David Wilcock "DIVINE INTERVENTION: Section I -- Defeating Financial Tyranny"

[felixq78]

I don't think that he was calling those who disagree with him, "ego strokers" That criticism was aimed at those who know the facts but are too lazy to act on them. I've listened to the interview four times and I didn't interpret that comment the way you did.

[foreverfan]

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)


No need to vacate the premises.

No need to change your underwear.

Everything is under control.

You have aces in the hole: friendly reptoids, free energy, scaler weapons, mountains of gold...and most of all, the sheeple people accept their lot in life. Hell, the sheeple people's neurons are so damaged that they don't even fire in-sequence any more. Plan? Strategy? Ha! Any little insurrection attempt will last 15 minutes, tops...and the only blood flowing won't be blue. All the brave little sheelpe people soldiers will be eliminated, the Department of Homeland Security will handle everything with the 400 million rounds of ammo they just bought, creating a macabre spectacle that will imprint a level and degree of fear so intense and so deeply into the rest of the sheeple people's DNA that they won't be able to look an oligarch in the eye without pissing themselves.

Golden Age - schmolden age. Bring on the Hunger Games! Champagne for everyone! (everyone at the apex of the Pyramid, that is.)
===============================

Dennis

Hey Dennis... This would make a great song. Maybe you can write one.

[EnergyGardener]

Posted by felixq78 (here)
Many references to ET interventions but that's all there is, no one has outlined actual events DETAILS who, what and where ! Which military attacks were stopped by whom and where. Without actual details it's all BS to me.

felixq78, I am sure the DETAILS are provided on a "Need to Know Basis."

However, I do share your frustration. But take comfort in the outward signs that good things are being accomplished: War with Iran has been prevented, there have been mass resignations, there have been many unexplained and misreported earthquakes, the planets and stars have never glowed so bright and flashed colors like they are now, we are 6 weeks ahead of the normal climate weather where I live (Pole Shift?), and the biggest reason of all: Too many people have awakened and are "NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!"

What is "IT"? Their BS.

felixq78, consider the following motto derived from John F. Kennedy's Inaugural Address speech, January 20, 1961:

Ask not what ET/ED can do for you (specifically, calling any news of their help BS)— ask what you can do for your fellow humans.

[Mozart]

Posted by modwiz (here)
Bottom line. Never use an attorney. They cannot represent you, only the state. They are not lawyers, in the true sense of the word ,but usurpers of that profession. Another form of parasite in the fauna of the English Admiralty corporate system.

Outstanding post, Modwiz!

I fully concur with everything that you said in this post and that there is, indeed, a big difference between a Title-of-Nobility-bearing Attorney and a learned man of Law/legal matters ... a lawyer.

I want to add to this with this comment:

The realm of "Law" = Substantive Law, Common Law and Organic Constitution of 1787, as Lawfully Amended.

The realm of anything "legal" = color of law; the UCC Code; Maritime/Admiralty "laws"; corporate, legal-fiction "laws"; codes, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc.

Too many people get those two terms -- "Law" and "legal" -- mixed up.

And your current avatar, Modwiz, totally cracks me up.

[YvonneG]

Freedomreigns.us has a show today a 1 EST, Drake and Teri will be there to update and answer questions. Why not call in and ask your question and misgivings to them? As I said in another post, I know who Teri and her background, and should would never be involved in this openly where it not the real deal.

They also have a show on sunday at 6 est, in case today doesn't work.

I have a confession to make, the only reason I delved into the awareness of the constitution is because I have a cousin who studied it since he was 12 and who in the 90' along with his daughter freed 100's who were wrongly accused or where the city/county wanted to steal their homes with code enforcement violation fines. He was so good at it and trained others around the country to do the same that the Clinton adminstration spent millions to go after him and his daughter. They spent 11 years in prison but not before his daugther had brain surgery and died on Feb 14th after talking to her mother, who was not allowed to see her, and telling her they had not given her the medications she needed.

[modwiz]

Posted by Mozart (here)

Posted by modwiz (here)
Bottom line. Never use an attorney. They cannot represent you, only the state. They are not lawyers, in the true sense of the word ,but usurpers of that profession. Another form of parasite in the fauna of the English Admiralty corporate system.

Outstanding post, Modwiz!

I fully concur with everything that you said in this post and that there is, indeed, a big difference between a Title-of-Nobility-bearing Attorney and a learned man of Law/legal matters ... a lawyer.

I want to add to this with this comment:

The realm of "Law" = Substantive Law, Common Law and Organic Constitution of 1787, as Lawfully Amended.

The realm of anything "legal" = color of law; the UCC Code; Maritime/Admiralty "laws"; corporate, legal-fiction "laws"; codes, ordinances, regulations, statutes, etc.

Too many people get those two terms -- "Law" and "legal" -- mixed up.

And your current avatar, Modwiz, totally cracks me up.

Mozart, I want you to know that I think this thread, the one you started and the one about Israel/Iran love hold the most importance and meaning here at the forum right now. At the heart of these threads are forces that are shaping our collective destinies. And that is no small matter.

[DreamsInDigital]

Felix,

In some/most instances revealing such details (order of battle information) is extremely dangerous for the ET/EDs pulling those maneuvers off, for those they are in direct contact with as well, or otherwise are only verifiable through contacting highly cleared military and intelligence sources. I hope you can understand and respect this. Also you might want to check out www.johnkettler.com , the guy is in direct telepathic contact with multiple ET/EDs on a daily basis and provides fairly detailed reports/blogs every few days.

[sdv]

Mozart, first, I did not say that the number of resignations was ONLY due to corporate burnout (although corporate burnout will increase in stressful times).

Do you understand what the purpose of the ICJ is? It is NOT there to protect and uphold international law. It's purpose is twofold:
1. To settle disputes between sovereign nations. The USA is one of the few countries who does not see itself as bound by any ruling by the ICJ in this regard.
2. To give advisory opinions when asked to do so by recognised organisations (and there is aist of these on the ICJ website).

The ICJ does NOT make or protect law - this is not it's purpose. It's purpose is to settle disputes between sovereign. There is no dispute between the USA and the thirteen colonies, and until there is, the ICJ has no jurisdiction over this matter at all.

I am not disputing that the thirteen original colonies have the right to declare themselves sovereign nations, and that the ICJ will validate this as legal under international law if the USA should dispute such declarations. If you read through the two cases of sovereignty that have gone to the ICJ (re. Kosovo and Palestine) you will see that the 13 original colonies probably do have a right to declare themselves independent sovereign nations (this has already been established by the ICJ in the Kosovo case).

There is no such thing as a notification process with the ICJ in this matter. There are no protocols of the ICJ for such paperwork. There has been no public declaration made by these thirteen states.

Drake is either lacking in understanding of what the ICJ is and how it operates, or is counting on all you gullible folks not understanding.

[Sidney]

I have not caught up on this whole thread yet, but my opinion is Drake is not jim mars. I listened to a few Mars interviews, right next to this Drake interview. Not the same. Similar, but not him.

[YvonneG]

Drake will be on Freedom Reigns Radio show at 1pm est right now: here is the direct link to the show http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomizerradio/2012/04/05/jim-duensingfreedom-reigns Good place to ask questions...directly from Drake and Teri.

[Eram]

Hi People,

I've been reading the Section I of DIVINE INTERVENTION from David Wilcock and I also listened to the first part of the 'Drake' interview.

I hope there's someone here who can help me out with a few questions that have been risen to me after especially listen to the Drake interview.

English is not my Native Language and sometimes it's hard for me to fully understand everything that's been said, especially when it gets technical in terms of law etc.

Here's what bothering me:
Drake paints a picture in the first part of the interview wherein the army or at least a major part of it, are people who have the heart in the right place and want to do good for the people of the USA. Reading this thread I see figures of 80 up to 90% of the people in the army that are on the good side (when it's time to take sides).
How can this picture merge with the picture that have been painted by people as Bill Wood, Dan Burisch, Henry Deacon and lots of other whistle blowers.
These people all tell story's about being in secrets projects that are lead by the army.
The army is supposed to have a fleet of UFO type space crafts (imagine how many people would have been working on that to make it and to keep it a secret), and has lots of black operations going.
For all I understood, The total top of the military and the whole of the pentagon is been IN on this.
Bill Wood for instance tells he's been guiding cruise missiles to their targets in the middle east for the good part of the ninety's. Firing a cruise missile requires a ship in the nearby ocean doesn't it, with lots of people on it and all are aware that a cruise missile has been fired. Again, lots of people who know to some degree that there are things going on that can't see the light of day.
To me, There has been risen the idea of an American army that is under full control of the dark powers, name them Illuminati, dark Cabal or whatever.
I have heard Bill wood speak of the 'oathkeepers' and I looked them up on the internet and i wrote to them with the question of how many people are actively involved in this organisation and they mentioned to me that it is in the tens of thousands, which is substantial, but still with the top of the military under full dark control not a number that can rise to 80 or 90% of the people in the army.
Al these stories mention things like mind control and other ways (like corrupting people) to get people under their control.

When I take these stories and this story from Drake, some things just don't add up for me.
If all the other testimonials are true, how comes there's a major part of the army suddenly ready to back the people up who are taking the Nation back under the control in the way that it was meant bye the founders? Drake talks about the army as if they were always part of the good guys trying to figure out how to fight the corrupt people in the governments in the USA.

I would be ever so happy when this whole story unfolds in the way that Drake is portraying, but to this point I can't wrap my mind around all of his claims.

Can you people please explain to me where I am missing the info?

[778 neighbour of some guy]

The Drake interview transcript is up.

http://divinecosmos.com/

[aranuk]

Posted by billyji (here)
Just found this http://pathwaytoascension.wordpress....n-to-go-viral/

The Original 13th Amendment http://www.amendment-13.org/

Mentioned in the interview

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension. office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”

Word is getting out there.

Hi Billy, Come to think about it didn't George Herbert Bush recently get an honary knighthood from the queen. Maybe a few years ago? I saw a video of it where he kneeled in front of her and bowed his head.

Stan

[Kimberley]

Posted a couple of hours ago

MASS ARRESTS: David Interviews Drake -- Transcript!

And several additional up dates from David...


http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/d...+Newsletter%29

[Earth Angel]

Kimberley are the additional updates from David through out the interview or at the end as I did not see them........thanks for posting this

Posted by Kimberley (here)
Posted a couple of hours ago

MASS ARRESTS: David Interviews Drake -- Transcript!

And several additional up dates from David...


http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/d...+Newsletter%29

[YvonneG]

Additionally updates are before the transcript

[Tommy]

I think you should all start using your own brains and look towards yourself for answers, not from Bill or Kerry (updated: or any one). Frankly most of you here do exactly what you accuse them of doing.

Bill: We could use a little more than just a short counter-statement like that. I think we should be careful to so easily point out that people are getting played, you of all people should know this.
I think it would be wise of you to stop threading on others..

I do not agree with a lot of Drakes solutions, mass arrests is one thing that I naturally agree with, but the killing talk just got me sick.. It was rather pathetic and I will have no part in it.
Why start choosing the lesser of two evils? No way..

I will speak about my personal views and research on all of this on a later occasion (Drake\Wilcock included), also probably on the Los Angeles Alchemy Event on the 29th of April where I will be on a panel discussion.

[aranuk]

I don't understand what you are saying here at all. Especially Bill:blabla? Was that what Bill said?

Stan

[aranuk]

Posted by seeingterra (here)
I think you should all start using your own brains and look towards yourself for answers, not from Bill or Kerry. Frankly most of you here do exactly what you accuse them of doing.

Bill: We could use a little more than just a short counter-statement like that. I think we should be careful to so easily point out that people are getting played, you of all people should know this.
I think it would be wise of you to stop threading on others..

I do not agree with a lot of Drakes solutions, mass arrests is one thing that I naturally agree with, but the killing talk just got me sick.. It was rather pathetic and I will have no part in it.
Why start choosing the lesser of two evils? No way..

I will speak about my personal views and research on all of this on a later occasion (Drake\Wilcock included), also probably on the Los Angeles Alchemy Event on the 29th of April where I will be on a panel discussion.

I don't agree with violence either. The Bush family and Blair have murdered more than a million people which includes thousands of civilians, women children and innocent men. Do you think a slap on their wrists or a 10,000 dollar fine is appropriate ? What would you suggest we do as a punishment for these genocidal maniacs?

Stan

[Tommy]

Posted by aranuk (here)

Posted by seeingterra (here)
I think you should all start using your own brains and look towards yourself for answers, not from Bill or Kerry. Frankly most of you here do exactly what you accuse them of doing.

Bill: We could use a little more than just a short counter-statement like that. I think we should be careful to so easily point out that people are getting played, you of all people should know this.
I think it would be wise of you to stop threading on others..

I do not agree with a lot of Drakes solutions, mass arrests is one thing that I naturally agree with, but the killing talk just got me sick.. It was rather pathetic and I will have no part in it.
Why start choosing the lesser of two evils? No way..

I will speak about my personal views and research on all of this on a later occasion (Drake\Wilcock included), also probably on the Los Angeles Alchemy Event on the 29th of April where I will be on a panel discussion.

I don't agree with violence either. The Bush family and Blair have murdered more than a million people which includes thousands of civilians, women children and innocent men. Do you think a slap on their wrists or a 10,000 dollar fine is appropriate ? What would you suggest we do as a punishment for these genocidal maniacs?

Stan

Hard labor