Page 1 of 3 1 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 48

Thread: War with Iran?...A big No No!

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member Eric J (Viking)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    16th March 2010
    Location
    Stockbridge Hampshire UK
    Posts
    4,965
    Thanks
    15,691
    Thanked 27,886 times in 3,450 posts

    Default War with Iran?...A big No No!

    This guy General Wesley Clark revealed 2007 that US planned to take out 7 countries in 5 years INCLUDING iran, Now november 14th 2011 he was on CNN saying how IRAN must be invaded. CNN blew it by showing this video cause now it is out in the open what they are doing.




    viking
    You decide...your thoughts..your actions..your reality.
    Choose well.
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...are-the-change

  2. The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Eric J (Viking) For This Post:

    58andfixed (26th November 2011), Asyloth (26th November 2011), baddbob (25th November 2011), buckminster fuller (25th November 2011), Cjay (26th November 2011), Corncrake (25th November 2011), crosby (1st December 2011), DreamsInDigital (29th December 2011), jackovesk (25th November 2011), jade (26th November 2011), Kristo (26th November 2011), Laura Elina (25th November 2011), mahalall (25th November 2011), OmeyocaN777 (26th November 2011), percival tyro (26th November 2011), RMorgan (25th November 2011), Samsara (26th November 2011), Seikou-Kishi (25th November 2011), THIRDEYE (25th November 2011)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Brazil Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    28th June 2011
    Location
    Belo Horizonte, Brazil
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,857
    Thanks
    18,436
    Thanked 24,134 times in 3,536 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    What a disgusting man...

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to RMorgan For This Post:

    buckminster fuller (25th November 2011), Eric J (Viking) (25th November 2011), Maia Gabrial (26th November 2011), percival tyro (26th November 2011), Seikou-Kishi (25th November 2011), seko (26th November 2011)

  5. Link to Post #3
    France Avalon Member buckminster fuller's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    rennes (britanny), france
    Age
    53
    Posts
    598
    Thanks
    2,230
    Thanked 1,879 times in 475 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    I wonder what drove him to be so willing to give it away in 2007, seeing how he's selling his lies now, live on tv...
    life is design

  6. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to buckminster fuller For This Post:

    58andfixed (26th November 2011), aranuk (26th November 2011), Eric J (Viking) (25th November 2011), Maia Gabrial (26th November 2011), OmeyocaN777 (26th November 2011), percival tyro (26th November 2011), RMorgan (25th November 2011)

  7. Link to Post #4
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    14th February 2011
    Posts
    438
    Thanks
    790
    Thanked 968 times in 296 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    He looks more link someone how wants to get the message out there. He appeared to be more surprised about the list and the action taken and wanted to let the population aware of it.
    He, from my point of view might be on the good side of it. But that we don’t know!
    That video has been around for a will now!

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to NewFounderHome For This Post:

    Eric J (Viking) (25th November 2011)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Avalon Member taizen's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th January 2011
    Posts
    102
    Thanks
    140
    Thanked 304 times in 81 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    Here is an interesting link: US sells Bunker Busters to ISRAEL. In the end, the chess game pieces aren't really being taken off the board, they are just being made to look invisible. If we were to connect the dots ... this guy is only another pawn trying to play a game for which he was put into position to play by the game masters. I feel the global political system is a grand scale of the teenage game : D & D. Those who don't want to play into this or have a different agenda of the game master are systematically wiped off the board.
    Game strategies vary, but are pretty consistent. When everyone was busying themselves with the distraction of Occupy Wallstreet and a stock exchange sell off/dramatic gain, there was another exchange going on.
    With this guy's announcement back in 2007 of the 7 country agenda, the Bunker Buster sale 4 years later, the upheavel of the Middle Eastern countries and now his new proclamation - time will tell if he will be allowed to stay in the game.
    If you're not learning, you're not living

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to taizen For This Post:

    58andfixed (26th November 2011), Eric J (Viking) (25th November 2011), percival tyro (26th November 2011)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Avalon Member Eric J (Viking)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    16th March 2010
    Location
    Stockbridge Hampshire UK
    Posts
    4,965
    Thanks
    15,691
    Thanked 27,886 times in 3,450 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    Quote Posted by taizen (here)
    Here is an interesting link: US sells Bunker Busters to ISRAEL. In the end, the chess game pieces aren't really being taken off the board, they are just being made to look invisible. If we were to connect the dots ... this guy is only another pawn trying to play a game for which he was put into position to play by the game masters. I feel the global political system is a grand scale of the teenage game : D & D. Those who don't want to play into this or have a different agenda of the game master are systematically wiped off the board.
    Game strategies vary, but are pretty consistent. When everyone was busying themselves with the distraction of Occupy Wallstreet and a stock exchange sell off/dramatic gain, there was another exchange going on.
    With this guy's announcement back in 2007 of the 7 country agenda, the Bunker Buster sale 4 years later, the upheavel of the Middle Eastern countries and now his new proclamation - time will tell if he will be allowed to stay in the game.
    And lets not forget what one of Bill's contact has said ... !!



    viking
    You decide...your thoughts..your actions..your reality.
    Choose well.
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...are-the-change

  12. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Eric J (Viking) For This Post:

    58andfixed (26th November 2011), aranuk (26th November 2011), Calz (26th November 2011), Cjay (26th November 2011), Corncrake (25th November 2011), crosby (1st December 2011), jjjones (26th November 2011), Lord Sidious (25th November 2011), NewFounderHome (25th November 2011), Operator (26th November 2011), percival tyro (26th November 2011), Ron Mauer Sr (26th November 2011), seko (25th November 2011), taizen (27th November 2011), THIRDEYE (25th November 2011), Truthseeker85 (29th November 2011)

  13. Link to Post #7
    Avalon Member Operator's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th March 2010
    Location
    Caribbean
    Posts
    2,734
    Thanks
    8,070
    Thanked 9,739 times in 1,991 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    Quote Posted by buckminster fuller (here)
    I wonder what drove him to be so willing to give it away in 2007, seeing how he's selling his lies now, live on tv...
    I think he was a candidate for the presidential elections during that time ...

  14. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Operator For This Post:

    aranuk (26th November 2011), Calz (26th November 2011), Cjay (26th November 2011), Eric J (Viking) (26th November 2011), Lord Sidious (25th November 2011), percival tyro (26th November 2011)

  15. Link to Post #8
    Palestinian Territory Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    Coruscant
    Age
    57
    Posts
    7,236
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 33,087 times in 6,275 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    Quote Posted by Operator (here)
    Quote Posted by buckminster fuller (here)
    I wonder what drove him to be so willing to give it away in 2007, seeing how he's selling his lies now, live on tv...
    I think he was a candidate for the presidential elections during that time ...
    Typical, the sharmouta will sell their souls to get into political office.

  16. Link to Post #9
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,061
    Thanks
    84,330
    Thanked 69,401 times in 10,490 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    I expect the original plan was to push into Iran from Iraq ... but circumstances have changed dramatically.

    Supposedly Iraq has insisted all US troops leave by the end of this year (ie one more month) and allegedly refused to even allow the asked for 17,000 to stay to maintain bases. According to this current article there are now less than 20,000 left:

    _________________

    Quote US troops mark last Thanksgiving in Iraq with turkey, stuffing and rocket fire alarm

    Published: November 24

    COS ECHO, Iraq — American troops marked their last Thanksgiving in Iraq Thursday with turkey, stuffing and a rocket fire alarm.

    Fewer than 20,000 American troops remain in Iraq at eight bases across the country. All of the forces must be out of Iraq by the end of this year, and American soldiers have been busily packing up their equipment and heading south.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...nsN_story.html
    ____________________________


    A glimpse at a (somewhat aged) middle east map shows that takes away a large portion of a shared border with Iran.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Middle_East98.jpg
Views:	111
Size:	195.4 KB
ID:	11557

    So it would *appear* that there is no longer any intention of occupying Iran (if there ever was) thus any involvement would be from the air (with various delievery systems). Yes, supposedly many of the US troops are still "bottlenecked" in Kuwait and there is the Afghan border as well ... but from a logistical perspective it seems obvious (to me at least) troops leaving Iraq has changed the nature of things.

    Perhaps all that is "planned" is for the initial exchange between Iran and Israel to lead to WW3?

  17. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    58andfixed (26th November 2011), aranuk (26th November 2011), Eric J (Viking) (26th November 2011), Kristo (29th November 2011), Lord Sidious (26th November 2011), percival tyro (26th November 2011), seko (26th November 2011)

  18. Link to Post #10
    Belgium Avalon Member Asyloth's Avatar
    Join Date
    14th June 2011
    Age
    39
    Posts
    132
    Thanks
    363
    Thanked 646 times in 117 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    I also believe that WW3 is part of the plan of the PTB.
    I mean what better idea could the PTB have to make themselves forget when all attention is being drawn on them? What better idea could they have to at the same time put their (totalitarian) world government after it? Today people are waking up about the PTB, the way they are manipulating society and the world in general, the way they're taking total control for cruel ends.
    So what better plan could they have? Excepted the idea of a false flag alien attack?

    I also think that it makes a lot of sense to trigger WW3 with a conflict between Israel and Iran, where Europe-U.S.(-Japan-Australia-Canada-Mexico) would ally with Israel into the conflict and China-Russia(-South America-Indonesia-India) would ally with Iran. This would be a WW not even comparable with the other 2 WW, this would be the REAL WW, fought all over the globe, and with China having supposedly 200 million soldiers, I don't see any other way than the atomic bomb to try to defeat them, even if they're technologically less advanced than we are, how do you defeat 200 million soldiers? xD

    That's also I believe the reason why Iran is doing all it can to protect Syria, cause they know they're next on the list, with probably WW3 if they can't stop it.

    I think we probably won't be able to avoid this, I mean look at how it would help the PTB:
    -First this would be a great plan for their famous world population reduction, the deads would probably be counted in Billions.
    -Second this would be a great way to draw the attention away from them, attention that's quite a lot on them right now.
    -Third they could use the chaos to get rid of the free thinkers all over the globe.
    -Fourth this would be a very smart way to put their world government in place at the end of it.

    So yeah, I think the PTB are working hard over this, and I think we're more or less ****ed if the people of the world in general don't wake up very quickly!
    Last edited by Asyloth; 26th November 2011 at 12:09.

  19. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Asyloth For This Post:

    58andfixed (26th November 2011), aranuk (26th November 2011), Black Panther (26th November 2011), buckminster fuller (26th November 2011), Calz (26th November 2011), eric charles (28th November 2011), Eric J (Viking) (26th November 2011), Lord Sidious (26th November 2011), percival tyro (26th November 2011)

  20. Link to Post #11
    Avalon Member Eric J (Viking)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    16th March 2010
    Location
    Stockbridge Hampshire UK
    Posts
    4,965
    Thanks
    15,691
    Thanked 27,886 times in 3,450 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    Just a thought...If the stories about the Galactics intervening with Nuclear warheads are true...then how will this all unfold??

    Both sides will be pressing the buttons with no effect..!! ha ha ...

    viking
    You decide...your thoughts..your actions..your reality.
    Choose well.
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...are-the-change

  21. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Eric J (Viking) For This Post:

    aranuk (26th November 2011), Asyloth (30th November 2011), buckminster fuller (26th November 2011), Calz (26th November 2011), Kristo (29th November 2011), percival tyro (26th November 2011)

  22. Link to Post #12
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,061
    Thanks
    84,330
    Thanked 69,401 times in 10,490 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    Quote Posted by viking (here)
    Just a thought...If the stories about the Galactics intervening with Nuclear warheads are true...then how will this all unfold??

    Both sides will be pressing the buttons with no effect..!! ha ha ...

    viking
    Well "they" have certainly shut them down a number of times.

    No denying that one.

  23. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    aranuk (26th November 2011), Eric J (Viking) (26th November 2011), Kristo (29th November 2011), percival tyro (26th November 2011), Samsara (26th November 2011)

  24. Link to Post #13
    England Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    6th July 2011
    Age
    81
    Posts
    210
    Thanks
    1,984
    Thanked 532 times in 166 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    They say that cockroaches leave their site before impending disaster. We'll have to keep a close eye on the migration from the Knesset.
    Last edited by percival tyro; 28th November 2011 at 23:39.

  25. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to percival tyro For This Post:

    aranuk (26th November 2011), Calz (27th November 2011), crosby (1st December 2011), Lord Sidious (26th November 2011)

  26. Link to Post #14
    Avalon Member Maia Gabrial's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th April 2011
    Location
    On the planet Sophia
    Age
    73
    Posts
    4,605
    Thanks
    15,747
    Thanked 17,170 times in 3,859 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    This general is two-faced for sure....However, I think he was more honest in 2007 than he is now. I want to ignore what he says now....

    Seems to me that Israel is dangerously sitting on a powder keg of 60+ nuclear weapons and now add bunker busters to all that. To me, it seems more like a death trap for all of us on the planet. Either they don't know what they're doing with all of this.... Or they do and it has deadly consequences for all of us....

  27. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Maia Gabrial For This Post:

    aranuk (26th November 2011), Calz (27th November 2011), eric charles (28th November 2011), Eric J (Viking) (28th November 2011), Lord Sidious (26th November 2011), Operator (28th November 2011), percival tyro (27th November 2011)

  28. Link to Post #15
    Greece Avalon Member OmeyocaN777's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th February 2011
    Posts
    356
    Thanks
    2,662
    Thanked 2,441 times in 330 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    It's obvious that General Wesley Clark has been threatened by Elite maybe he is afraid for his family........

  29. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to OmeyocaN777 For This Post:

    aranuk (26th November 2011), Calz (27th November 2011), Lord Sidious (26th November 2011), Maia Gabrial (27th November 2011), percival tyro (27th November 2011)

  30. Link to Post #16
    Morocco Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    18th January 2011
    Location
    With friends
    Age
    73
    Posts
    5,659
    Thanks
    45,848
    Thanked 45,191 times in 5,447 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    Quote Posted by Maia Gabrial (here)
    This general is two-faced for sure....However, I think he was more honest in 2007 than he is now. I want to ignore what he says now....

    Seems to me that Israel is dangerously sitting on a powder keg of 60+ nuclear weapons and now add bunker busters to all that. To me, it seems more like a death trap for all of us on the planet. Either they don't know what they're doing with all of this.... Or they do and it has deadly consequences for all of us....
    With your mention of a very dangerous country here, this is an article with high explosive potential:http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/11...er-iran-nukes/

  31. Link to Post #17
    Portugal Avalon Member
    Join Date
    15th November 2011
    Age
    34
    Posts
    41
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 98 times in 31 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    i have an word on this, rpt1 a Radio Television Portugal owned by the portuguese state interviewed Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. they spoke English during this interview about the "regime", the nuclear program in Iran and the Islamic world and much interesting things i'm trying to found the interview but the only thing i could find was this http://tv1.rtp.pt/noticias/?t=RTP-es...le=476680&tm=7 , the interview was live and i saw it. the link is spoken in Portuguese

    ps- Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected by the people, Iran is a Democratic state not a dictatorship.
    Last edited by Guaxini; 26th November 2011 at 19:29.

  32. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Guaxini For This Post:

    aranuk (26th November 2011), Calz (27th November 2011), eric charles (28th November 2011), Eric J (Viking) (28th November 2011), Lord Sidious (26th November 2011), Maia Gabrial (27th November 2011), percival tyro (28th November 2011), phillipbbg (29th November 2011)

  33. Link to Post #18
    Portugal Avalon Member
    Join Date
    15th November 2011
    Age
    34
    Posts
    41
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 98 times in 31 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    the interview as a few months or weeks, its not old was made this present year..

  34. The Following User Says Thank You to Guaxini For This Post:

    percival tyro (28th November 2011)

  35. Link to Post #19
    Portugal Avalon Member
    Join Date
    15th November 2011
    Age
    34
    Posts
    41
    Thanks
    33
    Thanked 98 times in 31 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    i just heard on the news that NATO as killed 20 Pakistan soldiers.

  36. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Guaxini For This Post:

    Calz (27th November 2011), Maia Gabrial (27th November 2011), modwiz (27th November 2011), percival tyro (28th November 2011)

  37. Link to Post #20
    United States Avalon Member Calz's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Smurfin' USA
    Posts
    11,061
    Thanks
    84,330
    Thanked 69,401 times in 10,490 posts

    Default Re: War with Iran?...A big No No!

    Quote Posted by Guaxini (here)
    i just heard on the news that NATO as killed 20 Pakistan soldiers.
    Yep ... not getting much notice (or else the world is simply exhausted about hearing about war mongering and is ignoring it)

    ______________________

    (Reuters) - NATO helicopters and fighter jets attacked two military outposts in northwest Pakistan Saturday, killing as many as 28 troops and plunging U.S.-Pakistan relations deeper into crisis.

    Pakistan shut down NATO supply routes into Afghanistan - used for sending in nearly half of the alliance's land shipments - in retaliation for the worst such incident since Islamabad uneasily allied itself with Washington following the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.

    Islamabad also said it had ordered the United States to vacate a drone base in the country, but a senior U.S. official said Washington had received no such request and noted that Pakistan had made similar eviction threats in the past, without following through.

    NATO and U.S. officials expressed regret about the deaths of the Pakistani soldiers, indicating the attack may have been an error; but the exact circumstances remained unclear.

    "Senior U.S. civilian and military officials have been in touch with their Pakistani counterparts from Islamabad, Kabul and Washington to express our condolences, our desire to work together to determine what took place, and our commitment to the U.S.-Pakistan partnership which advances our shared interests, including fighting terrorism in the region," said White House national security council spokesman Tommy Vieter.

    U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar spoke by telephone, as did General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Pakistani Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani.

    The NATO-led force in Afghanistan confirmed that NATO aircraft had probably killed Pakistani soldiers in an area close to the Afghan-Pakistani border.

    "Close air support was called in, in the development of the tactical situation, and it is what highly likely caused the Pakistan casualties," said General Carsten Jacobson, spokesman for the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF).

    He added he could not confirm the number of casualties, but ISAF was investigating. "We are aware that Pakistani soldiers perished. We don't know the size, the magnitude," he said.

    Pakistan's Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani said the killings were "an attack on Pakistan's sovereignty," adding: "We will not let any harm come to Pakistan's sovereignty and solidarity."

    Pakistan's Foreign Office said it would take up the matter "in the strongest terms" with NATO and the United States, while army chief Kayani said steps would be taken to respond "to this irresponsible act."

    "A strong protest has been launched with NATO/ISAF in which it has been demanded that strong and urgent action be taken against those responsible for this aggression."

    Two military officials said up to 28 troops had been killed and 11 wounded in the attack on the outposts, about 2.5 km (1.5 miles) from the Afghan border. The Pakistani military said 24 troops were killed and 13 wounded.

    The attack took place around 2 a.m. (2100 GMT) in the Baizai area of Mohmand, where Pakistani troops are fighting Taliban militants. Across the border is Afghanistan's Kunar province, which has seen years of heavy fighting.

    "Pakistani troops effectively responded immediately in self-defense to NATO/ISAF's aggression with all available weapons," the Pakistani military statement said.

    The commander of NATO-led forces in Afghanistan, General John R. Allen, offered his condolences to the families of Pakistani soldiers who "may have been killed or injured."

    Dempsey's spokesman, Colonel David Lapan, could not confirm the closure of the Pakistani border crossing to trucks carrying supplies for ISAF forces. However, he noted that "if true, we have alternate routes we can use, as we have in the past."

    POORLY MARKED

    Around 40 troops were stationed at the outposts, military sources said. Two officers were reported among the dead. "They without any reasons attacked on our post and killed soldiers asleep," said a senior Pakistani officer, requesting anonymity.

    The border is often poorly marked, and Afghan and Pakistani maps have differences of several kilometres in some places, military officials have said.

    However, Pakistani military spokesman Major-General Athar Abbas said NATO had been given maps of the area, with Pakistani military posts identified.

    "When the other side is saying there is a doubt about this, there is no doubt about it. These posts have been marked and handed over to the other side for marking on their maps and are clearly inside Pakistani territory."

    The incident occurred a day after Allen met Kayani to discuss border control and enhanced cooperation.

    A senior military source told Reuters that after the meeting that set out "to build confidence and trust, these kind of attacks should not have taken place."

    BLOCKED SUPPLIES

    Pakistan is a vital land route for nearly half of NATO supplies shipped overland to its troops in Afghanistan, a NATO spokesman said. Land shipments account for about two thirds of the alliance's cargo shipments into Afghanistan.

    Hours after the raid, NATO supply trucks and fuel tankers bound for Afghanistan were stopped at Jamrud town in the Khyber tribal region near the city of Peshawar, officials said.

    The border crossing at Chaman in southwestern Baluchistan province was also closed, Frontier Corps officials said.

    A meeting of the cabinet's defense committee convened by Gilani "decided to close with immediate effect NATO/ISAF logistics supply lines," according to a statement issued by Gilani's office.

    The committee decided to ask the United States to vacate, within 15 days, the Shamsi Air Base, a remote installation in Baluchistan used by U.S. forces for drone strikes which has long been at the center of a dispute between Islamabad and Washington.

    The meeting also decided the government would "revisit and undertake a complete review of all programs, activities and cooperative arrangements with US/NATO/ISAF, including diplomatic, political, military and intelligence."

    A similar incident on Sept 30, 2010, which killed two Pakistani service personnel, led to the closure of one of NATO's supply routes through Pakistan for 10 days. NATO apologised for that incident, which it said happened when NATO gunships mistook warning shots by Pakistani forces for a militant attack.

    Relations between the United States and Pakistan were strained by the killing of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden by U.S. special forces in Pakistan in May, which Pakistan called a flagrant violation of sovereignty.

    Pakistan's jailing of a CIA contractor and U.S. accusations that Pakistan backed a militant attack on the U.S. embassy in Kabul have added to the tensions.

    "This will have a catastrophic effect on Pakistan-U.S. relations. The public in Pakistan are going to go berserk on this," said Charles Heyman, senior defense analyst at British military website Armedforces.co.uk.

    Other analysts, including Rustam Shah Mohmand, a former ambassador to Afghanistan, predicted Pakistan would protest and close the supply lines for some time, but that ultimately "things will get back to normal."



    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/...7AP03S20111126

  38. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Calz For This Post:

    Eric J (Viking) (28th November 2011), Guaxini (27th November 2011), Kristo (29th November 2011), Lord Sidious (27th November 2011), Maia Gabrial (27th November 2011), modwiz (27th November 2011), percival tyro (27th November 2011)

Page 1 of 3 1 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts