Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: The Difference between a Chemtrail & a Contrail

  1. Link to Post #1
    Avalon Member Verdilac's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st October 2014
    Posts
    269
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 1,296 times in 243 posts

    Default The Difference between a Chemtrail & a Contrail

    Hello to all reading this, let me just start by saying that am not an expert and that I am just drawing attention to an observation that I have made over the past few years.

    The first picture in my opinion its a Contrail or 2, if you look closely, this picture was taken in quite a remote part of the Durham dales in the Northern UK ,it was around 5 degrees C & mid December.

    I would like to draw you attention to the fact that this picture was taken over a almost completely unpopulated area. Notice no lingering trail.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN1381.JPG
Views:	300
Size:	821.5 KB
ID:	28349

    The second 2 pictures were taken over a populated area very near Newcastle in the northern UK, similar weather, temperature at both locations, also the same time of the year
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN1479.JPG
Views:	259
Size:	657.4 KB
ID:	28350
    The picture above is the aftermath of 2 of the perpetrators of this abomination of the sky, they weren't solely responsible but played there part as they formed the horizontal trail, interestingly enough they didn't have a transponder signal between them
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCN1474.JPG
Views:	251
Size:	647.7 KB
ID:	28351

    Now my pictures may not be very impressive but they show the point I'm trying to bring to attention.

    As for the weather modification argument, that there spraying pollution/particles to stop atmospheric heating, well yes but why only do it over a populated area and why do it a 5C when were freezing, and unpopulated area stays untouched.

    Other possible explanations, its not for weather modification like we have been lead to believe and may have hoped it was.( a lesser of evils)

    This leaves us with a possibility that the spraying is being directed at some densely populated areas for other reasons, I don't know what these reasons are as I'm as in the dark as everyone else.

    Whilst I have noticed the mention of nanoparticles being deployed by various people, they give no estimation of the size of particle so a 1st line of defence cannot be formulated to help stop respiratory infection or even filtering to cut down the amount of particles that is breathed to a level that the body may be able to deal with.

    As someone that notices this spraying by un transpondered planes on a daily basis I am very worried for people in general as its very real and its happening now as we speak.

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Verdilac For This Post:

    Cidersomerset (21st December 2014), Matt P (22nd December 2014), Sérénité (21st December 2014), Sunny-side-up (21st December 2014), thepainterdoug (22nd December 2014), the_real_dave-id (22nd December 2014), yelik (21st December 2014)

  3. Link to Post #2
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    64
    Posts
    22,333
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,785 times in 18,698 posts

    Default Re: The Difference between a Chemtrail & a Contrail

    As I have said before 2006/7 was a major turning point in my interest in the
    alternate community , I had been interested in mysterious and political historical
    events from a young boy so when we got our first second hand old desk computer
    and got access to the net , the first thing I put in was UFO's and I came across
    Kerry interviewing Bill about Mr X and from there have got 'Deeeeep' down the
    rabbit hole with millions of other like minded people around this world & others
    ...LOL

    This also coincided with me becoming a post man in 2007 which meant I worked
    outside everyday , previous to this I had office jobs. One of the many subjects
    discussed was chemtrails a term I had not heard before and I started to look up
    and straight away I noticed the difference in a contrail which last several seconds to
    a minute or so, to chemtrails that spread out and lasted all day.




    There is dispute to what they are from military, UV screen,geo engineering and
    weather control over different areas of the globe, To its how the water vapour
    reacts at different altitudes and temperature and the fact that air traffic has
    increased in certain areas.

    I was watching them yesterday sat 20/12/14 as I was on my rounds and the
    weather was identical to the day before yet the trails were different Fri normal , sat
    dense and spread out to give a milky cloud cover. I have seen the proof of
    chemtrailing in this area over the last seven years regularly,with at time the sky
    filled with Tankers creating grid patterns especially around 2011/12 , but not so
    much lately, though the sky has been so cloudy at times its hard to say what is
    natural cloud cover and what has artificially been laid by 'contrails' wether
    deliberately or due to the fuel, temp and extra volume as we are told all it
    is, whatever else it is causing air and light pollution at the very least.

    Now I have put up lots of posts and threads on the subject,because it is happening
    above my head and I see them most days. Now if I'm interpreting them wrong so
    be it,but I'm not convinced of that and governments records of covert experiment
    and black projects does not lead me to believe official denials. But if it can be
    proved that they are just Alliminium, barium and other metallic particasl
    mixed in with the water vapour from the engines fair enough.

    But I'm not of that opinion at the moment....


    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...rail-Beta-Test


    ===================================================


    Some images from the web, to illustrate what I'm observing over the past 7/8
    years at various times , frequently enough to form a consistent pattern to this
    phenomenon or programme .......















    ===================================================

    What we are not seeing enough of is beautiful blue Somerset Sky's for whatever reason...


    The Cornhill Bridgwater Town Centre



    More often like this .........

    Last edited by Cidersomerset; 27th September 2016 at 19:41.

  4. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Cidersomerset For This Post:

    ghostrider (22nd December 2014), Matt P (22nd December 2014), Sérénité (21st December 2014), sheme (22nd December 2014), Sunny-side-up (21st December 2014), the_real_dave-id (22nd December 2014), Verdilac (22nd December 2014)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Avalon Member Verdilac's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st October 2014
    Posts
    269
    Thanks
    1,440
    Thanked 1,296 times in 243 posts

    Default Re: The Difference between a Chemtrail & a Contrail

    I was looking at your pictures Cider and you have some great shots BTW, and a thought just occurred to me whilst looking at the trails that formed square patterns, what if part of the chemtrail system is ment for marking out a grid in the sky to test some sort of weapon or technology that is possibly fitted to a satellite.

    For instance a mood altering frequency that is transmitted at the grid and because of the conductivity of the elements being used it acts as an antenna to amplify this frequency on a larger number of individuals, I'm not talking about a Haarp base station bouncing waves around , I'm talking about the new alternative that may be tiny in comparison ,like the way the record player made way for the tape and the tape for the ipod, then imagine each grid square could be adjusted and fine tuned to give a different behaviour pattern.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Verdilac For This Post:

    Cidersomerset (22nd December 2014)

  7. Link to Post #4
    United States Avalon Member ghostrider's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Location
    Sand Springs Ok
    Age
    60
    Posts
    7,427
    Thanks
    9,893
    Thanked 28,833 times in 6,635 posts

    Default Re: The Difference between a Chemtrail & a Contrail

    The information I've read about the application of weather modification is , they spray out in front of an approaching weather system , the trails spread out and form thin clouds ... they then bounce the harp radio frequency wave off of the thing clouds and tilt it as to steer it in the direction they want the weather to go ... they can enhance what's already there , snowstorm , rain , thunder etc ... Mixing chemicals into the spray they can produce as much rain as they want ... a contrail is not nearly as long as a chemtrail , and your right the contrail evaporates quickly , where the chemtrail remains all day , and three days later it rains where they sprayed ...
    Raiding the Matrix One Mind at a Time ...

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to ghostrider For This Post:

    Cidersomerset (22nd December 2014)

  9. Link to Post #5
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    64
    Posts
    22,333
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,785 times in 18,698 posts

    Default Re: The Difference between a Chemtrail & a Contrail

    This is a new documentary posted on Davids site this morning which I'l post
    but will put here as this is a current thread as well.....

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Chemtrails: The Secret War

    new Monday 22nd December 2014 at 04:24 By David Icke



    ‘Antonio and Rosario Marciano, of the Italian website Tanker Enemy have produced an
    outstanding documentary entitled: “ Chemtrails: the secret war ”. This film analyses
    and provides scientific evidence pertaining to the chemtrails phenomenon.

    Weather manipulation is only one (collateral) aspect of this phenomenon. What is at stake is a covert military agenda.’





    Published on 21 Dec 2014


    “ This documentary is dedicated to everyone who wants to fight for truth and life on planet Earth.
    Let's stand up and defend our rights ! " Antonio and Rosario Marciano
    http://www.tanker-enemy.eu/scie-chimi...
    Antonio and Rosario Marciano administrators of the Italian website TANKER ENEMY produced the
    film : “ Chemtrails the secret war ”. This HD documentary film is the first Italian professional film
    on illegal geo-engineering aka chemtrails. It has been realized thanks to many friends and
    collaborators. For years this issue has been denied and mocked but the chemical spraying of our
    sky is still going on !

    This documentary analyses, in a scientific and rigorous approach the main characteristics of this issue.
    The weather manipulation is only a collateral aspect of the phenomenon.

    In September 2014, Jacques Daidié, a French activist, went to Italy and met Antonio and Rosario Marciano,
    well-known Italian activists against geo-engineering. The French translation is born from this meeting and
    has been realized by several members of the French association “Ciel voilé”, (www.cielvoile.fr). We thank
    him warmly and all those who have contributed to the translation: Jacques, Dominique from Avignon,
    Mary from Monteux, Sebastien from St Firmin in Valgaudemard and Danielle from Gap.
    All our gratitude to “Sky Watch Geneva”, on Facebook, for the English translation.
    www.cielvoile.fr

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cidersomerset For This Post:

    Matt P (22nd December 2014), sheme (22nd December 2014)

  11. Link to Post #6
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    64
    Posts
    22,333
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,785 times in 18,698 posts

    Default Re: The Difference between a Chemtrail & a Contrail

    Default Re: Chemtrails: The Secret War.....Excellent Italian Documentry with subtitles , illustration etc.....21 Dec 2014

    Sheme posted this on my thread and it surprised me the Beeb are
    sterting to use the Geo -Engineering term. I copied the most recent
    one below , confirms a lot of what is being said in the alternate
    media only they are pretending its still on the concept phase....Yeh ..LOL


    Quote http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30197085

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24033772

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-19371833

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-19146256

    For what ever reason it seems that our climate is warming up fast - among
    the Aluminium Barium Strontium sprays soon we can expect sulphur dioxide
    in the stratosphere of Earth - it seems every thing must be painted white to
    reflect the Sun even our crops have been designed to make us carbon holders
    (big and fat) and they too shall be white the cereal crops that is -are to be
    chosen for the amount of solar radiation they reflect back. We must stop this
    madness now and tell the people and the scientists what the truth is, No more
    weapons of mutual destruction just free energy and and a total 'as you need
    you receive society- plus Total Truth trust in humanity to do what is best for
    the Earth Mother.

    Find reference of any scientist from the above- then google that name and
    you will find out what they plan and consider without our consent they are
    all pushing papers out with dastardly ideas. Not one of them can agree on
    anything- why not just tell us the absolute truth?

    Thanks Sheme

    I don't know how I missed these I look on the News web page nearly every day....

    Well the BBC are Using the Geo Engineering term and aerosol spraying ( chemtrails )
    although fail to say they have been doing it already for decades...



    26 November 2014 Last updated at 01:12

    Geo-engineering: Climate fixes 'could harm billions'David Shukman
    By David Shukman

    Science editor, BBC News




    Using aerosols to block solar radiation represents one approach to geo-engineering

    Continue reading the main story
    Related Stories
    Climate fix could make warming worse
    Are ideas to cool the planet realistic?
    Geoengineering: Risks and benefits

    Schemes to tackle climate change could prove disastrous for billions of people,
    but might be required for the good of the planet, scientists say.

    That is the conclusion of a new set of studies into what's become known
    as geo-engineering.

    This is the so far unproven science of intervening in the climate to bring
    down temperatures.

    These projects work by, for example, shading the Earth from the Sun or
    soaking up carbon dioxide.

    Ideas include aircraft spraying out sulphur particles at high altitude to
    mimic the cooling effect of volcanoes or using artificial "trees" to absorb CO2.

    Long regarded as the most bizarre of all solutions for global warming,
    ideas for geo-engineering have come in for more scrutiny in recent
    years as international efforts to limit carbon emissions have failed.

    Now three combined research projects, led by teams from the universities
    of Leeds, Bristol and Oxford, have explored the implications in more detail.

    The central conclusion, according to Dr Matt Watson of Bristol University,
    is that the issues surrounding geo-engineering - how it might work, the
    effects it might have and the potential downsides - are "really really complicated".




    Sun block




    Volcano Injecting aerosols into the stratosphere mimics the cooling effects of volcanoes
    "We don't like the idea but we're more convinced than ever that we have to research it," he said.

    "Personally I find this stuff terrifying but we have to compare it to doing nothing,
    to business-as-usual leading us to a world with a 4C rise."

    The studies used computer models to simulate the possible implications of different
    technologies - with a major focus on ideas for making the deserts, seas and clouds
    more reflective so that incoming solar radiation does not reach the surface.

    One simulation imagined sea-going vessels spraying dense plumes of particles into
    the air to try to alter the clouds. But the model found that this would be far less
    effective than once thought.

    Another explored the option of injecting sulphate aerosols into the air above the
    Arctic in an effort to reverse the decline of sea-ice.

    A key finding was that none of the simulations managed to keep the world's
    temperature at the level experienced between 1986-2005 - suggesting that
    any effort would have to be maintained for years.

    More alarming for the researchers were the potential implications for rainfall patterns.

    Although all the simulations showed that blocking the Sun's rays - or solar radiation
    management, as it is called - did reduce the global temperature, the models revealed
    profound changes to precipitation including disrupting the Indian Monsoon.



    Indian monsoon But blocking the Sun's rays could have undesirable effects, such
    as disrupting the Indian Monsoon
    Prof Piers Forster of Leeds University said: "We have found that between 1.2 and
    4.1 billion people could be adversely affected by changes in rainfall patterns.

    "The most striking example of a downside would be the complete drying-out of the
    Sahel region of Africa - that would be very difficult to adapt to for those substantial
    populations - and that happens across all the scenarios."

    Despite the risk of catastrophic side-effects from geo-engineering, the study authors
    believe that research should continue just in case runaway warming leaves no other options.

    Prof Forster said: "If we were in a really desperate situation, trying to cool the temps
    for a 10-20 year time period, there could be some merit in those circumstances in
    introducing solar radiation management to give you a 10-20 year time period."

    Lack of knowledge




    Plankton bloom Dumping iron into the sea was seen as a way to stimulate plankton
    blooms, and trap carbon
    According to Prof Steve Rayner of Oxford University, it is easier to devise the technology
    than to understand its effects or how its use should be governed.

    "If you were just thinking of the capability of putting sulphate aerosols in the atmosphere,
    that you could do in less than two decades - whether you would know it was smart to do
    it in less than two decades is another question.

    "We don't know enough - we have a few islands of knowledge in a sea of ignorance and it's
    absolutely worth knowing more. There is the potential that some of these technologies may
    be part of a broader tool kit of ways in which we can better manage climate change.

    "People decry solar radiation management as a band-aid but band-aids can be useful for healing."

    Geo-engineering has long been one of the most controversial aspects of the debate about
    solutions to climate change and few experiments have been conducted in the field.

    One of the largest, known as Lohafex, was an Indian-German experiment in 2009 which
    involved dumping six tonnes of an iron solution into the South Atlantic to encourage
    plankton to bloom - trapping carbon which would then be sent to the seabed when the
    organisms died. Results showed limited success.

    Another proposal for the trial flight of a balloon in Britain, as part of geo-engineering
    research for the SPICE project, attracted stiff opposition from environmental groups
    and was cancelled.

    It would have been the precursor to a test of a technique for pumping sulphate aerosols
    into the atmosphere in an effort to bounce solar radiation back into space and cool the planet.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30197085

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts