Yeah, I know, that is a problem.Posted by Paul (here)
Well, you know how it goes. Waving nerdie numbers in front of a geek is like wiggling a string in front of a cat ... guaranteed reactionsPosted by ulli (here)
Thanks, Paul. He is going to consult with one of the top people from our electric company here, as he doesn't even trust our regular electrician in this matter. I was just sharing here and now stuff.....
http://www.kropla.com/electric2.htm
Costa Rica:
Line and neutral at 120VAC , same as USA and Canada. probably 220 two phase and 220 three phase, in the same way. Gonna check on that. Can't find that info, but it is likely the same.
Thus, the wiring will come in at, oh, 220 two phase and then be broken down for each place. Higher voltage is the better anyway, as this gets more into 'field' conditions than current drive and this drops costs for the wiring. 100M is a LONG run, about 340ft for the underground part alone. Expect to hit a good 400ft, overall. #2 gauge is likely the deal, at minimum, considering the total loading. 400 ft through a 1" pipe would be a real bear to pull. You might have to go to a underground rated ('bury rated') cable and leave it at that. Then go to buried conduit from the breakout for the cottages.
Is it a case of doing a single line then breaking out to each cottage? That is the cheaper way to go, the proper, one might say. However that's 10-11 junctions. Not unusual, they do it all the time in suburbs. Ernie should know...
I was going to buy my dad a roll of bury rated copper wire for his garage, which was a 880ft run, and at the time the wire needed to be 00 or 000, I can't recall. He needed 220VAC, three phase, at a minimum of 100amps. It was almost cheaper to have a new transformer put in near the garage, instead of coming off the house line, and running the 880ft. Your distance is under half but your load is at least as high.





.
Reply With Quote