MASSIVE FRAUD: Major Lawsuits (update: all foiled so far)

[rgray222]

First off I think this video/information (The Absolute Truth) really requires a separate thread to get as much discussion going as possible instead of being on page 118. An intelligent lively discussion always brings us closer to truth.

The evidence (if true) appears to be compelling that not only was there voter fraud but Trump actually won the election. The reason I say 'if true' is because he did not make it crystal clear where all this data came from. I have no doubt that all the data he put forward actually exists but how can I be absolutely sure that it is pulled from reliable sources.

What also came out in this video is that there was collusion between big Tech and Democrat state governments to silence those people trying to expose the voter fraud. This much appears to be indisputable.

There was also provable evidence (video clips and Washington Posts Reports) that state governments threaten to punish lawyers that were trying to bring this info to the public or take it to court. There definitely was a conspiracy of silence.

The idea that 60 court cases were rejected does not hold water. Courts around the world and especially in the USA will almost always reject hearing cases that determine a political outcome. The Gore vs Bush Supreme Court Case in 2000 was an exception as the country had nowhere else to turn to solve this historical urgent problem.

Also as a footnote, I have been wondering for the past two weeks why there was such a vicious attack against Mike Lindell and his company, my God he makes pillows. I had no idea (until 2 days ago) that he was coming out with evidence, so now it makes all the sense in the world.

I am going to go back and watch this again (I rarely watch videos longer than 30 minutes) to see if there is something that can cement the facts or derail the train for me.

[Savannah]

Posted by Gracy May (here)

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
("all foiled so far", hell no!)

• Absolute Proof

Folks, I got to 30+ minutes into "Absolute Proof", and have seen nothing but another parade of claims and opinions. I'm going to assume that if there was zero actual evidence in that first 30, a trend has been set.

I'm not going to continue for the whole 2 hours in search of, but if someone can kindly point out something resembling absolute proof subsequent to that, please do post the time and I'll go check it out.

reason, logic, politeness, exasperation, bluntness have all failed so perhaps a metaphor will do.......................

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LiuQ5rNuKAI

[Gemma13]

Please see this thread for discussions on Mike Lindell's video and Conflicting TIME article. 

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1409195

[greybeard]

The expression " An inconvenient truth" sums up the situation.
So we have indisputable evidence of voter fraud.
This will be disputed or ignored as it is a massive threat to the life style of many, or even their freedom.
It cant be expected that they will roll over and say "You got me"
So what happens next I wonder.
Chris

[Gemma13]

Posted by greybeard (here)
The expression " An inconvenient truth" sums up the situation.
So we have indisputable evidence of voter fraud.
This will be disputed or ignored as it is a massive threat to the life style of many, or even their freedom.
It cant be expected that they will roll over and say "You got me"
So what happens next I wonder.
Chris

See this thread Chris for their historical victory text which will no doubt flood their territory and drown out any opposition trying to get airtime for Lindell's election fraud summary.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1409195

[ExomatrixTV]

("all foiled so far", hell no!)

⚠️ Free utorrent program needed for this: tinyurl.com/Absolute-Proof-Docu-2021 = 1,74 Gb .mp4 video file!

• Recommended additional use: Free: PeerBlock 1.2, Free: AntVir & Free: Comodo Firewall.

cheers,
John Kuhles aka 'ExomatrixTV'
February 6th, 2021

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Savannah (here)

Posted by Gracy May (here)

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
("all foiled so far", hell no!)

• Absolute Proof

Folks, I got to 30+ minutes into "Absolute Proof", and have seen nothing but another parade of claims and opinions. I'm going to assume that if there was zero actual evidence in that first 30, a trend has been set.

I'm not going to continue for the whole 2 hours in search of, but if someone can kindly point out something resembling absolute proof subsequent to that, please do post the time and I'll go check it out.

reason, logic, politeness, exasperation, bluntness have all failed so perhaps a metaphor will do.......................

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=LiuQ5rNuKAI

I do not care when some one else claims he or she does not care, there are millions who DO care! ... and I never seek or need "approval" from (willful ignorant) deniers or dismissive types.

John Kuhles

🌐 tinyurl.com/Absolute-Proof-Docu-Feb-2021

[ExomatrixTV]

• Time Magazine ADMITS There Was Election Conspiracy, But THEY Call It SAVING Democracy

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5ZKyCxhzIsM

[gord]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• Time Magazine ADMITS There Was Election Conspiracy, But THEY Call It SAVING Democracy

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5ZKyCxhzIsM

Yes, but why? Is this just the $%^&^#$% that thinks they've somehow acquired or have been gifted the "right" to own or control everything there is (through their proxies, I suppose), thumbing their noses at everyone else? I don't get it.

[ExomatrixTV]

• Time Magazine Admits International Cabal Of Elites Stole Election From Trump

[onawah]

Supreme Court to Consider 2020 Election Challenge Lawsuits in February Conference
BY TOM OZIMEK February 6, 2021
https://www.theepochtimes.com/suprem...g-2021-02-06-3

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday scheduled several high-profile contest-of-election lawsuits, including ones brought by attorneys Sidney Powell and Lin Wood, and the Trump campaign, for consideration at its Feb. 19 conference.

According to a case listing, the lawsuits include Sidney Powell’s Michigan case (20-815), the Trump campaign’s Pennsylvania lawsuit (20-845) and Wisconsin lawsuit (20-882), the Pennsylvania lawsuit brought by Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) (20-810), and Lin Wood’s Georgia case (20-799).

All cases allege some form of unlawful election-related conduct affecting the result of the election, including expansion of mail-in balloting by elections officials changing rules in contravention of state election laws, lack of adequate security measures around mail ballots, issues with machine vote tabulation, and denial of meaningful access to poll watchers.

The Supreme Court declined to grant relief or fast-track the cases as requested in respective petitions filed ahead of the Jan. 20 inauguration of President Joe Biden.

Powell’s Michigan petition (pdf) sought “emergency declaratory relief avowing that the presidential election results certified by Michigan officials were unconstitutional and otherwise contrary to law, together with injunctive relief de-certifying those results.”

Wood’s Georgia petition (pdf) asked the Supreme Court to “enter an emergency order instructing Respondents to de-certify the results of the General Election for the Office of the President.”

The Kelly petition (pdf) asked the court for an injunction “that prohibits the Executive-Respondents from taking official action to tabulate, compute, canvass, certify, or otherwise finalize the results of the Election.”

The Trump campaign suits similarly called for emergency injunctive relief in the form of expedited hearings and blocking certification of the electoral college votes for Biden.

Some of the lawyers in the cases said that seeing the challenges through is important as they could have an impact on long-term election fairness.

“Our legal issue remains important in need of the court’s review,” attorney John Eastman told the Washington Examiner, referring to Pennsylvania’s conduct during the 2020 election.

Greg Teufel, Kelly’s lawyer, told the Washington Examiner that the congressman has no intention of dropping the suit.

The Supreme Court has kept its distance from Trump’s election challenges. In December, it rejected a lawsuit filed by the Republican attorney general of Texas and backed by Trump seeking to decertify the election results in four states.

If, at the Feb. 19 conference, the Supreme Court decides to take up any of the election lawsuits, they most likely won’t be heard until October.

In a sweeping report on the integrity of the 2020 election, Trump adviser Peter Navarro concluded that the allegations of irregularities surrounding the vote in key battleground states were serious enough to warrant an urgent probe and substantial enough to potentially overturn the results.

“If these election irregularities are not fully investigated prior to Inauguration Day and thereby effectively allowed to stand, this nation runs the very real risk of never being able to have a fair presidential election again,” Navarro warned in his report."

[greybeard]

Time Magazine's A Secret Shadow Campaign That Destroyed The 2020 Election？

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5rNO3gKBqHo

[Eric J (Viking)]

Trump is winning election lawsuits, in case you haven’t heard

Trump has won two-thirds of the cases that have been adjudicated by the courts.

February 4, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – Of late, I’ve felt more and more like I am back in Communist China. A place where every day, no matter what channel you turn on, what radio broadcast you listen to, or what online news service you subscribe to (except LifeSiteNews and a couple of others), the same dreary party line spews out.

The oligarchy is so confident that they can manipulate our very thoughts – after all, they control the search engines, the Twitter feeds, and the trending news – that they no longer even bother to hide what they do. Deleting President Trump’s account made it clear to the world what devious little Jack Dorsey spends his days doing: maniacally deleting accounts that deviate from his “truths.” And who doesn’t know by now that Mark Zuckerberg specializes in devising algorithms that are the hi-tech version of the mushroom treatment – keeping us in the dark and feeding us horse manure.

The party line with regard to the 2020 presidential election, aggressively promoted by America’s corporate media and Big Tech, is this: There was no election fraud because the courts have said so.

Both claims are false. Not just questionable, but dead wrong.

By now, most people know that America’s corporate media and Big Tech have aggressively and punitively suppressed an open discussion of possible election irregularities.

But have you noticed that – to prop up their version of reality – they’ve simply stopped reporting on the dozens of ongoing lawsuits that are slowly wending their way through the court system? At most, they will simply make a blanket statement along the lines of “Trump has lost all the lawsuits that have come before the courts.”

Sometimes they will go further, and suggest that our justice system has thoroughly and impartially examined the claims of election fraud made in those suits, and have ruled that they are completely unfounded.

Nothing could be further from the truth, as Physicist John Droz has discovered. Droz assembled a team of his fellow scientists and engineers – all volunteers – to take a close look at the lawsuits that have been filed, all of which are a matter of public record, and to summarize the results. This is no easy task, since there have been 80 lawsuits filed in connection with the 2020 presidential election by Trump or on his behalf, and each of these lawsuits consists of dozens of pages of filing and decisions.

The summary report, called “2020 Presidential Election Lawsuits Related to Election Integrity,” strips the excess verbiage of which lawyers are so fond, leaving the bare essentials of the lawsuits: What issues were at stake, how each case was treated by the courts, what evidence was objectively analyzed and, finally and most importantly, who won and who lost.

So what did Droz and his team find?

First, of the 80 total lawsuits, 34 have either been withdrawn, consolidated with other suits, or dismissed due to legal technicalities such as lack of standing, timing, or jurisdiction. Those judges who dismissed suits never heard the actual evidence of election irregularities and/or fraud, since they did not allow it to be presented in their courtrooms. Such cases cannot be counted as a loss for Trump. If anything, they are evidence of a failure of our judicial system to – at a moment of national crisis – actually address election fraud.

Of the 46 remaining lawsuits, 25 cases are still ongoing, so that the winner and loser of these cases is yet to be determined, while 21 have been completely adjudicated. These are cases where the court heard arguments, considered any relevant evidence, and then issued a formal ruling on the merits.

You may be surprised to learn that, of these 21 cases, Trump has won 14 and lost 7.

In other words, Trump has won two-thirds of the cases to date that have been adjudicated by the courts.

Don’t expect to hear this on the evening news.

John Droz notes separately that, despite the widespread allegations of massive voter fraud:

“… only three (3) of these lawsuits materially dealt with voter illegalities (citizens voting twice, votes from deceased persons, etc.). Interestingly, all three of these cases are still open.”

“Further, just three (3) lawsuits addressed voting machine inaccuracies (purposeful or accidental). One of these was dismissed (due to jurisdiction), one was ruled against (although no discovery was granted), and one is still open (discovery was granted).”

“The likely explanation for so few cases in these two areas is that legally proving fraud or voting machine manipulations are very time-consuming processes, that require substantial investigative work and documentation. There simply wasn’t enough time to do this prior to key points in the process (like the Electoral College).”
Kudos to John Droz and his team for helping to educate the public about the ongoing legal efforts in ensure election integrity.

I think everyone understands that, if we can be defrauded of our vote, we no longer live in a democracy.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/t...u-havent-heard

Viking

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by viking (here)
Trump is winning election lawsuits, in case you haven’t heard

Trump has won two-thirds of the cases that have been adjudicated by the courts.

February 4, 2021 (LifeSiteNews)

Please everybody add: "(update: all foiled so far)" ??? Hell No!
if you can prove the change in this Project Avalon Forum Thread Title is not justified!

... and super thanks for sharing

Some people follow mainstream news pushed narratives MORE than ALL narratives and become conditioned to assume it "must be so" ... meanwhile we have shown thousands of times last 10+ years it is all perception they push & sell 24/7 ... The evidence of mainstream media contradictions are endless ... So it would be wise NOT to assume "it's over" as any form of defeatism attitude is exactly what they want you to do ... and some do not mean it as "defeatism" but they truly beLIEve the lies no matter what you say as their minds are already made up ... and want you to copy that behavior. Hell No!

cheers,
John

[ExomatrixTV]

The world is watching Biden signing dozens of Executive Orders he did not write nor read but agents of the Deep State did! ... None of the mass media wants (you) to know who the real puppet masters are. Preparing for endless Global War on "Domestic Terrorism" Agenda 2030 "The Great Dystopian Reset" and their "Build Back Better" propaganda.

• TheGreatReset
• The-Covid-Cult
• BillGatesTyranny
• WeatherWars-BillGates
• Biden-Scandal-Explodes
• ClimateScare-Agenda2030
• PCR-Deception-Exposed-Docu
• Planetary-Lockdown-Explained
• Absolute-Proof-Docu-Feb-2021
• DeepRootedBiPartisanCorruption
• NWO-War-On-DomesticTerrorism
• 7ConspiracyTheories-BecameReal
• 1933-1945-2020-2032-JohnKuhles

[Eric J (Viking)]

Found this on my travels....

https://www.infowars.com/posts/mathe...impossibility/

Mathematician Says Biden Election Win A Statistical Impossibility
Infowars.com

February 7th 2021, 11:13 am

A shocking report from OAN explains how a legitimate win by Joe Biden couldn't have occurred in a million years

A shocking report from One America News explains how Joe Biden’s “win” was statistically impossible, further evidence that the 2020 presidential election was fraudulent.

----------------------------------
Dear SOB's That Stole The Election- Our Right full President is President Trump, I'm not asking you for anything because he is already the President!!!

Viking

[greybeard]

Ep. 2398b - [DS] Revealed How They Rigged The Election, Assets In Place, Wait For It..
https://www.bitchute.com/video/EZ64jPEHTn1C/

[T Smith]

Posted by Satori (here)

Expert testimony is evidence. If you want to ignore the experts, as well as many, many, many affidavits providing facts and not opinions, not to mention all the other factual evidence, all I can conclude is that you like the result irrespective of the means and methods used to obtain the result. That makes you part of the problem in my book.

I suppose you will continue to enjoy totalitarian collectivism in the USA, for as long as it lasts.

I think what we are beginning to experience are the effects of social engineering in the post-modern world, what Huxley described as "the Ultimate Revolution of a really efficient totalitarian state," where all-powerful political bosses and their army of managers are able to render entire populations into submission without resistance. In a world where people have been conditioned to love their servitude, proof is subjective. Reality itself is subjective. What is proof, after all, but a construct of mind?

Control the mind, control reality.

"...There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution..." Aldous Huxley, 1962

[Gracy]

Posted by T Smith (here)

Posted by Satori (here)

Expert testimony is evidence. If you want to ignore the experts, as well as many, many, many affidavits providing facts and not opinions, not to mention all the other factual evidence, all I can conclude is that you like the result irrespective of the means and methods used to obtain the result. That makes you part of the problem in my book.

I suppose you will continue to enjoy totalitarian collectivism in the USA, for as long as it lasts.

I think what we are beginning to experience are the effects of social engineering in the post-modern world, what Huxley described as "the Ultimate Revolution of a really efficient totalitarian state," where all-powerful political bosses and their army of managers are able to render entire populations into submission without resistance. In a world where people have been conditioned to love their servitude, proof is subjective. Reality itself is subjective. What is proof, after all, but a construct of mind?

Control the mind, control reality.

"...There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution..." Aldous Huxley, 1962

This is obviously in reference to Mike (The Pillow Guy) Lindell's 2 hour video, which claims to demonstrate obvious and startling proof beyond the shadow of a doubt. Well, it did no such thing IMO, unless Lindell and his guests just stating and restating the same old claims over and over again, is now considered proof.

So now a person pointing this out, and asking where this startlingly new proof exists in the video, is simply brushed aside as being part of the problem, approving of criminal activity, a lover of totalitarian collectivism, and a victim of mind control as predicted by Aldous Huxley.

Wow... why not just point to where the "Absolute Proof" in this presentation was missed (aside from the chatter), and be done with it?

[Eric J (Viking)]

Posted by T Smith (here)

Posted by Satori (here)

Expert testimony is evidence. If you want to ignore the experts, as well as many, many, many affidavits providing facts and not opinions, not to mention all the other factual evidence, all I can conclude is that you like the result irrespective of the means and methods used to obtain the result. That makes you part of the problem in my book.

I suppose you will continue to enjoy totalitarian collectivism in the USA, for as long as it lasts.

I think what we are beginning to experience are the effects of social engineering in the post-modern world, what Huxley described as "the Ultimate Revolution of a really efficient totalitarian state," where all-powerful political bosses and their army of managers are able to render entire populations into submission without resistance. In a world where people have been conditioned to love their servitude, proof is subjective. Reality itself is subjective. What is proof, after all, but a construct of mind?

Control the mind, control reality.

"...There will be, in the next generation or so, a pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing dictatorship without tears, so to speak, producing a kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will in fact have their liberties taken away from them, but will rather enjoy it, because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda or brainwashing, or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods. And this seems to be the final revolution..." Aldous Huxley, 1962

Mr Smith ...In my words succinctly put, ‘thank you and spot on’...

Viking