Fukushima radioactive waste water treatment technique

[Carmody]

Fukushima radioactive waste water treatment technique:

This SHOULD work, and work well. The experiment merely needs to be done. Apologies for taking so long for this to form itself properly in the back of my noggin, it finally fell out in complete form, today.

~~~~~~~~~~

Take about a 1:1 ratio of microscopic iron, and microscopic aluminum. Mix the powders together. If mixing the powders together is a problem..which it will be...mix it into water, each component at a time, into water. maybe 10:1 with water, have the micro iron and the micro aluminum mix thoroughly in the water. Then fully dilute into maybe 100:1 via mass.

100kg of water, 1-2-3 kg of 1:1 micro aluminum/micro iron mix. It has to be micro, or better (finer particles), so it suspends in the water. Basically, you want nano aluminum and nano iron in the water, down to the chemical dispersion level. Together, in the water, at the molecular level.

Pour this into a mixture of the radioactive water. About 100kg of rad waste water, per 100 kg of water/iron/aluminum mix. (total mass of the mix is now 202kg (approx)

Run a Rhodes gas flame (aka :"brown's gas", aka "HHO gas") THROUGH the radioactive water. Repeatedly. Over and over. Repeatedly, in a continual run, ie, maybe 3-4-5 runs through.

This will require a maybe 4000L/Hr browns gas generator. You want lots of browns gas 'flame' bubbling through the mixture, lots of browns gas reacting with the water. The water will not heat up, it will not even boil, it will not reach 100 degrees Celsius.

Measure the residual radiation after a few cycles. Fine tune the mixtures and technique.

The radiation should drop to near unmeasurable levels.

That's the recipe for decontaminating the radioactive waste water.

~~~~~~~~~~~

Scale it up, for a few million dollars... and in a few months, all of that radioactive waste water should be treated, and have zero residual radiation.

Another potential way to do it, is to put the micro aluminum and the micro iron mix in the water and go for Ultrasonic cavitation, micro implosions in the water, which are electrical, and same-same as the brown's gas effect, in this case.

This mess has been solvable for a LONG time, ways of doing so have been known long before this mess even began. I'm sure that the black parts of certain governments know better ways than this.

Please understand that the technique of radiation reduction via brown's gas and aluminum/iron powders..was proven conclusively by the official Canadian government offices and official representatives of said outfit...at Chalk River Laboratories, at the town of Chalk River. The video tape of it being done is available on the internet.

This proposed technique, is a modification of their 'tested and found to be effective' technique. The Chalk River Labs did not find or discover the original radiation reduction technique, it was brought them ...and they conducted official works based on it.



it makes you wonder.....

(I personally own a 1600L/Hr browns gas generator and have played with similar techniques, but not radiation issues. I'm not talking out of an uneducated and uninformed butt here, my understandings are real, and my experience is direct and hands on.)

Please repost anywhere you can think of, get this message out there.

[Roisin]

I was in the following thread where I posted the following post but then after I hit Submit, that post ended up in this thread and not the one I actually posted it in. That thread is the Fukushima update thread in this forum.

Here's a link to that post that I posted in that other Fukushima thread here:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post796570

I had to repost it there because it ended up in this thread instead!

[Carmody]

Well, try not to dilute the thread's intent too much, the odd clean bump, and so on. (thanks for the edit of your post)

This has to get out there.

Someone had to break the stalemate/block on the release of molecular shift technologies, and no government agency or black ops outfit/corporation wants to give up their 'secrets'. The Death of the world via greed, fear, and ego.... has had enough of a run.

[Roisin]

Something really weird has happened here. Obviously some glitch with this forum.

Anyway, I agree, your topic here is an important one.

[panopticon]

Posted by Carmody (here)
Please understand that the technique of radiation reduction via brown's gas and aluminum/iron powders..was proven conclusively by the official Canadian government offices and official representatives of said outfit...at Chalk River Laboratories, at the town of Chalk River. The video tape of it being done is available on the internet.

Can you link to the video Carmody?

-- Pan

[meat suit]

thanks Carmody,

there is a whole community of hho device builders out there who have given up on modifying cars.
maybe thats something to try out....

[panopticon]

Is this the video you were talking about Carmody?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1R5G5hTC7pc

-- Pan

[RichD]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=e6CIcnnrHDU

Cheers, Rich

[Magneticman]

Hi Carmody..

In October last year I woke up with the same Brainwave you had..

We must be resonating at the same frequency...

Neutralising radioactive waste / rods using 'browns gas or water gas".





As things get more out of control at Fukushima....

Here's a positive idea that could neutralise the waste...

Set up a massive brown's gas generator on site and bombard the USED RODS with Hydroxy...(water gas).

This is old footage of a controlled experiment using 'Brown's Gas' TO NEUTRALISE radioactive waste. https://youtube.com/watch?v=1R5G5hTC7pc

Yule Brown did a controlled experiment on one rod for the AEC (Atomic energy commission)and was able to make it inert in less than 20 minutes. It went nowhere with the AEC.

Yule Brown patented this technology and died mysteriously of a heart attack as per the usual scenario for great minds that might interfere with the current system.

This could be a solution to the current situation in Japan?

So people we need to put these idea's back in their face..

And the world needs to help the Japanese to sort it because it isn't their problem .. it's our problem...

Love and Gratitude

You are onto it.. all we need is a bloody big browns gas generator to sort it ...As a thought...WE could have a break on all wars for 1 calendar month. then use that money to get it happening eh "-)

[alh02]

Fulvic acid people... research it!

[Carmody]

Posted by panopticon (here)
Is this the video you were talking about Carmody?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1R5G5hTC7pc

-- Pan

Yep, that's one of the tests...

Of course, people will pile onto the comments area of that video and complain (and they have). More shill naysayers, attempting to debunk and keep the technology out of the minds of people. They are trying to come up with inane complaints about how things were done, to resort to calling the thing trickery. Like trying to find the non existent tiny hole in the cement floor of the cage..where the elephant disappeared. Ludicrous.

Negative comments (on that video) are for breaking the opinion and thought formation of the common man, it has nothing to do with scientific debunking. It's about breaking the surety of those who do not know what is going on, not to break the surety of those who are scientifically inclined, and capable of repeating the experiment. Propaganda, plain and simple. Exactly how it's been done, for thousands of years.

Yet we've got over unity technology popping out of the woodworks these days. More and more, every day. Fukushima is a priority in such an environment, IMO.

See Wade Frazier's thread over in the priority thread section about what happened with Brown's gas and his friend Dennis.

Due to this one being a true molecular shift technology, one that truly enacts on a course that actually shifts atomic structures, this one ..'Brown's gas', is one of the technologies that was furiously fought with blocking tactics.

Most seriously, the technique I outlined above, will do the same to rad waste water. The reduction of radioactivity in the waste water will be enacted and that would cost no more than about what..$5 million, to get it started and then a few more $M to stream line the process and get it done.

The technique is about diffusing the iron and the aluminum in a fine enough powder, so that it suspends in the water that is to be added. Some given amount of dispersion will do, enough to get a good mix and dispersion. A true nano/chemical dispersion/suspension would work best and is not all that difficult to enact.

Then add to the rad water, stir....and then run a brown's gas flame through it.

As an extra avenue of proofing...Brown's gas is KNOWN for transmutation of the trace elements in water. it has been tested in that 'area' of research as well.

[eva08]

Thank you, for posting this thread -- so amazing

[Carmody]

I mentioned 'ultrasonic cavitation' as one technique.

Please understand that ultrasonic package sealers use a frequency of 41,500, or 41.5khz. they use this frequency as this is the best frequency found for sealing things like tubes, tubes full of products that are principally of water based origin. toothpaste, hair cream, and so on. All those plastic tubes. this came straight from the mouth of one of the head engineers of the world's best made and highest grade tube sealers, in a phone call.

The ultrasonic sealer designers found that 41.5khz was the best principle frequency, then that frequency is varied in an AC fashion, to 'hunt and seek' the best nearby frequency that will work for that particular and exact tube being sealed. The frequency is varied by +/-150 cps, centered on the mentioned 41.5khz.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From keelynet:

Verification of Frequency to produce Etheric Force from Water - The scientist, I shall call him Dr. X, was doing experiments with ultrasonic sound in a column of water. The object of the experiments was to devise a means of separating various densities of materials by injecting them into a column of water which was subjected to an ultrasonic standing wave vibration.

A Barium Titanate ultrasonic transducer was fixed to the bottom of a quartz tube which was closed at the bottom and open at the top. Pure water was poured into the tube and the water column was "tuned" so that a standing wave was produced at 40,000 CPS (cycles per second). The transducer was powered by a 700 Watt power amplifier which was driven by an ultrasonic frequency generator.

Because of the large amount of power put into the column of water a certain amount of evaporation took place at a constant rate when the transducer was energized. Therefore, to maintain a standing wave in the water column a feedback device caused the frequency to be raised as the water evaporated and the temperature changed.

As a test, Dr. X decided to run through the experiment with only water in the tube to insure that a standing wave was maintained as the water evaporated and the frequency rose higher and higher. When the experiment was started everything worked beautifully.

Dr. X took periodic readings of his instrumentation and was assured that the standing wave was being maintained. Suddenly, with no warning whatever the water disappeared from the open quartz tube. He looked up thinking to see the water splashed on the ceiling when to his amazement a clean hole went right through the ceiling. The hole was the same size as the inside of the quartz tube.

Further investigation showed the hole continued on through the roof also! Dr. X checked his notebook and found the last frequency entry to be 41,300 CPS. It was shortly after this that the water disappeared.

Because of the time interval between the last reading and the disappearing water, the frequency sent to the transducer was higher than the last reading and Dr. X said it could well have been very close to 42,800 CPS, the Keely dissociation frequency.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thus it IS possible to break down the radiation in this water, and quite quickly and simply.

YET, you see NO-ONE moving toward such solutions.

Which is a VERY powerful tell-tale sign, that we are probably dealing with deliberately made and maintained situations.

This (below) link is about using high power RF to break down water. It is from 2007.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Last winter, inventor John Kanzius was already attempting one seemingly impossible feat-building a machine to cure cancer with radio waves-when his device inadvertently succeeded in another: He made saltwater catch fire. TV footage of his bizarre discovery (check out the video below) has been burning up the blogosphere ever since, drawing crackpots and Ph.D.s alike into a raging debate. Can water burn? And if so, what good can come of it?

Some people gush over the invention's potential for desalinization or cheap energy. Briny seawater, after all, sloshes over most of the planet's surface, and harnessing its heat energy could power all sorts of things. Skeptics say Kanzius's radio generator is sucking up far more energy than it's creating, making it a carnival trick at best.

For now, Kanzius is tuning out the hubbub. The retired radio- and television- station owner says the saltwater stuff is interesting, but a cancer breakthrough is what he's really after. Diagnosed with leukemia in 2002, he began building his radio-wave blaster the next year, soon after a relapse. His lifelong fascination with radio provided further inspiration. Radio station antennas, he knew, can turn a bystander's metal eyeglasses toasty warm. If he could seed a person's cancerous cells with nanoscopic metal particles and blast them with radio waves, perhaps he could kill off the cancer while sparing healthy tissue.

The saltwater phenomenon happened by accident when an assistant was bombarding a saline-filled test tube with radio waves and bumped the tube, causing a small flash. Curious, Kanzius struck a match. "The water lit like a propane flame," he recalls.

"People said, 'It's a crock. Look for hidden electrodes in the water,' " says Penn State University materials scientist Rustum Roy, who visited the Erie, Pennsylvania, inventor in his lab in August after seeing the feat on Google Video. A demo made Roy a believer. "This is discovery science in the best tradition," he says.
Roy thinks the sodium chloride in the water may weaken the bonds between the oxygen and hydrogen atoms, which are broken free by radio waves. It's these gas molecules that are igniting, he explains, not the liquid itself. Tests show that the reaction disappears once the radio waves stop. Roy plans to conduct more tests to get to the bottom of the mystery.

Meanwhile, researchers at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center have made progress using Kanzius's technology to fight cancer in animals. They published their findings last month in the journal Cancer.

How to Burn Saltwater as Fuel

Inventor John Kanzius managed to burn saltwater to generate power. Here's how:


1. A generator emits 14-megahertz radio waves.

2 . The waves bombard a solution of regular table salt and water.

3. Exactly what happens next remains a mystery, but one theory posits that the sodium chloride may weaken the bonds between the strong>oxygen and hydrogen atoms in water. Radio waves break apart the bonds and liberate flammable hydrogen gas molecules.

4. A match ignites the hydrogen, generating an intense flame.

5. The resulting heat powers a simple engine.

~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.popsci.com/scitech/articl...ing-water-fuel


To re-iterate: we have KNOWN functional solutions, multiple solutions, IN the public purview.

Right out in the open, available for all people to see and understand.

The threat is to the entire world's biosphere, an EXTREME threat to the world's biosphere. Annihilation of the world's biosphere.

Nothing is being done.

So you tell me, where's the problem? Why aren't you out there, getting this fixed, forcing these fixes?

Why do you sleep?

[Carmody]

Something interesting came up recently. Two things, actually. Connected but not connected.

Reading my last post in this thread, I recall a recent article over at physorg.

It's about 'tickling' water or quantum structure. water is quantum fluid, each molecule is free-floating. Thus quantum effects have the upper hand. Liquid is more akin to quantum than solid, which is 'frozen linked lattice structure.

It explains the low energy input effect of the water expanding suddenly and shooting out of the quartz column. This finally gets an explanation.

I'll go and get it....

Physicists investigate onset of effective mass

Although mass may seem to be a fairly straightforward concept, from a physics perspective it can be much more complex than weighing an object and reading off a number in grams. For instance, an object's mass can be modified by putting it in a different medium.

The familiar type of mass, also called the "inertial mass" or "bare mass," is a fundamental property of an object that is determined by an object's resistance to acceleration when subject to a force, for example gravity.

When an object's mass is modified by putting it in a different medium, the modified mass is called the "effective mass." Effective mass is distinctly different than bare mass, as it is not a fundamental property of an object, but changes depending on the material it is in. For practical purposes, effective mass plays an important role in electrical conductivity and electronic devices.

"The effective mass description is incredibly powerful because it allows one to sweep away a lot of the complex physics, which describes the interactions between the electron and the medium, replacing it with an intuitive 'classical' description, while burying the details within a modified mass," physicist Rockson Chang, currently at the Institut d'Optique at the Université Paris-Sud, told Phys.org.

"Effective mass behavior is well established, both in fundamental science and modern electronic engineering," he said. "An example of the latter is in the use of the semiconductor gallium arsenide (GaAs). Electrons in GaAs turn out to have a very small effective mass, just 0.067 times that of the bare electron mass. This very small mass means that when the electrons are subjected to a potential difference, they move significantly faster than outside this medium, making them ideal for high-speed electronic devices. "

While working at the University of Toronto, Chang and his coauthors investigated what happens to effective mass when an external force is applied very abruptly. In the simplified theory of effective mass, which is often used in research, the assumption is that the forces are applied slowly. The researchers wanted to find out what happens when this assumption is not met.

To do this, the researchers used a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC)—a large number of atoms cooled to near absolute zero temperature. These atoms were trapped in an artificial crystal made of light called an optical lattice. Although this system contains atoms rather than electrons, it exhibits many of the same fundamental properties as a semiconductor. However, because BECs exist on larger length and time scales, they have the advantage of being much more easily accessed experimentally than semiconductors. As the researchers explained, this idea of using one well-controlled quantum system to "simulate" the properties of another is called "quantum simulation."

After trapping the BEC in an optical lattice, the researchers abruptly (in about 20 µs) applied a force on the atoms with an external magnetic field. This force results in an oscillation of an atom's motion in the crystal, and from this motion the researchers were able to extract the particle's mass.

The researchers' most important finding was that the initial response of the atoms to this applied force is characterized not by the effective mass as expected, but by the bare mass. Shortly after this initial time period, the atoms response undergo rapid oscillations and the onset of effective mass occurs.

"For over 50 years, the observed effective mass behavior has been well described by theory," Chang said. "However, the popular and intuitive description is based on some fundamental assumptions, in particular that the external force is applied relatively slowly. In our work we probe what happens when this assumption is invalidated. Our work shows that if one were to apply a force sufficiently quickly, the effective mass description falls apart. Interestingly, the initial response of the particle is that of a particle with its bare mass—or in other words, the particle responds as if the medium wasn't there at all. Only over longer time does the medium have a chance to catch up, again modifying the behavior of the particle and gradually returning to the usual effective mass response."

To give a loose analogy, Chang explains that the onset of effective mass is somewhat like walking through a muddy field. Because of the mud, you tend to walk slower than you would otherwise. This is like having an effective mass larger than a bare mass. However, if you started off by running into the mud, you would at first move very quickly. At this point, effective mass is still low. But as you sink deeper and deeper into the mud, it becomes more and more difficult to maintain that speed, and you eventually slow down. Likewise, it takes some time for the effective mass behavior to arise when subjected to a force.

"It's not that our work is the first observation of the effective mass," Chang said. "Rather, our experiment demonstrates that the simple and intuitive picture of effective mass can actually break down, while revealing a conceptually very satisfying transition between two different behaviors, from a response in free space (described by the bare mass) to in a medium (described by an effective mass). Our work explores a new regime of dynamics, fast compared to the characteristic timescale of the material-particle interaction."

By showing how effective mass develops on short time scales, the results shed light on some of the most fundamental properties of solid state systems.

"This regime is increasingly of interest for researchers looking to continually push the speed of electronic devices," Chang said. "For example, there has been recent interest in using ultrafast laser pulses (femto-second and shorter) for fast electronic switches. Our results show that the speed and effectiveness of this switching may be affected since the effective mass description may no longer be valid."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What happened is the the applied occilaltion changed the effective mass, and the effective volume and the effective 'structure' of the water changed, as a lumped parameter. Ie, all at once. Since it's volume was suddenly a lot greater (connectivity and/or spacing in the quantum aspect of the water/liquid) it had to shoot out of the top of the quartz tube. The experimenter was essentially lucky it did not happen faster, or it would have popped the tube, instead of merely shooting out the end of it.

~~~~~~~~~~

The other thing is directly tied to this thread. something I found out today. I have a little Geiger counter. A soeks unit.

"evaluates radiation background on the amount of power of ionizing radiation (gamma and beta-particles) with taking into account X-rays."-

What happened, is that there was a fairly powerful rain storm, and i went outside just after it occurred, and decided to check the radiation count of the rain. The typical trick, is to wipe a surface, in this case, a car windshield (washed clean by the rain, no dust). I used a paper towel, folded twice, quartered. The soeks unit is kept in a plastic zip bag, so it cannot be contaminated by radiation or water, or whatever is being tested....

I placed the meter on top of the paper towel,and the numbers were elevated above normal. I noticed this effect before and did not know what it was, but not so severely as this time. This time I exacerbated the effect, as i noted, finally, how it came to be. I thought the meter was malfunctioning. It may still be, but not due to internal issues or whatnot. Malfunctioning in the way of badly applied causality applied to observation.

When I tapped the unit, while it sat on the soaked paper towel, it's readings went crazy. Crazy levels of UP in intensity.

As the paper towel settled under the gentle tapping, the effect decreased until it was down to a stable baseline number, that was about two times higher than the regular background levels. Which is typical of a rainstorm, these days. normal, free air, lying in dry dirt, etc, is about 0.14 microsieverts. The rainstorm elevation effect is about 0.35-0.45 microsieverts. when tapped, the readings went through the roof, to about 10+ microsieverts. That elevated level of 10 microsieverts is way way way high. It is definitely a 'wherever you are...get the hell out of there!' warning from the soeks Geiger counter.

No matter if it is static induction, it is saying that a radiation induction of some sort is indeed happening. It could be just static induction from the shock, the combination of the differently charged water, the blend with the pores of the paper towel, and an exchange effect going on, but the readings for radiation went off the chart, so to speak. I will try and duplicate the effect again, and see what happens. I'll try tap water and see if it happens again. I cannot duplicate the effect with simply tapping the meter, in or out of a bag, so we shall see. There is definitely room for error, in this little situation, but again, Ill try and track down the exact culprit.

Basically, we are potentially looking at radiation release being induced by physically shocking a rain water soaked paper towel.

What does that say about driving a car during a thunderstorm? Or riding a bike in a thunderstorm? This heads into the 'charged water' area of things, the morning dew consideration, and the full moon morning dew situation that makes for the best 'philosopher's stone' making. we're looking at nuclear energy interchange. quantum and dimensional energies. This is what we may be looking at.

It may also represent a way of using a meter of this type to check on the qualities of 'charged water' (vortex spun)that is becoming popular in the world of alternative health products.

Rainwater is known for 'radon' production, which is why we have to be careful about pronouncements of radiation in rainwater. We had a thread here, somewhere, about that, and how it may be intimately tied to the dimensional energies encountered at ley line and vortex line/point situations, and thus dimensional crossing areas. We may be suffering with greatly increased short term radon production in rainstorms and rainwater, due to all the nuke testing and the fukushima/Chernobyl situations. This may be changing the balance of energetic egress across dimensions.

I used to open the windows and let all that humid air in, or go out and stand in the rain, during thunderstorms. The air during and afterward felt great.

Now, after Fukushima, and all this chemtrail crap, it just feels downright horrible. I have to close the windows, seal the house up, and turn on my large ionizer, just to keep my head clear. I get a severe allergenic response from the humid air after a rainstorm now, and from fog, etc.

[Carmody]

OK, I cannot exactly replicate the effect with tap water, which indicates that the level of particle saturation or possibly 'charge' of the water, the molecular energetic levels and polarization is different with tap water. In my case, it is well water.

What we appear to be seeing here, is directly tied to the scotch tape x-ray production effect.



http://www.nature.com/news/2008/0123...2008.1185.html

Of course, the Russians were way ahead on the publishing of that one, reporting on the basic phenomena back in 1953.

My point is that the rainwater is very high in the prerequisites for the creation of this x-ray energetic output.

This one should end up getting out there and into the books. someone else needs to try this trick. We're talking about the breakdown of water at the atomic level, transmutation, and emission.

Which supports the philosopher's stone creation/manufacturing techniques as being real and it may be related to the issue of the Fukushima/Chernobyl situation, and atomic testing up to this date.

Lots of other things too, but people can only deal with so much at one time and my time also has to be spent in other ways besides continual typing. I have no clue whether anyone but me understands any of what I type up here, on the forum. It's a bit frustrating, but the alternative is to be on a uncontrolled public/open forum, where the morons and hitshills come out of the woodwork and hammer anyone who does not toe the party science control line.

edit: I just did some checking and it turns out that the averaged reading from tapping the soeks meter while it sits on the wet paper towel, is similar to, in that short time period of tapping...an average day walking around Chernobyl. The continual level in Chernobyl, mind you. Only for a few seconds with the tapping of the meter. Which drops off dramatically as we get away from the meter.

However, we are in a giant unknown about how this affects people who may be out in the rain, how we absorb the mist from the rain, or driving down the road in a car, at high speed.

The rainstorm readings on the upper west coast of the USA and in Canada (BC-Vancouver), just after Fukushima, were all showing high levels such as this one I found when tapping the meter while it was on the soaked paper towel.

Never mind all the dimensional and ley line stuff.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Carmody (here)
Lots of other things too, but people can only deal with so much at one time and my time also has to be spent in other ways besides continual typing. I have no clue whether anyone but me understands any of what I type up here, on the forum.

Over time, as I keep reading, bits and pieces begin to connect .

So your isolation is not total.

[Carmody]

Ok, coming back on the thing of getting high reading levels when tapping the meter.

One big thing to be aware of, is that physical motion, or sharp changes in motion, or the addition of mechanical delta, on a transistor, will generate a signal.

I tried this trick again and again with my meter, and could generate, relatively speaking... the same levels of signal with no rain water exposure.

Which means that the meter was suffering from internal noise generation from the physical tapping.

I had a nice little hypothesis going there, but it can all be thrown into the trashcan. Which is a good thing, we don't need that sort of problem happening, if indeed it was real. Which it is not.

The physical 'signal' generation itself is interesting as known phenomena go, but not sure if it has any relevance to radiation. The basic connection of electrical generation in a lattice structure from physical impact does indeed get to producing very low levels of radiation, yes, but it is not generally applicable to the macro situation of worrying about radiation in daily human life as we know it, nor to the proper use and operation of this tiny Soeks dosimeter/counter.

If one is looking to interview phenomena and go out to the limits and find how all this stuff connects, knowing about this consideration of signal noise in transistors from physical impact (possibly to be filed under piezoelectric) is critical, it is connective tissue in the fabric of this place.

The overall levels of radiation, where I'm at, are about 0.08u-0.15u seiverts/hr as a range and are elevated to about 0.25u-0.35u sieverts/hr, after a rainstorm. This is the same readings I've had for the past two years. Happy to report operator error.

[cuitlahuac]

Any more links?

Posted by Carmody (here)
Fukushima radioactive waste water treatment technique:

This SHOULD work, and work well. The experiment merely needs to be done. Apologies for taking so long for this to form itself properly in the back of my noggin, it finally fell out in complete form, today.

~~~~~~~~~~

Take about a 1:1 ratio of microscopic iron, and microscopic aluminum. Mix the powders together. If mixing the powders together is a problem..which it will be...mix it into water, each component at a time, into water. maybe 10:1 with water, have the micro iron and the micro aluminum mix thoroughly in the water. Then fully dilute into maybe 100:1 via mass.

100kg of water, 1-2-3 kg of 1:1 micro aluminum/micro iron mix. It has to be micro, or better (finer particles), so it suspends in the water. Basically, you want nano aluminum and nano iron in the water, down to the chemical dispersion level. Together, in the water, at the molecular level.

Pour this into a mixture of the radioactive water. About 100kg of rad waste water, per 100 kg of water/iron/aluminum mix. (total mass of the mix is now 202kg (approx)

Run a Rhodes gas flame (aka :"brown's gas", aka "HHO gas") THROUGH the radioactive water. Repeatedly. Over and over. Repeatedly, in a continual run, ie, maybe 3-4-5 runs through.

This will require a maybe 4000L/Hr browns gas generator. You want lots of browns gas 'flame' bubbling through the mixture, lots of browns gas reacting with the water. The water will not heat up, it will not even boil, it will not reach 100 degrees Celsius.

Measure the residual radiation after a few cycles. Fine tune the mixtures and technique.

The radiation should drop to near unmeasurable levels.

That's the recipe for decontaminating the radioactive waste water.

~~~~~~~~~~~

Scale it up, for a few million dollars... and in a few months, all of that radioactive waste water should be treated, and have zero residual radiation.

Another potential way to do it, is to put the micro aluminum and the micro iron mix in the water and go for Ultrasonic cavitation, micro implosions in the water, which are electrical, and same-same as the brown's gas effect, in this case.

This mess has been solvable for a LONG time, ways of doing so have been known long before this mess even began. I'm sure that the black parts of certain governments know better ways than this.

Please understand that the technique of radiation reduction via brown's gas and aluminum/iron powders..was proven conclusively by the official Canadian government offices and official representatives of said outfit...at Chalk River Laboratories, at the town of Chalk River. The video tape of it being done is available on the internet.

This proposed technique, is a modification of their 'tested and found to be effective' technique. The Chalk River Labs did not find or discover the original radiation reduction technique, it was brought them ...and they conducted official works based on it.



it makes you wonder.....

(I personally own a 1600L/Hr browns gas generator and have played with similar techniques, but not radiation issues. I'm not talking out of an uneducated and uninformed butt here, my understandings are real, and my experience is direct and hands on.)

Please repost anywhere you can think of, get this message out there.

[Carmody]

Everything is right there.

The price of not rolling up one's sleeves and digging in to it, is ..oh..about one (1x) planet earth's future.

It's odd isn't it?..that humanity's capacity for projection of future, logical extrapolation....and so on..is not even as strong as the desire to make sure that they eat lunch today.

[Carmody]

Other demonstrations, measured with under more sophisticated protocol and instrumentation have been conducted before Japanese nuclear experts, including four scientists from Toshiba and Mitsui: Cobalt 60 of 24,000 mR/hr reduced with one treatment to 12,000 mR/hr. The Japanese scientists were so excited by what they saw that they immediately purchased a generator and air shipped it to Japan. They sent Prof. Brown a confidential report of some of their results. Subsequently, they tried to obtain additional Brown's Gas generators directly from the People's Republic of China.

The evidence is rather conclusive. The earth is suffering in the face of having the technology to stop it.

This is from the year 2000.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.co...ient=firefox-a

It illustrates the making of enormous brown's gas generators. Ones big enough to be installed on ocean going vessels, as well. The vast number of competent brown's gas generator builders, can scale them to any level of requirement. This, existing in the year 2000.

At this time, Brown's Gas generators are mass-produced in the Bautou, a major research city in the People's Republic of China by the NORINCO factory which also manufacturers locomotives and ordinances -- and services the nation's nuclear industry complex. Most of these generators (producing up to 4,000 litres/hour/2.4 litres of water at 0.45 MPa with power requirements ranging from 0.66 kW/hr up to 13.2 kW/hr) are marketed for their superior welding and brazing qualities, costing between $ 2,000 and $ 17,000. Other models, usually near the 1,000 litres/hour range are being manufactured in smaller quantities in several countries. Some units have been used for the decontamination of radioactive materials since 1991. Brown's Gas generators produce between 300 and 340 litres of Brown's Gas per 1 kW/hr energy DC current approximately and one litre of water produces about 1,866.6 litres of gas. A generator that produces 10,000 litres per hour has been built specifically for the reduction of nuclear waste. Prof. Brown first successfully reduced radioactivity radionuclides of Cobalt 60 in his laboratory in Sydney, Australia with initial experimental results of about 50%.