Posted by Elixer
(here)
WellAware1.com
First of all, I love this stuff. His idea is terrific and the efforts to back up his claims are often very compelling and convincing.
I'm sure Ed Chiarini will be reading this. Good job Ed.
Having said that, I hasten to add that I do not know how seriously to take this.
It could all be true, all be false, or anything in between. He could be good and right, or good and wrong, or just plain wrong.
This is not as important as the interestingness of his idea and his subsequent work, which, as far as scope, level of detail and sheer amount, is quite impressive and based on that alone, worthy of some interest.
What Ed is showing us, is that most of the news we get through both mainstream- and alternative media, is largely scripted, produced and in fact acted - performed by professional actors.
That might not be news to most, since we all know the media lie, but Ed takes this a few levels further.
He doesn't limit his critisicm to the MSM. He goes into the Alternative Media as well, as we shall see.
He attempts to prove that many characters we are shown through the media, presented to us as real people, are in fact part of a limited number of professional actors, some of whom play multiple roles.
This then is part of a program, very large in scope, to frame the mindset of humanity. The level of machination goes way way deeper than we already thought, with regards to the Propaganda Machine.
According to Ed, most of the actors we see, come from a single family, the Greenbergs. Another contingent comes from the Pima County Sheriff's Office. He focuses a lot on one guy in particular: Tony Greenberg.
If we are to believe Ed, Tony has played David de Rothchild, Anwar Al Alawki, a son of OBL and many many more people that are presented to us. Tony is very very good at his job. The way his appearance changes from character to character is incredible. That is, if we believe Ed.
In his latest releases, he comments on Project Avalon specifically.
In this video at around 6:30 minutes
He tells you that Inelia Benz is in fact one of these impostors, just as Steven Greer, just as Clifford Stone, just as Carol Rosyn and many others, even Jordan Maxwell.
At this point many might dissmiss wellaware1's perspective because you love one of these people. Here on Avalon many support Inelia's message. Jordan Maxwell is beyond reproach. And so on.
Maybe Ed is full of it, we cannot be sure at this point. To dissmiss his idea however, based merely on your personal preference for certain people, might not be wise. You would be letting emotion and sentiment determine what is true for you. But we all know how easy it is to manipulate those. Even a crappy movie can move you and cause you to sympathize with certain characters.
Do some investigation into Ed's work before judging any of it. His claims sometimes seem baseless, but he will often revisit his earlier statements to back them up with proof.
What is important about any of the people, speaking on the circuit, is their ideas. Not they themselves. Embrace every fellow human as your brother and your sister, equally and lovingly, unconditionally.
Support and reject, apply judgement to ideas only, through your spiritual endorsement, so to speak. ...
I highly recommend you look at some of the
dallasgoldbug videos on youtube, check out Ed's site,
wellaware1.com and just take in his perspective at least. I think it might greatly assist in discerning truth from lies, fact from fiction, but what is more, it might teach you to not necessarily identify with any of the things we see, since none of it can be trusted, really.
He 'exposes' the imposters through facial recognition features, focusing especially on the ears, which he says are like a genetic marker, unique to each person.
It seems he has had some training in this field, knows all the terms and speaks quite matter-of-factly. He also appears quite 'wellaware' of how Hollywood productions are done.
Some of his cases are more compelling than others. There are a few that seem almost irrefutable.
It is said that only
one real UFO needs to be identified in order for the entire ET phenomenon to be real. That goes for Chiarini's exposures as well. He tells you this himself. If you see one case that cannot be refuted, you'd have to admit that at least some aspect of the news media is scripted, acted and produced in this way, which to many will definitely make the deception go much deeper and further than they originally thought.
Regardless of whether it is true or not, I think it is a good use of anyone's time to look at this stuff.
He shows how the Gifford's shooting was in fact nothing but a drill and hence anything we hear about it is lies.
How the Columbine shooters might be the creators of 'South Park', Trey Parker and his buddy.
How much of the violence we see surrounding Occupy are mostly staged events, especially the incident on the NY bridge.
How this entire program seems to have come out of the Nazi propaganda machine and how there are specific and well known nazis currently involved with it.
etc.
As a funny counterpoint I'd like to entertain the notion that Ed Chiarini is part of the same Greenberg family he is exposing. He might in fact be Tony Greenberg himself.
Though I think the ears don't match, but then, that technique would be part of Tony's scam.
Or maybe Ed originally was part of this family or group, but was thrown out, hence his bitterness towards them. Or he was on the inside, saw what horrors they purpetrated on mankind and decided to leave and try and expose them.
Perhaps it is the Greenberg's vanity, their pride in this enourmous work they are performing, anonymously by necessity, that prompted them to have one of their own play the character of Ed Chiarini to do this type of 'exposure' and disclosure. He might have an inside-man pointing him to the relevant information. How else would you even find some of this stuff?
It is also possible, even plausible that wellaware1 is part of a larger psy-op to make us further distrust anything and everything, adding only to the confusion.
He might be on the level and truely finding these things.
Who knows, right?
--------------
This is the first thread I started on Avalon, even though I've been around for a while. I don't know if I'll be guiding things along, as I seem to have the attention span of a goldfish, so I might get bored with what I now find fascinating, but let's see where it goes.
It could well be just another thread for the memory hole.
I'd like for it to get some attention though, as Ed's perspective I think, offers a valuable direction for our thinking: we should really turn away from these cults-of-personalities in any of their forms.
It is ego-gratification after all, causing the ego to only gain more prominence, which would be the wrong way for it to go. We need to support ideas, concepts, stories and so on, rather than people.
Bob Dean is a case in point because his personality is what is most important about him, more so than his information. We love this man and therefore trust him, we want to believe what he tells us.
The question whether we really
can trust him, is almost taboo, can almost not be asked. All I'll say about him is that I too find him a lovely man and his stories are very interesting, but his extraordinary claims mostly lack evidence to back them up, as far as I know.
There are threads about con artists currently doing the rounds on Avalon. Personally I think, but cannot be sure, that George Kavassilas is one of those for instance, yet I like his story.
I don't believe much of what he's saying. He just sounds too emotionally manipulative, merely by varying his tone of voice.
Every time I hear him, he annoys me, yet afterwards I find myself thinking in terms of his concepts, which do help shed light on certain things, or add to our vocabulary and help better understand them.
I don't like him for his presentation, but I appreciate some of his ideas.
Listening to any interesting speaker, be they true or false, opens up vistas for my mind to visit that I had not thought of before. That is helpful.
"Disinformation is 80% truth". So that is what we'd need to do with any information: take those parts we like, or that spark our interest rather, and leave the rest. It sounds cliche by now, easier-said-than-done and it is.
In his latest video series (
Truth Exposed 2), Ed makes the point with
the 'amazing rant' video of the young guy at OWS. The young guy, a member of the Greenbergs, says all the right things throughout his rant, causing listeners to be in agreement with him. At the end of his rant though, he tells you the true message, according to Ed, which in this case is to limit Presidential power and increase decentralized power, Governors, Mayors and so on. The reason for this, says Ed, is that it is easier to put corrupt people in those 'lesser' positions of power, making it easier to gain more and more control.
See, the rant guy gets you to go along with him, to then drop the 'bombshell' on you that you might not otherwise be in agreement with, but because of the context and the mindset that has been framed, you
do now go along with. A form of mind control ('extended consent'?) and that is what this whole thing is about of course, purposely framing the mindset of humanity.
The important thing is to look at these larger packages of information and select packets from within them, to spiritually, intellectually, emotionally endorse. Don't buy the box, buy selective items from within the box.
Don't endorse the amazing-rant-guy, endorse some of what he is saying.
It was stated quite well in
one of the recent Fulford threads here on PA. The thing to do is to take beautiful ideas of people, Fulford in this case, and regardless of whether the
person is truthful or not, create a space in our hearts, our minds and infuse
the idea with our personal intent. All these incidental, individual endorsements are what might ultimately determine the fate of mankind and help shape our future reality. Or not.
Anyway, I wanted to post this due to the explicit 'accusations' leveled against 'Avalonians'. Like I said, I expect this thread to receive heavy critisism, also and especially because in one of Ed's earlier videos I think he shows Bill Ryan to be one of the imposters as well. But considering Bill's earlier endorsement of the Inelia material, that might then not be too great a leap to make, within this context. That's going too far?
Like I said, take packets from within the box. Don't dissmiss the entire box because of one particular item within it.
Fascinating.
(Ed, if you're still reading this... might I suggest you make your videos a little faster-paced for easier consumption and, if need be, repeat sequences of photos where now you have a blank screen in the videos. Black screens no good. Also some post production on your voice-over wouldn't hurt. Take out some pauses, cut some parts and so on. I should heed my own advice and make shorter posts on forums and blogs. I know how tempting it is to just ramble on.)
Re: The Truth Exposed by WellAware1.com?
And a short summary in the post with what the video is about is also very useful.
Bookmarks