Posted by araucaria
(here)
Why do we keep having these David Wilcock threads that run on very predictable lines? Why, because, as with big events like the JFK assassination, we know that some mystification is going on and we can’t leave it alone until we have put it to bed. Here’s my last word on this situation.
We (or perhaps just some of us) are not beings evolving towards enlightenment, we are enlightened beings who have devolved to come here and play a role in a kind of global
festspiele. Some have fairly typecast parts to play and can feel more or less comfortable with the character they embody, although I suspect most feel some discomfort at times, perhaps disliking the things the person is doing or maybe even disliking the person they think they are. Many are playing parts that require them to be unconscious of certain aspects of what they are really doing.
The entity playing the role of ‘David Wilcock’ has a difficult role to play because it is a key role in the deception which is the plot of this
festspiele. He is very bright, self-aware and aware about awareness, and has been uncovering a great deal of useful scientific and other information. He is also a highly flawed character who is having a hard time making sense of who he is and who he is not. Part of his role involves being greatly confused.
So for example, he was born on the one day in the late 20th century that could link him astrologically to Edgar Cayce, and so on and so forth. But it is a setup job from start to finish! Wealth, success and popularity are much more important to him than they should be, and whenever he is proved wrong he just carries on regardless. As a self-styled teacher, he should have failed long ago, but he is sustained by the groupies on his website.
His case may be likened to that of Steven Greer, who is also in very murky water. This is what I wrote on the Steven Greer thread:
Posted by araucaria
(here)
The following may be of help in understanding Bill and others’ dilemma in dealing with the case of Steven Greer. The idea of a leader being a traitor to his own cause is nothing new to reader’s of Borges’s
Labyrinths, and notably the story ‘Theme of the Traitor and Hero’ – p.76
http://ebookbrowse.com/gdoc.php?id=3...1f7b6d42a7110e
The story tells of the investigation by one… Ryan into the mysterious circumstances of the death of the rebel leader Kilpatrick on the cusp of victory for his cause. It turns out all previous attempts at revolt had been thwarted at the last moment by the actions of a traitor, who is discovered to be the leader himself. To the extent that there is honour in treachery, Kilpatrick accepts his fate of death provided it is used as an instrument to serve the cause rather than defeat it.
It was then that Nolan conceived his strange scheme. Ireland idolized Kilpatrick; the most tenuous suspicion of his infamy would have jeopardized the revolt; Nolan proposed a plan which made of the traitor's execution an instrument for the country's emancipation. He suggested that the condemned man die at the hands of an unknown assassin in deliberately dramatic circumstances which would remain engraved in the imagination of the people and would hasten the revolt. Kilpatrick swore he would take part in the scheme, which gave him the occasion to redeem himself and for which his death would provide the final flourish.
The solution then is a
Festspiele or theatrical performance on the largest scale, with many people acting small or not so small parts – what we would now call a false-flag Boston bombing-type operation.
Borges’s story is no more than a brilliant piece of fiction. However, there may be a germ of an idea in there for a practical face-saving operation leading to the jeopardized positive outcome.
So what’s the score with David Wilcock? This is what I wrote on Bill’s latest credible whistleblower thread:
Posted by araucaria
(here)
If Jay Weidner and Jiminii are correct, then probably it was a time traveler back in 1890 who influenced the perception of the Mayan question. The whole 2012 saga swelled out of all proportion fuelled by insider leakage and would have been guided all the way to serve this positive function as a booby-trap.
In this regard, the magnificently diabolical work of someone like David Wilcock was not in passing on insider info to his followers, but in shoveling 2012 disinfo in the opposite direction, to the controllers through his insider contacts, thereby consolidating their belief system. Although on the face of it another damp squib, December 21st was a game changer because those whose really believed and needed things to happen now find themselves in uncharted territory, so now their game is starting to unravel as Jiminii describes.
Anyone who knows anything about sport will confirm that if you don’t finish off your opponent when you are ahead, you will almost certainly lose. The closer you get – or think you get – to victory, the more likely you are to fold up altogether because what is happening was never supposed to happen. We are winning the third set of a tennis match that we were supposed to lose in two
http://www.englishblog.com/2009/01/c...l#.Ug3Br38auSo
I have been saying for some time that solar activity reflects human activity, i.e. it reacts to Wall St. rather than the other way round. Obviously then, the major effort made by a commando from the future will have involved, as we have known all along here on Avalon, the calming presence of spiritually advanced beings. This, extending out in all directions, would be the cause not just of pockets of resistance to the NWO, but also not least of the Sun’s unexpected behavior.
As our friend Jorr Lundstrom used to say, “All is well!”
Re: "Wisdom Teachings with David Wilcock" on Gaiamtv.com
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks