Bases 25 Part 3 Interview with an MIB

[ktlight]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=RH_2QSBwlxQ

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=RH_2QSBwlxQ

"Published on Jun 25, 2013
The Super Soldier Summit alleged MILAB abduction event continues, with the Exclusive First EVER!!! Interview with a Man In Black, or MIB.

Jay Collins asked Miles (now in West London) for a Skype Disclosure on the infamous Men In Black. Part of Bases 25.

Fantasy or fiction.. or the real deal. With disturbing and graphic descriptions, and Miles himself now in the frame as One Of The Super Soldiers. Taken to Area 51, 100miles north eats of Las Vegas, and a little post event visit with John Lear and Octoform (EIGHT LEGs) creatures on the moon (Off camera and not recorded.. its called PRIVATE)

John described how 2 of his grand children were recently taken to the Moon, and exposed to these 8 legged Mantis creatures.
This and more... see Part 4.

See Kerry Cassidy and Project Camelot and James Rink for further detailed interviews on this Super Soldier Summit mass MILAB event with 18 people taken for the Trip Seats (See Bases ONE 2010)

Once again this is RAW data, and for Research Only and Cannot be Verified... unless you know someone who can......"

THIS IS A MILES JOHNSTON PRODUCTION

[Ria]

Super Soldier Talk - Michael Prince - Mass Milab Abduction - May 23, 2013
https://youtube.com/watch?v=fk_so41ghrE
Published on Jun 24, 2013
In this video Michael Prince goes under regression to revisit what exactly happened during his missing time episodes at the 2013 super soldier summit in Las Vegas, NV; and in the process recalls his role as a soldier in the Nazi 4th Reich Space Command aboard Starship Calopia. Additionally be sure to tune into Super Soldier Tyler Clark's testimony as well.

[kodokan]

I do hate stuff like this. Not because it might or might not be real (who are we to say) but because I feel it's so "fantastic" that stuff like this can really undo really exceptional work on really exceptional websites with one stroke. All I would ask is that people who interview really dig into these peoples pasts before putting them on screen. I would like to say more but don't want to cause offense but lately I have been so disheartened by websites that have in the past done some amazing stuff only to (in my eyes) lose their credibility overnight. When you see stuff coming from the likes of like Pete Peterson, Michael Schratt, Richard Dolan, Graham Hancock, Brian O'Leary etc etc (the subject doesn't come into it) then all of a sudden this type of stuff, it really drives me crazy. As I say, I'm not saying it's true or not but I am saying that more background should be done before taking someones word for it and then putting it on camera.

Anyway, that's my 2 penneth worth

Peace.

[Ria]

Posted by kodokan (here)
I do hate stuff like this. Not because it might or might not be real (who are we to say) but because I feel it's so "fantastic" that stuff like this can really undo really exceptional work on really exceptional websites with one stroke. All I would ask is that people who interview really dig into these peoples pasts before putting them on screen. I would like to say more but don't want to cause offense but lately I have been so disheartened by websites that have in the past done some amazing stuff only to (in my eyes) lose their credibility overnight. When you see stuff coming from the likes of like Pete Peterson, Michael Schratt, Richard Dolan, Graham Hancock, Brian O'Leary etc etc (the subject doesn't come into it) then all of a sudden this type of stuff, it really drives me crazy. As I say, I'm not saying it's true or not but I am saying that more background should be done before taking someones word for it and then putting it on camera.

Anyway, that's my 2 penneth worth

Peace.

I suppose we are seeing this differently, this is part of information gathering, by posting it is not a vote of confidence it is simply information to be assessed.
Regarding Miles Johnson he is always cross-referencing same as Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy it is no guarantee only their intent to do their best. Also the nature of the information is quite difficult to cross reference. We are just looking at different parts of the whole machine.
With the viewto having a new one

[kodokan]

I hear what you say but it still doesn't take away the fact that it can be damaging. I think that Bill is more discerning and that's what makes him more credible than most. I really like Miles and Co I really do but lately I have despaired. (supersoldiers) Don't forget it only takes one unchecked and bad piece of info to destroy a reputation. It's hard enough when the ptb are constantly trying to confuse so there is no need to do it to yourself through not cross checking. We (the public) need to say something if we are to protect the sites we love. After the websites managers/owners, We are the firewall after all. Surely common sense would tell you that no special ops would go on camera and spill the beans if they were still operational. BUT, I could be wrong.

Peace.

[Forevernyt]

I couldn't get 10 minutes into it.

[ktlight]

We can all realise that truth is stranger than fiction.

[Forevernyt]

I will try again to watch it.

[Ria]

https://youtube.com/watch?v=-pOjznwof0g
video James Rink hypnotically regresses Jay, A.K.A. Jason, to help him discover why he is getting needle marks and missing time episodes. In the process we uncover methods milabs uses to torture their subjects and much more you don't want to miss this important interview.

This has some more info.
Yes, Forevernyt it is a possibility that you could be having triggers. And I hope not

[Forevernyt]

Hah, no I don't think I'm having any triggers. It just seemed like the guy he was trying to interview was self medicated. I've watched a lot of interviews but I couldn't watch that one. Just wasn't resonating with me.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by kodokan (here)
I hear what you say but it still doesn't take away the fact that it can be damaging. I think that Bill is more discerning and that's what makes him more credible than most.

Thank you for your vote of confidence!

This is an important topic -- and it's one that Kerry and I would quite often disagree about. For me, we needed to do better than the Fox News dictum of We Report, You Decide. That slippery slope leads to the Weekly World News. (The problem there is that even if some stories have real foundation, they get laughed at anyway.)

I'd always wanted Camelot to be a reliable, go-to source of solidly researched information that people could count on in a world full of confusion and deception. I held my fingers in the dyke for quite a while (although I only had ten of them) -- and after we parted company, Kerry interviewed a number of people whose testimonies I would not have wanted to condone. So I'm in broad agreement with everything you say, as a general principle.

Another problem is that (as I often say to people): there's a lot of crazy information out there, and some of it is true. Some supersoldiers definitely exist.

My guess about why some of them are talking is that quite a few of those speaking out are at least partially 'broken' in some way (which they may not consciously know about). By that, I mean that they have been assessed as unreliable and are surplus to requirements, and/or they know comparatively little, and/or their programming has not 'stuck', and/or that (in some cases) they have been reprogrammed with screen memories and then let loose on the alternative community.

The highly competent, well-programmed, mission-proven individuals would never be allowed 'out'. We may remember the exchange towards the end of the first Jason Bourne movie:

Jason Bourne: Who am I?
Alexander Conklin: You're U.S. government property. You're a malfunctioning, 30-million-dollar weapon. You're a total goddamn catastrophe. And by God if it kills me you're gonna tell me how this happened.

As a final note, hypnotic regression, in the presence of multiple programmed-in booby-traps and decoys, needs an expert with significant experience. It's absolutely not a DIY thing. Anyone who's read The Control of Candy Jones understands that there can be multiple layers of personalities, all sitting within each other like so many Russian Dolls. (Candy Jones had four layers, each unaware of the others. To untangle all that is far from simple.)

[Sidney]

Interesting how at approx 36:50 Miles askes where the jump machines are located, and the answer given has NOTHING to do with the question. Obvious programming IMO, and I was hoping Miles would go back and revisit that question.

[johnf]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by kodokan (here)
I hear what you say but it still doesn't take away the fact that it can be damaging. I think that Bill is more discerning and that's what makes him more credible than most.

Thank you for your vote of confidence!

This is an important topic -- and it's one that Kerry and I would quite often disagree about. For me, we needed to do better than the Fox News dictum of We Report, You Decide. That slippery slope leads to the Weekly World News. (The problem there is that even if some stories have real foundation, they get laughed at anyway.)

I'd always wanted Camelot to be a reliable, go-to source of solidly researched information that people could count on in a world full of confusion and deception. I held my fingers in the dyke for quite a while (although I only had ten of them) -- and after we parted company, Kerry interviewed a number of people whose testimonies I would not have wanted to condone. So I'm in broad agreement with everything you say, as a general principle.

Another problem is that (as I often say to people): there's a lot of crazy information out there, and some of it is true. Some supersoldiers definitely exist.

My guess about why some of them are talking is that quite a few of those speaking out are at least partially 'broken' in some way (which they may not consciously know about). By that, I mean that they have been assessed as unreliable and are surplus to requirements, and/or they know comparatively little, and/or their programming has not 'stuck', and/or that (in some cases) they have been reprogrammed with screen memories and then let loose on the alternative community.

The highly competent, well-programmed, mission-proven individuals would never be allowed 'out'. We may remember the exchange towards the end of the first Jason Bourne movie:

Jason Bourne: Who am I?
Alexander Conklin: You're U.S. government property. You're a malfunctioning, 30-million-dollar weapon. You're a total goddamn catastrophe. And by God if it kills me you're gonna tell me how this happened.

As a final note, hypnotic regression, in the presence of multiple programmed-in booby-traps and decoys, needs an expert with significant experience. It's absolutely not a DIY thing. Anyone who's read The Control of Candy Jones understands that there can be multiple layers of personalities, all sitting within each other like so many Russian Dolls. (Candy Jones had four layers, each unaware of the others. To untangle all that is far from simple.)

This post clarifies the mains reasons that some of us receive strong internal warning signs when watching interviews of
the super soldier, mind control victim type.
One can sense personality shifts in these people, especially if you try to probe past a vague statement or suspicious inconsistency.
I have not been able to dig up enough interest in this type of interview for some time now.
In retrospect I find it very painful to see the earnestness of these people, but realize they have no real idea what really was done to them, or not done to them, as well as wondering if it is any accident these interviews are all over the net.
Continued vigilance will insure more will be revealed.

jf