DEPOPULATION Agenda : Frightening Reality, Bitter Truth

[GuyFox]

DEPOPULATION Agenda : Killing Us Softly
The Frightening Reality, the Bitter Truth

1/ PODCAST:
Interview with Kevin Galalae on The Mike Harris Show: Apr.30th /

MP3 : http://mediaarchives.gsradio.net/mik.../hr1043014.mp3

Tonight's guest was Kevin Galalae, the topic was the global depopulation agenda and Kevin's new book "Killing Us Softly"

2/ VIDEO:
Unveiling The Truth #13: Interview With Author Kevin Galalae (2014-01-04)
=

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=N_r9fhsbuLE

=

[mpod001]

You should research Dr Rima Laibow! She has done extensive research on Codex Alimentarius and Agenda 21...the whole depopulation agenda!

[GuyFox]

Kevin Galalae seems new on the scene.

He is Canadian, and the interview (above, with Unvealing the Truth) in Jan. 2014 was the first time he was interviewed "by Canadian media."

His book is called: Killing Us Softly, and a search on Ixquick* brings:

"The birth of nearly two billion people has been prevented and the death of half a billion hurried. While these goals have been intentional, the architects of the Global Depopulation Policy have unintentionally undermined the genetic and intellectual endowment of the human species and have set back eons of natural selection. Their intentions have never been malevolent, but the unintended results of their actions are frightening.

It is the task of this article to reveal this silent offensive’s secret methods and insidious means, which make up the world’s greatest con, so that an awakening to the dire realities we face will prompt each and every human being on earth to demand a share of the responsibility and population control can be legislated across the globe, with little or no resistance, for the next three generations or until our numbers are sufficiently low to allow humanity to live in balance with nature and at peace with itself.

This is the only way our children will have a future and a life of dignity..."

==
> https://theusindependent.com/killing...kevin-galalae/

To me, his comments seem to have a real "ring of truth", though the conclusions are frightening. In the UTT interview, he talks about how the agenda is moving from: Targeting the young (through preventing births), to Targeting the old.

Is this what Obamacare is really about?
Will TPTB use it as a way to reduce the lifespan of the average citizen?

===
*I could find no Customer Review on Amazon.
Here's a brief book review: http://lovingenergies.spruz.com/pt/K...-2013/blog.htm

[Ellisa]

Sorry Guy. Personally I believe in contraception being easily available to all, especially the young, and men as well as women. More responsible attitudes towards conception will result in children who are wanted and not neglected. it should be possible for people to be childless if they wish, without condemnation.

At the end of life I know a number of my fellow seniors who have obtained enough medication to ensure that they may end their own lives should they wish to. The futility of treating over 90 year olds with hip replacements and massive CPR is also, in my opinion a form of malpractice. Everyone wants to have comfort in their later tears, free from pain and suffering. Most do not want treatments that are painful, expensive and finally useless. We all must die one day--- It is part of life.

I cannot understand why Americans (and other countries) cannot understand the benefit of a good health scheme, supported by themselves and others as a tax. Everyone will use the scheme at some stage in their life. No one can ever say they never will. Recently my husband broke his leg quite badly. He is in his 70s. He had first class care, 2 weeks in hospital and follow ups over the next six months. It all cost us NOTHING at that time -though of course over the years we had paid our taxes. I hope the system will continue.

[Frederick Jackson]

I am glad that Kevin Galalaea's campaign to awaken us to the fact that we are being poisoned to further the aim of a Global Depopulation Policy is getting more traction. It is difficult to comprehend a reason other than that of the Global Depopulation Policy for many governments' refusal to stop the practice of fluoridation despite the mountain of scientific evidence showing that the practice is harmful, even deadly. And there is really nothing to support the idea that fluoridation is needed to protect teeth except for a very flawed study from 60 years ago. (A deliberately flawed study? A false flag?). Compare that to the hundreds of studies showing the harm! Yet in spite of this, many governments refuse to abandon the policy of fluoridating water and salt (Latin America; and see some of my posts on the subject). To me it goes beyond government's tendency toward inertia. It speaks of an agenda.

A prayer for Kevin as he goes into his 18th day of his hunger strike in St. Peter's square.

PS This is a great web site on the fluoridation issue. http://fluoridealert.org/ It will give you the scientific studies and other publications and news about the problem. I was amazed to see that there was even a three year National Research Council study of the issue that recommended reducing the maximum level of fluoridation below the current 4 ppm as there is damage to bones, teeth and more... at this level. And yet what did the government do with this information? I should check to be sure, but I think the reaction of the Federal Government was: NOTHING.

[GuyFox]

Ellisa,
Are you serious?

" The futility of treating over 90 year olds with hip replacements and massive CPR is also, in my opinion a form of malpractice..."

My father was born in 1921 and is still alive - and my (younger) mother too. Their quality of life is not as high as it used to be, but they still face each day with optimism and a sense of humor. I would not want to take that away from them. And the idea that people will just decide to happily die when they reach a certain age, or need an expensive operation does not meet the test of reality. I think if they were in pain, or had lost their connection(s) with the world, they might be less interested in staying alive. But I would wish many of use to have that chance to stay alive and the choice to take some life-saving treatments and/or operations.

"I cannot understand why Americans (and other countries) cannot understand the benefit of a good health scheme, supported by themselves and others as a tax..."

Obamacare is not really a health system. It is an insurance system, and a very flawed one too. It retains the many inefficiencies of the US medical system - which is about making a profit by maintaining those with illness. It is not about preventing illness of even curing people with illness. The way that (expensive) pills and medication are handed out to those who have ailments is disgusting. If you lived abroad, outside the US for a few decades, you would see that more clearly.

I wonder if you bothered to listen to the podcast or the video with Kevin Galalae (?) Perhaps not. The best part was his advice near the end of the video where he made some suggestions about how to avoid the threats that are being thrown at us by a system which now seems determined to shorten people's lives.

[Ellisa]

I have never lived in the US and I have only lived in countries with a Health Scheme which allows treatment as needed for people with health problems. This is not free as it is paid for by taxes. I think this is a good thing. Maybe Obamacare is flawed--- I don't have to use it so I don't know--- but I am sure that if there had not been some sort of paranoia about taxes being levied to enable health cover for all, the scheme would now be up and running and everyone would be benefitting.

What on earth has fluoride got to do with this topic?

I do not advocate killing people over a certain age! Some people remain fit and active until they die of 'old age' peacefully. What I am talking about is the CPR that goes on with people who are old, demented and ill. In earlier days they would have died of pneumonia (nick-named 'the old man's friend). Now they live on bewildered and begging to be let go. This happens-- it is one of the things not talked about. Some medical staff refuse to give palliative medications because they will hasten death whilst they deaden the pain.

Some old people cherish their every moment (my own mother made 97 and a half useful and active years, aware to the end). However some are not so lucky and long for release. That cannot happen in many places, and they have to struggle on, confused and unhappy. That is why so many elderly have their 'escape kits' in case they are needed.

[GuyFox]

Thanks for you explanations

"What on earth has fluoride got to do with this topic?"

E., Kevin Galalae uses it as an example of a policy which has been sold to the American public for its supposed benefits in dental health, but which is reality can shorten life and weaken the population. If you do some research I think you will find it supports KG's thinking.

EXCERPT-1:
"Are you aware of the health dangers of fluoride? Did you know that fluoride can damage fertility, destroy bones and cause early puberty in children?

Water fluoridation has been banned in many countries including: China, Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, Hungary, and Japan. Nearly all of Europe’s water supply is fluoride-free.

And yet, fluoride is omnipresent in the American food supply. It’s in our water, in juice, soda, wine and coffee, in soups and processed food, and in baby formula. The majority of American cities have fluoridated water."
==
> source: http://www.cheeseslave.com/top-10-dangers-of-fluoride/

EXCERPT-2:

"The unconditional surrender of both Germany and Japan in 1945 provided the Allies with the opportunity to institute strict population control measures on the conquered nations of the Axis Powers without seeking anyone’s permission. Japan, being the most hated enemy of the United States, had already been punished with two nuclear bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. To ensure that it rose from the ashes but stayed humble, the reconstruction included a nation-wide plan of population control.

As an island nation with limited natural resources, an already large population, and a modern economy whose industry demanded vast imports of foreign resources, Japan was the ideal testing ground for aggressive fluoridation, which was the only tried and tested fertility-depressing agent known at the time. The Nazis had used it on the Jews and the Soviets on their gulag prisoners and was found to be not only extremely effective in sterilizing both men and women but also in inducing a bovine state of obedience and submissiveness.

In the cities, fluoride was put in the drinking water at every water treatment plant while in the country fluoride pills were distributed along with food rations. The work of poisoning the Japanese was accomplished by Japanese war criminals from Unit 731, which had performed lethal human experiments on civilians since 1937. The members of this unit, which was officially known as the Epidemic Prevention and Water Purification Department, were given immunity from criminal prosecution at war’s end by General McArthur, the Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces, and instead of being executed for having murdered tens of thousands of innocent civilians in heinous experiments and torture they were put to work on sterilizing their fellow nationals."
==
> KG: killing-us-softly-book-by-kevin-galalae

[jake gittes]

"Their intentions have never been malevolent?" Serious blow to his credibility there. Then it adds his article's goal is to "prompt each and every human being on earth to demand a share of the responsibility and population control can be legislated across the globe, with little or no resistance, for the next three generations or until our numbers are sufficiently low." wtf?

Sure sounds like part of the depopulation agenda to me. I will PASS on this read.

[Atlas]

Posted by GuyFox (here)
His book is called: Killing Us Softly

Found a PDF (110 pages): http://real-agenda.com/wp-content/up...US-SOFTLY2.pdf

[GuyFox]

Posted by jake gittes (here)
"Their intentions have never been malevolent?" Serious blow to his credibility there. Then it adds his article's goal is to "prompt each and every human being on earth to demand a share of the responsibility and population control can be legislated across the globe, with little or no resistance, for the next three generations or until our numbers are sufficiently low." wtf?

Sure sounds like part of the depopulation agenda to me. I will PASS on this read.

This could be intentional misinformation... For the author's own safety

[GuyFox]

Dallas considers ending 50 years of water fluoridation - 06 May 2014

Dallas, the ninth-largest city in the country, is teetering on a huge victory for public health pending four more City Council members agreeing to end water fluoridation.

So far, three council members, including Sheffie Kadane, Scott Griggs and Jennifer Staubach Gates, have stood up to the practice, acknowledging that it's unhealthy and expensive.

NSNBC International reports that ending water fluoridation in Dallas would immediately free up around $1 million.

Dallas City Council Member Sheffie Kadane said, "We don't need it and we'd just save a million dollars that we can use for something else. ... We're looking into seeing what we can do immediately so we can get those funds up front now."

For decades, activists around the nation, including home to the Texas State Capital, Austin, have fought relentlessly to discontinue fluoridating the public's water supply. Despite presenting current scientific evidence to the Austin City Council blatantly illustrating that the dangers of water fluoridation far outweigh any benefits, the City Council ignored public concern and renewed their contract with Mosaic, the chemical supplier, for $500K.

==
> http://www.transients.info/2014/05/d...-years-of.html

Are the drivers behind this, perhaps people like the Rockefellers or the Bush family, giving up?
(Texas is their own backyard for the Bushes)

[T Smith]

This is an outstanding synopsis of the depopulation agenda, argued from the perspective that the current policy is merely flawed, albeit necessary. There are many people in this camp. The argument goes like this: Depopulation is necessary for the survival of humanity and for the survival of the planet itself. We would have long since waged WWIII involving thermonuclear annihilation and/or humans would be extinct by now were it not for these soft-kill policies; while admittedly distasteful, they are the only way to survive as a species and nonetheless necessary. The ends justify the means.

This is an utterly fallacious argument. First, it assumes the premise that we humans are incapable of establishing an equilibrium with our environment. This may or may not be the case; nonetheless a sound argument should firmly establish the premise instead of assuming it as a given. No eugenics argument that I am aware of ever addresses this issue. Rather, the premise that we humans are analogous to a cancer or a virus and are incapable of equilibrium is always given, and always supported with an absurdly elementary analysis that highlights the rate of population growth spanning a minuscule time frame on a squat x-axis relative to limited planetary resources on a dubious y-axis.

Second, it assigns the solution of the problem (which is assumed, but not established) to a select elite, who, for all intents and purposes are selected for the task at random (often by birthright). This random pool among the vast human brain trust find themselves the architects and executors of solving the problem. We are assuming now, for sake of argument, that the problem is valid and that the eugenists nonetheless have benevolent motives (as the video argues) and they are merely executing a policy deemed necessary for the good of all.

But even if the intentions are benevolent (and I'm not buying it), this very minuscule sampling of human "globalists" is hardly an adequate representation of the collective brain power of the human species. We would not find an Einstein, or a Mozart, or a Tesla among this group. I would go so far to argue the humans who have come to the conclusion that necessitates the liquidation of the vast majority of us are an accurate representation of the most mediocre among us. If indeed our species is facing an existential threat in the name of unsustainable population growth, it would behoove us to solve this problem out in the open and collectively, and not in some back room by stealth by the most daft among us who so happen to be quite recklessly assuming the role of Gods. If the premise of unsustainable growth is true, it is most assuredly a complex problem, and not merely a two-dimensional consideration that can be illustrated on a x-y graph. I have no doubt this problem could be solved eloquently and perhaps in a ways none of us have yet to imagine, if only the entire human brain trust were summoned to engage the problem. Without doubt we can achieve a new level of becoming and attain equilibrium with our environment. But the organic solution reflective of our genuine human genius sure as hell isn't going to occur with the species drugged and doped and poisoned.

Third, almost every eugenics argument that assumes the progenitors of policy have the right intentions (on top of the right diagnosis) always fail to account for the suppression of free energy by the same power structure, by and large, that is advancing the eugenics agenda in the first place. Some resources are without limits, which invalidates the entire depopulation argument in the first place. The advent of free energy would admittedly alter the very evolution of our species and change our way of life on this planet in ways we can hardly imagine--but nonetheless, this fact is always conveniently omitted. It would be as if the high priests of the dark ages (who were fully aware the earth is round) were to establish a policy of eugenics based on the premise of the flat-earth paradigm embraced by the masses. The intellectuals of the day might buy into the policy because everybody understands too many people left to their own wanderings might well tip over the earth.

While Kevin Galalae's analysis of the depopulation agenda is spot on, I can't take seriously at all the notion that this agenda was set forth for the greater good. It just doesn't add up. Nor am I convinced we as a species can not solve the problem, collectively, if indeed there is a real threat of the earth ever toppling over if too many of us so happen to incarnate ourselves on this ever-listing flattened earth.

[GuyFox]

"While Kevin Galalae's analysis of the depopulation agenda is spot on,
I can't take seriously at all the notion that this agenda was set forth for the greater good. It just doesn't add up. Nor am I convinced we as a species can not solve the problem, collectively, if indeed there is a real threat of the earth ever toppling over if too many of us so happen to incarnate ourselves on this ever-listing flattened earth."
- T.Smith

I AGREE !
But I suppose you could say :
Depopulation is for the greater good of the Survivors... only



This wholly selfish notion may appeal to psychopaths who EXPECT to survive - and those are likely to be the very people driving this horrific agenda. Those who are UNAWARE of the agenda and/or get selected for elimination would be correct to feel threatened by it. But how can you fight a threat you are not aware of?

ALSO: Those who ARE AWARE and have loved ones who may be eliminated, or are simply concerned about basic ethical issue - that we should all do what is Good for the whole of Humanity will be rightly concerned.

Once your eyes are opened to the Agenda, there are sensible steps that you can take to improve your chances of survival. And passing on those strategies may be one of the best ways to help the whole of Humanity.

This is what Kevin Galalae seems to be doing... that and undertaking a Hunger Strike to get others to see the Reality he has described. I see him as a heroic and moral figure, who deserves our support.