Is Russell Brand a Rothschild shill?

[Akasha]

Posted by DeDukshyn (here)
Is this the gossip channel? No sources, no research, no evidence at all, but nice editorial ... A good place to vent pent up programming and frustrations perhaps though - maybe we could use that energy to make the world a better place? Too much work I guess. It's way easier to change the world by pointing fingers and judging from behind a keyboard.

So I shouldn't have reported my experience of trying to get him to comment on the Scottish vote rigging (post 5)?

There was a source for that story: Me!

[naste.de.lumina]

I think we are entering a 'financial' phase of the globalist plan in which they need many people on both sides of the counter.

They need a lot of people thinking they are 'aware' to support the BRICS side, as world saviors in contrast to the dark 'noble' European / Western banking cartel.

On the paul topic posted below is possible to understand in general terms how this process is occurring in the economic / financial perspective.

Global Currency Reset (SDR's and the New Bretton Woods; by JC Collins)

Controlled opposition is an old tactic as already mentioned in the posts above.

It is a risky tactic.

As the old and popular saying: who leaves in the rain is to wet.

[wishinshow]

@etheric_underground

When I was ten, I felt that I had pretty good intuition when it came to the nature of people. I used to think Jimmy Saville's heart was, "in the right place". He was mostly doing good.

[Wind]

Posted by wishinshow (here)
@21g I am also a climate change believer. It changes all the time! I don't believe CO2 is in any measure a driving force behind it. I believe that the sun's magnetosphere interacts with the earth's magnetosphere to alter cloud cover on this planet and to thus increase or decrease temp. And we're probably headed for the beginning of a mini ice age!

I think he can be forgiven that. Many people have bought the guilt lies (us sinful humans!) spread by the msm and politicians hook, line and sinker. Not everyone has researched and understood the correlation between the Sun and our weather here. Everyone is just screaming CO2 or HAARP without actually bothering to connect the dots. Our whole solar system is changing.

When it comes to Russell, I think that it's hilarious that people think him as a shill. No wonder that were not getting anywhere, meaning this endless blame game. Watch this video and tell me his a shill. Hell, in that case I too would qualify as a shill!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_bKQXmvdr8o

[Nasu]

Posted by wishinshow (here)
@etheric_underground

When I was ten, I felt that I had pretty good intuition when it came to the nature of people. I used to think Jimmy Saville's heart was, "in the right place". He was mostly doing good.

Yup. Experience is the hardest master, as she gives the lesson after the test... As for Russell, time will tell either way... N

[wishinshow]

Posted by naste.de.lumina (here)
I think we are entering a 'financial' phase of the globalist plan in which they need many people on both sides of the counter.

They need a lot of people thinking they are 'aware' to support the side BRICS, as world saviors in contrast to the dark 'noble' European / Western banking cartel.

It's very hard to tell what the plan is here. There's this new info from the thrive guy that there are some Chinese "elders" with a lot more gold than the Rothschilds who want to keep the status quo, in effect.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

This is the third time in ten days that I have seen 666 as the number of postings a person has made.

[wishinshow]

@wind The point here is that Russell Brand HAS done the research. All he has done for five years is research this material. And he must know that anthropo CO2 climate change, is hogwash! So he is, by inference, A BIG FAT SCREAMING ELEPHANT OF A SHILL

...or he is biding his time to pounce on 911truth, climate change fraud, aliens, reptiles, Scottish election fraud and the fact that my grandmother shaved her moustache.

[naste.de.lumina]

Posted by wishinshow (here)

Posted by naste.de.lumina (here)
I think we are entering a 'financial' phase of the globalist plan in which they need many people on both sides of the counter.

They need a lot of people thinking they are 'aware' to support the side BRICS, as world saviors in contrast to the dark 'noble' European / Western banking cartel.

It's very hard to tell what the plan is here. There's this new info from the thrive guy that there are some Chinese "elders" with a lot more gold than the Rothschilds who want to keep the status quo, in effect.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

This is the third time in ten days that I have seen 666 as the number of postings a person has made.

The content of this book is the cleaned part of the plan that is materializing around us and the Chinese perspective to this new world is also very clear in the book. They are in bed together.







David Rockefeller visits China to start working out implementation details for what is to come.
Here he is meeting with Premier Chou En-Lai…






The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words… (Update 1 – Putin and Kissinger’s friendship)

China’s complicity in building the Rockefeller New World Order, in their own words…

The Globalists are accelerating the rollout of their new financial system (Update 3 – An audit is coming for the Fed)

[MorningFox]

Of course he's a shill. He is given huge amounts of airtime on the BBC and other mainstream outlets. He is massively in the public eye in all forms of MSM. That says it all.

[wishinshow]

I'm interested in the agreements and pacts between Chinese/Russian/American/Iranian/reptile/mantid/grey/Pliedian etc NOW; not what the pacts were 50 years ago when Rockefeller put Mao in.

In fact, in recent days, I'm
becoming less interested because it looks like the amount of power these forces wield is absolutely nothing in comparison to what lies above them in the form of alternate galactic artificial intelligence. (The most recent avalon interview)

[Eric J (Viking)]

No imo he's not a shill..

The awakening has many faces, and yes he is not advocating mass demonstrations to fall into the trap of the ptw.

He is changing the way the masses think thus the consciousness change to enable reality to change course. That's all.

Was Jesus doing the same thing.? Critics will always find an angle! Manipulation of thoughts hey!! A whole new topic...ahhh which road to take?

Viking

[naste.de.lumina]

Posted by wishinshow (here)
I'm interested in the agreements and pacts between Chinese/Russian/American/Iranian/reptile/mantid/grey/Pliedian etc NOW; not what the pacts were 50 years ago when Rockefeller put Mao in.

In fact, I'm less and less interested because it looks like the amount of power these forces wield is absolutely nothing in comparison to what lies above them in the form of alternate galactic artificial intelligence. (The most recent avalon interview)

My friend.

I'm sorry to disappoint you but I must say that the plans are made 50 years ago or more of rockefeller / mao / kinssinger / etc, which are materializing around us now.

Like it or not, is another question.

[Dennis Leahy]

I couldn't disagree more (with the opening post.)

THIS is a Rothschild shill?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=VqsFp0J22Hc

...and the words "communism" and "socialism" have effectively been destroyed in an Orwellian doublespeak onslaught. In reality, at one end of the spectrum, there is the Rothschild Empire mindset: pyramidal-capitalism, unfathomable greed, privatization and (their) ownership of everything, and of consolidation of power (into their hands.) At the other end of the spectrum is sharing everything, which is what theoretical communism is. (There has NEVER been a communist society, just some totalitarian regimes that used the word in yet another twist of the lexicon to mask their greed and hunger for power.)

Real socialism includes some private ownership and a lot of group ownership (of infrastructure and resources.)

The ultra-rich of the world (of course including the Rothschild Empire) attacked "communism" in the 1950's by using the word "communism" rather than attacking a totalitarian regime mindset as was foisted on the Russian people. Russia wasn't communist or socialist, the ultra-rich Global Financial Empires knew it, and the opportunity to plant an anti-sharing meme that they called "anti-communism" was not wasted. And so, rather than the US regime opposing the totalitarian Russian regime, it was framed as freedom opposing communism (and communism was cleverly but falsely equated with a lack of freedom.) Gloogle "Red Scare", think about Edward Bernays and his work, and realize that the ultra-rich fooled everyone into opposing sharing! Well, of course they would - sharing is the opposite of greed.

Real socialism (I rarely even bother to use the word, with its trail of false-meme baggage) is group ownership of infrastructure and resources. Business within a real socialist model would be conducted by individuals and by businesses that are "worker-owned", and would involve the exchange of goods and services for bartered goods and services or much more frequently, using some sort of agreed-upon system of exchange (money.) So, "socialism" isn't the end of "capitalism" (nor is it the opposite of capitalism.)

The opposite of socialism is privatization and ownership of everything. Surprise! Guess who owns it all? The day each of us was born on this planet, the vast majority (maybe all) of everything was claimed by someone as their own. So, the whole notion of Empires owning everything doesn't work out too well for 99.9% of humanity.

Oh wait, what about anarchism? Well, as far as I know, it is purely theoretical and there has never been a major society that operated under anarchy. I do wish Larken Rose or someone else would create Larkenville and a few thousand anarchists move there and give it a fair try. Everyone could watch and see if it can be done in reality or only in theory. I have to admit, though I would watch carefully, I would not want to live downstream or downwind of a society that allowed people to do anything they want - as long as it wasn't a direct harm to other humans. Of the people I have met in my life (like my neighbors that saturate their lawns with herbicides and pesticides and are clueless about what happens downstream, and don't care who has to breathe it in downwind), they are not knowledgeable enough about their connection to everything and that their actions affect everyone. Could we hand-pick a thousand people who could live in harmonious anarchy?* I believe we could. But when you include EVERYONE, representing the entire spectrum of personal growth, I don't believe it would work for 2 weeks (when the 5% of people who always volunteer get tired of the other 95% who never volunteer - and when Larken actually had to drop everything in his life and actually go build a road.)

*(I think we could also hand-pick a thousand people who could live harmoniously in communism. The trick is picking dedicated people that already have what it takes to make that specific system work.)

Sorry for the rant, but we need to invent new words to discuss some of this. We need to stop having knee-jerk reactions to these words that have been successfully twisted by Global Rulers. For example, when speaking of legislation that has been passed by the US Congress, I ask people to examine whether the legislation is "citizen-centric", or "corporate-centric."

Dennis

[wishinshow]

Posted by naste.de.lumina (here)

Posted by wishinshow (here)
I'm interested in the agreements and pacts between Chinese/Russian/American/Iranian/reptile/mantid/grey/Pliedian etc NOW; not what the pacts were 50 years ago when Rockefeller put Mao in.

In fact, I'm less and less interested because it looks like the amount of power these forces wield is absolutely nothing in comparison to what lies above them in the form of alternate galactic artificial intelligence. (The most recent avalon interview)

My friend.

I'm sorry to disappoint you but I must say that the plans are made 50 years ago or more of rockefeller / mao / kinssinger / etc, which are materializing around us now.

Like it or not, is another question.

Yes. And the plans made now are what will materialise in ten years. Because the game is speeding up. I want to know where we're going; not where we are!

[wishinshow]

@Dennis

Fire in the minds of men - James Billington (revolution as a - reptile - religion for the 20th century)

Tragedy and Hope - Quigley

The Rothschilds used the Schiffs and Rockefellers to fund the Bolsheviks, and to run Lennin from New York.

1984 was written about the Fabian Socialist Society's agenda (established in 1884)

As far as I understand, the Pleiedians offer a fairly good manifestation of space faring anarchy.

[Shezbeth]

Lets look at the possibilities. On the one hand, his refusal to tackle certain issues could be an adherence to the concept of:

Choose Your Battles - For one, 911 and other issues have plenty of advocates, and over-applying himself to too many issues could diminish his efficacy in the eyes of his target audience, the people. Additionally - as referenced - he has had the opportunity to observe the likes of David Icke (who I also like but don't trust entirely,... whoops I gave away the surprise ending!). He could have a comparable agenda but attempting a different strategy,....

AND/OR

He could be choosing his battles in the interest of duping the public, as has been suggested. By 'championing' certain issues that both awaken and enliven the masses, he could be a trojan horse of sorts as Akasha has pointed out with the Scottish referendum shenanigens.

Personally, it seems readily apparent that he has a fairly grounded understanding of metaphysics (I.e he has at least been partially illuminated), and I have thought ever since his "Messiah Complex" show that he is deliberately conforming to the archetype of 'The Savior'. Don't get me wrong, I love his comedy, his wit, and the topics he covers, and I am a regular viewer of the Trews.

Don't think for a moment I trust the cheeky bastard tho! As for whether he's a shill or not, consider this.

If he's not 'powerful' enough to take on the Rothschilds, and is therefore avoiding that element for the time being, does that make him a shill, or does that make him a careful strategist who recognizes an insurmountable (ATM) opponent?

Russel is one who's material I will keep close to. Whether he's a 'friend' or an 'enemy', the procedure is the same is it not? ^_~

Posted by wishinshow (here)
I want to know where we're going; not where we are!

To get where one wants to go (or even CAN go) one MUST start from where one is.

[Chester]

Posted by TargeT (here)
Beware the overly charismatic, they are often Socio/Psycopaths...

Wow (says Sam as he gazes into the mirror...) as I often emulate overly charismatic behavior.

Your poster name, Target, is no coincidence. More than once has a post of your jolted me in this way... thanks.

[wishinshow]

@shezbeth To get where one wants to go (or even CAN go) one MUST start from where one is.

Very true on the level of the law of attraction and a mirrored existence to our soul progression. Perhaps not so true when there are powerful entities attempting to corrupt the universal law of attraction, wherever possible!

I ask, where I am being taken(?), so that I might find out where I am now and where one might choose to otherwise be and go.

[DeDukshyn]

Posted by Akasha (here)

Posted by DeDukshyn (here)
Is this the gossip channel? No sources, no research, no evidence at all, but nice editorial ... A good place to vent pent up programming and frustrations perhaps though - maybe we could use that energy to make the world a better place? Too much work I guess. It's way easier to change the world by pointing fingers and judging from behind a keyboard.

So I shouldn't have reported my experience of trying to get him to comment on the Scottish vote rigging (post 5)?

There was a source for that story: Me!

All right ... I'll grant you an exception

[DeDukshyn]

Posted by wishinshow (here)
@dedukshyn errr? Are you not pointing fingers and judging us/me from behind your keyboard in the posting above?

Had I started a thread called "wishinshow is Rothschild shill" and proceeded to make negative comments about you without any evidence or sources or even good explanations of exactly why I felt the way I did, then yeah I guess I would be doing the same ... but I didn't really do that. I am not trashing anyone, just pointing out what seems somewhat obvious to me.