|
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Anticomuna, I have had enough of your accusations of "Obama cult followers." You don't like this guy because some anti-Muslim, Christian fundamentalist, neo-fascist online venom spouter wrote some article that most people here are smart enough to see for the thoughtless, pedantic, and poorly written piece of garbage that it is.
Just like the folks who claim Obama is a Mason, which he is not a Mason (prove it - don't post a link to a youtube montage thrown together by a paranoid basement dweller, seething about the outside world that exists just outside his parents' basement windows; show me a picture of him in a fez, wearing a skull and bones t-shirt). Just like those who think that because he is a politician, he must be evil. He went to Harvard, he must be evil. His wife wore a red dress, he must be evil. Give me an ever lovin' break! Buddy, I love my country, and I love my people. I someday would like to contribute to our political system, and yes, my ultimate dream is to someday run for POTUS. I am not one of the folks here on this site who believe that we will vibrate out of our problems, or some of the that other cultish horse-hocky that passes for fact. I'm one of those people who is hoping for the best, yet preparing for the worst, and defining my own spiritual path instead of letting others define it for me. Obama is so popular because he IS different from what we have had for decades. Maybe, just maybe, this guy is from the outside, and will do good for our country. The fact is no one knows; not me, not you, or the Christo-facist gestapo that inspires you to wage your campaign against Obama. The fact that the Christian fundamentalist evangelicals are so upset about Obama's rise to power reinforces my belief that there might be something good about him after all. The fact Republicans in general are upset tells me we might really be on the verge of REAL, and POSITIVE change. After all, it is they that have destroyed this country, and led with a vision more fitting of the nineteenth century than the twenty-first. |
|
|