Torsion and Math

[unlimited mind]

you rock! i just got some bismuth a few days ago, as a side note.

but i think this is what being an organaut does to one's mind. it turns one into a mad scientist as your brain seems to have a strong connection to a certain energy information stream.

i really appreciate you posting this gregor, as i am not a mathematician but i have a big crush on torsion.

[GregorArturo]

Originally Posted by unlimited mind

you rock! i just got some bismuth a few days ago, as a side note.

but i think this is what being an organaut does to one's mind. it turns one into a mad scientist as your brain seems to have a strong connection to a certain energy information stream.

i really appreciate you posting this gregor, as i am not a mathematician but i have a big crush on torsion.

Let us know how the bismuth works for ya! There has been only two thoughts in my head lately: Preparing for all this, and then torsion and more torsion!

Man, my dream for years was to built a fully electric ultralight so I could fly anywhere unhindered, like Fly away Home, but instead of ducks and smiling gas. I might substitute for some ospreys though. That'd be cool. I feel though with Torsion this could be right at our finger tips.

Stop drooling now, Gregor.

[Animos]

GregorArturo,

If you understand the power of the numbers 3 6 and 9 you'll get the key of the universe!



http://projectavalon.net/forum/showthread.php?t=3485
(Just skip first 20min if you find "hard" times listening to some BS)

Let me know if you'll get some "clues" and if you would need some more explanations.

[unlimited mind]

drooling aside, here are some of my ramblings on torsion from earlier in the day. http://www.projectavalon.net/forum/s...1137#post41137.

goo goo ga ga

[nuxa]

hello

I fancy stuff like this, I never get tired of staring at sacred Geometry and platonic solids. The Torsion field I feel is the Holy Grail of knowledge of some sort. If you havent heard of Marko Rodin and his Vortex Based Mathematics you can find info about him here:

http://www.redicecreations.com/radio...ICR-080120.php

-nux-

[tone3jaguar]

You should listen to "The Science of Peace" by David Wilcock. He goes into depth about the history of Torsian Physics. Also check out the book "Dark Mission" by Richard Hoagland. He also has a great chapter on torsian physics.

[GregorArturo]

Originally Posted by tone3jaguar

You should listen to "The Science of Peace" by David Wilcock. He goes into depth about the history of Torsian Physics. Also check out the book "Dark Mission" by Richard Hoagland. He also has a great chapter on torsian physics.

Thanks Tone3. It was David's Divine Cosmos that really brought me on board with Torsion physics. Very mind blowing. Otherwise thanks for the sources.

-- ---------------

I did make a discovery to connect Rodin's work with prime numbers, my current area of focus. In essence I am trying to figure out why some numbers may be more sacred than others in a mathematical sense, such as prime numbers or numbers with high number of factors like 60. Well, taking both of those ideas I came up with this. I am not sure if anyone has every realized the factor relationship with prime numbers before, but I discovered it right after an intense meditation session last night heh.

Number on left is prime number.
1: 1 = 1 (1 factor)
2: 1 x 2 = 2 (2 factors)
3: 1 x 2 x 3 = 6 (4 factors)
5: 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 = 30 (8 factors)
7: 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 = 210 (16 factors)
11: 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 x 11 = 2310 (32 factors)
13: 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 x 11 x 13 = 30030 (64 factors)
17: 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 x 11 x 13 x 17 = 510510 (128 factors)
19: 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 x 11 x 13 x 17 x 19 = 9699690 (256 factors)

Then this connects with Rodin's work:
1 = 1
2 = 2
4 = 4
8 = 8
1 + 6 = 7
3 + 2 = 5
6 + 4 = 10, 1 + 0 = 1
1 + 2 + 8 = 11, 1 + 1 = 2
2 + 5 + 6 = 13, 1 + 3 = 4

Note though, one is not considered a prime number. They say a prime is a number only divisible by one and itself. It makes more sense to say a prime is a number that has only two factors. Most numbers have 4 or more even number of factors. Two square numbers have three, and all the other square numbers have an odd set of factors. One is the only number that has one factor. The barrier between prime and non-prime numbers could be more like Prime numbers > Factors of 2. But ya, hopefully not way over your heads.

[mikey]

This is an interesting article on torison..hope u enjoy it
http://www.eioba.com/a85528/torsion_...hipov_and_heim
peace
mikey

[GregorArturo]

Originally Posted by mikey

This is an interesting article on torison..hope u enjoy it
http://www.eioba.com/a85528/torsion_...hipov_and_heim
peace
mikey

Thanks a ton for that Mikey! I just finished reading it. Def filled in some holes for me that I haven't picked up elsewhere, and I'm glad it was much more physics focused than say orgonite technology focused.

I assumed with it being called torsion, relating with torque, it was spin related but couldn't fully figure out why. It makes physics make much more sense, and life in itself, really does.

It made me think. I am a poi spinner, so in essence I am generating torsion when I do that. Imagining if I could make all the movements geometric movements, like with tai chi you could say, following the golden ratio. And then also spinning orgonite. Hell, when I'm spinning fire, its fire and pure organic material going up. Heh, go figure.

[day]

Originally Posted by GregorArturo

Thanks Tone3. It was David's Divine Cosmos that really brought me on board with Torsion physics. Very mind blowing. Otherwise thanks for the sources.

-----------------

I did make a discovery to connect Rodin's work with prime numbers, my current area of focus. In essence I am trying to figure out why some numbers may be more sacred than others in a mathematical sense, such as prime numbers or numbers with high number of factors like 60. Well, taking both of those ideas I came up with this. I am not sure if anyone has every realized the factor relationship with prime numbers before, but I discovered it right after an intense meditation session last night heh.

Number on left is prime number.
1: 1 = 1 (1 factor)
2: 1 x 2 = 2 (2 factors)
3: 1 x 2 x 3 = 6 (4 factors)
5: 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 = 30 (8 factors)
7: 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 = 210 (16 factors)
11: 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 x 11 = 2310 (32 factors)
13: 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 x 11 x 13 = 30030 (64 factors)
17: 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 x 11 x 13 x 17 = 510510 (128 factors)
19: 1 x 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 x 11 x 13 x 17 x 19 = 9699690 (256 factors)

Then this connects with Rodin's work:
1 = 1
2 = 2
4 = 4
8 = 8
1 + 6 = 7
3 + 2 = 5
6 + 4 = 10, 1 + 0 = 1
1 + 2 + 8 = 11, 1 + 1 = 2
2 + 5 + 6 = 13, 1 + 3 = 4

Note though, one is not considered a prime number. They say a prime is a number only divisible by one and itself. It makes more sense to say a prime is a number that has only two factors. Most numbers have 4 or more even number of factors. Two square numbers have three, and all the other square numbers have an odd set of factors. One is the only number that has one factor. The barrier between prime and non-prime numbers could be more like Prime numbers > Factors of 2. But ya, hopefully not way over your heads.

Hi Mike I agree with you in your definition for the view of a prime number having two factors means really that our defining understanding and articulation should in fact have a few that is no longer linear. In support of your research and speculation id suggest an overview of how numbers and their definition can be interpreted with a 'holistic' view of their true functions.

if we dont fuss over the classics' hierarchy then we could proceed with vital creative thought.

here is Walter Russells table of elements
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/8989/russtbl.gif

I believe he and you are on the same path of understanding.

here is his paper on the 'electric universe and 9 harp strings
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/8989/radio.gif

and an overview of some of his work from the University of Physics and Philosophy
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/8989/

Walter Russell is a scientist whose work was used by Ralph Ring (interviewed by project camelot) Ring was able to build a spaceship which levitated -- during the interview Ring discloses how his project was scrapped by the gov.


Hassim Haramein also reflects on Russells work and has developed a new unified field theory which has drawn the attention of Nasa.

http://www.theresonanceproject.org/research.html
papers for peer review

http://www.theresonanceproject.org/pdf/torque_paper.pdf


while these men have in some cases like Newton developed new maths such as calculus-- often their work focused more on theory like Einstein.

I wonder if you may be on your way to developing a new math, understanding of math and applications thereof?


great thread!
day