orbiting a planet, Earth, but an entity which has thrown the minds of some of the greatest thinkers and scientific brains into a quandary and bewilderment unprecedented in the history of astronomy. Why haven't you heard about this? Another government cover-up? How could Moon mysteries have anything to do with government secrecy, and moreover could it relate to the suppression of the space programme?

    Let us outline some of the extraordinary anomalies and mysteries surrounding this puzzle. Clearly not all data will be equally reliable but the abundance of interrelated information nevertheless gives an overall picture which can be determined with some certainty. The first academic enigma must surely be that the Moon is apparently in its wrong orbit for its size. However, this would presumably be based on its assumed density. Technical reports claim a density of 3.3 for the Moon compared with 5.5 for Earth. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of the Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable but outrageous speculation that it could be hollow. The eminent scientist Carl Sagan, a typical sceptic, made the statement, 'A natural satellite cannot be a hollow ob-ject'. But meaning here that if it is hollow, it is not a natural satellite---and therefore artificial.

    Possibly the strongest evidence for it to be a 'hollow ob-ject' comes from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, the latter rings like a bell. More specifically when the Apollo crew in November 20, 1969 released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with the Moon caused their seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation like a bell for more than an hour. The same effect occurred with Apollo 13's third stage which caused the Moon to ring for over three hours. So what's going on with the Moon?

    Two Soviet scientists, Vasin and Shcherbokov, have spent much of their careers examining the facts compiled on lunar phenomena. Their conclusion is that the Moon is artificial, possibly a hollowed-out planet, and that it was steered from some distant region of the galaxy into a circular orbit around our planet (hence the extraordinary mystery of rock and Moon-dust age variations). They claim that intellectual life has existed in the Moon for eons.

    In 1968 as Apollo 8 moved into orbit around the Moon, the astronauts spotted a colossal extraterrestrial ob-ject, which then had disappeared on the next orbit. Photographs were taken, of course, but not released to the public. On another occasion when the lunar excursion module was down to 4-5 miles from the Moon's surface astronauts witnessed a UFO suddenly rise from a crater and rapidly disappear. In 1969 Aldrin was checking the lunar surface from orbit, when two UFOs appeared, moved towards the Apollo rocket, hovered nearby, then to Aldrin's utter astonishment the UFOs joined to form one entity. Furthermore, astronauts of Apollo 11 saw a spacefleet of UFOs lined up in a crater. Almost every Moon mission involved encounters with UFOs or UFO sightings, not to mention the discovery of many bases on the Moon's surface. Renowned astronomer Patrick Moore discovered over one hundred dome-like buildings. In fact, about one thousand such bases, dome-like structures of diameter around 700 feet, have been witnessed. Astronomy records extending back 200 years indicate no such artifacts until about the 1950s (remember the book Alternative III?). Many of the UFO encounters by the astronauts were stated to be of a positive nature in which unintrusive assistance was given.

    It has been found that asteroids and meteors not only create shallow craters on the Moon's surface but produce a convex floor to the crater instead of concave as expected, supporting the idea of a rigid shell. Countless other pieces of evidence from astronomers and NASA scientists began to reveal that some 2-3 miles down there appear to be dense layers of metal---which would explain why the craters were convex. But the most astonishing conclusion is that the only theory which can completely explain all the anomalies is that the Moon is hollow with a shell about 20 miles thick---mostly metal. Note that mascons (higher concentrations of mass) found in the marias cause fluctuations in gravity and have never been satisfactorily explained.

    Moreover, these structural anomalies were supported by two publications, one Time Magazine, which unwittingly revealed the gravity value of the Moon relative to Earth by publishing the distance from Earth to Moon of the null point between them, indicating a gravitational force some 60 -70 % of Earth. Furthermore, some people noticed the feeble plumage of the rocket exhaust as the module rose from the Moon's surface---explained away by NASA as due to the vacuum. But what about some of the telltale and suspicious features observed during the first Armstrong and Aldrin Moon landing. The American flag was seen briefly to wave in ... a breeze? But we are told there is no air on the Moon. The flag was then starched. Also we saw dust kicked up by the astronauts clearly drifting in . . . what? Dust particles do not drift in vacuum---they cling together. And what about the feeble leaps of the astronauts off the Moon's surface---were their spacesuits and backpacks really so heavy? The Moon is supposed to be about one-sixth the gravity of Earth.

    Thus we now know that air is present, and the feeble rocket exhaust could not be due to a vacuum. Moreover, the exhaust was apparently too weak to account for the necessary power to escape from such a gravitational pull in relationship to the size of the module, which was not large enough to contain the necessary fuel to escape the Moon's high gravity. Was antigravity propulsion secretly being used as a booster?

    The covert government have long since sent 'astronauts' into outer space in antigravity spacecrafts. They apparently had the so-called cosmospheres about 40 years ago, some larger than the old and massive dirigibles. They seized the antigravity research data from the Nazis, and have since then reverse-engineered captured spacecrafts and negotiated deals with aliens involving antigravity technologies.

    The more thorough have been the investigations of the Moon the more bizarre the results have been. Probably one of the most startling was that moonquakes occurred like clockwork. Moreover, the fluctuations on each occasion were the same. This is impossible for natural conditions which always obey fractal distributions. Furthermore, a study of rock samples reveal an age of 5.3 billion years, and that not only is the Moon older than the Earth, estimated to be about 4.6 billion years, but that it is older than the solar system (and by theoretical standards as old as the universe).

    What about the surface of the Moon? Several television viewers wrote explaining that they spotted one of the astronauts pick up what appeared to be a glass bottle and remark, 'My God, I don't believe it, look at this . .. ' Then the television screen went blank. Other viewers observed the extreme difficulty astronauts had when drilling down a few inches into the Moon's marias and that when the drill bit was pulled out, metal shavings were visible. Rocks were found to contain brass, mica, titanium, and elements uranium 236 and Neptunium 237 not previously found in nature.

    Astronomy literature reports the sighting of a 12-mile bridge-like structure over the Sea of Crisis in 1954 by John O'Neile, and in the 1950s astronomer Jessup realised that UFOs had bases on the Moon (and so does the government of course). Other strange lunar phenomena are: the observation by Dr. Frank Harris of a black body on the surface, 250 miles long and 50 miles wide; clouds and lightning; strange moving shadows and ob-jects, and spire-like structures thousands of feet high; a huge boulder with tracks (behind it) from inside a crater to the rim (uphill); the shrinking, over a period of time, of the crater Luna from six miles in diameter to one and a half miles; 'hill' effects in craters appearing and disappearing in a few hours; over 800 substantial observations made by scientists of blinking and flaashing lights; the results of NASA photographs of the lunar surface, indicating several large pyramid structures, strange rifts in the surface with entrances, massive girders, machinery and some 1000 kilometre blocks of metal, tears in the surface, revealing massive interior 'plumbing', huge crosses a mile long, and enormous excavating equipment. Professional astronomers have gradually been discouraged from investigating these observations, referred to as Transient Lunar Phenomena, and all such Fortean observations are now only of interest to the amateur.

    Our satellite has long since been established as being extremely dry but this information has been contradicted by the appearance of clouds on the surface. On one occasion a cloud of water vapour appeared covering more than 100 square miles. And it has been reported that strange clouds appear at lightning speed. The capture theory that the Moon was pulled into its orbit by the Earth was once favoured but the circular orbit of the Moon invalidated it. As already mentioned the Moon is the wrong size and in the wrong orbit. It is too big and too far out. It does not rotate relative to Earth; the same side always faces the Earth. And what about the amazing 'coincidence' of the eclipse phenomenon. The position and size of the Moon is precisely that necessary to eclipse the Sun's disc.

    Scientific experts, including NASA investigators believe that the Moon is hollow---it is the only explanation. The velocity of sound has been found to increase with depth and at 40 miles it is too fast for the speed of propagation through rock substance. 'Spaceship Moon' is the brainchild of the two Soviet researchers but many others agree with the theory, including NASA scientists at JPL and an Oxford University physicist. The capture theory is now back in favour but with a significant adjustment that the Moon was steered into orbit.

    It might be worth a comment on the recent 'conspiracy theory' that astronauts never actually went to the Moon. DVDs and television programmes have proffered that, in particular, photographs allegedly taken on the Moon were faked. In fact one can see clearly in the photographs that the shadows of ob-jects on the Moon were not parallel as they would be if the shadows were cast by the Sun, rather than by studio lighting. Further evidence has been given. But we may know from earlier suspicions that NASA has a propensity for faking scenes---for example, the view of the interior of the shuttle faking an outer-space mission when actually on the ground. Thus the conclusion, and personal opinion of the author, is that both scenarios are correct: astronauts did land on the Moon, and NASA has produced faked photographs.

    Was the space programme cut because further encounters with UFOs might blow the government cover-up? Even more important than this, allowing the public to increase their confront and interest in the subject of extraterrestrials would eventually lead to a worldwide awakening of the human race's true heritage, the causes of our downfall, the falsification of our history, and ultimately the disclosure and eradication of the control mechanism.

    We see that the Moon mysteries are intimately bound up with extraterrestrial sightings and involvement, in particular, the conclusion of the two Russian scientists that the Moon is artificial and hollow. Is this a favourable omen for the human race or a harbinger of something more ominous. Why was the Moon directed to retain continuously a dark side? A side of the Moon we never see. Also police records referring to increased crime during the full Moon are commonplace. A study of ET material of which literature today abounds, strongly indicates that the nature of the Moon has a sinister purpose and plays a role in manipulating man's evolution.

    In fact, if we include relevant data from extraterrestrial material transmitted by Ashayana Deane (see other articles for more information on this source) taken from a now vast body of advanced scientific knowledge about the universe, life and man's downfall, it is made clear that the Moon is another of the many components of the Beast machine (see Cosmic Map article), and does indeed play a sinister role. The natural matter of the Moon came from a very large planet, Maldek (or Marduk), which orbited our Sun thousands of years ago between Mars and Jupiter. It was inhabited by a thriving civilisation which degenerated to such a degree that the planet was destroyed. The asteroid belt is a product of the many fragments; also Wormwood (Bible), referred to as Battlestar Wormwood by ETs (see Planet X article).

    We can tentatively assume now that the Moon consists of a metallic framework which has been packed by pieces from Maldek, forming the spherical shape but is essentially hollow. Similarly for Wormwood. Thus the Moon contains energies and coding (frequency patterns) supporting the original ET agenda for assimilation of our planetary system and in fact the whole time matrix. Further programmes emanate from the moon, such as one to cause unnatural hormonal/menstrual cycles in women to produce more children---thus losing control over when to have children. The purpose being to keep a plentiful stock of DNA for their genetic experiments (the human DNA, that is, its original template is valuable to these spiritually-fallen ETs).

    In fact, not only does the Moon affect the tides of Earth but the blood in living organisms. A separate source of information (channelling) refers to the Moon as being an electromagnetic computer which can be programmed intelligently, such as to influence the feminine cycle (as also mentioned above in the Deane material), and has been transmitting signals to maintain our DNA for aeons.


    Link: http://www.redicecreations.com/speci...1jan/moon.html
    Life is meant to be spent, not saved.

  2. The Following 23 Users Say Thank You to divine_moments_of_truth For This Post:

    Billy (13th October 2011), Caren (15th October 2011), Carmen (18th October 2011), crosby (13th October 2011), Davidallany (14th October 2011), gigha (13th October 2011), GlassSteagallfan (15th October 2011), Kano (13th October 2011), KiwiElf (14th October 2011), Lefty Dave (13th October 2011), Maia Gabrial (14th October 2011), mesta0ptik (14th October 2011), Nasu (13th October 2011), nearing (14th October 2011), Pete (15th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011), selinam (13th October 2011), Sesan (14th October 2011), Snowbird (15th October 2011), TEEDA (16th October 2011), The One (13th October 2011), ViralSpiral (14th October 2011), WhiteFeather (15th October 2011)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    14th April 2010
    Location
    In-between
    Age
    52
    Posts
    3,401
    Thanks
    6,084
    Thanked 17,152 times in 2,815 posts

  4. Link to Post #3
    Canada Deactivated
    Join Date
    8th August 2011
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    1,349
    Thanks
    1,868
    Thanked 6,464 times in 1,156 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    divine_moments_of_truth

    I use to study the same things about the moon.
    Here are some things I should point out that will probably help make a bit more sense.

    The Moon Does rotate. A solar day on the moon is about 27.32 days relative to a solar day on earth.
    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_th...ay_on_the_moon

    Here is where you have to separate fact from fiction and misinformation.

    NASA never ...Ever......Sent a Man to the MOON....No Man or NASA Apollo space craft ...ever left earth orbit. It was a hoax very much like 911.



    Therefore, any talk of NASA crashing a space ship into the moon is just Propaganda and lies.

    If we take a pot full of boiled turnips, then we take a big dump in the pot, then we pull out a blender and mix it all together.
    It gets pretty hard to try and figure out the food from the human crap.

    NASA and the News Media do that to the people to always keep them dazed and confused.

    Is our moon anomalies..? definitely.

    Good post, just wanted to toss in a bit of food for thought

  5. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Vitalux For This Post:

    Anna (14th October 2011), Davidallany (14th October 2011), divine_moments_of_truth (13th October 2011), DoubleHelix (14th October 2011), KiwiElf (14th October 2011), Nasu (13th October 2011), Operator (13th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011)

  6. Link to Post #4
    Avalon Member WyoSeeker's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th November 2010
    Location
    Cheyenne, Wyoming US
    Age
    63
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 1,200 times in 246 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    Quote Posted by gary-arsenault (here)
    divine_moments_of_truth
    NASA never ...Ever......Sent a Man to the MOON....No Man or NASA Apollo space craft ...ever left earth orbit. It was a hoax very much like 911.
    I disagree. No doubt some of the images and video were faked but it's also certain that we did in fact land on the moon and bring back some rocks. The idea that we never went and it was ALL faked is disinformation. I think when they got there they realized there were ruins and artifacts everywhere and it was easier to fake some images and video than to keep airbrushing out everything they wanted to hide. IMHO
    "What the caterpillar calls the end of the world, The master calls a butterfly."
    Richard Bach

  7. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to WyoSeeker For This Post:

    bennycog (14th October 2011), Caren (15th October 2011), Davidallany (14th October 2011), Herbert (13th October 2011), jsb_swampfox (13th October 2011), KiwiElf (14th October 2011), Mare (14th October 2011), math330 (17th October 2011), Nasu (13th October 2011), norman (15th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011), seehas (14th October 2011), Sesan (14th October 2011)

  8. Link to Post #5
    United States Avalon Member divine_moments_of_truth's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th January 2011
    Age
    34
    Posts
    66
    Thanks
    237
    Thanked 247 times in 53 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    Thanks for clearing that up Gary, I found the reason why here. Kinda a weird coincidence.

    Quote Well, the Moon does rotate. In fact, the Moon takes 27.3 days to turn once on its axis. But the Moon also takes 27.3 days to complete one orbit around the Earth. Because the Moon’s rotation time is exactly the same amount of time it takes to complete an orbit, it always presents the same face to the Earth, and one face away.
    Max
    Life is meant to be spent, not saved.

  9. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to divine_moments_of_truth For This Post:

    Davidallany (14th October 2011), KiwiElf (14th October 2011), noprophet (14th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011), Vitalux (13th October 2011)

  10. Link to Post #6
    Canada Deactivated
    Join Date
    8th August 2011
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    1,349
    Thanks
    1,868
    Thanked 6,464 times in 1,156 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    Quote Posted by WyoSeeker (here)
    Quote Posted by gary-arsenault (here)
    divine_moments_of_truth
    NASA never ...Ever......Sent a Man to the MOON....No Man or NASA Apollo space craft ...ever left earth orbit. It was a hoax very much like 911.
    I disagree. No doubt some of the images and video were faked but it's also certain that we did in fact land on the moon and bring back some rocks. The idea that we never went and it was ALL faked is disinformation. I think when they got there they realized there were ruins and artifacts everywhere and it was easier to fake some images and video than to keep airbrushing out everything they wanted to hide. IMHO

    hey buddy....if you wanna believe they went to the moon ....but had to fake everything about it....all the power to you.
    Hey I have got some of those moon rocks in my back-yard I can sell you.

    Now don't pay any attention to those people that will tell you I am a liar ...and forget all the bull crap I have told the world.
    Buy my rocks. I will give them to you for a really good price....seeing as they are actual moon rocks.... for you $ 200 an ounce.


    It really boils down that ...you don't want to know the truth, which is how this tiny little pea sized brain of ours works.
    We probably can't handle the truth, because we have never been told it.
    Last edited by Vitalux; 13th October 2011 at 16:05.

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Vitalux For This Post:

    Davidallany (14th October 2011), KiwiElf (14th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011)

  12. Link to Post #7
    Scotland Moderator Billy's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th January 2011
    Location
    Scotland
    Age
    71
    Posts
    6,749
    Thanks
    55,318
    Thanked 33,599 times in 5,028 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    I found this comment from the CHANI project quite interesting.
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...nel#post314849

    http://thechaniproject.com/nexus.html


    Some questions asked by the Entity to the researchers:
    "ok me first question ask
    wat purpose yor moon
    me line time moon demise long ago
    life become better with no moon
    why u stil have moon
    wat purpose yor moon have u
    moon not natural heaven body
    moon put there by other being to control earth mood
    without moon big calm comes over peoples no big storm anymore only litel storm
    without moon peace among people
    elders say old race capture moon from space then put next earth
    elders say moon forces work like time mashine keep control time
    moon also control mood of beings on planet in this line time"

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Billy For This Post:

    Anna (14th October 2011), Davidallany (14th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011)

  14. Link to Post #8
    Avalon Member WyoSeeker's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th November 2010
    Location
    Cheyenne, Wyoming US
    Age
    63
    Posts
    288
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 1,200 times in 246 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    Quote Posted by gary-arsenault (here)
    hey buddy....if you wanna believe they went to the moon ....but had to fake everything about it....all the power to you.
    They didn't fake everything about it. If every photo was staged why would they airbrush out artifacts they didn't want there?

    You're going to believe what you want, but in my opinion if you buy into the "never went" theory you are not looking at all the evidence and using critical thinking.

    Once again, just my opinion and your mileage may vary.
    "What the caterpillar calls the end of the world, The master calls a butterfly."
    Richard Bach

  15. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to WyoSeeker For This Post:

    KiwiElf (14th October 2011), Nairnia (13th October 2011), NASA Apollo Cartographer (19th November 2023), noprophet (14th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011)

  16. Link to Post #9
    Avalon Member Kano's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Age
    46
    Posts
    582
    Thanks
    2,557
    Thanked 2,356 times in 491 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    Quote Posted by WyoSeeker (here)
    Quote Posted by gary-arsenault (here)
    hey buddy....if you wanna believe they went to the moon ....but had to fake everything about it....all the power to you.
    They didn't fake everything about it. If every photo was staged why would they airbrush out artifacts they didn't want there?

    You're going to believe what you want, but in my opinion if you buy into the "never went" theory you are not looking at all the evidence and using critical thinking.

    Once again, just my opinion and your mileage may vary.
    My .02

    I think you are probably both somewhat correct. I think we did in fact send astronauts to the Moon but far before the late 60's and most likely with some help from our "friends". Therefore, the data, the rock collecting, the Moon ringing like a bell, etc would be authentic. However, the media coverage that was presented to the world in the summer of '69 was totally a hoax.

    Check out Jay Weidners site. He has some really fascinating info on the moon landing hoax and who was behind it all.

    http://jayweidner.com/

  17. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Kano For This Post:

    Davidallany (14th October 2011), KiwiElf (14th October 2011), mountain_jim (14th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011)

  18. Link to Post #10
    UK Avalon Member
    Join Date
    26th September 2011
    Age
    71
    Posts
    14
    Thanks
    87
    Thanked 58 times in 12 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    Lots of interesting possibilities put out to comment here. I must admit I find it strange that man has not returned, I do think that the reason is that we might not be welcome. What a perfect way to conduct your work on this world, not too far away and in full view to mankind but out of sight.
    Everyone is a part of this planet, its ours and we should be aware of what others might know. I do think there are so many unexplained objects and items on this planet that we have had and still are getting help and direction from others.
    Telemark

  19. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to telemark For This Post:

    Davidallany (14th October 2011), KiwiElf (14th October 2011), KosmicKat (15th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011)

  20. Link to Post #11
    Peru Avalon Member seehas's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th April 2011
    Location
    Alpha Centauri
    Language
    German
    Posts
    835
    Thanks
    1,612
    Thanked 5,051 times in 781 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    Quote Posted by WyoSeeker (here)
    Quote Posted by gary-arsenault (here)
    hey buddy....if you wanna believe they went to the moon ....but had to fake everything about it....all the power to you.
    They didn't fake everything about it. If every photo was staged why would they airbrush out artifacts they didn't want there?

    You're going to believe what you want, but in my opinion if you buy into the "never went" theory you are not looking at all the evidence and using critical thinking.

    Once again, just my opinion and your mileage may vary.

    thats absolute like i see it also, they have been there but what they found was so strange that the best disinformation possible would be a hoaxed moon landing.

    why did many hours of moon film videos disapear? because with todays technology its to easy to see whats realy going on there.
    " Loka samasta sukhino bhavantu / May all beings in all worlds be happy and free and may the thoughts, words and actions of my own life contribute in some way to that happiness and to that freedom for all "


    tibetian mantra

  21. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to seehas For This Post:

    Davidallany (14th October 2011), KiwiElf (14th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011)

  22. Link to Post #12
    Avalon Member nearing's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd February 2011
    Location
    High in the Mountains of Mother Earth
    Posts
    1,373
    Thanks
    6,684
    Thanked 4,210 times in 1,064 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    I have to go on my gut with the Moon. My gut tells me we went there but the stuff we were fed was completely fabricated for our consumption. And, yes, we are not welcomed back.

    Also, I don't think the Moon does rotate, despite what Wiki says. The same face is ALWAYS facing us but turns my a few degrees, not even close to entirely rotating. We NEVER see the 'dark side' of the Moon here on Earth.

    I also have a hard time with the explanations of the 'phases' of the Moon. I always have. The Sun's light on the Moon should dictate the lighted face we see of it, but I often see the Sun (in summer) still up near setting and only see a small part of the Moon's face when clearly, it should be shining full on. And a New Moon, meaning we don't see it at all even though it's right there makes no sense to me whatsoever. Why wouldn't it be reflecting the light from the Sun?

    This last part (Phases) may have never been explained well enough for me to grasp, but the rest stands.

    I feel it is not a natural satellite at all. It's a home base for someone and they are keeping an eye on us.

    Eh, call me crazy.
    "In science, I discovered, you cannot find the Truth."
    --Marcel Messing (during an interview with Bill Ryan)

    We demand Tesla technology

  23. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to nearing For This Post:

    Caren (15th October 2011), conk (14th October 2011), Davidallany (14th October 2011), KiwiElf (14th October 2011), Pete (15th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011), seehas (14th October 2011), Sesan (14th October 2011), WhiteFeather (15th October 2011)

  24. Link to Post #13
    United States Avalon Member WhiteFeather's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th July 2011
    Location
    Grounded With Gaia
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    39,528
    Thanked 37,234 times in 5,674 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    Quote Posted by gary-arsenault (here)
    divine_moments_of_truth

    I use to study the same things about the moon.
    Here are some things I should point out that will probably help make a bit more sense.

    The Moon Does rotate. A solar day on the moon is about 27.32 days relative to a solar day on earth.
    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_th...ay_on_the_moon

    Here is where you have to separate fact from fiction and misinformation.

    NASA never ...Ever......Sent a Man to the MOON....No Man or NASA Apollo space craft ...ever left earth orbit. It was a hoax very much like 911.



    Therefore, any talk of NASA crashing a space ship into the moon is just Propaganda and lies.

    If we take a pot full of boiled turnips, then we take a big dump in the pot, then we pull out a blender and mix it all together.
    It gets pretty hard to try and figure out the food from the human crap.

    NASA and the News Media do that to the people to always keep them dazed and confused.

    Is our moon anomalies..? definitely.

    Good post, just wanted to toss in a bit of food for thought
    LMFAO, Awesome and well put Gary.

    Heres something that Uncle Alex Collier Spoke About Re:The Moon in 1995.

    A 1995 Lecture by Alex Collier- The moon originally came from Ursa Minor and is 6.2 billion years old. It was one of four moons around the 17th planet of the system referred to in the Orion tongue as "Chowta"

    The true military complex was underground. Entrances were at both poles, the
    Taurus mountains and JulesVerne crater (far side) and Archemedes (near side);
    all these were the original entrances when the *Orion Group was there. However,
    the secret government has created more openings and is currently expanding
    the underground complexes. The expansion is for the operation of private scientific
    and military agendas for the New World Order

    Many of the craters on the moon were used as spacecraft hangars. Large craters
    were capable of housing 200 or more craft. Some of the craters are as much as
    170 miles wide. The personnel consisted of half human-half Grey,
    and half human-half reptilian. The surface bases consisted of nine domed cities.
    The vegetation was grown inside these domed structures. Small lakes were
    scattered around the surface. The remains of these domed structures were
    discovered by *NSA astronauts, the Russians and the Apollo astronauts.

    The *NSA astronauts were there in 1958. They have been there ever since, as has
    a secret portion of the Russian government called the "Black Guard". Upon arriving
    on the surface of the moon, the *NSA astronauts (with their Grey "tour guides"),
    were taken to the underground facilities where the remains and skeletons of
    reptilian-like beings and human beings, as well as Orion technology, were located.

    The structures that were built on the surface were designed by JPL. These
    domed structures were built first on the moon, to test them, and then on
    Mars.

    Large mass structures, functioning as weights, have been designed into the structure
    of the moon to keep it from rotating on a normal basis, and they are located at
    both poles. These are magnetic in nature.

    When the Apollo astronauts landed on the moon, we had already been there for
    some time. The *NSA had already established a colony there eight years earlier,
    and the technology involved was not shared with the lower echelons in NASA
    or even the military. *NASA was used as a "blind" to keep the people of the
    United States ignorant of what was really happening in space, and is still fulfilling
    that function.

    Some of the greatest scientific minds on our planet who have vanished without a
    trace were taken to the moon and to Mars in an attempt to start a brand new
    society.
    Engineers, architects and people from every walk of life went there.

    The *Orion Group is not friendly to us. Since the world government realized there
    was now no place to go, they had to come back here.

    According to the perception of the world government, population is a "problem", and
    the corporations have polluted the environment. The fourth alternative is to stage
    a controlled pole shift while they are safe in their underground facilities, in order
    to eliminate most of the planetary population and artificially "cleanse" the
    environment.
    "Although I Live On This World, I Choose Not To Live In It"
    <:~W.F.~:>

    "The answer to every question can be found in nature, if one knows how to look and listen”
    Gwilda Wiyaka

    "Everything on the Earth has a purpose, Every disease a herb to cure it, and every person a mission. This is the Indian theory of existence".
    Mourning Dove Salish


  25. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to WhiteFeather For This Post:

    Anna (14th October 2011), Davidallany (14th October 2011), jjjones (15th October 2011), KiwiElf (14th October 2011), Open your eyes (14th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011), toothpick (16th October 2011)

  26. Link to Post #14
    New Zealand Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    1st September 2011
    Posts
    5,984
    Thanks
    34,888
    Thanked 38,520 times in 5,690 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    I agree with WyoSeeker, but as none of us have been there, we do not "know"... we each have an opinion based on what we've all studied and formed a belief about it. That doesn't make our beliefs "facts".

  27. Link to Post #15
    Avalon Member 13th Warrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th November 2010
    Posts
    1,192
    Thanks
    1,196
    Thanked 2,894 times in 914 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    Quote Posted by gary-arsenault (here)
    divine_moments_of_truth

    I use to study the same things about the moon.
    Here are some things I should point out that will probably help make a bit more sense.

    The Moon Does rotate. A solar day on the moon is about 27.32 days relative to a solar day on earth.
    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_th...ay_on_the_moon

    Here is where you have to separate fact from fiction and misinformation.

    NASA never ...Ever......Sent a Man to the MOON....No Man or NASA Apollo space craft ...ever left earth orbit. It was a hoax very much like 911.



    Therefore, any talk of NASA crashing a space ship into the moon is just Propaganda and lies.

    If we take a pot full of boiled turnips, then we take a big dump in the pot, then we pull out a blender and mix it all together.
    It gets pretty hard to try and figure out the food from the human crap.

    NASA and the News Media do that to the people to always keep them dazed and confused.

    Is our moon anomalies..? definitely.

    Good post, just wanted to toss in a bit of food for thought
    What is your source for this information that makes you so certain of this?
    “Bundinn er bátlaus maður”

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 13th Warrior For This Post:

    KiwiElf (15th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011)

  29. Link to Post #16
    Avalon Member OnyxKnight's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    In a troubled world ...
    Age
    37
    Posts
    1,214
    Thanks
    2,405
    Thanked 5,662 times in 944 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    The Moon was once part of the Polaris system. Brought here some 50.000+ years BC.

  30. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to OnyxKnight For This Post:

    divine_moments_of_truth (20th October 2011), KiwiElf (15th October 2011), Maunagarjana (20th September 2012), sandy (15th October 2011), TEEDA (16th October 2011)

  31. Link to Post #17
    Peru Avalon Member seehas's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th April 2011
    Location
    Alpha Centauri
    Language
    German
    Posts
    835
    Thanks
    1,612
    Thanked 5,051 times in 781 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    Quote Posted by OnyxKnight (here)
    The Moon was once part of the Polaris system. Brought here some 50.000+ years BC.
    thats a hell of a trip for a motorhome
    " Loka samasta sukhino bhavantu / May all beings in all worlds be happy and free and may the thoughts, words and actions of my own life contribute in some way to that happiness and to that freedom for all "


    tibetian mantra

  32. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to seehas For This Post:

    Carmen (18th October 2011), KiwiElf (15th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011)

  33. Link to Post #18
    Europe Avalon Member Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    20th July 2011
    Location
    north wales uk
    Posts
    366
    Thanks
    1,214
    Thanked 1,455 times in 312 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    Have you guys viewed the the white houses on the moon thread?

  34. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Pete For This Post:

    KiwiElf (15th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011)

  35. Link to Post #19
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    70
    Posts
    11,468
    Thanks
    11,114
    Thanked 75,967 times in 10,743 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    The moon doesn't have a dark side!

    It has a FAR side that we never see from here. When that far side is between us and the sun it's a bright and hot place. (new moon time) When that far side is at the outside opposite to that it's dark and cold(full moon time).

    The Sun rises on the moon very slowly. The alleged apollo landings were timed to be about three days on the surface. They had to do the equivalent of landing at dawn and getting out of there before the heat of the day cooked them. That would be something like about 10 or 11 am in our Earth terms. On the moon that's a much slower process and was actually 3 days of our time.

  36. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    KiwiElf (15th October 2011), KosmicKat (15th October 2011), Pete (15th October 2011), sandy (15th October 2011)

  37. Link to Post #20
    Canada Avalon Member DeDukshyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd January 2011
    Location
    From 100 Mile House ;-)
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    9,423
    Thanks
    29,861
    Thanked 45,931 times in 8,573 posts

    Default Re: Our Moon

    Quote Posted by OnyxKnight (here)
    The Moon was once part of the Polaris system. Brought here some 50.000+ years BC.
    Oxy,

    What do your source say that it is? It seems ... not entirely naturally formed ... and is certainly not a natural satellite of earth - that much is certain ...
    When you are one step ahead of the crowd, you are a genius.
    Two steps ahead, and you are deemed a crackpot.

  38. The Following User Says Thank You to DeDukshyn For This Post:

    KiwiElf (15th October 2011)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts