+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 35 of 35

Thread: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

  1. Link to Post #21
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th November 2013
    Posts
    111
    Thanks
    335
    Thanked 574 times in 99 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    Quote Posted by Roisin (here)
    Natural telepathy is a myth? Well, here's the way I look at it and I'm not just trying to come across as a know-it-all as I am speaking from the position as a participator in conversations with those from those realms outside of our own. Telepathy is indeed a reality and I can even prove it.... if you want me to. Sound outlandish? Try me

    But from what I KNOW via through my experiences since the early 90's (am going on 60 in a couple of weeks so I've been at this a loooong time... btw), is that there are intelligence's from those outside of our realm who use their own technology to not only communicate to us directly via technology on our end but also via through direct telepathy too where, in that case, that technology has been implanted into our electro/bio system. "They" in fact, even call it their "technology".

    But here's the bottom line, spirituality is only physics that has not been discovered yet.

    PS -- "they" know what you're going to "think", even before you think it... let alone say it. lol
    Hey Roisin, I want to try you. Can I? How should we conduct the experiment? I am curious....

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to David Ansible For This Post:

    Omni (7th February 2015), shadowstalker (7th February 2015), Victoria (22nd February 2026)

  3. Link to Post #22
    Avalon Member Maia Gabrial's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th April 2011
    Location
    On the planet Sophia
    Age
    73
    Posts
    4,605
    Thanks
    15,747
    Thanked 17,170 times in 3,859 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    Quote Electronic telepathy will not increase any type of hive mindedness. And I know for sure it is in humanity's future.
    I hope it's not part of our future! IMO all technologies take us away from what we truly are.
    Hive mind uses technology. Farsight Institute remote viewed them and discovered the central system and the being in control of it all.

    Everyone has something embarrassing or whatever they don't want others to know. Criminals especially. If natural telepathy happened to ALL of us at the same time, we could adjust to it together.

    George Kavassillas said that whenever he ran into someone in the 5D, he would know everything about them instantly. And vice versa. And this is a natural spiritual ability I'd welcome. We ARE ready for this. The only ones who would hate this are those with criminal intentions....

    I don't mind if anyone has access to my mind as long as I have access to theirs....What would bother me is if it were a one way street....

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Maia Gabrial For This Post:

    annacherie (7th February 2015), Sue (Ayt) (22nd February 2026), Victoria (22nd February 2026), william r sanford72 (7th February 2015)

  5. Link to Post #23
    United States Avalon Member annacherie's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th December 2011
    Location
    Eastern Oregon
    Posts
    92
    Thanks
    1,243
    Thanked 257 times in 80 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    "Suppose you had access to every persons' brain on the planet" - MP in 10 minutes!!! oi ye vey...... I posted this on another thread but felt it central to this conversation https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l6VPpDublg

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to annacherie For This Post:

    Victoria (22nd February 2026)

  7. Link to Post #24
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,441 times in 3,453 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    Quote Posted by annacherie (here)
    Omni ...what do you attribute your ability to maintain your sanity throughout your torture experiences?
    When they first started happening to me I went a little crazy due to being mind controlled to do such. But over the years I have learned to take torture in stride. It no longer affects me emotionally for the most part I just get through it.

    Quote Do you suppose they were inflicted upon you to silence any egoic type of disclosure??
    I'm not sure what you mean here.

    Quote It seems discerning the source of messages would be really important. I think its actually pretty easy to know what resonates vs what does not ...notice that the 7-10 hz (schumann) a positive and safe frequency band to work with....but curiously windows browser frequencies shuts it all down....perhaps this would speak to the hive mind issue. Persinger studies the OBE .....this is akin to the chicken or the egg metaphor. perhaps those who have learned to navigate the astral through to higher dimensions )higher frequenncies would best be those to experiment w this technology as the free will is the ultimate mediator and judge?
    I don't know his work very well, but it seems to be important.

    Quote Posted by Roisin (here)
    Natural telepathy is a myth? Well, here's the way I look at it and I'm not just trying to come across as a know-it-all as I am speaking from the position as a participator in conversations with those from those realms outside of our own. Telepathy is indeed a reality and I can even prove it.... if you want me to. Sound outlandish? Try me

    But from what I KNOW via through my experiences since the early 90's (am going on 60 in a couple of weeks so I've been at this a loooong time... btw), is that there are intelligence's from those outside of our realm who use their own technology to not only communicate to us directly via technology on our end but also via through direct telepathy too where, in that case, that technology has been implanted into our electro/bio system. "They" in fact, even call it their "technology".

    But here's the bottom line, spirituality is only physics that has not been discovered yet.

    PS -- "they" know what you're going to "think", even before you think it... let alone say it. lol
    Well everyone probably has their own perspective on this. Personally I find it incredulous the idea of natural telepathy. The mental control needed to do such a thing would likely require mind control technology the way I see it. How could you hone in on one person or multiple people just based on thinking to them? Would you have to hold them in your mind while talking ??? What about random thoughts you don't want to be beamed to someone, but when you are thinking of someone wouldn't your thoughts be transmitted to them? And wouldn't a planet full of people fully able to send anyone a thought be ridiculous? What about celebrities? They would basically get the effects of schizophrenia with so many people thinking about them and talking to them. Natural telepathy just doesn't seem practical to me.

    I'm open to being wrong about this, but I believe natural telepathy gives things like energetic signatures and not much else, and has been propagated by the absence of sources telling them it is microwaves being beamed into their mind accounting for telepathy. So naturally people assume it is some natural phenomenon when it is based on technology IMHO.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Victoria (22nd February 2026)

  9. Link to Post #25
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,441 times in 3,453 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    Found this article:
    The top 5 neurscience breakthroughs of 2014
    http://theconnecto.me/2014/12/the-to...oughs-of-2014/

    Quote 5. Brain-to-Brain Transmission of Words

    Last year’s #1 breakthrough spot went to Rao and Stocco’s wireless brain-to-brain interface – and this year has already seen some significant steps forward in that technology. Whereas that first system could transmit simple movement impulses from one person’s brain to another, a new system designed this year can send short verbal messages directly from one person’s brain to another.
    Quote 4. The Open-Source LEGO Robot Brain

    Robots controlled by digitized insect brains go back at least to 2007, when a digital moth brain was uploaded into a robot that responded to changes in light – but a project completed this year shows that anyone with some programming skill can create a robot inhabited by an invertebrate’s brain.
    Read more at http://theconnecto.me/2014/12/the-to...oughs-of-2014/

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    shadowstalker (8th February 2015), Victoria (22nd February 2026), william r sanford72 (7th February 2015)

  11. Link to Post #26
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th November 2013
    Posts
    111
    Thanks
    335
    Thanked 574 times in 99 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    Quote Posted by Omniverse (here)
    Quote Posted by annacherie (here)
    Omni ...what do you attribute your ability to maintain your sanity throughout your torture experiences?
    When they first started happening to me I went a little crazy due to being mind controlled to do such. But over the years I have learned to take torture in stride. It no longer affects me emotionally for the most part I just get through it.

    Quote Do you suppose they were inflicted upon you to silence any egoic type of disclosure??
    I'm not sure what you mean here.

    Quote It seems discerning the source of messages would be really important. I think its actually pretty easy to know what resonates vs what does not ...notice that the 7-10 hz (schumann) a positive and safe frequency band to work with....but curiously windows browser frequencies shuts it all down....perhaps this would speak to the hive mind issue. Persinger studies the OBE .....this is akin to the chicken or the egg metaphor. perhaps those who have learned to navigate the astral through to higher dimensions )higher frequenncies would best be those to experiment w this technology as the free will is the ultimate mediator and judge?
    I don't know his work very well, but it seems to be important.

    Quote Posted by Roisin (here)
    Natural telepathy is a myth? Well, here's the way I look at it and I'm not just trying to come across as a know-it-all as I am speaking from the position as a participator in conversations with those from those realms outside of our own. Telepathy is indeed a reality and I can even prove it.... if you want me to. Sound outlandish? Try me

    But from what I KNOW via through my experiences since the early 90's (am going on 60 in a couple of weeks so I've been at this a loooong time... btw), is that there are intelligence's from those outside of our realm who use their own technology to not only communicate to us directly via technology on our end but also via through direct telepathy too where, in that case, that technology has been implanted into our electro/bio system. "They" in fact, even call it their "technology".

    But here's the bottom line, spirituality is only physics that has not been discovered yet.

    PS -- "they" know what you're going to "think", even before you think it... let alone say it. lol
    Well everyone probably has their own perspective on this. Personally I find it incredulous the idea of natural telepathy. The mental control needed to do such a thing would likely require mind control technology the way I see it. How could you hone in on one person or multiple people just based on thinking to them? Would you have to hold them in your mind while talking ??? What about random thoughts you don't want to be beamed to someone, but when you are thinking of someone wouldn't your thoughts be transmitted to them? And wouldn't a planet full of people fully able to send anyone a thought be ridiculous? What about celebrities? They would basically get the effects of schizophrenia with so many people thinking about them and talking to them. Natural telepathy just doesn't seem practical to me.

    I'm open to being wrong about this, but I believe natural telepathy gives things like energetic signatures and not much else, and has been propagated by the absence of sources telling them it is microwaves being beamed into their mind accounting for telepathy. So naturally people assume it is some natural phenomenon when it is based on technology IMHO.
    "natural telepathy" wouldn't necessarily require control at all. Anecdotally it generally seems to occur suddenly and without warning - a mother's son is fatally wounded in battle and she is aware of his dying - that sort of thing. Persinger thinks it has something to do with the Earth's magnetic field (which we are all immersed in). I think you are assuming it is as advanced as full telepathic conversations, which it generally would not be.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to David Ansible For This Post:

    Victoria (22nd February 2026)

  13. Link to Post #27
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th January 2012
    Posts
    2,034
    Thanks
    4,895
    Thanked 7,304 times in 1,783 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    Hi David! Need to set things up on my end as I've taken a break from everything over this past year... but ready to go again. As soon as I'm set up, will let you know via this thread. thanks! (Let's give it a week from now)

    Last edited by Roisin; 8th February 2015 at 00:25.

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roisin For This Post:

    David Ansible (8th February 2015), shadowstalker (8th February 2015), Victoria (22nd February 2026)

  15. Link to Post #28
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th November 2013
    Posts
    111
    Thanks
    335
    Thanked 574 times in 99 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    Quote Posted by Roisin (here)
    Hi David! Need to set things up on my end as I've taken a break from everything over this past year... but ready to go again. As soon as I'm set up, will let you know via this thread. thanks! (Let's give it a week from now)

    Cool, I'm excited!

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to David Ansible For This Post:

    Omni (8th February 2015), Roisin (8th February 2015), Victoria (22nd February 2026)

  17. Link to Post #29
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,441 times in 3,453 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    Quote Posted by David Ansible (here)
    "natural telepathy" wouldn't necessarily require control at all. Anecdotally it generally seems to occur suddenly and without warning - a mother's son is fatally wounded in battle and she is aware of his dying - that sort of thing. Persinger thinks it has something to do with the Earth's magnetic field (which we are all immersed in). I think you are assuming it is as advanced as full telepathic conversations, which it generally would not be.
    I would term that more ESP than telepathy what you describe. I basically defined what I have skepticism of, as full mind to mind communication of mental voice, concepts, energy, etc.

    ESP of sensing when a loved one dies definitely occurs though, I dont discount that. But how it occurs I have a different perspective than most. This could be a technological thing or a natural thing from where I'm sitting. I have seen how deep the technological matrix is, and it isn't only negative either. The telepathy I experienced with a female in my teens was certainly technological after examining it from the knowledge I have now. However if you asked either of us at the time, we would have said it was natural...

    Some of the psychic things I have picked up in my life have been similar. After examining the full sequence of conscious realities after knowing this technology intimately, I have concluded many things I thought were natural psychic things I did early in my life, were actually technological, done by my guides in terms of helping me in unique situations.

    There is definitely a set of natural psychic abilities, and synthetic psychic abilities going on in the world. Same goes for telepathy. Although I am sure saying such will be wildly unpopular... How about instead of being simple and judging me, see that it takes courage to say something that so strongly goes against the grain of accepted notions...

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Victoria (22nd February 2026)

  19. Link to Post #30
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th January 2012
    Posts
    2,034
    Thanks
    4,895
    Thanked 7,304 times in 1,783 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    Hey Omniverse, can you provide us with a glossary of some of your most important terms... including the ones that you use a lot too. Just want a little more clarity on some of those processes that you have been introducing to us for some time now. Thanks!
    Last edited by Roisin; 8th February 2015 at 16:49.

  20. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roisin For This Post:

    Omni (8th February 2015), Victoria (22nd February 2026)

  21. Link to Post #31
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,441 times in 3,453 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    Quote Posted by Roisin (here)
    Hey Omniverse, can you provide us with a glossary of some of your most important terms... including the ones that you use a lot too. Just want a little more clarity on some of those processes that you have been introducing to us for some time now. Thanks!
    I am drawing a blank in terms of all the terminology I use. Sorry Dear Roisin It's a good idea to write something about it. I might do an article about the terminology I use and have coined. Thanks for the idea

  22. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Roisin (8th February 2015), Victoria (22nd February 2026)

  23. Link to Post #32
    Avalon Member Omni's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Location
    Pacific NW
    Posts
    3,813
    Thanks
    12,541
    Thanked 22,441 times in 3,453 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    DARPA working on transmitting images to the mind:

    Quote DARPA's 'Cortical Modem' will plug straight into your BRAIN

    The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is developing a brain interface it hopes could inject images directly into the visual cortex.

    news of the "Cortical Modem" project has emerged in transhumanist magazine Humanity Plus, which reports the agency is working on a direct neural interface (DNI) chip that could be used for human enhancement and motor-function repair.

    Project head Dr Phillip Alvelda, Biological Technologies chief with the agency, told the Biology Is Technology conference in Silicon Valley last week the project had a short term goal of building a US$10 device the size of two stacked nickels that could deliver images without the need for glasses or similar technology.
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02...to_your_brain/

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Omni For This Post:

    Harmony (21st February 2026), Victoria (22nd February 2026)

  25. Link to Post #33
    UK Avalon Member
    Join Date
    2nd January 2011
    Location
    In the playground
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,841
    Thanks
    37,899
    Thanked 22,047 times in 2,728 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    [B]Neuroscience JUST Did the IMPOSSIBLE[/B ]
    (12:02)

    In this short video Chase Hughes outlines experiments using psylocibin (magic mushrooms) and genetically modified rabies virus to rewire the brain. The implication for future therapies is quite startling. There's another video posted on the Hodgepodge thread which reported psylocibin had the ability to stop all withdrawal symptoms of opioid addiction.

    "A neuroscience paper published in Cell just days ago answers a question researchers have been trying to solve for years: what actually changes in the brain during a psilocybin experience—and why those changes can last.

    Using a genetically modified rabies virus as a neural tracer, researchers were able to map—cell by cell—how psilocybin alters brain connectivity. This allowed them to see, for the first time, which brain regions gain connections, which lose them, and how those changes depend on what the brain is doing during the experience itself.

    The findings help explain long-standing observations discussed by neuroscientists, psychiatrists, and researchers often referenced on platforms like Huberman Lab:
    • Why psilocybin can reduce depression and anxiety
    • Why the default mode network quiets during psychedelic states
    • Why sensory perception feels intensified
    • Why context and mental state during a trip matter so much
    • Why a single experience can lead to lasting psychological change

    One of the most important results from the study is this:
    only brain regions that are active during the psilocybin experience undergo lasting rewiring.
    Inactive regions do not change.

    That finding has major implications for mental health treatment, psychotherapy, and our understanding of how perception, mood, and identity are shaped at the neural level.

    In this video, Chase walks through:
    • How the rabies tracer virus works and why it was used
    • What changed in sensory, emotional, and self-referential brain networks
    • How this relates to depression, anxiety, PTSD, and trauma
    • What this discovery means for future psychedelic research
    "Is there an idea more radical in the history of the human race than turning your children over to total strangers whom you know nothing about, and having those strangers work on your child's mind, out of your sight, for a period of twelve years?" John Taylor Gatto

  26. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to grapevine For This Post:

    Ewan (21st February 2026), Harmony (21st February 2026), shaberon (21st February 2026), Sue (Ayt) (22nd February 2026), Victoria (22nd February 2026)

  27. Link to Post #34
    Scotland Avalon Member Ewan's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th February 2015
    Location
    Ireland
    Age
    66
    Posts
    2,745
    Thanks
    83,662
    Thanked 22,162 times in 2,699 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    Quote Posted by grapevine (here)

    There's another video posted on the Hodgepodge thread which reported psylocibin had the ability to stop all withdrawal symptoms of opioid addiction.

    "A neuroscience paper published in Cell just days ago answers a question researchers have been trying to solve for years: what actually changes in the brain during a psilocybin experience—and why those changes can last.

    Using a genetically modified rabies virus as a neural tracer, researchers were able to map—cell by cell—how psilocybin alters brain connectivity. This allowed them to see, for the first time, which brain regions gain connections, which lose them, and how those changes depend on what the brain is doing during the experience itself.
    That is promising, if accurate, but wait till we see how the military/black hat laboratories try to repurpose it!

  28. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Ewan For This Post:

    grapevine (21st February 2026), Harmony (21st February 2026), shaberon (21st February 2026), Sue (Ayt) (22nd February 2026), Victoria (22nd February 2026)

  29. Link to Post #35
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Posts
    6,525
    Thanks
    33,874
    Thanked 37,131 times in 6,175 posts

    Default Re: Public Neuroscience Thread (Mind Control, Thought Surveillance, Synthetic Dreams, etc)

    Psilocybin is very therapeutic -- we use it in death therapy where there aren't other candidates.

    I don't think it would be possible to militarize it.

    In essence this is a form of shamanism, which seems to me it would be the opposite of mind control. In fact, we used to say that such things would break the mind of war hawks. It will bring you close to the mycellium, the one organism that lives right under the surface soil globally.

    This explains most of history, man's selfish dominant mode saturating the brain until part of it is effectively dead, which can be more or less permanently re-wired by a mushroom, which, by the way, is the least harmful non-food substance you can ingest. Or at least I've not known it to be studied for nutritional content. But it leaves no residues in the body, therefor is "safer" than even cigarettes or tea, and incredibly far safer than alcohol.

    If I wanted someone asleep and prone to mind control, I'd use booze. Why do we legally have this? Gangsters and machine guns. But this therapeutic mushroom which grows abundantly enough in favorable circumstances is taboo. So far, it is mostly people in advanced stages of cancer that have given it any consideration.

  30. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shaberon For This Post:

    Sue (Ayt) (22nd February 2026), Victoria (22nd February 2026)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts