Sandy Hook Hero, Harassed By Conspiracy Theorists

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/newt...ies_come_from/

Gene Rosen, Sandy Hook Hero, Harassed By Conspiracy Theorists Who Claim He's An Actor
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...ef=mostpopular

Newtown truthers: Where conspiracy theories come from
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/newt...ies_come_from/

I wonder if the whole point of making it easy to spot actors is to demonize "conspiracy theorists" and websites.

Look at this quote from one of the articles above:

“There must be some way to morally shame these people,"

This may be the beginning of the shutting down of websites that point out problems with "official" stories.

[peace]

Posted by EYES WIDE OPEN (here)
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/newt...ies_come_from/

Gene Rosen, Sandy Hook Hero, Harassed By Conspiracy Theorists Who Claim He's An Actor
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...ef=mostpopular

Newtown truthers: Where conspiracy theories come from
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/newt...ies_come_from/

I wonder if the whole point of making it easy to spot actors is to demonize "conspiracy theorists" and websites.

Look at this quote from one of the articles above:

“There must be some way to morally shame these people,"

This may be the beginning of the shutting down of websites that point out problems with "official" stories.

conspiracy theorists are NOT, NOT, NOT the victims here.

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

I never said they were. I just think the official story does not add up. Especially the lone gunman part. Im not sure about the actor thing.
Its also pretty sick that the guy who made the sandy hook hoax website is selling bumper stickers for $5.00 saying 'sandy hook conspiracy".

[Earth Angel]

Personally I find the fact that they keep referring to him as a Hero disturbing......what did he do, besides bring some kids in to his house, which is actually kind of disturbing......and such a crock of **** , since they would have walked passed all the police and EMS at the Fire station to get to the hero's house.... plus they sat on his lawn afraid to knock on his door?? but not afraid to go in to his house with a stranger??? and the adult that was with them just walked off and left them with him.......its insulting they think we are so easily lead.

[peace]

holy ****. i'm done.

[Mark]

Posted by peace (here)
conspiracy theorists are NOT, NOT, NOT the victims here.

No. They are not, if you are considering the Newtown Tragedy as the prima faci exemplar of victimization in this instance.

But the following video should leave no doubt in anyone's mind who peruses forums of this type that among the many thousands of faceless and nameless visitors that browse these forums are those that report to CNN, MSNBC and other streams of the MSM on the discussion topics and opinions expressed here. Millions are engaged in conspiratorial research these days. The MSM and its controllers - not to mention the alphabet agencies - are now apprised of this reality and quite probably devote appropriate resources to trolling these sites and recording and categorizing individuals engaged herein.

It is obviously important to them that the accepted story is not disputed. Not seriously, or by anyone with mainstream credibility. It is apparent that they must devote every iota of their considerable influence to destroying anyone who attempts to dislodge the "official story" especially if those individuals are getting a lot of attention, like the Professor currently being attacked has been.

I'd be willing to bet that the internet site that A. Cooper absolutely refuses to name in this video could in fact be PA or another site very much like it.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=984ZcFgxM3k

While I'm not interested in these types of conspiracy discussions in their particulars, I recognize the freedom of people across the world to access this information and decide for themselves what is true or not. It looks like those who stray from the mainstream, as usual, are on their own. But even more disturbing, they are also subject to public msm attack and attempts to destroy their livelihoods.

And that, of course, is also nothing new.

[Earth Angel]

Anderson Cooper makes me sick.....if they really didn't want to offend the families as he said by covering this hoax theory that is going around, he wouldn't have spent nearly 10 minutes doing just that..... but seems he felt we didn't want to highlight the fact that many are questioning the official story but the opportunity to bring this guy down was just too good to miss...he is not a conspiracy NUTTER, he is a professor, people might actually respect and believe him so he has to be taken down!!! lets get him fired while we are at it

[WhiteFeather]

How Ironic, I just posted this on The Here and Now Thread.

www.jayweidner.com

"Whatever ideas are the most suppressed
are most likely to be the closest to the truth."

- Weidner's First Law of the Universe

"If a picture is worth a thousand words
then a symbol is worth a thousand pictures."

- Weidner's Second Law of the Universe

"The only people who call conspiracies
' theories' are the conspirators."

- Weidner's Third Law of the Universe

After reviewing the wealth info thats out there now,,,,,Im totally convinced this was a Staged Event. The prime motto is gun control and controlling the masses. I say no more. It wont work either,,,, if i may add. The program failed terribly.

Paula, WCBD posted this video on the Ranch thread. Have a look. Its startling. Thanks Paula.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Wx9GxXYKx_8

[watchZEITGEISTnow]

Im am really angry about the blatant BS the media is pushing.

Time for a plan to take back the media and the "news".

[WhiteFeather]

Posted by watchZEITGEISTnow (here)
Im am really angry about the blatant BS the media is pushing.

Time for a plan to take back the media and the "news".

Good Plan but,,,,,The Lamestream Media is owned and operated by The Upper Echelon Board Of Its Corrupted Elites. He who controls the money owns the media, thereby controls the media and its people. The sleepy ones that is.
I think its time for my damned swine flu shot.

[ghostrider]

controlling the narrative is the key, social media talking points that are focused will force the mainstream to respond to us, we the people, thus controlling the narrative ...they must mention the topic or appear behind the curve , and their ego won't let that happen, basically I'm saying use their ego against them ... they think they are cutting edge ...

[T Smith]

Posted by EYES WIDE OPEN (here)
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/newt...ies_come_from/

Gene Rosen, Sandy Hook Hero, Harassed By Conspiracy Theorists Who Claim He's An Actor
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...ef=mostpopular

Newtown truthers: Where conspiracy theories come from
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/newt...ies_come_from/

I wonder if the whole point of making it easy to spot actors is to demonize "conspiracy theorists" and websites.

Look at this quote from one of the articles above:

“There must be some way to morally shame these people,"

This may be the beginning of the shutting down of websites that point out problems with "official" stories.

I'm always conflicted and somewhat confused after I read articles like the Salon piece. A number of questions come to mind: does the author, who aptly demonstrates intelligent and well-thought-out prose, and who even seems fairly versed in the subject matter, truly believe what he is saying? Do those presumably bright academics who study the psychology and social psychology underlying the world of the conspiracy theorist, who even write and publish books on the subject, and who can't help but employ parroted pejoratives like "paranoid" and "conspiracy theorists" and "nuts" and "tinfoil hats" (presumably because they cannot come up with more original descriptions), truly believe what they are saying? Or are they merely gas-lighting for a paycheck? Do they know they're peddling nonsensical misinformation to any reasoning person who merely questions the givens? Are they merely advancing the official worldview to create controversy? For disinformation purposes? For a more sophisticated psyops campaign to influence the weak minded? Or perhaps for some other reason? If the objective of the Salon piece and countless others like it is to advance an agenda to shut down websites that point out the problems and inconsistencies of the official narratives, as Eyes Wide Open suggests, is the author a conscious agent of this psyops? Or just a useful idiot?

It is almost hard to fathom that the author truly subscribes to his own argument. It's simply astounds to read. But if one suspends disbelief, it is good writing and quite convincing.

[Carmody]

The fact that ...this early in the game..that they feel they HAVE TO address any conspiracy issue...this means they feel they are on the ropes.

No one in a conspiracy publicly addresses conspiracy theories directly. No one. Ever. At any price.

The Psychological position and behavior that is placed in front of the public is everything and addressing it --- means it is in the danger zone.

[Ellisa]

I cannot begin to think what these 'theories' are doing to the relatives of the 26 people who were killed by that really sick young man or what they feel when reading this stuff. Have a heart people.

Unless that is, you really, truly and honestly believe 'it was all a set-up', and the parents of those small children are actors. And you don't really believe that do you?

[Akasha]

Posted by Ellisa (here)
I cannot begin to think what these 'theories' are doing to the relatives of the 26 people who were killed by that really sick young man or what they feel when reading this stuff. Have a heart people.

Unless that is, you really, truly and honestly believe 'it was all a set-up', and the parents of those small children are actors. And you don't really believe that do you?

I always try and avoid investment in any kind of belief. That said, all unknowns, once pondered end up somewhere along the sliding scale of plausibility.

The fact that the MSM has gone into damage limitation mode on this subject with the above Anderson Cooper video speaks volumes especially considering, as Carmody points out, that they typically will not go there!

This latest manoeuvre along with the other high strangeness all adds up to move the whole thing along that plausibility scale towards the, frankly, unthinkable.

The cognitive dissonance required to absorb all the inconsistencies of this story currently outweighs the empathy that a part of me still has for these victims if they are indeed such.

[EYES WIDE OPEN]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2487427.html

[Ellisa]

Akasha- Read the post of EWO, and the link, that is below yours. Perhaps it will help you trade the worry you find in your cognitive dissonance for a measure of compassion for the people affected by the tragedy in Sandy Hook.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Ellisa (here)
I cannot begin to think what these 'theories' are doing to the relatives of the 26 people who were killed by that really sick young man or what they feel when reading this stuff. Have a heart people.

Unless that is, you really, truly and honestly believe 'it was all a set-up', and the parents of those small children are actors. And you don't really believe that do you?

Some children died that day. But many real people died in 9/11, as well. The sacrifice of innocent victims does not mean that there was not something way darker going on.

At first I was ambivalent about Sandy Hook, but then, over time, I looked at and listened to all the evidence. It appears overwhelmingly clear to me that something very strange, and deeply unsavory, happened that day, that has not yet been fully explained.

My best guess: this was an Illimunati operation, with at least some parents complicit. The parents were not actors. But some did not show any grief that a normal human being would show. This appears unequivocal. Just look and see. It's hard to watch, or believe.

Either they sacrificed their children (or allowed them to be sacrificed) -- or they are not fully human. I write this knowing exactly what those words mean.

It's also possible that not all the parents were complicit. But it does look like an enormous set-up -- yes. And, like 9/11, these people were strategically killed for a strategic reason: not to launch the war against terror, but to launch the war against guns.

[humanalien]

Didn't someone post something about sandy hook
having a drill on this very same thing, days before
it happened?

I never thought of those killed children as not being human
so that could be a possibility.

[Kendall]

My vote is it was staged.