I should qualify that when I refer to 'what results being incomprehensible/undesirable', I mean in close, physical/social conversation; Avalon members 'get it' and/or 'want to' quite readily. It was not my intention to imply that the ideas were 'too lofty' or 'beyond anyone's comprehension', nor that the ideas were unheard of especially here. ^_^Posted by Dawn (here)
Shezbeth, will you please tell me more? What ideas have you 'entertained during entity interaction'?
Can you also tell me more about the information you are referring to here, "Most of what results from such interaction is information/ideation that is incomprehensible or undesirable to most without a previously comprehended metaphorical or figurative reference"?
All manner of topics and ideas. Social perception/mind influence/control on a variety of levels (physical, mental, frequency/wave, etc.), the theory and mechanics of/behind various phenomena - quantum, metaphysic, etc., the comparable and/or contrasting nature of unity/singularity vs. duality/infinity, or just about any topic that requires lengthy explanation or research and an open mind to converse about. It is safe to assume that I discuss things with inorganics as readily/frequently as I do members of Avalon.
Lacking the need to explain terminology or concepts has led me to discuss more with inorganic entities than with present, physical ones, though 'discuss' may be a bit of a stretch. It would be more accurate to state that I monologue internally while processing information and at times am directed to oversight, fallacy, bias, or premature conclusion. Such interactions are thought-based rather than word-based so there is no conflict of perception as to the meanings of words or ideas, and metaphorical comparisons come quite quickly and naturally that could take hours to express verbally.
In that most threads I participate in on Avalon (for example) are subjects that the overwhelming majority (in my local community) would dismiss, discard, or ignore, I cannot ask for input from those around me (with one notable exception). Additionally, many people I've encountered use words inaccurately, or in the wrong context (but with all the confidence of correct meaning/usage).
For example, if I were to begin to discuss the Greek perception/concept of Daemon (which I might add could be relevant to this discussion ^_~), I would immediately be branded (and dismissed) as some type of satan-worshipper (which has happened) by the overwhelmingly Judeo-Christian conditioning which is most prevalent in my area. I could refer to Love (as the antithesis of Fear) and it would be interpreted as the commercial, valentine's day variety.
The Agent Smith syndrome DNA references is a most apt description. I find I am not readily targeted (in this sense) unless I attempt to express 'otherworldly' things to individuals not want to discuss/receive 'otherworldly' input. It is almost like a body/security guard steps between myself and the person 'for their protection', except the 'bodyguard' is within the person.
It is as though an individual's mental blocks/stonewalls have a consciousness of their own, which activate/mobilize when threatened.
The entity(-ies) I interact with did not do so. When contact was first made, we walked/talked together at length and at the conclusion the entity made to depart (in a sense). I suggested that a lasting connection could be made and made the invitation unsolicited.Posted by DNA (here)
... if they are going to attach to you, they "ASK YOUR PERMISSION". It is just like the vampire who asks permission before he can enter your home.




Reply With Quote