View Poll Results: Anyone appearing to NOT be in alignment with the purpose/energy of the forum should

Voters
88. You may not vote on this poll
  • Be rejected and banned.

    17 19.32%
  • Be accepted as a dissenting voice.

    71 80.68%
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 1 4 8 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 159

Thread: Banning for misalignment

  1. Link to Post #61
    Bahamas Deactivated
    Join Date
    30th May 2010
    Location
    Bahamas
    Posts
    160
    Thanks
    346
    Thanked 315 times in 92 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Hi Mr Steve_a

    I hope you were referring to me as andywright, cus I'm right all the time?

  2. Link to Post #62
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,797
    Thanks
    38,347
    Thanked 55,041 times in 9,099 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Quote Posted by steve_a (here)
    Hi loveandgratitude,

    I think you just described 99% of the people who enter in internet forums. We must all live under bridges waiting for the Billy Goats Gruff to pass by. I think if we don't do some of the things that you mentioned, like push for the truth, push a few respectable buttons, open subjects up for discussion, then what are we doing here? Are we just to sit here and accept everything that is told to us? That is very dangerous. Then here ceases to become a forum. The very meaning of a forum is a place where things are discussed and debated.

    Mods don't need to recognize trolls, they just need to keep the discussions withing the forum guidelines, even if posts at times can be scathing, they aren't necessarily breaking forum guidelines. Unfortunately there are some Mods who are a little 'trigger happy' and ban threads based on assumption rather than based on infringed guidelines. Some close threads then check to see if the guidelines are broken, a little like that law that was passed, in the US I think it was, where people can be arrested because the powers that be think they might commit a crime. How does one measure the margen? What happened to one is innocent until proven guilty? Does that make sense?

    I understand that there has been a new turnover of 'staff' and that each one is eager to show their service, but I know that eventually they will settle down. It's human nature. As for the forum in itself, only the future will answer that. Without trying to sound too much like a troll, things will get better.....

    Best regards,

    Steve
    Point well taken Steve, their job is to keep the threads going smoothly. And for this, some behaviors may sometimes have to be curtailed. If it is going to be, better have some clear guidelines. They do not have to be precisely what loveandgratitude described. They have of course to be adapted. No?

  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    andywight (18th May 2011), Calz (18th May 2011), loveandgratitude (18th May 2011)

  4. Link to Post #63
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    10th February 2010
    Posts
    455
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 969 times in 185 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Hi andywight,

    I just realized. I have a friend in the UK called Andy Wright and of course you are nearly always right. From now on I'll call you andynearlyalwayswright!

    Best regards,

    Steve



    Quote Posted by andywight (here)
    Hi Mr Steve_a

    I hope you were referring to me as andywright, cus I'm right all the time?

  5. Link to Post #64
    Bahamas Deactivated
    Join Date
    30th May 2010
    Location
    Bahamas
    Posts
    160
    Thanks
    346
    Thanked 315 times in 92 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Quote Posted by steve_a (here)
    Hi andywight,

    I just realized. I have a friend in the UK called Andy Wright and of course you are nearly always right. From now on I'll call you andynearlyalwayswright!

    Best regards,

    Steve



    Quote Posted by andywight (here)
    Hi Mr Steve_a

    I hope you were referring to me as andywright, cus I'm right all the time?
    I always strive to please

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to andywight For This Post:

    Calz (18th May 2011)

  7. Link to Post #65
    TimelessDimensions
    Guest

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Quote Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
    Quote Posted by TimelessDimensions (here)
    Free Will prevails against all things but Unconditional Love..
    That is an excellent observation as a stand alone comment.
    Thanks, and I pulled it out of my own A-H

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TimelessDimensions For This Post:

    andywight (18th May 2011), Calz (18th May 2011), Lord Sidious (18th May 2011)

  9. Link to Post #66
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    10th February 2010
    Posts
    455
    Thanks
    8
    Thanked 969 times in 185 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Hi Flash,

    I think there is a danger to over think what guidelines are necessary for an online forum. All forums have basically the same rules, ATS, Mists of Avalon, Godlikeproductions, Nexus etc.

    The problem is when one starts to make up specific policy which leaves huge holes for interpretation. If I, for example, complain or show frustration, am I not keeping withing the realms of what the forum is wanting from it's members? Would I be sent on a holiday (great Mafia talk) ? Would I get taken out? Don't try and over think what the forum is about, otherwise that will stifle many from their thoughts and honest, candid opinions.

    Best regards,

    Steve

    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    Point well taken Steve, their job is to keep the threads going smoothly. And for this, some behaviors may sometimes have to be curtailed. If it is going to be, better have some clear guidelines. They do not have to be precisely what loveandgratitude described. They have of course to be adapted. No?

  10. Link to Post #67
    Retired
    Join Date
    7th December 2010
    Location
    Beyond
    Age
    52
    Posts
    3,689
    Thanks
    34,680
    Thanked 27,060 times in 3,030 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Hey you guys,about betting on someone's potential leave from the forum.please refrain from doing that,as a joke or not.i find this slightly out of place.

    I would like to say that the general intent is that the forum will always sail on smooth waters,however as Anchor said earlier:" people here know when they are skating on thin ice".

    ~*&^ Peace and quiet and good energies to us all ~*&^

    Limor
    Last edited by Limor Wolf; 19th May 2011 at 07:59.

  11. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Limor Wolf For This Post:

    andywight (18th May 2011), Calz (18th May 2011), Isthatso (25th May 2011), Lord Sidious (18th May 2011), noxon medem (20th May 2011), Rocky_Shorz (18th May 2011), Shezbeth (18th May 2011)

  12. Link to Post #68
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    77
    Posts
    29,977
    Thanks
    35,363
    Thanked 150,017 times in 22,899 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    Finally, finally, a description behavior based of what a throll is. I have been asking and requesting it a few times. Thanks Loveandgratitude, now I know what it is being talked about. AND NOW, we can have a behavior based way of judging thread for their harmful content.
    ...

    Now, the guidelines have to be drafted. For this, Bill and mods have to be involved and want to do it.
    Yes - a good description (in my view.)

    However - I am skeptical that changes in guidelines would help much.

    As can be seen from some of the other replies, one man's troll is another man's truth seeker.

    After a point, group norms are formed in a more intuitive, dynamically evolving, process.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  13. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    andywight (18th May 2011), Calz (18th May 2011), K626 (19th May 2011), Lord Sidious (18th May 2011), loveandgratitude (18th May 2011), noxon medem (20th May 2011), ulli (18th May 2011)

  14. Link to Post #69
    Bahamas Deactivated
    Join Date
    30th May 2010
    Location
    Bahamas
    Posts
    160
    Thanks
    346
    Thanked 315 times in 92 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Quote Posted by Limor (here)
    Hey you guys,about betting on someone's potential leave from the forum.please refrain from doing that,as a joke or not.i find this slightly out of place.
    Just for the record, I have no problem with any members running a house on my purported banishment date!

    In fact I find these posts very informative as to character of the individuals involved.
    Last edited by andywight; 18th May 2011 at 23:00.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to andywight For This Post:

    buckminster fuller (18th May 2011)

  16. Link to Post #70
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    21st March 2010
    Location
    UK
    Age
    73
    Posts
    537
    Thanks
    436
    Thanked 1,589 times in 355 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    This place is just falling appart isn't it, I have been away for some time having major surgery for bowel cancer, just before I left the forum was ticking over nicely with everyone mostly getting on and dealing with all the outside goings on in the world that we are all so concerned with.
    After having half my guts ripped out I come back to find everyone at eachothers throats, people leaving and threats flying around all over the place. my god what's going on? Must be those damn chemtrails or something. How the hell are you lot going to turn this planet into the utopia we want it to be, and unite against any bad aliens and the PTB, if you can't even get on and live together in this virtual world in here I despair I really do

  17. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Daft Ada For This Post:

    ace (18th May 2011), andywight (18th May 2011), buckminster fuller (18th May 2011), DianeKJ (20th May 2011), Donna O (19th May 2011), Franny (18th May 2011), Fred Steeves (18th May 2011), gigha (18th May 2011), HURRITT ENYETO (19th May 2011), Karma Ninja (18th May 2011), Lord Sidious (18th May 2011), nearing (19th May 2011), noxon medem (20th May 2011), sepia (19th May 2011), sheddie (18th May 2011), Some Bloke (18th May 2011), winnasboy (19th May 2011)

  18. Link to Post #71
    France Deactivated
    Join Date
    21st January 2011
    Location
    Paris
    Age
    62
    Posts
    359
    Thanks
    1,134
    Thanked 1,430 times in 288 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Quote Posted by Daft Ada (here)
    This place is just falling appart isn't it, I have been away for some time having major surgery for bowel cancer, just before I left the forum was ticking over nicely with everyone mostly getting on and dealing with all the outside goings on in the world that we are all so concerned with.
    After having half my guts ripped out I come back to find everyone at eachothers throats, people leaving and threats flying around all over the place. my god what's going on? Must be those damn chemtrails or something. How the hell are you lot going to turn this planet into the utopia we want it to be, and unite against any bad aliens and the PTB, if you can't even get on and live together in this virtual world in here I despair I really do
    Wish you a speedy recovery.
    Kind of put's things in to perspective.

    Best wishes
    Ace

  19. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to ace For This Post:

    andywight (18th May 2011), Daft Ada (18th May 2011), DianeKJ (20th May 2011), gigha (18th May 2011), jjl (18th May 2011), Karma Ninja (18th May 2011), Lord Sidious (18th May 2011), loveandgratitude (18th May 2011), nearing (19th May 2011), noxon medem (20th May 2011), sepia (19th May 2011), sheddie (18th May 2011), winnasboy (19th May 2011)

  20. Link to Post #72
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    21st March 2010
    Location
    UK
    Age
    73
    Posts
    537
    Thanks
    436
    Thanked 1,589 times in 355 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Thanks Ace mate

  21. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Daft Ada For This Post:

    ace (18th May 2011), andywight (18th May 2011), Franny (18th May 2011), Lord Sidious (18th May 2011)

  22. Link to Post #73
    France Deactivated
    Join Date
    21st January 2011
    Location
    Paris
    Age
    62
    Posts
    359
    Thanks
    1,134
    Thanked 1,430 times in 288 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Quote Posted by Daft Ada (here)
    Thanks Ace mate
    You are more than welcome
    You stay strong.

    Ace

  23. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ace For This Post:

    andywight (18th May 2011), Lord Sidious (18th May 2011), nearing (19th May 2011)

  24. Link to Post #74
    Bahamas Deactivated
    Join Date
    30th May 2010
    Location
    Bahamas
    Posts
    160
    Thanks
    346
    Thanked 315 times in 92 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Quote Posted by Limor (here)
    I would like to say that the general intent is that the forum will always sail on a smooth waters,however as Anchor said earlier:" people here know when they are skating on thin ice".
    Hmmm! if I was at all paranoid, which of course I'm not, I would almost think that Limor's last statement was meant for me.

    I think a more apt statement to make, Limor please excuse my arrogance for wanting to edit you, would be that the whole of the "human race" right now is skating on thin ice!
    Last edited by andywight; 18th May 2011 at 20:42.

  25. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to andywight For This Post:

    buckminster fuller (18th May 2011), Isostool (20th May 2011), noxon medem (20th May 2011)

  26. Link to Post #75
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2010
    Posts
    424
    Thanks
    797
    Thanked 1,130 times in 289 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Quote Posted by Daft Ada (here)
    …I have been away for some time having major surgery for bowel cancer…
    Hi Daft Ada, sorry to hear about your cancer surgery and I hope you recover from it soon.

    And just as a brief off-topic comment (since the subject is important), I don’t know if you are aware of a German doctor called Dr. Hamer and his GNM (German New Medicine)...?

    I have researched Dr. Hamer in depth and, imo, there is no doubt whatsoever that he has found the cause and the cure for cancer, as well as for just about other diseases, but the elite is suppressing it. I could explain this subject in detail, but perhaps in another thread specifically dedicated to it.

    For now, just two very brief comments:

    1) Cancer is not what they have told us it is at all. Conventional medicine has been totally distorted (and falsified) to hide the truth about cancer and its solution.

    2) I posted the basic info about Dr. Hamer (links, videos, conferences, etc.) in this post:

    Post #874, pag 44. Dr. Hamer finds the cure for cancer and the elite suppress it
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ll=1#post92908

    Btw, I have the telephone numbers of several Spanish doctors in Madrid (Spain) who are applying Dr. Hamer’s cure with great success, more than conventional medicine.
    Last edited by qbeac; 18th May 2011 at 21:52.

  27. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to qbeac For This Post:

    andywight (18th May 2011), K626 (19th May 2011), Lord Sidious (18th May 2011), loveandgratitude (18th May 2011), winnasboy (19th May 2011)

  28. Link to Post #76
    Avalon Member dddanieljjjamesss's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    North Shore, MA, US
    Age
    37
    Posts
    248
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 502 times in 171 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    I liked chico,
    despite disagreeing with him
    ALL THE TIME

    and this being the internet, we need to take everything with more than a grain of salt
    nobody knows nothin bout nobody cept thru the window of a few small words

  29. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to dddanieljjjamesss For This Post:

    andywight (18th May 2011), buckminster fuller (18th May 2011), Isthatso (25th May 2011), Lord Sidious (18th May 2011), nearing (19th May 2011), noxon medem (20th May 2011), Oxygen (19th May 2011), shijo (19th May 2011)

  30. Link to Post #77
    Canada Avalon Retired Member Karma Ninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th April 2011
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    859
    Thanked 980 times in 209 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    I also enjoyed reading Chico's comments and disagreed with him most of the time too.

    I wish he could have understood what was being asked of him and delivered his message in a more constructive way. The onus was on him to change his approach and he chose his fate by returning with such a deliberately negative and confrontational thread. The mods did what they had to do and it remains the majority of members who agree with the decision. One man's good is another man's evil and both are a part of our souls.

  31. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Karma Ninja For This Post:

    andywight (19th May 2011), Isthatso (25th May 2011), Lord Sidious (18th May 2011), noxon medem (20th May 2011)

  32. Link to Post #78
    France Avalon Member buckminster fuller's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    rennes (britanny), france
    Age
    53
    Posts
    598
    Thanks
    2,230
    Thanked 1,879 times in 475 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Quote Posted by Karma Ninja (here)
    I also enjoyed reading Chico's comments and disagreed with him most of the time too.

    I wish he could have understood what was being asked of him and delivered his message in a more constructive way. The onus was on him to change his approach and he chose his fate by returning with such a deliberately negative and confrontational thread. The mods did what they had to do and it remains the majority of members who agree with the decision. One man's good is another man's evil and both are a part of our souls.
    The pole results right now is :

    Be rejected and banned:
    13 votes 22.81%

    Be accepted as a dissenting voice:
    44 votes 77.19%

    Based on the given reason why chico got banned, the results don't show that people agree with the decision made.
    No good or evil needed to explain what happened really...
    Unconditional love did show its conditional side.

    Peace
    life is design

  33. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to buckminster fuller For This Post:

    andywight (19th May 2011), qbeac (19th May 2011), sandy (18th May 2011)

  34. Link to Post #79
    Canada Avalon Retired Member Karma Ninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th April 2011
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    859
    Thanked 980 times in 209 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Quote Posted by buckminster fuller (here)
    Quote Posted by Karma Ninja (here)
    I also enjoyed reading Chico's comments and disagreed with him most of the time too.

    I wish he could have understood what was being asked of him and delivered his message in a more constructive way. The onus was on him to change his approach and he chose his fate by returning with such a deliberately negative and confrontational thread. The mods did what they had to do and it remains the majority of members who agree with the decision. One man's good is another man's evil and both are a part of our souls.
    The pole results right now is :

    Be rejected and banned:
    13 votes 22.81%

    Be accepted as a dissenting voice:
    44 votes 77.19%

    Based on the given reason why chico got banned, the results don't show that people agree with the decision made.
    No good or evil needed to explain what happened really...
    Unconditional love did show its conditional side.

    Peace
    How about looking at it this way... 3,500+ members and only 57 cared at all to vote. That is a measly 1.6% of the membership. Not all who did vote disagreed with Chico's ban. I fail to see how you can jump to the conclusion that this poll shows anything other than the fact that so few cared about this dismissal that they never read or moved on immediately from the topic.

    This thread shows that most members are not interested in this type of topic or the negativity and very few have bothered to offer their input into what is essentially a negative thread.

    The good and evil I mention was in defense of Chico and I have previously offered my support for his right to post his opinion. I accept that Chico's intentions may have been good but his approach failed.
    Last edited by Karma Ninja; 18th May 2011 at 23:50. Reason: clarification

  35. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Karma Ninja For This Post:

    andywight (19th May 2011), NancyV (19th May 2011)

  36. Link to Post #80
    Canada Avalon Member sandy's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th January 2011
    Location
    North East Saskatchewan
    Posts
    1,446
    Thanks
    28,707
    Thanked 6,916 times in 1,310 posts

    Default Re: Banning for misalignment

    Quote Posted by Karma Ninja (here)
    Quote Posted by buckminster fuller (here)
    Quote Posted by Karma Ninja (here)
    I also enjoyed reading Chico's comments and disagreed with him most of the time too.

    I wish he could have understood what was being asked of him and delivered his message in a more constructive way. The onus was on him to change his approach and he chose his fate by returning with such a deliberately negative and confrontational thread. The mods did what they had to do and it remains the majority of members who agree with the decision. One man's good is another man's evil and both are a part of our souls.
    The pole results right now is :

    Be rejected and banned:
    13 votes 22.81%

    Be accepted as a dissenting voice:
    44 votes 77.19%

    Based on the given reason why chico got banned, the results don't show that people agree with the decision made.
    No good or evil needed to explain what happened really...
    Unconditional love did show its conditional side.

    Peace
    How about looking at it this way... 3,500+ members and only 57 cared at all to vote. That is a measly 1.6% of the membership. Not all who did vote disagreed with Chico's ban. I fail to see how you can jump to the conclusion that this poll shows anything other than the fact that so few cared about this dismissal that they never read or moved on immediately from the topic.

    This thread shows that most members are not interested in this type of topic or the negativity and very few have bothered to offer their input into what is essentially a negative thread.

    The good and evil I mention was in defense of Chico and I have previously offered my support for his right to post his opinion. I accept that Chico's intentions may have been good but his approach failed.
    Dear Karma Ninja,

    Personally , everything you wrote makes me very sad. The world needs unity in diversity not division because of diversity.
    Love and Light Always/Sandy

  37. The Following User Says Thank You to sandy For This Post:

    andywight (19th May 2011)

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 1 4 8 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts