From a comment made in another thread by Sabastion:
Each and every comment I have review by many of those listed in your 'list of those to ask', have been comments of 'personal testimony'. Personal testimony is a wonderful thing when subscribing to dogma, like one might find in the 'Bible Thread', for instance.Posted by Sebastion (here)
Judgement does NOT exist in higher states of consciousness for there is no one and no thing to pass judgement. Been there, seen that, done that. Don't believe me? Get out of your body and go see for yourself, it isn't that hard...ask Anotherbob, NancyV, Jake, Sirdipswitch and others, then you will KNOW for yourself! [....snip]
There is not a shred of physical evidence that can support your 'personal testimony' claim of 'traveling out of your body'. Beyond your 'personal testimony', there is not a shred of physical evidence to support that which you may be experiencing, is not strongly influenced by an Archonic Presence within your 'Astral Dream State'.
If you could prove - without a shadow of doubt - what you claim to be part of this reality, than you (and the others you have represented) would be presenting hard physical evidence to your suppositions.... just as Houman has done with the (now) 88 pages of hard physical evidence contained within this thread.
All the members get from those in your 'list' are personal testimony.
I find testimonies from you, and the others whom you have referenced, to be personal interpretations of how reality works - as to the insistence of these channeled sources.
If you ever have had a doubt to your claim, than in that moment, you are questioning that to which you speak. This moment of doubt is what is referred to as a 'moral conflict'.
Show us the evidence. Otherwise contain your comments to the appropriate threads which I already suggested. This is a thread based on evidence.
Sorry for the rant, Houman, just my opinion, based on the available facts....
- edit update -
Please, do as you wish, blather-on. It can be counted as just one more with much to say, yet having so little revelation to their content. Why not ruin a perfectly good thread with more 'channeled' dogma?
I've said what I have to say, Sabastion.