Is Russell Brand a Rothschild shill?

[KaiLee]

There's definitely something about Brand. But what?

The whole marriage thing to Perry was just weird. Sometimes he is cuttingly funny, other times he is so obviously self inflated. Sometimes, his humour is sheer arrogance and manipulation of people who think they think. One can't deny he says the right things, sometimes. But for what purpose? Popular thought equals dollar signs for this sort.

I'm wary of Brand, but unable to form a conclusion on his behaviour. Watch and learn I guess.

[loc333]

if he is ..let him go he is wakeing up people who wouldnt have a clue.they can do the math and figure the rest out for themselves.

[TargeT]

Posted by loc333 (here)
if he is ..let him go he is wakeing up people who wouldnt have a clue.they can do the math and figure the rest out for themselves.

This is the fall back cointelpro defense... if he IS a "schill" don't you think it was taken into account him "waking up" people? these plans span thousands of years, I doubt we would be able to glean much in the 1-2 years he's been "doing" this strange act.

He is saying the EXACT things that make us distrust the current splintered "country based" governments.

Don't we also know that a "new world order" is desired? a Global governance and currency (even religion)? To achieve this wouldn't you have to demonize the system you currently have in place to allow the transition?

sure seems like that's what he's doing, guiding us right down the desired path.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by TargeT (here)
He is saying the EXACT things that make us distrust the current splintered "country based" governments.

Don't we also know that a "new world order" is desired? a Global governance and currency (even religion)? To achieve this wouldn't you have to demonize the system you currently have in place to allow the transition?

sure seems like that's what he's doing, guiding us right down the desired path.

"Ken", of RedefiningGod.com has an excellent post, expounding on this very point:

The Multilateral/Multipolar New World Order will seem like heaven… at first

[jerry]

Posted by pathaka (here)
Silly stuff.

Typical "first we raise them up, then we drag them to drug."

He's just a guy, who happens to speak fairly freely and due to his previous mainstream media appearances, before going really open, he just gets more coverage.

Shill?

He's not talking: eugenics, microchipping, culling down the population, transhumanism, one-world government or one-world currency or corporate fascism.

And if socialism means taking care of those unfortunate, I guess that makes me a socialist too. It's just a tag to put down people, when one disagrees. No content in it. Just an easy label.

Listen to the message, think for yourself. Ignore the carrier.

To take care of the poor socialism is not required at all ...just one years expenditures of the US military budget alone including black opps is enough to fund every social program for 30 years on some accounts up to a hundred years.

[Cardillac]

all one has to do is look at Russell Brand's absolutely hideous/freaky "smile"- I never had a good feeling about this man (reportedly Katy Perry's handler but don't know if that's totally true)- talk is cheap but body language is worth its weight in gold- body language never lies and if one is versed in it (I am- I work in theater) it reveals a helluva lot-

and I've noticed David Icke has discontinued sourcing Russell Brand

[mahalall]

he aint no shill,
cos if ee were
hed be talking about this in his home town.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=qIHajwS_NYc

in it!!

[TargeT]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by TargeT (here)
He is saying the EXACT things that make us distrust the current splintered "country based" governments.

Don't we also know that a "new world order" is desired? a Global governance and currency (even religion)? To achieve this wouldn't you have to demonize the system you currently have in place to allow the transition?

sure seems like that's what he's doing, guiding us right down the desired path.

"Ken", of RedefiningGod.com has an excellent post, expounding on this very point:

The Multilateral/Multipolar New World Order will seem like heaven… at first

His adopting of the "savior" archetype fits very well with this too; almost puzzle perfect.

Edit:

That was a great article, shows how "our hopes and dreams" may not have originated with us, and just be another Hegelian outcome.

[Dennis Leahy]

The level of cognitive dissonance necessary to discount and ignore 98% of what Russell Brand IS ACTUALLY SAYING is astounding to me. Let's tie him to a stone, throw him in the water, and see if he floats! If he floats, he a witch! er, I mean he's a Rothschild Illuminati master manipulating bastard. Burn him! Stone him! Off with his head!

Who's next, me?

Dennis

[Tesseract]

Posted by MorningFox (here)
Of course he's a shill. He is given huge amounts of airtime on the BBC and other mainstream outlets. He is massively in the public eye in all forms of MSM. That says it all.

So is George Galloway, is he a shill too?

[AnamCara]

Perhaps no matter how much or little that we 'know' about someone's intent, our own intuition is the deciding factor. It seems to me there has always been in a thread of honesty in Russell's rants, woven in with the laughs and the desire to shock/wake up the audience. Jim Carrey has a similar appeal and he also is on a mission to 'wake up' the audience. I have great respect for Jim Carrey and also intuit his honesty.

[Maunagarjana]

Russell Brand just has a different perspective, than you. Just because he's got some blind spots in certain areas doesn't make him a shill. I've known many people who think just like him, and they are people who I respect, think are good people, that their heart is in the right place. He's missing some important pieces of the puzzle, sure, but I think he's got a lot of good pieces too. To claim to know what it is that he knows is ridiculous. Like all of us, he is a work in progress, and down the line he may be singing a different tune once he figures out some things. Also, as it has been pointed out, Brand split up with Jemima Khan. http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrit...-split-4297376

[Shezbeth]

There's a story that stuck with me I would like to share. It originates from a Star Wars novel (can't remember which one, sorry!) so please bear with.

The story is about a particularly (arguably the most) beautiful butterfly. When the butterfly is in its cocoon, it experiences a period of extreme encapsulation, suffocation, and terror. This feeling is particularly 'loud' to those force-sensitive. The butterfly literally cries out through the force to be saved. A particular jedi apprentice once heard that cry, and set out to alleviate the butterfly's feelings, and freed the butterfly from the cocoon.

While the sentiment was sincere and benevolent, the doing so (freeing) was premature, and the butterfly's wings never fully developed, never reached their full size and never developed its characteristic beauty and color. The butterfly could not fly, and died shortly thereafter.

The experience of terror, of imprisonment and suffocation was a necessary part of the butterfly's development. By being freed too soon the butterfly was dependent on outside forces for its survival, which was very short-lived. What was intended to be a gesture and an act of charity resulted in tragedy.

My point is, Brand may be alerting people to some of the ill things going on in the world, but is he really awakening people? Are not all the things he says things that have already been said elsewhere, better, and more comprehensively? Do his words really lead others to a higher understanding, or is he 'awakening (freeing) the butterfly before it is fully developed'? Food for thought.

[Flowerpunkchip]

oh for f*** sake, concentrate on the bigger picture than accusing Brand of being a shill.

And I totally understand if he doesn't want to touch 9/11. You all know what happens if you question 9/11 in the media. He'll be shooting himself in the foot. It's bad enough when I mention that I have certain unanswered questions about 9/11 to friends, you are treated like a moron. The media in Britain (and most other places) are savage and if I was famous, I wouldn't even talk about 9/11 to my family.

I think the same goes for George Galloway regarding 9/11, I am sure he respects the 9/11 movement but he will stay clear of it.

[Anchor]

Posted by Nasu (here)
Then we round up the followers, trouble makers, rebels, etc, with ease...

Ooops, that's me buggered then....

[wishinshow]

Russell Brand is moving the UK towards a socialist revolution on the streets of London. What could be better if you were a Rothschild who wanted to steal everything from the middle classes and wanted to steal everything from the reigning royal family?

Hasn't that been done before by the Rothschilds? The French Revolution? The. Bolshevik revolution? Hasn't it been copied by every other tin pot dictator with a Rothschild rule book?

This is about Fabian socialism meets revolutionary socialism. Both of these ideologies fomented with Rothschild money. (Please see Fire in the Minds of Men - James Billington.)

I just can't understand why the majority on a forum of this pedigree and grooming isn't au fait with the understanding that the Rothschilds used their minions to fund every socialist/communist movement in history.

[bluestflame]

i have seen memes circulating depicting brand as a " pied piper" , i couldn't get past it , not sure what it brought forth in me but beyond all the surface appearances i don't trust him

[Akasha]

Posted by Flowerpunkchip (here)
oh for f*** sake, concentrate on the bigger picture than accusing Brand of being a shill.

And I totally understand if he doesn't want to touch 9/11. You all know what happens if you question 9/11 in the media. He'll be shooting himself in the foot. It's bad enough when I mention that I have certain unanswered questions about 9/11 to friends, you are treated like a moron. The media in Britain (and most other places) are savage and if I was famous, I wouldn't even talk about 9/11 to my family.

I think the same goes for George Galloway regarding 9/11, I am sure he respects the 9/11 movement but he will stay clear of it.

Exactly the meme that ensures perpetuated high (and low) profile adherence to the script. Once a critical mass of celeb's (and nobodies) get over the fear of pariahship they/we will be collectively redefined as reality analysts.

David Icke has consistently advocated the "growing a pair" method and he's gone from strength to strength as a result. The climate is far more ripe for folk like Brand to successfully tackle the really hot potatoes than it was back in the early 90's when Icke's truth quest started.

[Baby Steps]

Like Jessie Ventura, someone in the public eye, who wants to take a section of their followers a certain number of steps down the rabbit hole, in the cause of awakening them, has to draw a line somewhere, in order to avoid alienating them. There will be a numerical relationship between how deep one goes and how many one takes along. Done in the spirit of service, there is definitely a place for people who 'only go so far' because more will go that far and eventually go further. RB is great (but he might be a sexual vampire). For many people this will have been the first time that they hear that our society is dominated by corporate corruption, and this is key.
In the case of Jessie's interview with David Icke where he demanded 'show me a reptile', I suspect it was a set up with Alex Jones in order to differentiate JV from DI, and thereby retain his mass support, and perhaps not threaten certain groups. Again that is a legitimate ploy to retain mass support.

[Anchor]

Posted by Shezbeth (here)
My point is, Brand may be alerting people to some of the ill things going on in the world, but is he really awakening people? Are not all the things he says things that have already been said elsewhere, better, and more comprehensively? Do his words really lead others to a higher understanding, or is he 'awakening (freeing) the butterfly before it is fully developed'? Food for thought.

You could level that accusation at any teacher who is teaching outside of a specialized teacher/guru-devotee/disciple/chela relationship (call it what you want) who encourages people to do things, since the teacher is constantly providing grist to the mill for awakening for those who decide to explore it.

The fail safe for each is freewill and the freedom to discern for oneself how one should act.

If I act to free a butterfly prematurely, then I have abridged the butterfly's freewill.

If I present thoughtful information, which may or may not be super-good-stuff, but you ignore it, then I am not infringing on your freewill - I just might irritate you a while until you reach the threshold of deciding to ignore me.

If I impose my will (however that can be, unlikely in your case, but assume someone less aware) and act with intent to attempt to undermine your discernment (by perhaps using cunning techniques not known to the majority) then I infringe your freewill and karma adheres to me.

If I were a service-to-self oriented loveless-psychopath type with no active green ray, or heart centre, it would not matter, since were I on that path I would not care about your freewill, just how many followers I could accrue. The weaker and more prematurely damaged the better - just so long as you have enough in you left to enrich my powerbase - muwahahaha!

Russel Brand certainly seems to irritate a lot of people.

The acid test passes for me, which is that he is, at will, ignorable, you can take or leave what he has to say.