Mini-Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by bram (here)
I must admit I haven't read the book(s), but without wanting to piss anybody off, what's the point of discussing 'how' it was done?

For some of us, such as myself, the "physical how" was the pry bar that opened the door.

For several years after 9/11, I was a full supporter of George W. Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld's War on Terror. I was employed by a company whose largest customers included US military, intelligence and NASA. I had a nice house in the suburbs of Silicon Valley, California.

But I'm pretty good in my amateur understanding of physics and such, and I began to realize that the twin towers did not go down as we were told. I'm now an unemployed forum admin on an "alternative" web site, living in a trailer in North Texas, and still trying to figure all this crap out .

We each have our gateways, depending on what we notice first.

If time, mass, distance, acceleration, force and energy equations aren't your gig ... that's cool.

[Calz]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by bram (here)
I must admit I haven't read the book(s), but without wanting to piss anybody off, what's the point of discussing 'how' it was done?

For some of us, such as myself, the "physical how" was the pry bar that opened the door.

Actually I found her lack of interest in "who" or "why" to lend credence (at least initially ... after you look with an open mind the images themselves tell the story).

She took several aspects of the "official storyline" and completely dismantled them by making it clear what is, or is not possible. Looking at Hutchinson's work supplements hers. From a psychological standpoint alone it was fascinating to see how many people initially (and many are still there) blindly followed the "official explanation".

Toasted cars ... fire dept walking around calmly in theortically molten steel in rubber boots ... etc etc etc.

OMG ... it's right here in Popular Mechanics so it *MUST* be true!!!

[Tangri]

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
Article Title: Mini-Neutron Bombs: A Major Piece of the 9/11 Puzzle

By: by Don Fox, Clare Kuehn, Jeff Prager, Jim Viken and Dr. Ed Ward (with Dennis Cimino and Jim Fetzer)

Source: Veterans Today : http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/10...he-911-puzzle/

Posted by from the VT article
There are a half-dozen or more theories about how the Twin Towers were destroyed, where, as The Vancouver Hearings have established, the “official account”–that the buildings collapsed, due to the intense heat of the jet-fuel based fires, which caused the steel to lose its strength and lead to a cascade of floors falling upon one another–is the least defensible and most effortlessly refuted of them all. Here I am going to summarize the evidence for each and explain why the most defensible and difficult to falsify are those that posit the use of sophisticated arrangements of micro and mini-nukes, which, of course, is not a technique that would have been available to Osama bin Laden and his hearty band of 19 Islamic fanatics, which the government has peddled to the public with a straight face and which has been supported by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). The NIST, alas, has been carrying the burden for the Bush/Cheney administration, which, together with its friends in the Mossad, appear to have been the principals responsible for 9/11.
The theories to be discussed include (h1) the collapse theory, (h2) the nanothermite theory, (h3) the DEW theory, and (h4), the nuke theory, which should be distinguished by its own subtheories, including (h4a) the 150kt subbasement theory (associated with Dimitri Khalezov) and the (h4b) mini and mico-nuke theory (associated with The Anonymous Physicist, Dr. William Deagle, Dr. Ed Ward, Jeff Prager and Don Fox, among others), which appears by far the most promising.

Excellent article honing down to the plausible and using the real evidence. (There is a tidbit in the article that I think needs to be highlighted, but I'll wait to see if anyone mentions it - to see if the info impacts you the same way as it did me.)

Dennis

In my humble opinion N -bomb does not effect to the structures but living creatures. It designed for purpose of booty(looting).
And residue radiation limited but steady for long period.
The neutron bomb was originally conceived by the U.S. military as a weapon that could stop massed Soviet armored divisions from overrunning allied nations without destroying the infrastructure of the allied nation.the weapon must now be detonated at such a close proximity to the tank that the nuclear explosion's blast would now be equally effective at incapacitating it and its crew
Love and Hope

[Kristin]

Posted by araucaria (here)
I understand your argument about the price of books etc. and agree. But as I said, I don't have the time to summarize it. Maybe someone else does.

Hello!

The book, "Where did the Towers Go?" is an exceptional forensics quality text book. The printing of such a book in the US would cost $120 per book. Dr. Wood had to have the printing done in China, as it is cheapest to do there without loss of quality. All said, she is basically selling the book at cost. Dennis, I would encourage you to make the investment. I understand that it is a lot for a book, however, it has A LOT OF EVIDENCE that is painstakingly diagramed, explained, and shown in full colour glossy pictorials in order to demonstrate completely the full aspects of evidence based observation and to create the space for anyone to make those observations for themselves. Anything less would not be able to demonstrate fully the wide diaspora of information. She is a credit to her profession and a credit to this search for truth beyond anything that I have seen or read prior. This is where she shines as a researcher with a Bachelor's in Civil Engineering, Masters in Engineering mechanics, and a Doctorate in Materials Engineering Science. You may not like her interviews or her lectures but I promise you will not be let down with this book.

From the Heart,
Kristin

[araucaria]

Yes, the cost of printing the 500 high quality photos needed for her analysis probably has a lot to do with the paper quality needed to produce them.

She hardly mentions DEW until page 475/500 and has nothing at all to say about who or why. Here conclusion is a list of 43 questions that need answering, some of which she hasn't even had time to address. The Hutchison effect is only given as one possible explanation for things like I beams that are curled in two instead of bending in a sine wave when overloaded, or wheatchex rolled up like a carpet in a direction where no force could have been exerted, or parts of cars burning up amid reams of paper that remains white, or one surviving file cabinet rolled up in a basketball and containing intact $20 bills. Etc etc.

[modwiz]

The molten steel rivers weeks (months?) after the towers went down coupled with the kinds of illnesses/cancers showing up in those who were at the site as responders and clean-up crews does lend considerable credence to nuclear energy being involved, IMO.

My second choice is the Dragon theory.

The above said, it is who, that matters to me. Why seems obvious. At least for the first few floors down the rabbit hole.

[Kristin]

Posted by modwiz (here)
The molten steel rivers weeks (months?) after the towers went down coupled with the kinds of illnesses/cancers showing up in those who were at the site as responders and clean-up crews does lend considerable credence to nuclear energy being involved, IMO.

My second choice is the Dragon theory.

The above said, it is who, that matters to me. Why seems obvious. At least for the first few floors down the rabbit hole.

Here's some intel on concrete dust and cancer: Harry J. Beaulieu, PhD, CIH, CSP
"It is well documented that once air borne, the silica-dust (inherent in concrete) is hazardous to all that may accidentally breathe it
For years commercial concrete bags have carried the Federal warnings about breathing concrete dust and OSHA has been deeply involved in regulating use and developing safety guidelines for its use.
Virtually every contractor and professional working with concrete knows that it poses some specific health dangers, but the benefit of this irreplaceable material precludes any possible prohibition of its use. Those of using concrete for residential or commercial purposes know we are suppose to avoid breathing the dust, but caution alone of course does not eliminate the reality of the concern.
Professionals involved in commercial concrete work, whether that is for foundation and slab installation or the surfacing and finishing of concrete, know that more needs to be done to improve safety for concrete workers as well as consumers.
As the awareness and demand for finished concrete grows, professionals in this field are facing the reality that what they do; the grinding and polishing of concrete for dying, resurfacing and sealing, generates the release of large amounts of silica-bearing dust in the air. The resurfacing process exposes workers and others to a very real and potential danger. Breathing the silica dust can result in several forms of respiratory ailments that ultimately can develop into untreatable, chronic conditions including silicosis and lung cancer. It is therefore incumbent on these businesses, contractors and workers to establish truly best practice guidelines for controlling exposure to the silica dust, to eliminate or greatly reduce the potential risk of injury and illness.
The US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) strictly regulates operations that release silica dust into the air (such as concrete grinding, shown in Photo 1) and certainly the pressures of Federal enforcement serve as an incentives to improve worker safety. However, as the new polishing industry begins to mature it must establish and implement new and better methodologies and techniques to ultimately turn these historically hazardous tasks into environmentally responsible processes that are safe for contractors, their workers and clients in order to advance the concrete finishing industry to the status it deserves.. "

From the Heart,
Kristin

[meat suit]

interesting....

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=qK2NT-udlGc

[Kristin]

The same oxidized iron "balls" and residuals have also been found in crop circles... did nano thermite also create them? LOL, I've listened to this video and it is actually a HUGE smear piece which states things that Judy Wood has never said. Fascinating. I wonder how thermite also creates no pile of rubble or seismic evidence... hmmm... I'm very unimpressed with the video. But it SOUNDS convincing, now doesn't it.

From the Heart,
Kristin

[Hervé]

There is another aspect of this event that's not addressed and that is a "why" having to do with the "how."

That particular "why" has to do with the holding of a gun to the head of heads of nations with a "See what we can do!?"

It's the same "why" that was used to supposedly end WW II in blowing up Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Japan had been ready for months prior to capitulate, surrender, whatever... but their bombs weren't quite ready yet... and these bombs were the guns held to the heads of Russia and China with a "You better behave now and do what you are told to do!"

The "Earthquake Machine" is another one of these guns held in the face of many nations of which we have only heard of japan being the target of (see Fulford's Camelot interview).


Just adding my few cents to the pot...

[Flash]

Guys Guys Guys,

What about having had both used. The mini nuke for the basement and some columns (the cement/steel stuff holding the building up-no taste for dictionary tonight). This would have allowed an in depth destruction where an energy weapon could not reach, and the energy weapon to dustify everything and also, at the same time, get rid of any trace of mini nuke usage.

This would make sense and would be justify for making sure the basement is destroyed and explain the loss of the gold that was supposedly there for example.

[Kristin]

Posted by Flash (here)
Guys Guys Guys,

What about having had both used. The mini nuke for the basement and some columns (the cement/steel stuff holding the building up-no taste for dictionary tonight). This would have allowed an in depth destruction where an energy weapon could not reach, and the energy weapon to dustify everything and also, at the same time, get rid of any trace of mini nuke usage.

This would make sense and would be justify for making sure the basement is destroyed and explain the loss of the gold that was supposedly there for example.

Thanks Flash, I had thought about that... but since there was no major damage in the basement or evidence of a nuclear device (nuclear radiation), I dropped the thought. It seems that thermite is a great way to drop the issue of another possibility, like a new weapon. The opinions are strong on the issue. I used to be a big proponent of the thermite theory but still couldn't justify many other things that it did not explain. I hope you get a chance to read the Book that Judy wrote one day... it's not just a text filled with pretty pictures, believe me!
From the Heart,
Kristin

[Flash]

Interesting:

Neutron bombs are purposely designed with explosive yields lower than other nuclear weapons.[citation needed] Since neutrons are absorbed by air,[citation needed] even a high-yield neutron bomb is not able to radiate neutrons beyond its blast range and so would theoretically have no destructive advantage over a normal hydrogen bomb. However, the intense pulse of high-energy neutrons that is generated is intended as the principal killing mechanism, not the fallout, heat or blast. Although neutron bombs are commonly believed to "leave the infrastructure intact", current designs have explosive yields in the kiloton range,[20] the detonation of which would cause considerable destruction through blast and heat effects

...As an anti-ballistic missile weapon, an ER warhead was developed for the Sprint missile system as part of the Safeguard Program to protect United States cities and missile silos from incoming Soviet warheads by damaging their electronic components with the intense neutron flux.[

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb

considerable destruction through blast and heat, damaging electronic componenets with intense neutron flux, this would make sense that both were used.

three lettres agencies must be ringing tonight with all those explosive terms.

[Kristin]

Yes, but they are used to create high yields of radiation to kill people... not buildings. There was not that type of radiation present at ground zero.

LOL, yes we are always on the radar here!

A neutron bomb is a thermonuclear bomb that has a shell as well as several other parts made of chromium or nickel and uses tritium as its primary explosive that thankfully only has a half life or I think 12 years. These materials are used because it only allows wide spread proliferation of the neutrons during the explosion.

Basically its used to throw heavy bombardments of neutrons at a target primarily ones that are armored and might survive any other type of attack. The ionized neutrons go right through the armor and cause massive amounts of radioactive damage to anything inside thats biological i.e. Humans, Its not necessarily an instant kill type bomb, rather dependent on were you are when it goes off it might be a rather slow (very horrible) death.

Yes a wave of highly ionized neutrons that will react with another molecules nucleus causing mass cell apoptosis and general genetic mutation leading major organ failure and death.

[norman]

Molten steel, 1 month later !

None of us have the briefings into that kind of thing and we must work with what we can reasonably assume we have a level pegging knowledge about. On that basis, I agree with Kerry Cassidy, in that we should go with witness testimony first.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=5BdqX87KcQ4&feature=plcp

[Kristin]

The molten steel is interesting. For instance, this very hot steel would not have been able to have been lifted by hydraulic machinery as it would have been too hot for the machinery to handle, yet it was in fact removed by these machines and without damaging the machines or the people around it. This is not possible if the metal was molten... however, it was glowing and it was dripping... but it was not that hot. How can this be? Well, Hutchinson's experiments have these qualities and effects of this type are observed when looking at plasma effects as well. This includes plasma flames... which do not effect paper, like in a microwave. You can boil and burn your food in a microwave, yet the plate remains paper.

[Ron Mauer Sr]

The theories of how it was done are interesting. But it is far more important "why" it was done.

When enough people discover the "why" it was done, someone will think of a plan to fix many current problems.

[gooty64]

Posted by rmauersr (here)
The theories of how it was done are interesting. But it is far more important "why" it was done.

When enough people discover the "why" it was done, someone will think of a plan to fix many current problems.

Right on the money, rmauser.
Someone(s) blew those buildings WTC 1&2 to smithereens with some very advanced technology.
It seems like the conversations are getting mired down in the "unknown advanced technology" and whatever cocktail of "unknown advanced technology" that the TPTWTB used to obliterate the tall buildings on 911.

I am more interested in the why and who of it than exactly the how.

[meat suit]

Posted by Kristin (here)
The same oxidized iron "balls" and residuals have also been found in crop circles... did nano thermite also create them? LOL, I've listened to this video and it is actually a HUGE smear piece which states things that Judy Wood has never said. Fascinating. I wonder how thermite also creates no pile of rubble or seismic evidence... hmmm... I'm very unimpressed with the video. But it SOUNDS convincing, now doesn't it.

From the Heart,
Kristin

would that be 'manmade' or 'ET' made cropcircles?
how would that metal get into the field in the first place to be then melted there?

[gooty64]

WTC 1&2 nuclear Destruction, visual evidence for your eyes to see.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=D7FNGWsjj_Y