BBC ‘doctored’ Trump speech - one of many examples of BBC deceit

[Eric J (Viking)]

BBC caught with their pants down.

I wonder what Trump has to say about this….

BBC ‘doctored’ Trump speech.


The BBC doctored a Donald Trump speech by making him appear to encourage the Capitol Hill riot, according to an internal whistleblowing memo seen by The Telegraph.

A Panorama programme broadcast a week before the US election made it seem that the president told supporters he was going to walk to the Capitol with them to “fight like hell”, when in fact he said he would walk with them “to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard”.

The “mangled” footage was highlighted in a 19-page dossier on BBC bias which was compiled by a recent member of the BBC’s standards committee and is now circulating in government departments.

The dossier said the programme made the US president “‘say’ things [he] never actually said” by splicing together footage from the start of his speech with something he said nearly an hour later.
It claimed that senior executives and the BBC’s chairman had ignored and dismissed a string of serious complaints raised by the corporation’s own standards watchdog.

The Telegraph will soon publish other excerpts of the memo which accuse the BBC’s Arabic service of bias over its coverage of the war in Gaza, and accuse the corporation of “effective censorship” of its coverage of the transgender debate.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=EjPlfUt4S9U

[Eric J (Viking)]

More here…

BBC got caught editing Trump’s January 6 speech to make it sound like he encouraged rioting.

According to The Telegraph, an internal whistleblower memo revealed the BBC “doctored” Trump’s speech to make it sound like he was telling supporters to march over to the Capitol and “fight like hell.”

The Telegraph reported:

The BBC “doctored” a Donald Trump speech by making him appear to encourage the Capitol Hill riot, according to an internal whistleblowing memo seen by The Telegraph.

A Panorama programme, broadcast a week before the US election, “completely misled” viewers by showing the president telling supporters he was going to walk to the Capitol with them to “fight like hell”, when in fact he said he would walk with them “to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard”.

With video showing doctored and original…

https://rumble.com/v716g72-bbc-caugh...sed-rioti.html

[Myristyl]

I would be outraged but it is the BBC and many of us got used to their bias years ago. Quite frankly they are an embarrassment.

[Mari]

BBC - the mouthpiece of State control.
I want Trump to sue the arse off this entity. And I want all the times they doctored 'reporting' - whether 'war' stuff (and there's countless examples of that (those 'reporters' out in 'war zones') or speeches or text to come to the light of day. This corporation has to go - it will, but cannot come fast enough for me or those wise to the corporation's ways.

[norman]

Posted by Mari (here)
BBC - the mouthpiece of State control.
I want Trump to sue the arse off this entity. And I want all the times they doctored 'reporting' - whether 'war' stuff (and there's countless examples of that (those 'reporters' out in 'war zones') or speeches or text to come to the light of day. This corporation has to go - it will, but cannot come fast enough for me or those wise to the corporation's ways.

The sooner the BBC is dead and gone the better.

Americans cannot comprehend the insanity of my facing a thousand pound fine for accidentally clicking on a link to a live stream on the internet. The BBC TV Licence "authority" has sweeping power ( and obviously special arrangements ) to plant cookies on any device that accesses a live stream.

Why live stream ?

The wording of their rules has always specified live TV. not just BBC live TV, ALL live TV. Using the argument that people now use the internet to watch live TV they have included all live streaming.

When I try to explain all this to non Brits the reaction is WTF !.

WTF indeed. They not only want to control information and our minds, they want to make a huge amount of money out of it at the same time. I'm not sure but I think a "colourTV licence" fee is now nearly 200 pounds a year. That's not unique tho'. That model is being used across the board. The death jabs didn't just kill and maim masses of people, they made hundreds of billions of dollars out of doing it.

I've done a lot of work on reducing the number of anger triggers I have but the BBC and it's bloody licence remains in the cluster of them I still have.

[Mari]

Posted by norman (here)

Posted by Mari (here)
BBC - the mouthpiece of State control.
I want Trump to sue the arse off this entity. And I want all the times they doctored 'reporting' - whether 'war' stuff (and there's countless examples of that (those 'reporters' out in 'war zones') or speeches or text to come to the light of day. This corporation has to go - it will, but cannot come fast enough for me or those wise to the corporation's ways.

The sooner the BBC is dead and gone the better.

Americans cannot comprehend the insanity of my facing a thousand pound fine for accidentally clicking on a link to a live stream on the internet. The BBC TV Licence "authority" has sweeping power ( and obviously special arrangements ) to plant cookies on any device that accesses a live stream.

Why live stream ?

The wording of their rules has always specified live TV. not just BBC live TV, ALL live TV. Using the argument that people now use the internet to watch live TV they have included all live streaming.

When I try to explain all this to non Brits the reaction is WTF !.

WTF indeed. They not only want to control information and our minds, they want to make a huge amount of money out of it at the same time. I'm not sure but I think a "colourTV licence" fee is now nearly 200 pounds a year. That's not unique tho'. That model is being used across the board. The death jabs didn't just kill and maim masses of people, they made hundreds of billions of dollars out of doing it.

I've done a lot of work on reducing the number of anger triggers I have but the BBC and it's bloody licence remains in the cluster of them I still have.

We stopped paying the licence fee years ago and stopped watching mainstream TV, although 'they' dont believe us and have continued to send their pathetic 'threatening' letters, all of which we have joyously torn up and binned. I dont know if you know this guy, but for anyone looking to find out the 'rules' (such as they are) he is a godsend and quite funny too:
Just click on the 'All you need to know' link on his page to dive straight in.

https://www.youtube.com/@ChilliJonCarne

[Brigantia]

Posted by Mari (here)
We stopped paying the licence fee years ago and stopped watching mainstream TV, although 'they' dont believe us and have continued to send their pathetic 'threatening' letters, all of which we have joyously torn up and binned. I dont know if you know this guy, but for anyone looking to find out the 'rules' (such as they are) he is a godsend and quite funny too:
Just click on the 'All you need to know' link on his page to dive straight in.

https://www.youtube.com/@ChilliJonCarne

Yes, we cancelled it years ago too. I sent in a complaint after being forced to declare earlier this year that I did not watch live TV, as the email they sent had the headline. "Sneaking a peek at what everyone's talking about?". I told them that what everyone talks about regarding TV is a load of trash content and I felt that it was an insult to my intelligence. They never send the goons here anyway as we are out in the sticks, but even if they did, they would never catch us in the act of watching TV.

[Mari]

Posted by Brigantia (here)

Posted by Mari (here)
We stopped paying the licence fee years ago and stopped watching mainstream TV, although 'they' dont believe us and have continued to send their pathetic 'threatening' letters, all of which we have joyously torn up and binned. I dont know if you know this guy, but for anyone looking to find out the 'rules' (such as they are) he is a godsend and quite funny too:
Just click on the 'All you need to know' link on his page to dive straight in.

https://www.youtube.com/@ChilliJonCarne

Yes, we cancelled it years ago too. I sent in a complaint after being forced to declare earlier this year that I did not watch live TV, as the email they sent had the headline. "Sneaking a peek at what everyone's talking about?". I told them that what everyone talks about regarding TV is a load of trash content and I felt that it was an insult to my intelligence. They never send the goons here anyway as we are out in the sticks, but even if they did, they would never catch us in the act of watching TV.

I got one of their goons a few years ago and sent him off with a flea in his ear - I did know what to say, fortunately, so he was flummoxed, as they rely heavily on 'fear' tactics. Chilli Jon Carne says never to engage with them, as they are trained to lure you into admitting that you do watch their crap tv.
My friend goes one better: her line to a visit she had once was 'how can you sleep at night, knowing you are working and accepting a wage from a corporation which supports pedophiles?' The man simply turned and walked away.

[Myristyl]

Looks like the telegraph is having a go at the BBC. Link to article without paywall here. Although I welcome somebody publicly calling out the BBC for what it is sometimes I wonder if it is 'allowed' just so we can let off a bit of steam and then go back to grumbling into our beer.

[rgray222]

BBC director general resigns amid criticism over doctoring Trump’s video


BBC CEO of News Deborah Turness and Director General Tim Davie.

Along with Davie, BBC CEO of New Deborah Turness also resigned

LONDON, November 9. /TASS/. BBC Director General Tim Davie has resigned amid the scandal over editing a speech by US President Donald Trump.

"I wanted to let you know that I have decided to leave the BBC after 20 years. This is entirely my decision, and I remain very thankful to the Chair and Board for their unswerving and unanimous support throughout my entire tenure, including during recent days," Davie, who has headed the BBC since 2020, said in a statement.

"Like all public organizations, the BBC is not perfect, and we must always be open, transparent and accountable. While not being the only reason, the current debate around BBC News has understandably contributed to my decision," he stated. "There have been some mistakes made and as Director-General I have to take ultimate responsibility."

Along with Davie, BBC CEO of New Deborah Turness also resigned.

The Daily Telegraph said on November 3 that a BBC Panorama documentary aired in October 2024 ahead of the presidential election in the United States had misled viewers by splicing two parts of Donald Trump’s speech together. The broadcast showed Trump saying he would walk with his supporters to the Capitol before the riots on January 6, 2021, urging them to "fight like hell." However, it omitted a section of the speech where Trump urged the crowd "to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.".

https://tass.com/world/2041123

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

"Like all public organizations, the BBC is not perfect, and we must always be open, transparent and accountable."

When have they ever been 'open, transparent and accountable?'

Good riddance to bad rubbish.

[lunaflare]

Resignation? Hmmm seems like an easy way to sweep criminal activity under the dirty carpet!
A major lawsuit and hefty fines would be more satisfying, ultimately leading to the closure of this offending network! (and then all other colluding media outlets)

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Remember the greening argument? That by planting trees, we might soak up excess CO2 in the atmosphere.

BBC were on it. Well known for pushing globalist narratives, they immediately gaslight the public, asserting that re-greening the world won't help with climate change. Because trees are no longer effective. Nature has suddenly stopped working, according to them.

https://x.com/real_shirelass/status/1987641818507301175

The Yorkshire Lass
@real_shirelass
Remember when the bias BBC telling the masses, that trees everywhere are suddenly losing their ability, after tens of thousand of years in existence, to soak up carbon, & therefore trees are no longer an effective measure in fighting the Climate Change Hoax Scam.

Are the bias BBC going to apologise for pushing the climate change scam, even though Bill Gates has now come out saying it’s bollocks.

[Eric J (Viking)]

WOW… this is getting serious… could this be the end of the BBC ? 🤷‍♂️

BBC resignations latest: Trump threatens to sue BBC for $1bn if it does not respond within days over speech edit error

https://news.sky.com/story/bbc-resig...gning-13467560

[Mari]

Great posts Star Mariner/Viking! I've waited a helluva long time to see these b*****ds sued out of existence. Will $1Billion be enough I wonder.

[Myristyl]

Posted by Eric J (Viking) (here)
WOW… this is getting serious… could this be the end of the BBC ? 🤷‍♂️

BBC resignations latest: Trump threatens to sue BBC for $1bn if it does not respond within days over speech edit error

https://news.sky.com/story/bbc-resig...gning-13467560

'Speech edit error' eh. That could become a meme. It wasn't an error they meant to do it. I'm with Mari, sue them out of existence.

[Mari]

Posted by lunaflare (here)
Resignation? Hmmm seems like an easy way to sweep criminal activity under the dirty carpet!
A major lawsuit and hefty fines would be more satisfying, ultimately leading to the closure of this offending network! (and then all other colluding media outlets)

'Resignations' are the BBC's and other corrupt entities' way of avoiding any accountability - such institutions just carry on their corrupt ways. At the very least these people should've been sacked. How many 'resignations' have we been witness to over the years - whether from politicians or the BBC where nothing has ever changed? They seem to think its what the public 'require' - throw a fall-guy into the sacrificial ring amid the usual media frenzy...then all will be well - business as usual folks!

Will we get to know just who edited the Panorama programme, who made the decision to doctor Trumps words - who's really behind all this? Of course not - we've never found out anything about who's behind, or has enabled, all the many, many corruptions that have surfaced throughout the years. For example - who at the BBC was behind the media 'D' notice of Saville's crimes, for a great many years? Who, in the Royal family gave the instructions for Saville's doings to remain hidden? (privately, we can take good educated guesses for who they were!) It is someone, or a small group, but we never hear from then, instead we get the usual hapless 'Bosses', 'Heads' and Ceo's thrown onto the bonfire for the public to gawp at.

Trump is demanding total disclosure from the BBC of every time he's been mis-represented (and there is lots of that!) and it has to be in a 'conspicuous' manner - ie: put out into the public domain, where all the mis-representation can be seen. He is giving the BBC till Friday to agree to this, or he will go ahead and sue. Brilliant.

[norman]

Posted by Mari (here)
BBC - the mouthpiece of State control.
I want Trump to sue the arse off this entity. And I want all the times they doctored 'reporting' - whether 'war' stuff (and there's countless examples of that (those 'reporters' out in 'war zones') or speeches or text to come to the light of day. This corporation has to go - it will, but cannot come fast enough for me or those wise to the corporation's ways.

BBC crisis deepens as Trump threatens to sue for $1bn | ITV News
ITV News - Nov 10, 2025

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=C4WLix38J3o

Donald Trump has threatened a billion-dollar legal action against the BBC over the editing of a Panorama documentary.

It comes as BBC chairman Samir Shah was forced to apologise on Monday for an "error of judgment" over the editing of a speech in a Panorama documentary by Mr Trump before the attack on the US Capitol on January 6 2021.

The apology follows the resignation of two of the corporation’s most senior figures on Sunday – Chief Executive of BBC News Deborah Turness and Director-General Tim Davie.

Trump's legal team has submitted a letter to the BBC threatening a lawsuit unless they retract the documentary.

ITV News obtained a copy of the letter from a source close to President Trump

The letter, from Trump counsel Alejandro Brito, demands that “false, defamatory, disparaging, and inflammatory statements” made about Mr Trump must be retracted immediately, Fox News reported.

The letter gives the corporation a Friday deadline to respond, adding if it does not, Mr Trump will be “left with no alternative but to enforce his legal and equitable rights, all of which are expressly reserved and are not waived, including by filing legal action for no less than 1,000,000,000 dollars in damages.”

It concludes: “The BBC is on notice.”

Mr Trump has a history of suing news organisations in the US.

The BBC said it has received communication from Trump over the editing of the documentary, broadcast the week before last year’s US election and said "we are now considering how to reply to him.”

In a letter to the Culture, Media and Sport Committee, Mr Shah said the corporation accepted that the way the speech had been edited for a Panorama documentary had given "the impression of a direct call for violent action."

Their resignations of Turness and Davie follows the release of a memo by Michael Prescott, a former external adviser to the BBC’s editorial standards committee, which raised concerns in the summer about the way President Trump's speech on January 6, 2021, had been edited.

Clips were spliced together in the documentary 'Trump: A Second Chance?' to make it appear he had told supporters he was going to walk to the US Capitol with them to “fight like hell”.

In his letter, Mr Shah said there have been more than 500 complaints since the publication of the memo, and that it is "simply not true" that Mr Prescott "uncovered" issues that the BBC has sought to "bury".

He added: "There is another view that has gained currency in the coverage that the BBC has done nothing to tackle these problems.

"That is also simply not true."

On the editing of the clip, Mr Shah said the BBC's editorial guidelines and standards committee was told by BBC News the purpose of doing so was "to convey the message of the speech made by President Trump so that Panorama's audience could better understand how it had been received by President Trump's supporters and what was happening on the ground at that time."

He said the issue was discussed as part of a wider review of the BBC's US election coverage, but was not pursued further at that time as it had not attracted significant audience feedback.
The letter continued: "The points raised in the review were relayed to the Panorama team, including the decision-making on this edit. With hindsight, it would have been better to take more formal action."

Downing Street has said the BBC is not corrupt or institutionally biased after hitting back at claims made by President Trump and other critics of the public broadcaster.

A spokesman for the prime minister said: “On the question of is the BBC corrupt? No.

"The BBC has a vital role in an age of disinformation… where there’s a clear argument for a robust, impartial British news service to deliver, and that case is stronger than ever."

Asked if Starmer believed the BBC was institutionally biased, the spokesman replied: “No, but it is important that the BBC acts to maintain trust and correct mistakes quickly when they occur, because as I say, for any public service broadcaster, accountability is vital to maintain trust.”

On Monday morning, the former CEO of BBC News, Deborah Turness, insisted the organisation is not "institutionally biased".

Speaking to reporters outside Broadcasting House, Ms Turness said: "I stepped down over the weekend because the buck stops with me, but I would like to make one thing very clear.

"BBC News is not institutionally biased, that's why it's the world's most trusted news provider."

Asked why mistakes were not dealt with, including on Trump, on antisemitism, and on women’s rights, Ms Turness replied: “I’m sure that story will emerge.”

[Wilbur2]

I was going to write something about the various Trojan Horses in our country, including the BBC, and what they are doing. I realised half-way through what I was writing, that I risked getting arrested and jailed the next time I visit the UK for free-speech-crimes. I pressed the delete button....

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by norman (here)
Speaking to reporters outside Broadcasting House, Ms Turness said: "I stepped down over the weekend because the buck stops with me, but I would like to make one thing very clear.

"BBC News is not institutionally biased, that's why it's the world's most trusted news provider."

The bolded part above is likely a true statement. Around the world (less so at home) the BBC probably is perceived as the most trusted news provider. That's because their decades-long gaslighting campaign has just been that good! A top-tier propaganda outlet of which KGB would be proud.