The birth of Kate and William's baby today - a coincidence?

[Soulboy]

Wills & Kate were photographed dangling their newborn out of the window... Does anyone remember what happened when a little someone called Michael Jackson did that very same thing? He was called a lunatic, shunned in the media and it was on the "news" for weeks, but when this lot of German tyrants in the UK do it, it's ever so wonderful... Let me go get a sick bag

[naste.de.lumina]

[Soulboy]

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
Many yearn and live for the thrill and rush of the "story" regardless if there's any truth or not to it....a good lie with some really good juicy stuff in it told just right will get the zombies in to a frenzy and turn the world upsidedown! LOL!

The 'good lie' is already rampant, and as a result astrology is discredited, again and again.
When in reality it is the most efficient teaching tool there is for empowering the masses,
and ought to be taught to third graders.

Very true, Ulli. Not without a reason have the British royals had royal astrologers for centuries and time most of their important decisions and ceremonies with certain astrological dates. It could not be any more blatantly obvious, I think. The same goes for politicians and other people of what we dislike to call "the elite". They know about it, use it to their advantage on a constant basis and everyone else should do too, but it's easy to laugh about it when the majority opinion is that it's a laughable subject and cannot be taken seriously. What would your colleagues in the office, so-called mates, etc. say if you were to take this "hocus pocus" seriously...

[Ria]

I was sent this, I don't know if this holds any merit, see what you think.
http://lightworkersxm.wordpress.com/...ht-royal-scam/

[BIG CAT]

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
Many yearn and live for the thrill and rush of the "story" regardless if there's any truth or not to it....a good lie with some really good juicy stuff in it told just right will get the zombies in to a frenzy and turn the world upsidedown! LOL!

The 'good lie' is already rampant, and as a result astrology is discredited, again and again.
When in reality it is the most efficient teaching tool there is for empowering the masses,
and ought to be taught to third graders.

doesn't astrology tend to discredit itself ? nothing I have ever seen or been told by any so called experts in this field has ever passed,
in fact the only thing they got spot on was the fee.

[ulli]

Posted by BIG CAT (here)

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
Many yearn and live for the thrill and rush of the "story" regardless if there's any truth or not to it....a good lie with some really good juicy stuff in it told just right will get the zombies in to a frenzy and turn the world upsidedown! LOL!

The 'good lie' is already rampant, and as a result astrology is discredited, again and again.
When in reality it is the most efficient teaching tool there is for empowering the masses,
and ought to be taught to third graders.

doesn't astrology tend to discredit itself ? nothing I have ever seen or been told by any so called experts in this field has ever passed,
in fact the only thing they got spot on was the fee.

The word so-called is the real clue here. The only way to find out is to study it.
Not as hard as people think.
Basic maths.
Another plus-, when you make your own predictions there are no fees involved.

[Nick Matkin]

Are there any dates/times this kid could have been conceived and born that someone, somewhere just couldn't make any sinister numerological/astrological links to anything?

Seems to me that with a world full of daily events, not to mention astronomical movements, there just isn't a date where a royal birth could occur without being linked to many "significant" co-incidences.

And God only knows why the British media is still fawning over this royal nonsense. Everyone I know (OK, maybe not a representative sample of the British public I admit!) are sick to ******g death of hearing about it. Even the BBC kind of apologised over the endless speculation "when no facts were known"!

Then there'll be all that bollocks in the media about the significance of the name. Probably also to be discussed endlessly on here by numerologists that should get out more...

(That's a thought - can anyone come up with a name now that can't be linked in any way to, or symbolic of the New World Order, Illuminati, shape-shifting reptilians, human destiny, etc?)

Nick

[RMorgan]

Posted by Nick Matkin (here)
Seems to me that with a world full of daily events, not to mention astronomical movements, there just isn't a date where a royal birth could occur without being linked to many "significant" co-incidences.

I couldn´t agree more, mate.

Independently of his birth date, people would find numerological or astrological connections.

Raf.

[ulli]

Posted by Ria (here)
I was sent this, I don't know if this holds any merit, see what you think.
http://lightworkersxm.wordpress.com/...ht-royal-scam/

If this is true, (and Im not denying it, as I intuited something similar earlier on, when I saw the pictures of the royal couple with their baby), then the 22/7/13 chart won't fit at all.
If the real birth is in September there will be no Saturn square sun and moon in that chart, and that makes a totally different personality and even physical type. Interesting...I'm curious to see how this unfolds....

[seeker/reader]

=============

[BIG CAT]

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by BIG CAT (here)

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
Many yearn and live for the thrill and rush of the "story" regardless if there's any truth or not to it....a good lie with some really good juicy stuff in it told just right will get the zombies in to a frenzy and turn the world upsidedown! LOL!

The 'good lie' is already rampant, and as a result astrology is discredited, again and again.
When in reality it is the most efficient teaching tool there is for empowering the masses,
and ought to be taught to third graders.

doesn't astrology tend to discredit itself ? nothing I have ever seen or been told by any so called experts in this field has ever passed,
in fact the only thing they got spot on was the fee.

The word so-called is the real clue here. The only way to find out is to study it.
Not as hard as people think.
Basic maths.
Another plus-, when you make your own predictions there are no fees involved.

would love to have the time to study it but seems as pointless as nailing jelly to the celling!
plus, I have more pressing matters like work and spending time with my young family.

[ulli]

Posted by BIG CAT (here)

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by BIG CAT (here)

Posted by ulli (here)

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
Many yearn and live for the thrill and rush of the "story" regardless if there's any truth or not to it....a good lie with some really good juicy stuff in it told just right will get the zombies in to a frenzy and turn the world upsidedown! LOL!

The 'good lie' is already rampant, and as a result astrology is discredited, again and again.
When in reality it is the most efficient teaching tool there is for empowering the masses,
and ought to be taught to third graders.

doesn't astrology tend to discredit itself ? nothing I have ever seen or been told by any so called experts in this field has ever passed,
in fact the only thing they got spot on was the fee.

The word so-called is the real clue here. The only way to find out is to study it.
Not as hard as people think.
Basic maths.
Another plus-, when you make your own predictions there are no fees involved.

would love to have the time to study it but seems as pointless as nailing jelly to the celling!
plus, I have more pressing matters like work and spending time with my young family.

In that case I'd like to know what was your point in engaging in this conversation in the first place.

[sleepy]

xxxxx xxxxx

[gripreaper]

Posted by sleepy (here)
The little prince has been named...George Alexander Louis.

King George? Geez, makes me cringe when I think of King George 111 historically.

[araucaria]

It's a complete misnomer. Ge-orgos meant a worker (tiller) of the land; it never meant land-owner until royalty came along.

Unknown lands used to marked 'Here be dragons!' until some George came along and said, I'll have that!

I wonder what dragon they have in mind this time.

[Ba-ba-Ra]

I didn't notice that anyone had mentioned the significance of the numbers:

7...22....13 Strange coincidence, hmmm!

[Sierra]

Posted by gripreaper (here)

Posted by sleepy (here)
The little prince has been named...George Alexander Louis.

King George? Geez, makes me cringe when I think of King George 111 historically.

Not to mention Louis the Headless. And the life of Alexander the Great wasn't so great ...

[witchy1]

Thanks Ria, I also have been having some significant doubts about the whole thing really. Her post baby belly is about the same as the week before when she christened that ship despite having been delivered of an 8lb 6oz baby. She seemed to carry at the same height through the pregnancy - which was very low and didnt really get much bigger since she popped out. She has had no swelling or puffy features despite being late.

Then she presents shortly after birth in heels and still no swelling at all. (She is even wearing her the engagement ring.)
(Maybe she just had the unheard of perfect pregnancy and delivery)

What William said after doesnt seem right either eg

Let us take him away and look after him now
This is the first time we have met him
Catherine and I have never been happier (missing - mother and child doing well?)


I was not aware that her baby Doctor #1- Dr Alan Farthing was Jill Dando's fiance - how interesting. (of course he wasn't questioned in relation to her murder) http://thecolemanexperience.wordpres...dirty-secrets/

Baby Doctor #2 Marcus Setchell sued for Negligence - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...or-300000.html

I just dunno...something is just not ok with this




Drs. Alan Farthing (left) and Marcus Setchell
http://www.people.com/people/package...710260,00.html

[seeker/reader]

-----------------

[witchy1]

Hi seeker/reader - yes, unless there is something really really wrong the bonding happens immediately as its so important. Also I expect there would have been scans vidoe maybe amnio etc especially given the "importance" of the child and no doubt needing a healthy babe

I just read that her parents are having $7mil upgrade to their home.... that kids party business must be doing really well...... wonder why more arn't into it.

Also shes gone to her parents place for 6 weeks, whats that all about.... cant they cope by themselves (even with paid staff although she apparently refused a middy - hmmmm)?????

The more I think about it the more I feel its all just wrong.....something is just not right (maybe my overactive imagination)