9/11 TV Fakery No Planes!(3:10 is of particular importance)

[sigma6]

Posted by danceblackcatdance (here)
in my utterly humble opinion... you are doing yourselves a gross disservice if you don't watch the 'september clues' video.....

then again i can totally understand the tendency of an ostrich to put its head in the sand...

i'm out... cya on the other side!

I second that 100%, of all the videos on 911, September Clues is the one that sticks out in my mind the most. No video so clearly exposes how embedded the media is in blatantly misrepresenting themselves to the public. How they are completely lying to the public, they are doing it knowing, willingly and with complete avarice...


It exposes the following in stunning clarity,

- the timing of the independent "black outs" on CNN and Fox
- the 'in out nose cone' of a 'Boeing 767' flying into the building coming out on the other side intact! when it should have crumpled like tin foil
- the "mysterious ball" ... televised and then completely ignored by the media !!!??? (10:00)
- loads more... a must see...

All this video is taken from actual television news footage, material that was displayed to millions and millions and millions of viewers... It makes for an excellent case study, very much like re-watching a magic trick, with all the secrets revealed.

To the people that may find this hard to believe, consider this: If people couldn't be deceived, if they didn't mis-perceive what is in front of their own eyes, there wouldn't be ANY magic tricks, but the fact is there are millions of magicians the world over. This is proof and testament that people do NOT accurately perceive what is presented in front of their eyes. And September Clues operates on this premise and exposes this very, very clearly.

It also answers the question, why the aircraft photographed appeared to have something "attached" to the bottom of the hull. Again this is actual televised footage (like all the footage in September Clues) was screened to millions of people on TV. And it is the answer that has to be the most accurate and compelling and comprehensive explanation that leaves nothing out.

Then there is approx 10 seconds of televised footage of what appears to be a "mysterious orb" heading toward one of the buildings. This was immediately removed from circulation and NEVER explained or mentioned again on television!!! It is clearly explained in this video and found to be related to the "mysterious object" under the plane...

It turns out these 'hollywood story tellers' in their need to do things 'live' (or as close to live as possible, as they actually operate on a 17 (or 22?) sec delay in live news production, which will also be explained) Because of this, they were pushing the limits of their technology, and ended up making some really JUICY MISTAKES that couldn't be caught even with the extra delay, clearly exposing what was going on... to an educated or trained eye) What they expose are unmistakable characteristics of well known digital video manipulation techniques.

Things which clearly couldn't happen in a real material physics world and have no other explanation otherwise. And the 'media personalities' are the 'circus announcers' designed to make it all sound so 'real'.

I guess we should be so lucky that 90% of all the initial and publicized eye witness accounts were from people who worked for the major media companies or friends and relatives of people who worked for the major media companies... can you imagine how lucky we all are to have such good fortune... (LOL) - Don't be distracted by any vids that are debunking this video, this is a direct attack on the media, done very reasonably and accurately but clearly exposing the media for a bunch of self serving propaganda agents. How far it goes up is anyone's guess, but it looks pretty obvious. So naturally there will be media attempts at debunking this... it simply exposes too much, things which can't be refuted...

After all, it makes the media look like a bunch of ivory tower, self serving scumbags, that wouldn't hesitate to lie to your face for a dollar bill. Do you think they could even pretend to ignore it? But on the other hand they can't possibly attack it publicly either. The debunking videos are weak minded and meaningless. One has to question why someone would so vehemently go through so much trouble to debunk just one tiny aspect by misintepreting it and blowing it out of proportion while ignoring the other 90% of the video... just more mindless media BS foisted on us to look like private individuals imo...

Watch September Clues at least 3 times!
Stop the video and replay any scenes you need to as many times as necessary as they pack a lot of information into this NO FLUFF hard hitting presentation.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=aWl8mUSDIwU

It is very encouraging to note that if you do a Search on YouTube and filter for 'greater then 20 min' on "September Clues" I have seen over over 40 full length versions in the first 3 pages!!!! I would encourage everyone to watch the lesser promoted videos and share them with as many people as possible.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

The "Orb" theory always seemed a bit silly to me. I thought it was quite obvious from the beginning that the ropey quality of the footage was at fault here. At that distance with VHS details are lost to a blur of noise.

For a detailed analysis of this footage, which pretty much clears it up once and for all, you need to watch this:
http://www.richplanet.net/rp_genre.p...8&part=1&gen=2

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Star Mariner (here)
For a detailed analysis of this footage, which pretty much clears it up once and for all, you need to watch this:
http://www.richplanet.net/rp_genre.p...8&part=1&gen=2

Awesome - thanks!

This provides a much more persuasive analysis of what we know about the "plane" that hit the second tower.

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

Posted by Star Mariner (here)
The "Orb" theory always seemed a bit silly to me. I thought it was quite obvious from the beginning that the ropey quality of the footage was at fault here. At that distance with VHS details are lost to a blur of noise.

For a detailed analysis of this footage, which pretty much clears it up once and for all, you need to watch this:
http://www.richplanet.net/rp_genre.p...8&part=1&gen=2

I emailed rich (one of many who did) to say he was wrong right after he put out the "ball" video. Glad to see he has the integrity to admit he was wrong. Many could learn from his example. He is a good man.