Benjamin Fulford's posts and reports

[Kimberley]

i can not tell you all how hard I am laughing hahahah I can not stop... I love this... thank you!!!

[WhiteFeather]

Posted by Kimberley (here)
I think this belongs in this thread.... we are so powerful!!

Thank you for being you!

This 13 minute video is perfect... Enjoy ...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=FR7GmHyNV5U

Not to take away anything from this Thread, But This Video Posted By Kimberly Was Simply, Breathtaking.
Intention, is Everything! Thanks Kimberly for that, what a great find.

[Carmody]

Posted by Cartomancer (here)
Dallas goldbug is already saying both Wilcock and Fulford are actors. I don't know if that is true but this scenario is kind of making them at least look like that may be true.

On the other hand if Fulford is legitimate then maybe the only show that will listen to him is one of this caliber.

they can say what they want, but there is not one word of Wilcock's new book that is any way bullcrap.

[aranuk]

Posted by modwiz (here)
As a musician, my ears hear Ben's voice in the man with the bowler hat. I will have to look at some other videos to check my hunch. The ears will be a good place to look. But in the clip, before they cut to the man in the hat, I thought it was Ben's voice. Japanese not being my language, I had no idea who was being introduced. The voice started and I immediately 'heard' Ben'. When the camera cut to the man my first thought was, "that's Ben in a disguise". I am not saying any of this is correct. I am just sharing my first impressions of this video.

I thought I heard Bens voice just before the guy started talking. The tv show maybe had Ben voice added for a comic stunt.

Stan

[modwiz]

Posted by aranuk (here)

Posted by modwiz (here)
As a musician, my ears hear Ben's voice in the man with the bowler hat. I will have to look at some other videos to check my hunch. The ears will be a good place to look. But in the clip, before they cut to the man in the hat, I thought it was Ben's voice. Japanese not being my language, I had no idea who was being introduced. The voice started and I immediately 'heard' Ben'. When the camera cut to the man my first thought was, "that's Ben in a disguise". I am not saying any of this is correct. I am just sharing my first impressions of this video.

I thought I heard Bens voice just before the guy started talking. The tv show maybe had Ben voice added for a comic stunt.

Stan

I heard the guys voice as Ben's voice, as he was speaking. Disguised, but tonally familiar.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by Cartomancer (here)
Dallas goldbug is already saying both Wilcock and Fulford are actors. I don't know if that is true but this scenario is kind of making them at least look like that may be true.

On the other hand if Fulford is legitimate then maybe the only show that will listen to him is one of this caliber.

they can say what they want, but there is not one word of Wilcock's new book that is any way bullcrap.

I just spent 24 minutes of my time with a goldbug video. I won't even get into my critiques. As with most disinfo, intentional or by genetically caused buffoonery, there is some truth. Have to hide the crap in something.

I agree with Carmody.

[WhiteFeather]

The gentleman speaking Chinese in that video sounds and looks like The Sensai in The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Movie, or it could of well been Ben Fulford himself in disguise. Im Really Curious! : )~

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by Cartomancer (here)
Dallas goldbug is already saying both Wilcock and Fulford are actors. I don't know if that is true but this scenario is kind of making them at least look like that may be true.

On the other hand if Fulford is legitimate then maybe the only show that will listen to him is one of this caliber.

they can say what they want, but there is not one word of Wilcock's new book that is any way bullcrap.

I'm up to page 205 Carmody, It is that good.

[onawah]

I would certainly LIKE to believe that the DUMBs are being disabled (though not by nukes, of course), and I am familiar with all the reports you've named, but I think we are going to need more corroboration than that, which is why I am waiting to hear what DW has to say in his 3rd article, which has yet to be posted.
Alex Collier has said a lot of things which have not been proven, and which have been proven untrue.
Tolec's opinions are based on "lucid dreaming" which cannot be confirmed in any way that I am aware of.
So given that, what can anyone base their "knowing' on?

DW said that all of his insiders have confirmed at least some of the reports, but I would like to know HOW they know.
All sorts of stories and rumors can circulate in alternative circles, but until there is some kind of real evidence, we can't be sure of anything.
Hearsay doesn't cut it.

We also know that insiders like Bill Ryan don't believe any of this, and his opinion is certainly worth something.
If nothing can be verified because none of the insiders who may have actually provided evidence want to be exposed, then I think it's going to be necessary to find another way to prove these stories one way or another.
This is an important issue, and much depends on it, whether it's true or not.
Which is also why I don't think it should just be swept under the carpet until some real evidence emerges.
That has been going on long enough.

If it's not true, then Fulford and Wilcock need to realize it and own up to having been duped, and STOP IT, so this kind of thing doesn't continue to distract.
It it's true, then we have good reason to celebrate, and deserve to know.

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)
@ Onawah,
I know the DUMBS are being exploded, even Alex Collier and Tolec are confirming. The only real discrepancy there, is what is being used with what BF claims 'vs' what has been said by the Andromeda Council Reps, BF claims it is Nuclear Explosives. Yet, AC, Tolec and The Andromeda Council are saying that it's a combination of the Regressives blowing up bases on their own to prevent the Benevolents from getting the bases, and then also the Benevolents are using special highly advanced sonic energy weapons of various frequencies. There has been zero evidence of radioactivity at these sites found, and a lot of audio recordings, plus seismic reports etc are collaborative with what The Andromeda Council and their representatives have been saying. But, either-way the DUMBS that were planned "housing" for the Global Elite/Cabal/NWO, are definitely being blown up and destroyed. So, are the ones that housed the Reptilians and Greys that are/were behind this situation to begin with.

I don't think the guy in the bowler hat looks like BF at all. His nose is completely different, and he holds himself like a true Japanese, something that would be very hard to imitate.

[transiten]

Is Bill Ryan an "insider" really???

[onawah]

Sure he is . Have you ever looked at the Serpo site?

[DreamsInDigital]

@ Onawah,
To the best of my knowledge the only things Alex Collier has "missed" on were things he put out as possibilities and probabilities, there for with the consideration that they were "subject to change". Therefore without loss of credibility if they did not happen, but that is something that is taken into consideration and I think why he never touted himself to be a prophet and predict things, because he was first to admit that even a simple thought could change the scope or timing of anything. And, there is more to Tolec than just Lucid Dreaming, the majority of his contacts (aside from the few that have been "in person" early on) have been Telepathic, which is the way known that the Andromedans communicate. The other method he uses is Automatic Writing, now how reliable Automatic Writing is, or his interpretation of the "down loads" he gets of information could be variable. But, there is more than enough solid evidence, even from DW (USGS, Eyewitnesses etc.) and Benjamin Fulford to corroborate the DUMBS being destroyed. The seismic reports, audio files, etc. Alex, Tolec, David and Ben all on many levels corroborate each other. And, where like I said Alex goofed is on his probabilities or possibilities, easily explained without loss of credibility because he did not say "this is going to happen 100% , nothing can change it." had he actually said and claimed them to be predictions, it would be a whole different story. There are few things that conflict between Alex and Tolec, but that's a different thread for a different time. Alex did confirm though that Tolec is a real true contactee.

Even David Wilcock has said that the ET's are involved in the DUMBs destruction on his first two blogs, and when I emailed him and pointed out it was the Procyon's that were involved. I got a short email, just a quick response of thanks and certain appreciation for me pointing out the planet/star system involved. He apparently just didn't know which or who the ones were involved just that they were benevolent forces.

[aranuk]

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by Cartomancer (here)
Dallas goldbug is already saying both Wilcock and Fulford are actors. I don't know if that is true but this scenario is kind of making them at least look like that may be true.

On the other hand if Fulford is legitimate then maybe the only show that will listen to him is one of this caliber.

they can say what they want, but there is not one word of Wilcock's new book that is any way bullcrap.

So Carmody you would endorse David Willcocks book then?

Stan

[YvonneG]

Posted by billyji (here)

Posted by modwiz (here)
As a musician, my ears hear Ben's voice in the man with the bowler hat. I will have to look at some other videos to check my hunch. The ears will be a good place to look. But in the clip, before they cut to the man in the hat, I thought it was Ben's voice. Japanese not being my language, I had no idea who was being introduced. The voice started and I immediately 'heard' Ben'. When the camera cut to the man my first thought was, "that's Ben in a disguise". I am not saying any of this is correct. I am just sharing my first impressions of this video.

SNAP, my first impression also, but then i said NO surely not hehe

If this is Ben and he is actor he also can be at two places at once. Here the man with hat AND Ben sitting at the same table at about 1 minute into this youtube video https://youtube.com/watch?v=vlxaqDKWE-8

Considering that 100's, 1000's of us believe in Ben because many of us have following him for several years and have done research of our own that agrees with so much of what he says, I just had to "prove"with the video that the man in the hat ain't no Ben acting. I am assuming everyone is more interested in the truth then "opinions"?

I think that if anyone listens to David's interview with Ben with an open mind you might realize and check for yourself, that almost everything Ben says has some kind of validation behind it. I think that there is enough misinformation out there that we should consider what we say. When I first heard Ben I had a lot of opinions and spent a lot of time voice them on the first forum of Project Camelot. 2 years or so later, what seemed so fantastic has proven itself to be true through other avenues. Ben is going to make mistakes and also be given misinformation at times I imagine. But the guy is real. The reverse speech analysis done with a 4 minute clip of his verifies that he is not lying and that at the very least he believes what he saying. If he believes it, then he is either for real or crazy

Hope I haven't hurt anyone's feelings here. I can see where people who have not followed Ben or David might think this. So no judgement intended. Just speaking my heart and mind and hopefully it is of service to some of you.

blessings
Yvonne

[modwiz]

Posted by YvonneG (here)

Posted by billyji (here)

Posted by modwiz (here)
As a musician, my ears hear Ben's voice in the man with the bowler hat. I will have to look at some other videos to check my hunch. The ears will be a good place to look. But in the clip, before they cut to the man in the hat, I thought it was Ben's voice. Japanese not being my language, I had no idea who was being introduced. The voice started and I immediately 'heard' Ben'. When the camera cut to the man my first thought was, "that's Ben in a disguise". I am not saying any of this is correct. I am just sharing my first impressions of this video.

SNAP, my first impression also, but then i said NO surely not hehe

If this is Ben and he is actor he also can be at two places at once. Here the man with hat AND Ben sitting at the same table at about 1 minute into this youtube video https://youtube.com/watch?v=vlxaqDKWE-8

Considering that 100's, 1000's of us believe in Ben because many of us have following him for several years and have done research of our own that agrees with so much of what he says, I just had to "prove"with the video that the man in the hat ain't no Ben acting. I am assuming everyone is more interested in the truth then "opinions"?

I think that if anyone listens to David's interview with Ben with an open mind you might realize and check for yourself, that almost everything Ben says has some kind of validation behind it. I think that there is enough misinformation out there that we should consider what we say. When I first heard Ben I had a lot of opinions and spent a lot of time voice them on the first forum of Project Camelot. 2 years or so later, what seemed so fantastic has proven itself to be true through other avenues. Ben is going to make mistakes and also be given misinformation at times I imagine. But the guy is real. The reverse speech analysis done with a 4 minute clip of his verifies that he is not lying and that at the very least he believes what he saying. If he believes it, then he is either for real or crazy

Hope I haven't hurt anyone's feelings here. I can see where people who have not followed Ben or David might think this. So no judgement intended. Just speaking my heart and mind and hopefully it is of service to some of you.

blessings
Yvonne

I love Ben. I love the whole financial rescue thing. I left it open for me to be wrong. The way I do reality, one thing does not beget another thing automatically. I can state that I think it is Ben in costume and still hold to the validity of the financial scenario. You can't be grabbing the seat of your chair with your butt cheeks while thinking this way though. Life can be a lot of fun. Don Juan had a great sense of humor in a world in serious disrepair.

Coyote is one of my power animals.

[onawah]

I am not saying you are wrong, DiD, but why do you suppose that no one else in the community is corroborating this info, or even paying attention to it?
There seems to be a deafening silence where this is concerned, if it is indeed true.
Certainly there is evidence of earthquakes, no doubt of that, but I have yet to see any evidence proving the quakes were caused by the destruction of DUMBs.
In most circles, evidence gathered by psychics, telepaths, lucid dreamers, etc. would not be regarded as conclusive.
If it's all true, something more should be surfacing besides this kind of evidence.
And a lot of people should be really excited about it.
None of which has happened so far.

Posted by DreamsInDigital (here)
@ Onawah,
To the best of my knowledge the only things Alex Collier has "missed" on were things he put out as possibilities and probabilities, there for with the consideration that they were "subject to change". Therefore without loss of credibility if they did not happen, but that is something that is taken into consideration and I think why he never touted himself to be a prophet and predict things, because he was first to admit that even a simple thought could change the scope or timing of anything. And, there is more to Tolec than just Lucid Dreaming, the majority of his contacts (aside from the few that have been "in person" early on) have been Telepathic, which is the way known that the Andromedans communicate. The other method he uses is Automatic Writing, now how reliable Automatic Writing is, or his interpretation of the "down loads" he gets of information could be variable. But, there is more than enough solid evidence, even from DW (USGS, Eyewitnesses etc.) and Benjamin Fulford to corroborate the DUMBS being destroyed. The seismic reports, audio files, etc. Alex, Tolec, David and Ben all on many levels corroborate each other. And, where like I said Alex goofed is on his probabilities or possibilities, easily explained without loss of credibility because he did not say "this is going to happen 100% , nothing can change it." had he actually said and claimed them to be predictions, it would be a whole different story. There are few things that conflict between Alex and Tolec, but that's a different thread for a different time. Alex did confirm though that Tolec is a real true contactee.

Even David Wilcock has said that the ET's are involved in the DUMBs destruction on his first two blogs, and when I emailed him and pointed out it was the Procyon's that were involved. I got a short email, just a quick response of thanks and certain appreciation for me pointing out the planet/star system involved. He apparently just didn't know which or who the ones were involved just that they were benevolent forces.

[Carmody]

Posted by aranuk (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by Cartomancer (here)
Dallas goldbug is already saying both Wilcock and Fulford are actors. I don't know if that is true but this scenario is kind of making them at least look like that may be true.

On the other hand if Fulford is legitimate then maybe the only show that will listen to him is one of this caliber.

they can say what they want, but there is not one word of Wilcock's new book that is any way bullcrap.

So Carmody you would endorse David Willcocks book then?

Stan

I'm at about the 200 page mark, myself. Not one slip or conjecture (that is weakly executed or implausible) that I'm aware of. Some of it has been covered before, in bits and drabs, but David puts it together nicely.

some people are put off by David's public speaking. this I know. David is himself, I find his speaking style to be just fine. People pass judgment too easily.

However, in print, his workmanship is excellent. This is not a casual statement, I've read over 4000 books.

[WhiteFeather]

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by aranuk (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by Cartomancer (here)
Dallas goldbug is already saying both Wilcock and Fulford are actors. I don't know if that is true but this scenario is kind of making them at least look like that may be true.

On the other hand if Fulford is legitimate then maybe the only show that will listen to him is one of this caliber.

they can say what they want, but there is not one word of Wilcock's new book that is any way bullcrap.

So Carmody you would endorse David Willcocks book then?

Stan

I'm at about the 200 page mark, myself. Not one slip or conjecture (that is weakly executed or implausible) that I'm aware of. Some of it has been covered before, in bits and drabs, but David puts it together nicely.

The Source Field Is A Magical Thing!


Good Vibes to you Alex, Wanishi. We all Hope you make a tremendous comeback my brother from The Stars! Keep Shining On, You Crazy Diamond!

[DreamsInDigital]

The seismic reports show they (the "earthquakes") were caused by explosives or some form of explosions. And, these explosions/earthquakes have taken place at *known* DUMB and Alien Undersea/Underground bases. (That have been corroborated by multiple sources) The one in the south china sea, the "impact" was so great it vibrated the entire crust. USGS Live has proof of this on their reports. There are experts (though I'd have to find the pieces) that corroborate them being non-earthquakes. Have you listened to the audio files on youtube? Not all of those weird hum ones are HAARP. You said you've read DW's blogs, then you must have seen where he talked about the ET's interventions and connection to the DUMBs, Ben has said about the DUMBs exploding, there have been many other outside non-connected sources that have said the DUMBs are exploding, being destroyed. The only thing the evidence disagrees with Ben on is what actual method was used. So the DUMBs being destroyed isn't just information riding on Two Andromedan contactees and David Wilcock and Ben Fulford. There is substantial scientific and other sources that corroborate them.

[misericordia]

UPDATE.. from David Wilcock!

Has received.. possible death threats!

WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 14TH, 3:39 PM: DEATH THREAT

For the first time in my entire career as a journalist, I have been given a very severe threat, handed to me from one of my top insiders.

I was told that I have tonight only to get Part Two out -- "it would be a very good idea" for my own safety, as publicity is protection.

Although the exact nature of the threat is unspecified, I was told I might be "lucky" if all I got was torture.

If I am savvy, so I am told, I may get away with spending the rest of my life in a top-secret facility in a "deep, dark hole" working as a black-ops scientist.

The best protection I have is publicity. For that same reason I will be releasing Part Two as soon as possible, even if I have to stay up all night.

It has been an honor serving you. Never forget how much you are loved. If I am to die, then I die with honor -- a noble soldier of the Light. I thank you for all the love and care you have shown me over the years and am grateful that I have left such a vast legacy of helpful material for you.

I have to get to work now. Thank you and God bless you.

[Cartomancer]

I'm wondering about the whole idea of DUMBS being destroyed. Why would such effort be put into constructing facilities that were designed to enable people to survive disasters if they could be destroyed so easily? It makes sense that facilities like this exist for many different reasons.

[aranuk]

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by aranuk (here)

Posted by Carmody (here)

Posted by Cartomancer (here)
Dallas goldbug is already saying both Wilcock and Fulford are actors. I don't know if that is true but this scenario is kind of making them at least look like that may be true.

On the other hand if Fulford is legitimate then maybe the only show that will listen to him is one of this caliber.

they can say what they want, but there is not one word of Wilcock's new book that is any way bullcrap.

So Carmody you would endorse David Willcocks book then?

Stan

I'm at about the 200 page mark, myself. Not one slip or conjecture (that is weakly executed or implausible) that I'm aware of. Some of it has been covered before, in bits and drabs, but David puts it together nicely.

some people are put off by David's public speaking. this I know. David is himself, I find his speaking style to be just fine. People pass judgment too easily.

However, in print, his workmanship is excellent. This is not a casual statement, I've read over 4000 books.

Sorry about carrying all the historical quotes here. I don't know how to separate them.
Carmody thanks for the feedback about the book. I think I will buy it now.

Stan