+ Reply to Thread
Page 93 of 115 FirstFirst 1 43 83 93 103 115 LastLast
Results 1,841 to 1,860 of 2292

Thread: Vaccine Crimes

  1. Link to Post #1841
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    12,352
    Thanks
    75,850
    Thanked 111,074 times in 12,192 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1761...928105007?s=20

    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  2. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (24th February 2024), avid (28th February 2024), Bill Ryan (24th February 2024), Brigantia (24th February 2024), fifi (24th February 2024), Harmony (24th February 2024), Jamie (28th February 2024), Matthew (24th February 2024), Mercedes (24th February 2024), onawah (26th February 2024), RatRodRob...RRR (28th February 2024)

  3. Link to Post #1842
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    12,352
    Thanks
    75,850
    Thanked 111,074 times in 12,192 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/176...716728487?s=20




    See new posts
    Conversation
    The Vigilant Fox 🦊

    @VigilantFox
    The CDC doesn’t want you to see this data.

    They tried to keep it hidden, but they lost a legal battle with Aaron Siri.

    Now, 390,000 free text submissions from their safety monitoring system, V-Safe, are available to the public.

    This is what the data shows so far:


    • 1 in 1,300 individuals reported experiencing Bell’s palsy (facial paralysis) in the initial few days after vaccination.

    • 1 in 906 individuals reported disturbances in their normal menstrual cycle following vaccination.

    • 1 in 450 individuals reportedly experienced shingles after receiving the vaccine.

    • 1 in 160 individuals reported tinnitus or ringing in the ears.

    • 1 in 143 individuals experienced heart palpitations after vaccination.

    “Safe and effective”?

    “I think this is reflective of Why the CDC fought so hard because this is probably the best reflection of what the true safety profile is,” remarked attorney @AaronSiriSG
    .
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  4. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (24th February 2024), avid (28th February 2024), Bill Ryan (27th February 2024), Brigantia (24th February 2024), Ewan (24th February 2024), fifi (24th February 2024), Harmony (24th February 2024), Jamie (28th February 2024), Matthew (24th February 2024), Mercedes (24th February 2024), onawah (26th February 2024), RatRodRob...RRR (28th February 2024), Sue (Ayt) (29th February 2024)

  5. Link to Post #1843
    Avalon Member Eric J (Viking)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    16th March 2010
    Location
    Stockbridge Hampshire UK
    Posts
    4,960
    Thanks
    15,638
    Thanked 27,821 times in 3,445 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    “The unvaccinated will save humanity.”

    Insurance Industry’s Actuarial Data Reveals
    True Scope Of Exploding Public Health
    Disaster Caused By Covid ‘Vaccines’

    SOTN Editor’s Note: Decades prior to serving as one of the editors of State of the Nation, I was a both a Personal Financial Planner and Business Financial Consultant. During the estate planning aspects of servicing my clients needs I was involved with all the different types of insurance products and services. My father was a Chartered Financial Consultant and a crackerjack insurance broker, so I learned that business early on from him before joining his firm. The key point here is that I became acutely aware of the industry fact that “actuarial data” is taken very seriously or else the company can go bust.

    So, when SOTN received the following submission, we knew just how serious a situation we were facing in the aftermath of the implementation of the Covid Super Vaccination Agenda. For the hard actuarial data does not lie. Yes, it can somehow be suppressed; but eventually talk of the unheard of “12-SIGMA EVENT” will leak out and eventually cause a sea change insurance industry-wide…which will then ripple through the Reinsurance Industry, and then through the entire Financial Services Industry.

    In light of the early information published by VAERS concerning the Covid vaccine-induced deaths and injuries nationwide, it was clear from the outset that the U.S. military deployment of the weaponized Covid injections was a premeditated genocide of the American people. However, the much greater manmade tragedy here concerns the countless vax-induced medical ailments and health conditions which have been reported by VAERS. In point of fact, it has been proven that even the VAERS statistics only account for 1% to 10% of the actual deaths and vaccine injuries caused by the Covid shots.

    In short, we have no idea just how big this thing yet. For not only was OPERATION WARP SPEED rolled out as a full-blown depopulation scheme, it was also designed to irreversibly debilitate and incapacitate as many ‘vaccine’ victims as possible. What this really does is that it ties up the great majority of US citizens so that they have no time or energy to hold their murderous government accountable. Likewise, all the institutional co-conspirators such as Big Pharma, Big Medical, Big Media, Big Tech, etc. skate… should the perps be successful in effectively covering up this highly organized and long-planned criminal conspiracy to commit mass murder.

    State of the Nation
    February 26, 2024

    N.B. The well stated points made below are very important for everyone to be aware of, so please disseminate this post far and wide—thank you.

    The Ongoing Carnage From the Covid Injections

    Submitted by an Insurance Industry Retiree

    We are now a few months into year four since the Covid injections were rolled out in December 2020. There is now insurmountable evidence that the injections are not vaccines; they are an experiment in gene therapy that turns the human body into spike protein-producing factories, and these proteins accumulate and attack every organ in our bodies.

    As I write in February, 2024, hardly a day goes by without more damning information being revealed about the tragic consequences of these injections. The evidence can be found everywhere, except of course in the controlled mainstream media which continues pushing this fraudulent narrative; but cracks in the MSM narrative are now everywhere, and the truth is slowly but surely coming to light.

    I spent thirty-two years of my forty-five year career in the insurance and reinsurance industries, the last 19 years with one of the two largest reinsurance companies in the world. I was an underwriter, not an actuary, but I worked with actuaries every day, and the main point of this article concerns actuarial data confirming the devastating effects of the Covid injections on the global population. But before I get to that data, I want to share the most recent information about the catastrophic impact of these so-called vaccines.

    In just the first few weeks of February, numerous oncologists have revealed a new epidemic of rapidly metastasizing cancers that have exploded across the population, particularly among younger people. This has never been seen before.

    Renowned Canadian oncologist and radiologist Dr. William Makis, who has diagnosed 20,000 cancer cases of all kinds during his career, recently stated on camera at The People’s Voice, that he and his colleagues feel like “kindergartners” trying to explain what they are seeing. He reports many of these “turbo cancers”, as some have begun calling them, metastasize so rapidly that patients often die within days of diagnosis. He further reports that many of these new cases present at stage 4 at initial diagnosis, which he has also never seen before. Makis believes the Covid injections are the proximate cause of this explosion in cancer cases.

    According to Makis, the pressure for Canadian doctors to get the Covid injections was so overwhelming that more than 99% complied. Within months of the injection campaign, Canadian doctors began dying, many at very young ages in their twenties and thirties. Many died shortly after being injected, and virtually all deaths occurred within a year of receiving the injections.

    Some of the most disturbing data has been reported by the US Group Life Insurance Industry. On 1/1/2022, a little over a year after the December, 2020 rollout of the Covid injections, the CEO of OneAmerica Life Insurance, Scott Davidson reported startling financial results. He reported death claims increased by 40% in the previous two quarters for policyholders in the company’s group life division. This group of insureds is covered by group policies issued to corporations, and consist of what has historically been the healthiest population segment of 18-64 year olds.

    Quoting Davidson:

    “Just to give an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a
    one-in-200 year catastrophe would be a 10% increase over
    pre-pandemic, so 40% is just unheard of”.

    Extrapolating from the numbers Davidson provided, if a 10% increase represents a three-sigma, or a one in 200 year event, a 40% increase represents a twelve-sigma, or a one in 800 year event. Nothing like this has ever been witnessed in the history of actuarial science.

    But perhaps his most disturbing statement is that “most of the claims for deaths are not classified as COVID-19 deaths”, but from a myriad of other causes. Myocarditis has been the most widely publicized cause of death among the vaccinated. The UK-based website expose-news.com published a report on February 10th titled ‘Shocking CDC Report – Autoimmune Heart Disease Skyrockets Post-Covid Vaccination’. The report states that the risk of suffering myocarditis following mRNA vaccination is around 133x, which means that COVID-19 vaccination increases the risk of suffering myocarditis by 13,000 percent.

    If the Covid injections were safe and effective as advertised, one would expect to have seen the number of deaths level off, then decrease from pre-pandemic levels, but the opposite has happened. This has literally blown up the actuarial tables of the life insurance industry. The findings of this study are corroborated by Ed Dowd’s important book: Cause Unknown — The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022.

    The numbers Davidson reported are now a little over two years old, so the recent explosion in cancer deaths is not included in the numbers. At this point there is no telling how much worse the actuarial data will get as this new wave of cancer deaths become known.

    I expect the life insurance industry will be under intense pressure to suppress this information, but financial results speak for themselves, so it’s just a matter of time until this worsening picture is revealed. The criminal Pfizer organization has already positioned themselves to profit from this coming wave of cancer deaths caused by their mRNA injections, having completed a $43 billion acquisition of Seagen in December of last year, thereby doubling their oncology pipeline. This is yet another case of problem-reaction-solution at work.

    In conclusion, I would like to share a post from Rense.com from February 14th.

    A Final Warning From The Late Dr. Luc Montaignier

    Contrary to what was said at the beginning, these vaccines do not protect at all, and this is slowly emerging. This is scientifically recognized by all today. It is not only scientific experiments that say it, but also all patients on whom the effects have been analyzed to prove it. Instead, to protect as it was said, it can even promote other infections.

    The protein that was used in vaccines for this virus is actually toxic, it is a poison. The vaccine was not born to kill, but to protect and there have been many deaths, even young sportsmen who have important problems, due to this vaccine. It is an absolute crime to give these vaccines to children today.

    “Let’s stop mass vaccination.” It can also cause very serious nerve diseases in the brain. Due to the long-term effects of this vaccine, there are a lot of people who are dying. Neurological disorders can also occur from the first dose, and not only from the second. Even today, no one can predict how many of these people who have been vaccinated now will have major neurological problems in the future.

    I ask all my colleagues to absolutely stop vaccinating with this type of vaccine. Doctors today are perfectly informed of what I am saying, and therefore they should intervene immediately because the future of humanity is at stake. Many countries have forgotten about treatments, there is not only the vaccine, there are drugs that have not been used and that work very well, such as antibiotics.

    “The unvaccinated will save humanity.” It depends on you, especially on the unvaccinated, who will be able to save humanity one day. Only the unvaccinated will be able to save the vaccinated. Vaccinated who will, in any case, contact the medical centers to be saved. We must avoid listening and giving a voice to those who do not have the right to do so and let science speak. I repeat: it is the unvaccinated who will be able to save humanity.

    May God deliver us from this most egregious crime against humanity in world history.

    Sources for this article:

    https://thehill.com/changing-america...news.com/2024-
    You decide...your thoughts..your actions..your reality.
    Choose well.
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...are-the-change

  6. The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to Eric J (Viking) For This Post:

    aledum (27th February 2024), aoibhghaire (27th February 2024), avid (28th February 2024), Bald (12th March 2024), Bassplayer1 (28th February 2024), Bill Ryan (27th February 2024), Ewan (28th February 2024), gini (27th February 2024), Harmony (28th February 2024), Ioneo (27th February 2024), Kindred (27th February 2024), Matthew (27th February 2024), Mercedes (27th February 2024), mountain_jim (27th February 2024), Pam (27th February 2024), pueblo (27th February 2024), RatRodRob...RRR (28th February 2024), Rizotto (27th February 2024), Sue (Ayt) (29th February 2024), Vangelo (29th February 2024), Vicus (27th February 2024)

  7. Link to Post #1844
    UK Avalon Member
    Join Date
    2nd June 2023
    Posts
    119
    Thanks
    36
    Thanked 970 times in 117 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    So is the new mRNA cancer vaccine being rolled out to mitigate the effects of cancer causing covid vaccine?

  8. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to thirtythree For This Post:

    avid (28th February 2024), Bill Ryan (27th February 2024), Ewan (28th February 2024), Harmony (28th February 2024), Jamie (28th February 2024), Matthew (27th February 2024), mountain_jim (27th February 2024), Sue (Ayt) (29th February 2024), Vangelo (29th February 2024)

  9. Link to Post #1845
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,710
    Thanks
    54,201
    Thanked 138,910 times in 24,143 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    U.S. Government is Funding Gain-of-Function Research in China to Make Bird Flu More Infectious
    February 26, 2024
    From:National Vaccine Information Center <news@nvic.ccsend.com>
    by Carolyn Hendler, JD
    Published February 26, 2024
    The Vaccine Reaction Newsletter
    https://thevaccinereaction.org/

    (NVIC is the group, headed by Barbara Loe Fisher, that partners with RFKennedy Jr. and is one of the leading groups that gets the truth out about vaccines.)

    (Gee, what could possibly go wrong...!? )

    "The U.S government is again funding gain-of-function (GoF) research with Chinese scientists to make a dangerous virus even more potent. This time it is with birds not bats. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) gave $1 million to fund risky research on bird flu viruses to the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, China; the USDA Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory in Athena, Georgia and the University of Edinburgh’s Roslin Institute in Scotland.1

    The plan is to infect ducks and geese with various strains of bird flu to render the virus more infectious and transmissible as scientists study the virus’s ability, “to jump into mammalian hosts.”

    Documents outlining the research, which began in 2021 and will continue until 2026, were obtained by the White Coat Waste Project. The White Coat Waste Project is a nonprofit “bipartisan taxpayer watchdog organization” with a mission to “unite animal-lovers and liberty-lovers to find, expose and defund wasteful and cruel taxpayer-funded animal experimentation.”2

    Bird Flu Research Tied to Wuhan Institute of Virology
    It is worth noting that one of the research partners, the Roslin Institute, is connected to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) whose research is believed to have started the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. One of the researchers on the project, Wenju Liu, is affiliated with the WIV along with the “bat lady” herself, Zheng-Li Shi, well known for her long-time work on bat corona viruses.3

    The research is focusing on three strains of bird flu, H5NX, H7N9 and H9N2, all three of which are capable of infecting animals and humans. H5NX is considered, “highly pathogenic” and can lead to neurological problems while H7N9 has caused severe illness in humans in the past.4

    The experimental GoF research will use chickens, quails, geese and duck to predict the virus evolution in natural hosts and study their “potential to jump into mammalian hosts”.5 6

    Answers Demanded from U.S. Secretary of Agriculture
    U.S. Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa has demanded answers from U.S. Secretary Agriculture Tom Vilsack about the tax payer funded research. She asked whether this research was considered GoF research, what part of the research was being conducted in China and what, if any, safeguards were put in place. The goal of GoF research is to increase the transmissibility or virulence of a pathogen for the purpose of trying to understand the likelihood of it causing a pandemic.7 8

    Sen. Ernst said:

    The health and safety of Americans are too important to just wing it, and Biden’s USDA should have had more apprehension before sending any taxpayer dollars to collaborate with the CCP on risky avian flu research. They should know by now to suspect ‘fowl’ play when it comes to researchers who have ties to the dangerous Wuhan Lab, and simply switching from bats to birds causes concern that they are creating more pathogens of pandemic potential… We cannot allow what happened in Wuhan to happen again.9

    The discovery of this risky research comes on the heels of former U.S. intelligence officials, the FBI, the U.S. Department of Energy and scientists agreeing that the COVID pandemic likely began when the SARS-CoV-2 virus escaped from the WIV while engaging in GoF research which, according to Rutgers University molecular biologist, Richard Ebright, PhD, violated federal policies on GoF research and enhanced potential pandemic pathogen research.

    U.S. Government May be Giving Tens of Millions for Viral Research Overseas
    Sen. Ernst and Representative Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin allege that the U.S. government is providing tens of millions of dollars for viral research abroad including $11 million in grants to EcoHealth Alliance (the U.S. group connected to the coronavirus research at the WIV) for research including, but not limited to, “viral spillover from wildlife in the Philippines”, “viral spillover bio surveillance in India” and “high-risk” pathogens in Liberia.10

    USDA spokesperson Allan Rodriguez denied the allegations saying:

    USDA’s funding is only being committed to the specific components carried out by our own team located in Athens, Georgia, and is not [in] any way contributing to research taking place in the U.K. or China.11

    U.S. is 18 Months Away from Controversial Bird Flu Vaccine for Birds
    Bird flu cases have been on the rise in the U.S. In the last two years, the virus has been detected in flocks in 47 states and caused more than 81 million birds to be culled.12 In June 2023, the USDA announced it would spend $502 million to prepare for potential future outbreaks in response to the worst ever bird flu outbreak. In the year and a half prior, 58.7 million chicken, turkeys and other birds across 47 states died from the bird flu, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).13

    The USDA, in response to the increase in bird flu cases among the avian population, is talking about poultry vaccinations with international trading partners. The World Organization for Animal Health recommends using bird flu vaccinations as preventive measure against a potential pandemic.14

    In fact, the USDA recently announced that it is about 18 months away from identifying an animal vaccine for the current strain of bird flu and are working on a process to distribute it.15

    Secretary Vilsack announced:

    We are probably 18 months or so away from being able to identify a vaccine that would be effective for this particular (avian flu) that we’re dealing with now.16

    Vaccinating the avian population is controversial. According to Rodrigo Gallardo, PhD, DVM, professor in poultry medicine and avian virology specialist at the University of California Davis, eradication (putting down the entire flock when only case of bird flu is detected) is preferred over vaccination as vaccinating flocks creates a number of complications. Vaccinated birds could shed the virus to unprotected birds, although they may not appear sick and, therefore, may not be isolated from unprotected birds. Also, testing may not be able to differentiate between antibodies from infection and antibodies from the vaccine and evidence has shown that birds in countries that vaccinate have developed a more endemic strain that does not ever get totally eliminated.17

    Yuko Sato, DVM, associate professor at the College of Veterinary Medicine at Iowa State University warned:

    The vaccine is not a silver bullet. This is not going to prevent infection of the birds, so in order to have an exit strategy as the country, you would have to make sure that if you vaccinate, if you still have positive birds, you have to be able to make sure that you could stamp out the virus. Otherwise, we’ll never be looking at eradicating the virus from the United States.18

    The U.S. does not currently accept chickens from countries that vaccinate for bird flu. The National Chicken Council is against the vaccination of chickens for bird flu because the vaccine can mask the presence of the infection. They are concerned that should U.S. chickens be vaccinated, the U.S. broiler industry, which is the second largest exporter of chickens in the world, would lose out in the very valuable export world valued at more than $5 billion annually.19

    Clinical Trial of mRNA Bird Flu Vaccines for Humans Also Underway
    With much of the poultry community against vaccinating birds, the focus may turn to human vaccinations for the bird flu. The CDC have been conducting clinical trials of experimental mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) bird flu vaccines for humans. One study, which showed mRNA vaccines are immunogenic in mice and ferrets and prevent morbidity and mortality in ferrets for a strain of bird flu, was funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the Penn Institute for Infectious and Zoonotic Diseases.20

    The study on experimental mRNA bird flu vaccine for humans stated:

    Our laboratory and others previously demonstrated that mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (LNP) vaccines encoding influenza virus HA induce potent immune responses in mice, rabbits, and ferrets, and clinical trials confirm their safety and immunogenicity in humans.21"
    Last edited by onawah; 28th February 2024 at 06:08.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  10. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (28th February 2024), Bill Ryan (28th February 2024), Ewan (28th February 2024), Harmony (28th February 2024), Matthew (28th February 2024), mountain_jim (28th February 2024), RatRodRob...RRR (28th February 2024), Sue (Ayt) (29th February 2024), Sunny (29th February 2024), Vangelo (29th February 2024)

  11. Link to Post #1846
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    12,352
    Thanks
    75,850
    Thanked 111,074 times in 12,192 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/RenzTom/status/1762660957396914372?s=20



    BREAKING: Pfizer is now admitting to including modRNA in the flu and Shingles vaccines. Also they admit to working on saRNA which may result in RNA vaccines permanently replicating in your body. If you take anything called a vaccine at this point you are risking your live and your genetic make up. Please look at the article below in the comments. You will see that as early as 2006 the FDA acknowledged that gene therapies can cause cancer and autoimmune issues. It also shows that Moderna and the FDA admitted that the modRNA COVID jabs ARE gene therapies.

    — Tom Renz (@RenzTom) February 28, 2024


    https://x.com/RenzTom/status/1762661076242501853?s=20




    https://tomrenz.substack.com/p/argum...web&open=false

    Arguments for Halting Covid-19 Vaccines
    FEB 26, 2024

    < article at link >
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  12. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bassplayer1 (28th February 2024), Bill Ryan (28th February 2024), bojancan (13th March 2024), Ewan (29th February 2024), Harmony (1st March 2024), jaybee (2nd March 2024), Matthew (28th February 2024), onawah (28th February 2024), Reinhard (2nd March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (29th February 2024), Vangelo (29th February 2024)

  13. Link to Post #1847
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    12,352
    Thanks
    75,850
    Thanked 111,074 times in 12,192 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/WallStreetSilv/status/...393517201?s=20

    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  14. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (29th February 2024), bojancan (13th March 2024), Harmony (1st March 2024), jaybee (2nd March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (29th February 2024), Vangelo (2nd March 2024)

  15. Link to Post #1848
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    12,352
    Thanks
    75,850
    Thanked 111,074 times in 12,192 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/s...l-been-waiting

    Sen. Johnson's Senate Panel On The Vaccines Is The Red Pill We've All Been Waiting For

    BY TYLER DURDEN
    FRIDAY, MAR 01, 2024 - 11:00 PM
    Authored by 'A Midwestern Doctor' via 'The Forgotten Side Of Medicine' substack,

    This excellent presentation meticulously breaks down exactly what went awry throughout COVID-19. What everyone needs to know is summarized below...

    Ron Johnson has gradually become one of my favorite senators in American history. In 2020, he repeatedly advocated for early COVID-19 treatments to be made available to Americans (which had they been made available would have ended the pandemic).

    Throughout 2021, he spoke out against the vaccine mandates and in November hosted a panel at the Senate which scrutinized the federal vaccine mandates and exposed how poorly those who experienced severe COVID-19 vaccine injuries were being treated. In January 2022, he hosted a panel which scrutinized the entire COVID-19 response, and in December of 2022, he hosted a panel focusing on everything we now know about the vaccines.

    Being one of the most outspoken critics of the vaccination program in American history got him a lot of pushback, and in 2022, he decided to postpone his retirement to go through a grueling re-election campaign so there would be someone in the government who could advocate for everyone whose lives had been ruined by the COVID vaccines.

    Despite being public enemy number one of the pharmaceutical industry, Johnson narrowly won, becoming the first politician in America’s history to run on the vaccine safety issue and win. Since then Johnson has kept his promise and fought for the vaccine injured (along with taking a variety of other difficult but important positions such as giving one of the most poignant speeches I’ve heard on the Ukraine War when he tried to block the Senate from continuing to fund it).

    A lot of work has gone into producing each of the vaccine panels he’s hosted. On Monday, he hosted “Federal Health Agencies and the COVID Cartel: What Are They Hiding?” When it was all said and done, I believe this panel was the most effective presentation I have seen for explaining what happened throughout COVID-19 and waking people up to how much they have been lied to. Because of this I strongly encourage you to watch or share his presentation with people who you think might be open to understanding exactly what was done to all of us. This article will begin with his entire panel:



    < posted at end of post due to Rumble videos on Avalon requiring that (last I checked) >



    Note: I have been struggling to find the best term for these criminals. The four I’ve used are listed below; I would appreciate knowing what you think is the best one.

    What's the best term for the COVID criminals?
    • The COVID Cartel
    • The Pandemic Profiteers
    • The Pandemic Industrial Complex
    • The Biosecurity Agenda

    Lastly, for those who prefer to read, a transcript of Johnson’s symposium can be found here.

    Note: for each of the videos embedded within this article, I (or the Vigilant Fox) edited them down to their most important parts. A lot of time was put into this article because of the importance of what was presented.

    Federal Health Agencies and the COVID Cartel: What Are They Hiding?

    Since the entire panel was 4 hours long, I recognize that many of you will not be able to watch all of it. For that reason, I tried to highlight what I felt were it’s most important parts.

    First, in Johnson’s opening statement, he discusses just how hard it has been over the last three years to get any of the information his office is legally entitled to from the government. For example with (Fauci’s) NIH:

    We are down to the last 50 pages [of the 4000 he originally requested]. They will not release these. It's been now going close to 2 years. This is what has been provided to us. Do you think there might be some incriminating information in this?

    Likewise, these agencies have completely brushed off all evidence something is wrong. For example, with the NIH:

    Just like former NIH director Francis Collins Collins told me when I asked about all the deaths being reported on VAERS, [he said], “Senator, people die.” The fact that both of these statements are as true as they are callous highlights the challenge we face in exposing the truth.

    While with the FDA:

    I've written 4 [letters on hot-lots] starting in December of 2021. The first letter compared 25,000 lots of COVID vaccine to 22,000 lots of flu vaccine. One COVID lot had 5,297 adverse reactions associated with it. The worst flu lot had a 137. So 5,300 versus 137.

    365 COVID lots had more than 100 adverse events. Only 10 flu lots had more than 100. And 80% of the serious adverse events, those with emergency room visits, hospitalization, or death were associated with only 5% of the lots. So, again, to me, I'm from manufacturing. That shows to me a manufacturing process out of control.

    [It] took us a year to get some kind of response and, basically, response from the agencies was, “we don't see any variation in lots.”

    Johnson then illustrates how the current political climate has undermined everything science once stood for:

    “Vaccine injuries are rare.” “The benefits outweigh the risk and that the science is clear and overwhelming.” “And anyone challenging this narrative is an is an anti science conspiracy theorist.” In other words, second opinions are not allowed. To me, this attitude is the antithesis of science.

    I am amazed at the knowledge mankind has obtained over the millennia. But I would argue that what we don't know vastly exceeds what we do know. So as we pursue truth, we must pursue it with the humility that that reality demands.

    Johnson’s opening statement was then followed by Robert Malone:

    I'll be succinct. The SARS CoV 2 modified mRNA based vaccine products were deployed via emergency use authorization without adequate nonclinical and clinical testing and without full disclosure of known patient risk and efficacy data. This violated well established legislatively mandated patient informed consent requirements. The FDA and HHS justified these actions as necessary due to reliance on deeply flawed modeling data indicating that SARS CoV 2 was associated with an infection fatality rate of 3.4%.

    Note: the IFR was subsequently shown to average between 0.018%-0.03% for everyone under 60 and was approximately 0.506% for those between 60-69 years of age.

    Subsequent clinical research experience has revealed a number of problems with the genetic vaccine technology based SARS COV 2 products, which have been marketed as vaccines. In most cases, there has been an effort to obscure or deny facts in public communication by government and pharmaceutical industry representatives.

    Malone then listed the key issues with the vaccines, to which Johnson replied:

    Doctor Malone, I think one of the things that always bothers me is [that] so much of what we're learning in terms of harms of these vaccine was clearly known before they were rolled out.

    Jessica Rose spoke next. After concisely summarizing all of the issues that had been found within VAERS, she concluded with:

    Standard operating procedures for analysis of safety signals emergent from VAERS when utilized reveal causal links between the COVID 19 injectable products and the adverse events investigated. Standard operating procedures are not being followed by the owners of the data, namely CDC, HHS, and FDA, and this equates to hiding the millions of people reporting not only adverse events but injuries in the context of the COVID 19 injectable products.

    Note: Rose also reviews the science behind why vaccinated individuals keep on catching COVID-19.

    Edward Dowd then concisely presented the years of work his team has done to quantify just how devastating the vaccines have been for the world.


    https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/176...532238270?s=20



    To quote part of Dowd’s testimony:

    When analyzing the excess death human cost…in 2020, there were approximately 458,000 excess deaths, of which 73% were aged 65 and older and 15 to 64 comprising just 27%. However, in 2021, with the rollout of the “safe and effective vaccine,” there were approximately another 500,000 excess deaths, but a mix shift had occurred from older to younger. In 2021, the 65 plus age category was [only] 57…while the 15 to 64 cohort increased to 43%.

    The absolute excess death increase from 2020 to 2021 for the productive working age 15 to 64 was 73% [124,000 to 215,000].

    The total excess death since the rollout of the vaccine in the US, including 21, 22, and 23 is approximately 1,100,000. We estimate the economic cost, productive working age people dying at $15,600,000,000 When analyzing disabilities, it's interesting to note that there were no excess disabilities in 2020.

    Using the civilian labor force, we have calculated an increase of 2,300,000 individuals with disabilities costing the economy an estimated $77,000,000,000. When analyzing lost work time, which we call injuries, we estimate 28,400,000 individuals are chronically absent resulting in an estimated economic cost of a $135,000,000,000 since 2021…Obviously, the policy cure was undeniably worse than the illness.

    Kevin McKernan then discussed his groundbreaking discovery that there was widespread DNA plasmid contamination of the COVID vaccines and how horrendously the drug regulators have responded to that discovery.

    This work has been replicated by many labs around the world, and now the FDA, the EMA, and even Health Canada, have admitted to this. The regulatory agents have admitted that Pfizer also omitted the SV40 sequences that are in their vaccine. They've deemed this contamination to be of little consequence, claiming the DNA is of too little concentration to matter or to be containing DNA of no functional consequence. These statements are false and are not supported by any independent testing by these regulators.

    After the regulators have admitted to being deceived, they asked the opinion of the party that deceived them how bad was the deception. They shockingly believe the answer they were given, which is that these sequences have no relevance to plasmid manufacturing. As someone who has worked on the Human Genome Project manufacturing millions of plasmids, I can assure you that this is an overt lie. DNA contamination can lead to insertional mutagenesis. This is actually declared in Moderna's own patent regarding the mRNA vaccines.

    This is also supported by Lim et al, which speaks to the rate of spontaneous integration in the genome during transfection. We are using transfection after all with LMPs. The SV40 DNA is in fact functional. It is published as a potent gene therapy tool in a nuclear targeting sequence as described by David Dean et al.

    The SV40 promoter DNA is also known to bind to the tumor suppressor gene known as p53.

    Note: p53 defects are commonly linked to cancers.

    We've applied these vaccine system cancer cell lines and have evidence that it enters the cell and can survive several cell divisions. We have preliminary evidence, although this requires replication in other labs, that this DNA can integrate into the genome. We found 2 spike sequence integration events in ovarian cancer cell lines of CAR 3 into chromosome 12 and 19 very recently. Since these vaccines were expected to only contain mRNA, they were never assessed for genotoxicity studies. These studies were therefore being conducted as guinea pig US citizens as we witnessed an unprecedented rise in cancer drug sales since the vaccines rolled out.

    It is time for our representatives to repeal or review the PDUFA Act of 1992. This act allows regulators to defray the cost of regulation by accepting payments directly from the companies they regulate. Over half of the FDA's budget is sourced through this act.

    Note: I discussed the significance of the vaccine plasmid contamination in more detail here.

    Dr. David Gortler (who previously served as a senior advisor at the FDA) then explains why the contamination and widespread variability we are seeing in the vaccines (e.g., the hot lots) being completely ignored is so unprecedented:

    Federal rules requiring ingredient transparency date all the way back, believe it or not, to 1862 [and] it's the whole reason the FDA was started in 1906. Prior to COVIDsRNA injections, the FDA had approved 4 different RNA based products. Onpattro, shown here, was the 1st RNA product approved back in 2018…as you can see by looking at this label, Onpattro prominently details the exact structure, milligram strength, and molecular weight. Highlighted in green at the very top, you'll see it specifies [what its] lipid nanoparticles are engineered for.

    In contrast to the previous labels I've shown, here is the official FDA label for COVID RNA injections. As you can see just looking at it, it details a lot less information. We don't [even] have the structure.

    Of note, in pharmacology, even very minor deviations in any molecular structure can mean the difference between a drug and a poison…The lack of transparency means that scientists can't use modeling to test lipid nanoparticles for safety receptor specificity or analyze inequality [in batches of those products].

    Unfortunately, around 70% of the 127 page document that explains the methodology to perform quality control on RNA injections are redacted much like the document I've shown here.

    Next Dr. Harvey Risch discusses the “crushingly obsessive push to COVID vaccinate every living person on the planet” and provides a concise overview of the horrific bioweapons industry which gave birth to COVID-19 and then tried to pivot to vaccinating everyone rather than accept responsibility for what it had done.

    https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/htt...7970?s=20?s=20



    Note: This catastrophic industry is discussed in more detail here (e.g., I highlighted how numerous modern diseases are the results of lab leaks).

    Next, Barbara Loe Fisher, an activist who has spent decades fighting for vaccine safety shared the broader context of what we are now dealing with.

    I worked with parents in congress to secure safety and informed consent provisions in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. It was an historic law, the first official acknowledgment by government that federally licensed and state mandated vaccines can and do injure and kill some children. In January, my eyewitness perspective of how and why child vaccine victims and their parents were betrayed after that law was passed 38 years ago, was featured in a 2 hour conversation I had on the Highwire.

    I encourage everyone to watch it and learn how parents trusted that the 5 years of work we put into that 1986 act to successfully secure life saving, informing, recording, reporting, and research provisions in it, and to protect the legal right of vaccine victims to sue vaccine manufacturers for product design defects, and to sue negligent doctors for medical malpractice, and to create an expedited, more just, less traumatic federal vaccine injury compensation system alternative to a lawsuit were all destroyed by congressional amendments, by federal health agencies, and the US Supreme Court after that law was passed. Following that betrayal of trust, Congress directed federal agencies to create lucrative public private business partnerships with the pharmaceutical industry, a business deal that has broken America's public health system.

    Note: I previously wrote about how the 1986 Vaccine Injury Act forced the government to create VAERS (as parents had no way to report vaccine injuries) and ever since that time, the government has done everything it could to undermine VAERS.

    Johnson then shares a poignant observation with Fisher that illustrates how effectively the pharmaceutical industry has bought out our media:

    By the way,I became aware of you from that excellent documentary which I would also recommend. What struck me about [it] is back then in 1982 through 1986, you could talk about these things. You could advocate for your child who's vaccine injured. You weren't ostracized. You were actually welcomed here in the senate by people like Senator Hatch and Senator Kennedy and you got this [law] signed by Ronald Reagan.

    To which Fisher replies:

    I never imagined when I began this work in 1982 that the day would come when I would not be able to exercise freedom of thought and conscience in the country I love. And I thank you for allowing me to exercise that right today.

    Next, Bryan Hooker, the parent of a severely vaccine injured adult son shares his 23 years of work (e.g., 15 peer-reviewed papers) to get the data on vaccine injury the CDC has been hiding for decades.

    https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/176...002352386?s=20



    In 1962, children received 5 vaccine doses, and in 1986, the schedule expanded to 25 doses of 5 different vaccine formulations. Shortly after the passage of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, the law was amended to essentially erect a liability shield protecting vaccine manufacturers, and the schedule expanded dramatically. By 2023, 73 doses of 16 different vaccine formulations were given to children up to age 18. [As we discovered through lawsuits] the FDA approved these formulations individually only with minimal and inadequate safety testing, and the CDC has never tested the cumulative effect of the vaccine schedule on childhood health outcomes.

    Since [proper trials] are really the only way to establish that a pharmaceutical product is safe, it is misinformation to state that the vaccines are safe.

    However, independent researchers have assessed the outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children.

    This [study] demonstrates that vaccinated children were at least twice as likely to be diagnosed with developmental delays, ear infections, and gastrointestinal disorders.

    [In this study] a control group of over 1800 unvaccinated children recruited from 46 different states in the US were compared to the national average rates of the listed disorders…For each of the autoimmune, neurodevelopmental, and other disorders considered, the unvaccinated group fares much better with incidence rates between 4-20 times lower than their vaccinated counterparts.

    The CDC has a database called the vaccine safety data link. It's over 10,000,000 individuals with 2,000,000 children from 10 participating HMOs. I would say that within that database, there were at least 10,000 unvaccinated children that can be studied.

    Neither do they they publish the results [discovered from that data], nor do they let any independent scientist in to look at that information. [That’s] because [they know] the bloated vaccination schedule is responsible is in part responsible for the epidemic of chronic disorders that we see in children in the United States.

    Note: Hooker also discusses the evidence the COVID-19 vaccine harms children (e.g., that it appears to kill 30 children for each child it saves from COVID and has given many of our children myocarditis).

    Next, Del Bigtree discusses the decade of work he and the non-profit ICAN have conducted to get that data from the government:

    < another rumble video, this, much more text/videos, and many, many embedded links at link >

    https://rumble.com/v4g9f6c-del-bigtr...they-hidi.html

    In his talk, he puts the results of a recent study which monitored 99 million people for 45 days post vaccination into context. It found that their risk for a variety of severe conditions increased by 2-7 times, something which quickly adds up as you when consider how many of those “rare” conditions exist (that often take more than 45 days to appear) and how many vaccines they’ve received. These results is turn sheds a light on exactly what’s been happening to our children.

    Every one of the childhood vaccines has a similar [lengthy] list of [severe] side effects. Though they are considered rare, how rare is it when you multiply roughly 50 potential side effects 72 times, which is the total number of doses given to a child by the time they're 18. The revelations from the recent study of the COVID vaccine explains what we have been saying for years. Vaccines are not completely safe, and [though] those side effects are rare. What happens when you add them altogether?

    Bigtree then shows this slide (which references this study and this study):



    Next, Dr. Sabine Hazan shared how her [self-funded] research to evaluate the use of existing therapies to treat COVID-19 was blocked by the FDA, her discovery that the severity of COVID-19 was directly linked to a loss of bifidobacteria in the gut and that the vaccine also caused a loss of bifidobacteria in the gut. She then contrasted this to how previous research she did (which supported the pharmaceutical industry) never ran into similar road blocks.
    Note: I synopsized that research here.

    Pierre Kory then discussed the lengthy number of mechanisms which are in place to ensure that repurposed (off-patent) drugs can never have enough evidence to be acknowledged as treatments for a disease someone is profiting off of.

    https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/176...174494138?s=20



    Note: this talk has already been seen by over 1.6 million people on Twitter.

    Next, Christian Perron MD PhD (former chairman of the WHO’s committee on vaccines and communicable diseases) recounted how early in the pandemic, he completed a study which showed hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin dramatically lowered the death rate from COVID-19. A political backlash forced the withdraw of his study and he was fired from his 26 year professorship.

    Before long France then banned the use of hydroxychloroquine and began enacting harsher and harsher sanctions against French dissidents like Perron who tried to tell the truth—eventually forcing Perron to publish in a French newspaper which had originally been created to defy the Nazis (as every other publication censored him).

    Perron was followed by Raphael Lataster PhD, who is one of the leading researchers working with the BMJ (one of the top 5 medical journals) to expose the fraud within the COVID vaccine trials:

    These [abhorrent] policies [e.g., the vaccine mandates] were justified via claims about the vaccine’s effectiveness and safety. Now recent research published in major medical journals reveals that these claims were highly exaggerated…we have found in the studies varying definitions of fully vaccinated and unvaccinated. And, generally, what we find with the term fully vaccinated is that they are ignoring COVID cases, COVID infections, in the partially vaccinated…that effect was found to be up to 48% using data from Pfizer's trial as an example.

    We can't be sure what the actual exaggeration is because we aren't supplied with all the data. So it's impossible to actually know. But it looks like there are huge exaggerations of effectiveness because of what you could call manipulation of the data. So if these [omitted COVID cases] were included, or if even just some of these were included, we could have an effectiveness of the vaccines of around 10%...[which]is well below the 50% required for approval. Furthermore, looking to safety in the clinical trials, adverse effect counting windows are again incredibly short.

    Note: Lataster also discusses many of the safety issues with the vaccines that were demonstrated within the trial data but hidden from the public (e.g., that the vaccines have a significant risk of myocarditis) and states “now Pfizer also admits that they're still trying, this is a quote ‘to determine if Cominati is safe and effective and if there is a myocarditispericarditis association that should be noted’. That's on clinicaltrials.gov still right now. They're trying to find out if it's safe and effective right now.”

    Award winning investigative journalist Lara Logan then provides a poignant summary of how her profession has been hijacked by the government and how a variety of shadowy organizations now enforce this vast propaganda apparatus. This was the most compelling part of her talk:

    https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/176...149293081?s=20



    Note: Her testimony was followed by one from Jason Christoff, a propaganda expert, who explained why flooding the population with a single narrative and way of thinking has caused many people to adopt completely dysfunctional beliefs at odds with everything they’d held dear

    They were then followed by Rodney Palmer, who was a Canadian journalist for 20 years, sharing his perspectives on the current state of the media.

    If the news reporters did their jobs instead of reporting propaganda, this fraud would have been exposed from the outset.

    Censorship is what actually caused these deaths. It was the lie that assured us it was safe when it wasn't, and it still isn't

    In America, it's much worse. The vaccine companies are allowed to sponsor the news directly…To a visiting Canadian, the news here looks like one big ad for pharmaceutical products. It's a bit of a culture shock when you turn on the TV. There wouldn't even be a US newscast without Pharma ads. So the reporters on your newscasts are all conflicted.

    They can't bite the hand that feeds them. They can't possibly investigate the most important stories of our time.

    It appears that the reporters are actually colluding with their sponsors to break FDA advertising laws. FDA law requires them to conspicuously describe the known risks of any pharmaceutical product [which news anchors promoting vaccines never do.

    The good news is no one believes the TV news anymore. Only 15% of Canadians, 15%, are getting the boosters.

    [The media has] now canceled lunchtime news hours. It's canceled weekend newscasts. After these reporters are laid off, we'll only be left with the trusted favor of the trusted faces of our favorite news anchors, delivering the propaganda of the day, instead of the news of the day. But when those trusted faces are telling us lies, they're like a super weapon aimed directly at us. The news anchors are now the finger on the trigger in that game of Russian roulette.

    When the news is poisoned, so is Democracy…most every other country is letting this happen, but where goes America, so goes the world. You have a unique role in setting the moral tone for Western democracies.

    So I respectfully recommend that the senate investigate the role of American television news networks, including with pharmaceutical advertisers to skirt the FDA laws that require them to declare the known risks of a pharmaceutical product. This investigation should extend to any reporters, news anchors, editors, and executives who lied to their audience about the safety of the COVID vaccines.

    Note: Palmer also describes how he gradually saw the corrupting influence of the pharmaceutical industry enter Canada’s media over the last decade. One of the most compelling observations he shared was that during the pandemic, the doctors who spoke on television didn’t talk like doctors but instead appeared to have corporate media training, which he took as an early sign a lengthy PR campaign was being enacted to sell as many vaccines as possible.

    Next, Matthias Desmet provided a concise summary of the crowd psychology which explained how it was possible for so many people to refuse to see what was being hidden from them, even thing after thing happened which made it clear we were all being lied to:

    https://rumble.com/v4gc1a8-mattias-d...re-they-h.html

    Note: I recently completed an article relating Desmet’s work on crowd psychology to how individuals commonly become trapped in cults and dangerous spiritual practices.

    Brett Weinstein then describes the institutional breakdown gripping our society and the malicious forces which are taking away each thing we had previously depended upon for truth and justice (e.g., our premier scientific apparatus). I wanted to quote one exchange he had with Johnson:

    [Johnson] Now I kind of want to ask you, I describe my eyes being opened up, certainly during COVID to a number of things…Can you just describe your [red pill] journey here?

    [Weinstein] Well, I think we are all on a similar journey. I did not think that I was naive 7 years ago, and then I learned that I had been very naive and I keep learning that lesson. Each new discovery reveals that I was missing something that was right in front of me, and I think that's actually the hallmark of the exact pattern I'm describing.

    Canadian Randy Hillier served in Ontario’s parliament for 15 years and was the first member to publicly oppose his government's response to COVID. Like Canada’s citizens, Hillier was targeted by the government for doing so, and argues we are at the tip of a slippery slope with this. In this part of his testimony, he shares how Ontario’s leadership told him they made the decision to continually coverup the damage of the COVID policies because they felt the political consequences would be too severe if they admitted their mistakes:

    https://rumble.com/v4g5c96-randy-hil...eapon-inv.html

    Next, Dr. Sorin Titus Muncaciu shared his experience as a Romanian member of parliament who watched the central authorities use every tool at their disposal to forcefully vaccinate Romania.

    We are a party having probably 10% of the votes we got in the parliament in 2020, and we, from the very beginning of this pandemic, we decided that the rights of the people to decide if they accept, or [do not accept receiving] an experimental drug should be respected.

    When the European Union started behaving like the USSR with those commissars coming to us and mister Barnier came to Romania. This gentleman was the commissioner for internal affairs of the European Union and pushed us, pushed the Romanian parliament to vote [for COVID vaccine mandates].

    But in Romania the problem they face is that we are 40 years after a communist dictatorship, 30, 34 years after a communist dictatorship. And it's in our genes to distrust the government because we knew every time a communist government is saying anything or is directing anything, we knew that's a lie, that's something that we should not trust or we should not follow.

    We did everything in the book that we could to stop that and we stopped it. And, as a consequence to that, the Romanian rate of vaccination was probably less than half of what the other European countries experienced or United States, Canada and Australia [experienced]. And, therefore we can compare now the low rate and the excess mortality. And that's the best proof I can bring to the table is the fact that having a relationship between a low rate of vaccination and low excess mortality, which is right there you see it on the, Romania is the last country on the right which means we have negative excess mortality while all the other countries in Europe have positive excess mortality.

    Rob Roos (a European member of Parliament) and Phillip Kruse (a lawyer) then discussed who actually funds the WHO and the disastrous treaty it is trying to sneak through which will force everyone to comply with the pandemic cartel and silence anyone who challenges their next pandemic response.

    https://rumble.com/v4gczb8-whos-mach...mocratie..html

    Note: I discussed this treaty and the grass roots effort to stop it in more detail here. I consider that article to be one of the most important articles I’ve published on Substack.

    Finally, Ryan Cole concluded the talk by discussing how he was punished for speaking out, how everything which happened throughout the pandemic has violated our fundamental constitutional rights and how critical it is for us to reclaim what our Founding Fathers fought for.

    https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/176...034681247?s=20



    Note: for anyone considering being a whistleblower, Johnson requested for you to contact his office here.

    Conclusion

    Since Johnson packed this presentation with so many impactful points, it was quite hard to decide which was the best one to conclude it with. Eventually however, I settled on this one, which while brief, I believe is the critically important message all Americans can agree with:

    <embedded Rumble video at link >

    It is remarkable how much each successive panel Johnson has hosted has improved upon the one which preceded it. I consider this to be both a product of how dedicated each participant has been to fixing this mess and how much the alternative media has facilitated the production of high quality information that has rapidly unravelled the immensely complex web we were trapped within.

    Without each of your supporting the wonderful community of dissident authors on Substack, much of this would likely have never happened, and I thank each of you from the bottom of my heart for giving me the opportunity to be part of it.

    Lastly, if you have anyone close to you who is on the fence about the vaccines, please consider sharing this article or a video of Johnson’s panel with them; it’s something than can persuade people who are at last beginning to become open to hearing the truth and we have reached the moment where it is critical for the truth to reach as many people as possible.

    https://rumble.com/v4fpw4c-federal-h...ey-hiding.html


    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v4d4mj0
    Last edited by mountain_jim; 2nd March 2024 at 18:27.
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  16. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    avid (2nd March 2024), Bill Ryan (2nd March 2024), bojancan (13th March 2024), Ewan (3rd March 2024), Harmony (3rd March 2024), jaybee (2nd March 2024), onawah (2nd March 2024), Reinhard (2nd March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (2nd March 2024), Vangelo (2nd March 2024)

  17. Link to Post #1849
    Avalon Member jaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Midlands England
    Posts
    3,422
    Thanks
    11,565
    Thanked 22,788 times in 2,995 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Quote Posted by mountain_jim (here)
    Canadian Randy Hillier served in Ontario’s parliament for 15 years and was the first member to publicly oppose his government's response to COVID. Like Canada’s citizens, Hillier was targeted by the government for doing so, and argues we are at the tip of a slippery slope with this. In this part of his testimony, he shares how Ontario’s leadership told him they made the decision to continually cover up the damage of the COVID policies because they felt the political consequences would be too severe if they admitted their mistakes:
    Many thanks for the (complete) above post - I have just read the summary and it covers just about every aspect of the whole deadly + cruel fiasco ---- thankfully there are many caring, intelligent and HONEST professionals and connected people working hard to bring out the truth - we are indebted to them ....

    I picked out this one paragraph because it echoes what MP Andrew Bridgen says in an article in the Light Paper - Page 3

    he says...

    Quote ‘The[Conservative] Party basically told me through a grandee in January that they wanted to cover up excess deaths and the vaccine harms for 20 years.
    This must be happening in all governments around the world.... they KNOW that the so called vaccines that THEY okayed have done extreme harm, including large numbers of deaths and they KNOW that they were not and are not effective ---

    But they are determined not to admit to it until decades have passed and probably never.... that way they cannot be brought to account - and they can continue to convince themselves that they acted in good faith on the advice of scientists and health professionals.....

    They must have lots of excuses, behind closed doors - for their silence and denial....but one aspect of that silence and denial is still causing extreme harm and death......................the so called vaccine is still being given to trusting, unsuspecting members of the public and is still touted as 'safe and effective' -

    To withdraw it completely now would expose the truth about it and the people who pushed it - not to mention the collapse of trust and the loss of revenue in the 'vaccine' industry...

    So they are continually 'kicking the ball into the long grass' while more people are suffering the effects...letting it continue is part of the cover up...

    That's totally unacceptable and at the end of the article Andrew Bridgen addressing this point says...

    Quote ‘That is not acceptable to me, and I don’t think that is acceptable to the public, and I don’t think they are going to get that. This is about how fast we can get to the truth; and, of course, the longer it takes to get to the truth, the more people are going to be harmed – and, sadly, die – because of these experimental vaccines, which are not safe and are not effective.’

    With the evidence mounting up against covid injections, the question must surely be asked, why is the NHS still trying to push this medical intervention onto the public when the first mission of medicine is to ‘do no harm’?
    Last edited by jaybee; 2nd March 2024 at 17:28.

  18. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to jaybee For This Post:

    avid (2nd March 2024), Bassplayer1 (3rd March 2024), Bill Ryan (2nd March 2024), bojancan (13th March 2024), Ewan (3rd March 2024), Harmony (3rd March 2024), lake (2nd March 2024), Matthew (4th March 2024), mountain_jim (2nd March 2024), Reinhard (2nd March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (8th March 2024), Vangelo (2nd March 2024)

  19. Link to Post #1850
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Posts
    982
    Thanks
    3,981
    Thanked 4,944 times in 852 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Quote Posted by jaybee (here)

    I picked out this one paragraph because it echoes what MP Andrew Bridgen says in an article in the Light Paper - Page 3

    he says...

    Quote ‘The[Conservative] Party basically told me through a grandee in January that they wanted to cover up excess deaths and the vaccine harms for 20 years.
    This is him on the 23rd September 2023, when he was on a protest in London .... towards the end of the 4 mins he states what you have said!


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fDTa3CvOWFse
    Normal..!

  20. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to lake For This Post:

    avid (2nd March 2024), Bassplayer1 (3rd March 2024), Bill Ryan (3rd March 2024), Ewan (3rd March 2024), Harmony (3rd March 2024), jaybee (2nd March 2024), Matthew (4th March 2024), mountain_jim (3rd March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (8th March 2024), Vangelo (3rd March 2024)

  21. Link to Post #1851
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,710
    Thanks
    54,201
    Thanked 138,910 times in 24,143 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Long, very detailed post, not to be missed! Thanks Jim! Sen. Johnson's Senate Panel On The Vaccines Is The Red Pill We've All Been Waiting For
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  22. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (2nd March 2024), Bassplayer1 (3rd March 2024), Bill Ryan (3rd March 2024), bojancan (13th March 2024), Ewan (4th March 2024), Harmony (3rd March 2024), Matthew (4th March 2024), mountain_jim (3rd March 2024), Patient (7th March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (8th March 2024), Vangelo (3rd March 2024)

  23. Link to Post #1852
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    12,352
    Thanks
    75,850
    Thanked 111,074 times in 12,192 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/cd...-booster-shots

    CDC Tells People 65 And Older To Take More COVID-19 Booster Shots

    BY TYLER DURDEN
    SUNDAY, MAR 03, 2024 - 09:20 AM
    Authored by Naveen Athrappully via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that adults aged 65 and above get an additional dose of the updated 2023–2024 COVID-19 vaccine following a heated debate by an advisory panel on the issue.



    The vaccination was recommended by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) panel.

    “The recommendation acknowledges the increased risk of severe disease from COVID-19 in older adults, along with the currently available data on vaccine effectiveness,” the agency said in a Feb. 28 press release. “Adults 65 years and older are disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, with more than half of COVID-19 hospitalizations during October 2023 to December 2023 occurring in this age group.”

    “Data continues to show the importance of vaccination to protect those most at risk for severe outcomes of COVID-19. An additional dose of the updated COVID-19 vaccine may restore protection that has waned since a fall vaccine dose, providing increased protection to adults ages 65 years and older,” it said.

    As of Feb. 23, more than 22 percent of U.S. adults have received the updated COVID-19 vaccine, including 41.8 percent of adults over 65.

    Dispute Over Wording

    During the panel discussion, members debated intensely about the wording of the recommendation. Some wanted a stronger wording, such as “should receive an additional dose,” in the recommendation, according to a report by the Center for Infectious Disease Research & Policy Research and Innovation Office at the University of Minnesota.

    However, other members disagreed, pointing out that evidence does not support the need to add “should” in the vaccine recommendation. They also raised concerns that the wording could end up having a chilling or discouraging effect on individuals who haven’t received a shot during the fall.

    Several members noted that COVID-19 activity is not following a seasonal pattern such as what is seen with the flu. They projected the number of COVID-19 levels to likely wax and wane over coming months.

    The members eventually voted in favor of the stronger recommendation, with the measure passing 11–1. After ACIP’s decision, CDC Director Mandy Cohen endorsed the recommendation.

    “Most COVID-19 deaths and hospitalizations last year were among people 65 years and older. An additional vaccine dose can provide added protection that may have decreased over time for those at highest risk,” she said.

    The next dose should be taken at least four months after the previous dose. Individuals with compromised immune systems can get their next dose two months after the previous one.

    Vaccine Harms

    Despite the CDC pushing older people to take additional COVID-19 shots, studies have shown that the jabs may not be effective and could instead cause harm.

    A study from Japan published in January looked at the impact of bivalent vaccines among older people. A bivalent vaccine is a shot that triggers an immune response against two different strains of the virus.

    Researchers said they “did not find sufficient evidence of effectiveness of bivalent vaccines among previously infected older adults.”

    An April 2023 study that looked at over 51,000 employees at the Cleveland Clinic who were given bivalent vaccines found that effectiveness of the shots declined depending on the strain. With the BA.4/5 strain, vaccine effectiveness was only 29 percent, which dropped to 20 percent for BQ strain, and then to just 4 percent for XBB.

    A January 2024 study warned that repeated vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 boosters could result in “adverse effects on the immune system.”

    “This is particularly relevant in the case of immunocompromised individuals, where the overall cost-to-benefit ratio may lean toward the negative,” the researchers wrote.

    “Given the decreased severity of the virus, as acknowledged in various jurisdictions, there are legitimate concerns about the frequent administration of boosters in immunocompromised patients, raising questions about whether this practice may be causing more harm than benefit.”

    COVID-19 vaccines are also facing scrutiny for shedding effects. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration defines shedding as the “release of [viral or bacterial gene therapy products] ... from the patient through one or all of the following ways: excreta (feces); secreta (urine, saliva, nasopharyngeal fluids, etc.); or through the skin (pustules, sores, wounds).”

    Dr. Pierre Kory, founder of Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), has said that both mRNA and adenovirus COVID-19 vaccines may cause vaccinated individuals to release spike proteins and other components. For instance, one study found the presence of mRNA in the breast milk of vaccinated females.

    During a Feb. 15 congressional hearing, health officials from the FDA and the CDC admitted that COVID-19 vaccinated people can still get infected and transmit the disease.

    “There’s data that shows that earlier in the pandemic there was some reduction in transmission. The data on that are very challenging to pin down. It does not absolutely prevent transmission,” Dr. Peter Marks, director of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA, said at the hearing.

    “[The COVID-19 vaccines] do a very good job of preventing death and hospitalization. They may not prevent infection,” he admitted.

    < more links at link >
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  24. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd March 2024), bojancan (13th March 2024), Ewan (4th March 2024), Harmony (6th March 2024), Matthew (4th March 2024), onawah (3rd March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (8th March 2024), Vangelo (4th March 2024)

  25. Link to Post #1853
    England Avalon Member Paul D.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    16th January 2023
    Location
    England
    Language
    English
    Age
    63
    Posts
    358
    Thanks
    3,213
    Thanked 3,489 times in 357 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    How it started. How it’s going.


  26. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Paul D. For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th March 2024), bojancan (13th March 2024), Harmony (5th March 2024), mountain_jim (5th March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (8th March 2024), Vangelo (5th March 2024)

  27. Link to Post #1854
    United States Avalon Member Bo Atkinson's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Language
    English
    Age
    77
    Posts
    972
    Thanks
    2,741
    Thanked 3,736 times in 866 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Does this help or make any sense? See what comes.


    "BREAKING: Writ of Mandamus Filed in Florida Supreme Court, Seeks to Compel Governor DeSantis, and Attorney General Ashley Moody, to Ban the Jab!

    DR. JOSEPH SANSONE
    MAR 5, 2024

    https://acis-api.flcourts.gov/courts...c-bd5ddbcb1cfc


    https://josephsansone.substack.com/p...damus-filed-in

  28. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bo Atkinson For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (5th March 2024), Ewan (6th March 2024), Harmony (6th March 2024), mountain_jim (7th March 2024), onawah (6th March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (8th March 2024), Vangelo (6th March 2024)

  29. Link to Post #1855
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    25,710
    Thanks
    54,201
    Thanked 138,910 times in 24,143 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    Accusing RFK Jr, BBC Spreads Vaccine Misinformation
    by Jeremy R. Hammond
    Mar 5, 2024
    Health Freedom
    https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2024/...Misinformation
    (Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)

    "On March 1, the BBC ran an article titled “RFK Jr: How anti-vaccine misinformation has shaped his ‘truth-teller’ candidacy”, which in typical mainstream media fashion accuses presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. of spreading “misinformation” about vaccines while itself basing that accusation on its own misinformation.

    The effect of the BBC’s deceptions is to deflect from rampant government corruption in serving the pharmaceutical industry instead of public health, from how the government brazenly lies about the science, and from how social media companies have acted in service to the government and industry by censoring factually accurate information about vaccines that does not align with the policy goal of achieving high vaccination rates.

    Deceiving about CDC Corruption
    The article is presented as an investigation by Rachel Schraer, who describes herself in her Twitter profile as a senior reporter covering health and “misinformation”.

    The article includes the usual obligatory mention of Kennedy’s 2005 article “Deadly Immunity”. Here is how Schraer presents that episode in history (bold emphasis added):

    Mr Kennedy, a member of the famous political dynasty and nephew of former president John F Kennedy, told Prof [Paul] Offit he was looking for information. He wanted to reassure parents who were worried about the effects of a mercury-based preservative called thimerosal, found in some vaccines.

    Prof Offit confesses he was excited to be able to talk a Kennedy through the studies, which showed children exposed to thimerosal (not found in most US vaccines anyway since 2001) were no worse off than those who hadn’t had exposure.

    But a year or so later, Mr Kennedy wrote an article published in Rolling Stone magazine which repeated baseless claims that thimerosal was causing health problems. It also wrongly claimed the vaccine that Prof Offit was working on at the time contained this preservative, suggesting this had driven him to misrepresent the risks. The article was later retracted due to a large number of inaccuracies.

    The problem here is that it is the BBC spreading misinformation.

    First, contrary to the BBC’s claim, Rolling Stone never retracted the article. On the contrary, it stood by Kennedy’s article when it was retracted in 2011 by Salon, which had jointly published it in 2005.

    …none of the corrections made to the article materially affected its thesis…
    Rolling Stone did later quietly remove the article from its website but never issued a formal retraction, and, again, it stood by the article when Salon retracted it, correctly pointing out that none of the corrections made to the article materially affected its thesis that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had tried to cover up an analysis by one of its own top researchers finding statistically significant associations between thimerosal-containing vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders.

    I detailed each of the corrections that Salon’s editors made to the article in my freely downloadable e-book The New York Times vs. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. I also debunked mainstream media misinformation about this episode in my June 2023 article “The Mainstream Media’s Reign of Error: Correcting the Record about RFK Jr.’s ‘Deadly Immunity’.”

    Among those corrections was the one mentioned by the BBC: the original article falsely claimed that the rotavirus vaccine developed by Dr. Paul Offit contained the mercury-based preservative thimerosal.

    However, Ms. Schraer deceives by omission by failing to inform BBC readers that it is a matter of public record that this misstatement was not in Mr. Kennedy’s submitted manuscript but was, as Salon admitted, introduced into the article “because of an editing error”.

    Kennedy did suggest in the article that Offit was misrepresenting the risks, but not because his rotavirus vaccine contained thimerosal.

    Here again Schraer deceives by omission because Kennedy rather correctly pointed out that Offit had a blatant conflict of interest in sharing ownership of the patent for Merck’s rotavirus vaccine while sitting on the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and using his vote to help ensure the vaccine would be profitable.

    Offit later sold his stake in the vaccine and acknowledged making several million dollars for it.

    I detailed that episode in an article for Kennedy’s organization Children’s Health Defense (CHD) that I wrote in 2019 titled “The Rotavirus Vaccine: A Case Study in Government Corruption and Malfeasance”, which I encourage you to read for the full details of just how thoroughly corrupt the CDC is and how the BBC’s source Paul Offit perfectly illustrates the corruption.

    (I also reviewed Offit’s conflict of interest in my book The War on Informed Consent, which features a Foreword by Mr. Kennedy.)

    The effect if not the intent of the BBC’s deceptions in this regard is to whitewash Offit’s conflict of interest and hence to deflect attention from Kennedy’s legitimate point about CDC corruption.
    CDC Director Julie Gerberding speaking at a press briefing about West Nile Virus in August 2003 (CDC/Public Domain). Gerberding left her government job to work for vaccine manufacturer Merck.

    Deceiving about Ethylmercury Toxicity
    A third deception in the above excerpt from the BBC article is the claim that Kennedy’s assertion that the mercury in many childhood vaccines posed a health risk is that assertion was “baseless”.

    In this regard, the BBC is simply following the example set by the CDC, which claims that ethylmercury, the form of mercury used as a preservative in vaccines, is “safe” and non-toxic.

    Instructively, to support that claim, the CDC cites a 2004 review by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) observing that the mercury in vaccines is a “known neurotoxin” that “accumulates in the brain” and “can injure the nervous system”.

    The same IOM review pointed out that the CDC’s routine childhood vaccine schedule during the 1990s was exposing infants “to cumulative doses of ethylmercury that exceed some federal safety guidelines established for ingestion of methylmercury, another form of organic mercury.”

    The reason federal regulators compared the amount of injected ethylmercury to safety guidelines for ingested methylmercury is because there are no established safety guidelines for exposure to ethylmercury. (That was true at the time and remains true today.)

    The IOM review further concluded that the hypothesis that vaccines can contribute to the development of autism in some children is “biologically plausible” and that the studies done to date had failed to consider the possibility of a subset of children who are genetically susceptible to vaccine injury manifesting as symptoms of autism.

    The CDC also supports its claim that the mercury in vaccines is “safe” by citing an FDA study published in Pediatrics in 2001 in which FDA researchers admitted that the CDC’s schedule exposed infants to cumulative levels of mercury in excess of the government’s own safety guidelines, that ethylmercury is toxic even at low doses, and that it is possible that this exposure from vaccines could cause neurodevelopmental abnormalities in children.

    (Hence the concurrent withdrawal of thimerosal from most vaccines around the turn of the century; multi-dose vials of influenza vaccines, however, which are recommended for infants as young as six months as well as pregnant women, still contain mercury.)

    In fact, the study found that, while more readily eliminated from the blood, ethylmercury is more persistent in the brain than methylmercury.
    Another study the CDC cites to support its absurd claim, which is mindlessly parroted by mainstream media outlets like the BBC who refuse to do any kind of real investigation into the topic of vaccines, is a study published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives in 2005.

    The CDC cites that study to support its claim that ethylmercury from vaccines is rapidly eliminated from the body. In fact, the study found that, while more readily eliminated from the blood, ethylmercury is more persistent in the brain than methylmercury.

    The study authors further concluded that the government’s use of methylmercury toxicology as a reference for the risk assessment from thimerosal is scientifically invalid and that the use of mercury in vaccines was a significant cause for concern.

    In fact, far from supporting the CDC’s purpose for citing the study, its authors even expressed the concern that the known neuroinflammation caused by the accumulation of mercury in the brain was a possible cause of autism.

    Consider that this is the type of study that the CDC cites to support its claims that the mercury in vaccines is “safe” and that “vaccines do not cause autism”.

    For further discussion and full documentation of how the CDC brazenly lies about what the science says about it, see my 2022 essay “Why the Claim ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ Is Disinformation“. (For the most relevant part of that article for our purposes here, see the section under the subheading “CDC Mischaracterizes the Science on Mercury Toxicity“.)

    The effect of the BBC’s misinformation in this regard is to deflect attention from how the CDC brazenly lies about the science to support its policy positions on vaccines.



    An analysis by FDA consultant Dr. Barry Rumack showing that the CDC’s vaccine schedule in the 1990s was exposing infants to cumulative levels of mercury exceeding the government’s own safety guidelines, obtained by SafeMinds via FOIA request. (Source)
    Deceiving about Kennedy’s “Deadly Immunity” Article
    Setting aside how the CDC grossly mischaracterizes its own cited sources, in his Rolling Stone article, Kennedy did not make a “baseless” claim.

    On the contrary, a key source cited by Kennedy was the transcript of a series of meetings held by the CDC at the Simpsonwood conference center in Norcross, Georgia, in July 2000.

    The CDC called the meeting to discuss the findings of various analyses being conducted by epidemiologist Thomas Verstraeten using data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), a tightly controlled database managed by the CDC in partnership with several health care maintenance organizations (HMOs). (A PDF document compiling the Simpsonwood transcripts from the multi-day event is available at Children’s Health Defense.)

    Especially when it comes to the topic of vaccines, the media do policy advocacy rather than journalism…
    Incidentally, Thomas Verstraeten is today the CEO of P95, a company based in Belgium that he founded in 2011, and which boasts on its website’s homepage that its clients include vaccine manufacturers GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Pfizer, and AstraZeneca, as well as the World Health Organization (WHO). Prior to that, he was employed by GSK as Vice President of its vaccine department and head of pharmacovigilance and epidemiology.

    Are you starting to see a pattern here?

    Whereas the BBC would have you believe that the thesis Kennedy presented in his 2005 article was “baseless”, here are several key points Kennedy made that the Salon editors who retracted the article in 2011 did not dispute:

    From the late 1980s through the 1990s, the CDC substantially increased the number of mercury-containing vaccinations on its recommended childhood schedule.
    Throughout this time, nobody in the CDC or FDA had ever bothered to consider the potential harms from this increased exposure to a known neurotoxin, and when the FDA finally got around to doing the simple calculations as a result of a Congressional directive in 1997, government officials realized that the CDC’s routine childhood vaccine schedule was exposing infants to cumulative levels of mercury that exceeded the government’s own safety guidelines.
    Once “public health” officials realized this, with the understanding that it was only a matter of time before this damning realization became public, they panicked and scrambled to resolve the impossible dilemma of how to disclose the FDA’s finding without causing irreparable damage to their own credibility.
    The initial analysis of VSD data carried out by Tom Verstraeten in the wake of the FDA’s realization of how the CDC had been recklessly placing children’s health at risk found mercury-containing vaccines to be associated with a statistically significant increased risk of autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders.
    The documentary record indicated that the CDC sought to make the statistical significance of that association go away through subsequent revisions of Verstraeten’s analysis that strayed from the original study protocol.
    Attendees at the Simpsonwood conference expressed concerns about the potential health impacts of exposing children to harmful levels of mercury and the potential legal liability resulting from the government’s malfeasance.
    A parsimonious explanation for why you will never hear the BBC, the New York Times, CNN, ABC or any of the other mainstream media outlets ever talk about any of those points, even when bringing up Kennedy’s “Deadly Immunity” article, is that they are indisputable facts, and the function of the media is simply not to inform people.

    Especially when it comes to the topic of vaccines, the media do policy advocacy rather than journalism, which explains why they go to such great lengths to avoid addressing the real underlying issues and instead obfuscating the facts while themselves hypocritically spreading disinformation about vaccines.

    In sum, to support its accusation that Mr. Kennedy has spread “misinformation” about vaccines, the BBC itself has had to resort to lying and spreading disinformation. The effect is to deflect attention once again from the CDC’s corruption and how its routine childhood vaccine schedule in the 1990s was exposing infants to cumulative levels of mercury in excess of the government’s own safety guidelines.

    Hence the CDC’s motive in brazenly lying about the science to support its policy position that it is “safe” to inject infants with mercury.

    A baby receives an intramuscular vaccination in his right thigh (Public Domain photo by Amanda Mills, CDC, courtesy of Pixnio).
    Deceiving about Kennedy ‘Spreading Conspiracy Theories’
    Continuing with the supposed “investigation” by Ms. Schraer, which consists entirely of regurgitation of standard mainstream media talking points, the next attempt she makes to substantiate her own article’s thesis is as follows:

    Mr Kennedy appeared to speak especially to people who were unhappy with—or suspicious of—the US government and the rest of the world’s response to the Covid pandemic.

    Mr Kennedy’s supporters point to genuine failings by public institutions on issues from the opioid crisis to the Iraq war as reasons they’ve lost trust in the two main parties.

    But this doesn’t change the fact there are also countless examples of Mr Kennedy spreading conspiracy theories, making false or misleading statements, and sticking by his positions regardless of the evidence presented to the contrary.

    The link the BBC provides is to an article from the New York Times on July 6, 2023, which purports to debunk statements that Kennedy has made about vaccines that were false. But in that article, the Times similarly fails to substantiate its own argument and instead hypocritically spreads its own misinformation.

    To support its argument, the Times claimed that the hypothesis that vaccines administered according to the CDC’s schedule can contribute to the development of autism in children with a genetic or environmentally caused susceptibility has been “scientifically discredited”.

    But this is simply an example of the media mindlessly parroting the CDC’s claim that “vaccines do not cause autism”.

    However, as I detailed at considerable length in my essay “Why the Claim ‘Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism’ Is Disinformation“, the fact is that none of the studies relied upon to support the CDC’s claim that “vaccines do not cause autism” were actually designed to test the hypothesis.

    Rather, the very different point that Kennedy eloquently made at the rally is that governments today have technological capabilities to surveil and control us that the Nazis could only ever have dreamed of.
    To further support its first argument, the Times claims that, at an anti-lockdown rally in Washington in January 2022, Kennedy compared the government’s efforts to coerce individuals into accepting COVID‑19 vaccines with the persecution of Jews under Nazi Germany during WWII.

    But that, too, is just another mainstream media fabrication, as I also documented in my free e-book The New York Times vs. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

    During that speech, Kennedy absolutely did not say that what Americans experienced during the COVID‑19 lockdown madness, the endgame of which from the start was coerced mass vaccination, was equivalent to what Jews experienced during the Holocaust.

    Rather, the very different point that Kennedy eloquently made at the rally is that governments today have technological capabilities to surveil and control us that the Nazis could only ever have dreamed of.

    This is obviously true, and examples Kennedy had in mind include satellite surveillance, the prospect of central bank digital currencies used in conjunction with “social credit” systems, and “vaccine passport” systems denying people freedom of movement if they choose to exercise their right to decline a risk-carrying pharmaceutical product such as the mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines.

    The COVID‑19 vaccines, I’m sure you can recall, were sold to the public on the basis of lies—notwithstanding the mainstream media’s vain attempts to gaslight us into forgetting that historical fact.

    The effect of the BBC’s deceptions in this regard is to deflect from Kennedy’s legitimate point about the existential threat of medical tyranny and other manifestations of authoritarian governance.

    NIAID Director and Chief Medical Adviser to President Biden Dr. Anthony Fauci and CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky hold a White House press briefing on August 2, 2021 (White House/Public Domain)
    Deceiving about Social Media Censorship
    The final piece of evidence the Times provides to support its claim that Kennedy has spread vaccine misinformation is that “Facebook and Instagram removed the group’s accounts last year for espousing vaccine misinformation, and Mr. Kennedy has often lamented the perils of ‘censorship’ in campaign speeches since.”

    So, the argument the Times presents is that Mr. Kennedy has spread misinformation because Meta Platforms, Inc.—the corporation that owns Facebook and Instagram—has said so.

    However, the Times does not present any examples of social media posts from Kennedy in which he spread misinformation, and the suggestion that Kennedy only started speaking out against censorship after having been banned from Facebook and Instagram in 2022 is patently false.

    To demonstrate the falsity of that claim, it is sufficient to observe that I personally authored an e-book on the threat of social media censorship that was published by Kennedy’s organization Children’s Health Defense in June 2020.

    The title of that e-book is How Censorship is Redefining Informed Consent as ‘Misinformation’. In it, I documented how, in November 2019, prominent mainstream media headlines declared that a study in the journal Vaccine had shown that CHD was the top spreader of vaccine “misinformation” on Facebook.

    In fact, as I detailed at length in the e-book, the authors of the Vaccine study did not produce even a single example of a Facebook post by CHD that contained any misinformation. Indeed, they didn’t even attempt to support their accusation with any evidence.

    Thus, the study authors literally (and preposterously) equated advocacy of the internationally recognized right to informed consent with the “spread of misinformation” about vaccines.
    Instead, they lazily (and unscientifically) defined any Facebook posts that did not align with the CDC’s policy goal of achieving high vaccination rates as being “anti-vaccine”, and then they further defined anything “anti-vaccine” as being “misinformation”.

    One Facebook post the authors did present as an illustrative example of what they thus deemed to be “misinformation” was a post from the group Michigan for Vaccine Choice that made zero claims and instead simply expressed the view that parents have a right to make their own informed choice about childhood vaccines.

    Thus, the study authors literally (and preposterously) equated advocacy of the internationally recognized right to informed consent with the “spread of misinformation” about vaccines.

    And that is the level of intellectualism—or lack thereof—that you will find on the “pro-vaccine” side of the vaccine debate—or lack thereof.

    Illustrating how “misinformation” is used euphemistically to include factually accurate information that does not align with “public health” policies, I was banned from LinkedIn in 2022 for accurately reporting how the CDC’s claim that natural immunity to SARS‑CoV‑2 is inferior to that conferred by mRNA COVID‑19 vaccines was contradicted at the time by the overwhelming preponderance of evidence in the scientific literature and was subsequently falsified by the CDC’s own data as reported by the agency’s own researchers in its own MMWR journal.

    One clear lesson is: Don’t trust the mainstream media’s so-called “fact-checkers”! Because they are among the leading spreaders of misinformation, the purpose of which propaganda is invariably to manufacture consent for criminal government policies, including the systematic violation of the right to informed consent.

    The effect of the BBC’s own misinformation is, of course, to deflect from the government’s criminal violation of this fundamental human right and the role that social media censorship has played in supporting medical tyranny.

    Deceiving about the Absence of Proper Studies
    The next example that self-described “health and disinformation reporter” Rachel Schraer provides to support her claim about RFK Jr. spreading vaccine “misinformation” is that Kennedy has said that proper vaccine safety studies have never been done.

    Here is how the BBC article presents Kennedy’s point:

    “Whenever presented with copious evidence and scientific studies that vaccines do not cause autism… or whatever health condition he attributes to them, it is never enough,” said Dr David Gorski, professor of surgery at Wayne State University and managing editor of the site Science Based Medicine. “He always moves the goalposts, demanding still more evidence.”

    When contacted for comment, Mr Kennedy’s team maintained that: “Proper safety studies have never been conducted on vaccines: long-term, all-cause mortality studies comparing fully-vaccinated children to never-vaccinated children.”

    Many Kennedy supporters echo this argument but Dr Gorski says it “just plain not true”.

    He explains that for decades countless groups of independent scientists have looked at the effect of vaccines on a huge range of specific health outcomes and found the benefits far outweigh any risks.

    But this is just another example of the BBC brazenly lying in an attempt to support its accusation that Kennedy spreads “vaccine misinformation”.

    When Kennedy says that there has never been a study comparing long-term health outcomes, including all-cause mortality, between children fully vaccinated according to the CDC’s schedule and completely unvaccinated children, he is telling the truth.

    …the independent studies that have been done actually lead to the opposite conclusion that unvaccinated children are healthier…
    When Dr. Gorski, an infamous pro-pharma propagandist (for examples see here and here), claims that for decades there have been many such studies, he is lying.

    And the BBC’s supposed “misinformation” investigator passes that lie off as though it were true. It’s the same brazen lie told by Washington Post reporter Lena Sun, who claimed in an April 2017 article that “No new immunization is added to the schedule until it has been evaluated both alone and when given with the other current immunizations.” (Emphasis added.)

    As the Institute of Medicine observed in a 2013 review, “No studies have compared the differences in health outcomes . . . between entirely unimmunized populations of children and fully immunized children.” The IOM reiterated that “existing research has not been designed to test the entire immunization schedule”, and “studies designed to examine the long-term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted.”

    That remains true today. The BBC notably does not provide any links to any such studies—for the obvious reason.

    Instructively, when I confronted Ms. Sun and the Post editors about their false claim, they refused to issue a correction. This tells you all you need to know about the nature of mainstream media reporting when it comes to the topic of vaccines. Truth is deemed “misinformation” while government-approved vaccine disinformation is deemed factual. The media do policy advocacy, not journalism.

    For the full details about how no such studies have ever been done and how, contrary to the BBC’s big lie, the independent studies that have been done comparing health outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated children actually lead to the opposite conclusion that unvaccinated children are healthier, I encourage you to read my book The War on Informed Consent.

    Also see my follow-up article, “New York Times Dismisses Data Showing Unvaccinated Kids Are Healthier”.

    And that was it; those were all of the arguments presented by the BBC’s so-called “health and disinformation reporter” Rachel Schraer to support the BBC article’s claim that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a spreader of “vaccine misinformation”—a label that accurately describes the BBC itself along with the rest of the disgraceful mainstream media who incessantly masquerade statist and pro-pharma propaganda as “journalism”.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  30. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (8th March 2024), Bill Ryan (6th March 2024), bojancan (13th March 2024), Ewan (6th March 2024), Harmony (6th March 2024), mountain_jim (7th March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (8th March 2024)

  31. Link to Post #1856
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    12,352
    Thanks
    75,850
    Thanked 111,074 times in 12,192 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/ne...ity-protection

    New Bill Would Strip COVID-19 Vaccine Manufacturers Of Liability Protection

    BY TYLER DURDEN
    THURSDAY, MAR 07, 2024 - 10:05 AM
    Authored by Zachary Stieber via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

    Legislation introduced on March 5 would strip COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers of liability protections, enabling Americans injured by the shots to sue the companies.



    The bill, proposed by Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), would retroactively remove protections from the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) for COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers.

    “No federal law ... may make the manufacturer of a COVID-19 vaccine immune from suit or liability, or limit the liability of such a manufacturer, with respect to claims for loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration to or the use by an individual of a COVID–19 vaccine,” the bill states.

    The PREP Act currently protects manufacturers and people who administer the vaccines from liability, under a 2020 declaration entered by then-Health Secretary Alex Azar during former President Donald Trump’s administration in 2020. President Joe Biden’s administration has since extended the declaration.

    The only exception to the PREP Act protection is in cases of death or serious injury caused by “willful misconduct.”

    The protection even covers people who “reasonably could have believed” they were protected even if, in actuality, they were not, according to an opinion from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

    “Millions of Americans were forced to take a COVID-19 shot out of fear of losing their livelihoods and under false pretenses. Many have faced injury from the vaccine, but few have been afforded little recourse,” Mr. Roy said in a statement.

    He said he was introducing the new bill “to empower Americans to remove crony federal liability protections for COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and empower injured Americans,” adding, “The American people deserve justice for the infringement on their personal medical freedom and those medically harmed deserve restitution.”

    As part of the federal vaccine system, people who have suspected or confirmed injuries from COVID-19 vaccines can apply for compensation from the government under a program called the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. But as of January, just 11 people have been compensated, with the highest payout being just $8,961.

    The overwhelming majority of claims that have been processed have been rejected, according to the HHS, which both runs and administers the program. Some of the denials involved people whose doctors diagnosed them with vaccine injuries. A lawsuit has challenged the constitutionality of the program, describing it as a “kangaroo court.”

    The new legislation makes clear that it does not affect the ability of people to apply for recompense through the compensation program.

    Pfizer and Moderna did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the bill and have not appeared to comment publicly on it.

    A spokesperson for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, a trade group for pharmaceutical companies, told Fox News that “by upending the existing liability framework manufacturers rely upon to provide predictable vaccine development, our ability to address future public health threats will be at risk.”

    HHS has said the PREP Act declaration “has been a key tool for ensuring that Americans have broad access to critical COVID-19 countermeasures including vaccines, tests, and treatments” and “has provided flexibilities and protections for those individuals and entities who have been involved in providing these critical tools that have helped the United States get to a better place with COVID-19.”

    Mr. Roy’s bill already has 19 co-sponsors, including Reps. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), Clary Higgins (R-La.), Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), and Andy Harris (R-Md.).

    “Many Americans were wrongly forced to take a COVID-19 vaccine,” Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.), another co-sponsor, said in a statement. “Of course, they should be allowed to sue if they become injured by the shot.”

    Children’s Health Defense, a nonprofit, is among the supporters of the proposal.

    “The damages and fatalities caused by the COVID-19 vaccine demand accountability,” Mary Holland, president of the group, said in a statement. “This legislation represents a critical milestone in rectifying these injustices and paving the way for a more accountable future.”

    < embedded links at link >
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  32. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    avid (8th March 2024), Bill Ryan (10th March 2024), bojancan (13th March 2024), Ewan (8th March 2024), Harmony (8th March 2024), Kryztian (8th March 2024), Matthew (7th March 2024), onawah (8th March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (8th March 2024), Vangelo (9th March 2024)

  33. Link to Post #1857
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    12,352
    Thanks
    75,850
    Thanked 111,074 times in 12,192 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/HansMahncke/status/176...606726557?s=20



    The CDC "released" a 148 page study on myocarditis after COVID-19 "vaccination" and every single page is completely redacted. This must be a new record.

    — Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) March 7, 2024
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  34. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    avid (8th March 2024), Bill Ryan (10th March 2024), bojancan (13th March 2024), Ewan (8th March 2024), Harmony (8th March 2024), jaybee (7th March 2024), Matthew (8th March 2024), onawah (8th March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (8th March 2024), Vangelo (9th March 2024)

  35. Link to Post #1858
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    12,352
    Thanks
    75,850
    Thanked 111,074 times in 12,192 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/karma44921039/status/1...893402535?s=20




    A document from Pfizer laboratory.
    Proof, it's a bio weapon
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  36. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    avid (8th March 2024), Bill Ryan (10th March 2024), bojancan (13th March 2024), Ewan (9th March 2024), Harmony (8th March 2024), Kryztian (8th March 2024), meat suit (8th March 2024), norman (8th March 2024), onawah (9th March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (8th March 2024), Sunny (8th March 2024), Vangelo (9th March 2024)

  37. Link to Post #1859
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    12,352
    Thanks
    75,850
    Thanked 111,074 times in 12,192 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/176...169581205?s=20



    “The COVID Vaccines Are the Most Dangerous Vaccines of All Time”

    “Not only is there NO clinical benefit that is demonstrated, but it kills you,” says
    @stkirsch.

    “Far more people have been killed by the vaccines than by the COVID virus.”

    “It has killed probably on the order of — it’s over 10 million people worldwide have been killed by these vaccines. Far more people have been killed by the vaccines than by the COVID virus. And most of the deaths, like 90% of the deaths from the COVID virus are from the hospital treatment protocols.”

    Original clip:
    @detorresbruce

    The Vigilant Fox 🦊

    @VigilantFox
    “NO LIVES WERE SAVED” by the COVID-19 injections, says researcher and scientist
    @DenisRancourt
    .

    In fact, Rancourt and his fellow scientists found in their analysis that all-cause mortality INCREASED every time the COVID-19 shots were deployed.


    Here’s the 50,000-foot view:

    For every 800 injections administered, Rancourt and his colleagues concluded in their 180-page paper that one vaccine-related death occurred.

    This 1-in-800 number becomes even more alarming when you consider how many doses were given.

    At the time of Rancourt and colleagues’ report, 13.5 billion COVID-19 injections were administered.

    Divide that number by 800, and you end up with approximately 17 million COVID-19 vaccine-related deaths.
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  38. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th March 2024), Ewan (11th March 2024), Harmony (10th March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (10th March 2024), Vangelo (10th March 2024)

  39. Link to Post #1860
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    12,352
    Thanks
    75,850
    Thanked 111,074 times in 12,192 posts

    Default Re: Vaccine Crimes

    https://x.com/MdBreathe/status/1766626329431011480?s=20



    Mary Talley Bowden MD
    @MdBreathe
    Brook Jackson’s lawsuit against Pfizer could send them into eternal bankruptcy.

    On Friday,
    @TheJusticeDept
    swept in to save Pfizer, telling Brook she can’t sue.

    Robert Barnes
    @barnes_law
    ·
    Mar 7
    The corrupt @USDOJ under #Biden now intervening at last minute to try to block @IamBrookJackson case against @pfizer concerning #COVID19 #Vaccine fraud. The #BigPharma handpicked lawyer at DOJ waited until the eve of discovery to intervene. Why is @POTUS covering up Pfizer fraud?
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  40. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th March 2024), Ewan (11th March 2024), Harmony (10th March 2024), Matthew (12th March 2024), Sue (Ayt) (10th March 2024), Vangelo (10th March 2024)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 93 of 115 FirstFirst 1 43 83 93 103 115 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts