Posted by justoneman
(here)
Posted by Vivek
(here)
I'll be happy to pick apart Gardner's material for what it's worth, but I honestly do not trust the guy. My main beef is the notion that the messianic bloodline started with Cain. That is the biggest load of bull**** I have ever heard. The lineage of Cain was the serpent seed, not the Dragon Bloodline. The Jesus Christ that lived on earth was a descendant of Seth, that aint a stab in the dark either (well, it is but not with the typical connotations). In my opinion, that is a huge discrepancy to attribute the messianic/dragon/grail bloodline to Cain and it's just the kind of deceptive tactics used to mix stuff up - a damn good way to do it too, difficult to remedy.
Cain was the product of Eve and Saklas. That's the serpent seed, deluded righteousness. Kingship, monarchy. Nothing majestic about it. Bull****.
There is no doubt valuable information in LGs work, but that's true for any good disinformation. It's that little percentage, that little discrepancy that infects the rest of the information leading people to lend prestige where none is due. Empowering the very forces that enslave us by misplacing our homage to the Truth.
If I have misplaced my suspicions then please, help me to understand, I'm up for discussion in all seriousness. Excuse the fervor, but it looks to me as if his information is the equivalent of the twisted etymology/new egyptology-type distortion of information used by a lot of the people on the list in the OP.
Might I point out that the notion of Cain being the first of the messianic lineage (I don't think he was, because he was of the serpent seed) is the same belief professed by the historical/spiritual ideologies of the Illuminati and Freemasonry. This is part of the reason they hold Lucifer in such high regards. The serpent was
good, he liberated the first of humanity with
knowledge, Cain was of "divine blood",
royal blood. Don't think so. Serpent seed. Not Dragon.
Again, if I have misunderstood something, please point it out. I am also going back over the material myself.
Hi Vivek - I have been chasing much of this down the last few days - who is who, as in who might be "good guys" and who might be "bad guys" and I have found multiple conflicting stories in this regard. I don't think it is productive to start tossing out references with links,etc. at this point because it means dwelling within that world of good guys and bad guys (trying to figure it out so we can be sure we align with the right guys) which I see as the very dynamic which has mankind (and perhaps other beings as well) in their constant state of war.
I will note that I found several references to "twins" and that each twin would represent things like creation / destruction. The twin serpents as depicted on the caduceus is an example of this.
On the one hand, I can see wisdom in acceptance that we all have a little good and bad within each of us and yet, on the other hand, I personally align only with what I call Christ energies and at least from my "thinking mind" which I must utilize in the process of writing a post, I see no other "energy" to align with that makes any sense.
Those who know me say, "Chester, your problem is you love everyone." They say that because I tend to trust all sorts of folks that later, at least in the view of many of my friends that have known me for years, end up "burning me" somehow.
Please bare with me and read this true story.
Once I was involved in a large business project where I unfortunately wound up being the leader guy and largest shareholder. In this project, I had brought in several friends, some of which I had known since childhood. After our first year, we partnered with some wealthy international businessmen from Europe and eventually there became an internal struggle between these "partners" and my "friends."
Because I was the "decider" I made several decisions that were popular with one side and not the other. I never aligned with one particular side until we were presented a merger opportunity. I controlled the decision as to my position in ownership. The Europeans pushed for the merger. I agreed that the merger would be the best idea. Due to my large shareholder position, the merger would have made me a multimillionaire instantly.
My friends, on the other hand implored me not to accept the merger. In this specific example, I decided that honoring the wishes of my friends was more important than doing what I wanted to do. In hindsight, it was clear to me that my friends were worried not just about their jobs, but their positions of power they held and the sense of self worth they derived from these positions within the small community our business was located.
Anyways, my point is that I have examples in my life where I was in positions of power over others and in some cases, like the above example, I decided as to the wishes of others over my own best self interests. At other times in my life when I was in a position to make decisions that would effect myself and others, I chose selfishly.
The point I am reaching here is that regardless of how things worked out, I was always much more comfortable with deciding along the lines of the wishes of others and when it came to decisions where there has been opposition within the group of others, I have always been happiest with siding with my friends.
Now who are the good guys and who are the bad guys in the above story? If I had decided to accept the merger, it is certain that my friends would have been devolved out of the project as these friends were over paid and under qualified. They gained their positions due to friendship (and that they could be trusted... at least in the early stages of the project). But what they created was a block... a separation within a larger whole. And knowing their demise would likely occur, they used their power of "friendship" against me, the decider.
Anyways, soon after I turned down the merger, the company began to lose ground to other competing companies. Companies that made the harder decisions which ensured their greater success. Our company all but died and was sold off and everyone lost within the group of friends including myself who lost the most when measuring the results financially.
The fact is that if I had always made decisions based on the welfare of the company, I would have ended up quite wealthy and perhaps the company would still be thriving today. The other company that wanted to merge with us is, today, one of the largest, most respected companies within our industry.
Additionally, What I found amongst the CEOs of the various competitors was their ability to make decisions that put the welfare of individuals within the organization secondary to the organization itself. I could have made those types of decisions but I hated being the person I was when I did so.
This is why I say I align with the Christ energies (an example of this (to me) is putting others first, especially those who have proven themselves to be your friend when you need a friend, as the friends I am speaking about in the above story had done over and over and for years and years). When I have aligned with selfishness and/or devotion to an artificial entity (such as my former company) I do not enjoy life in the least.
I hope to receive feedback for this post.
justoneman
Re: A New World Order: Exposing the Luciferian Agenda
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks