I'm bumping this post because I think it is important and quite relevant to this event....and adding another thought or two to ponder.Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
Even though I don't always agree with him a 100% of the time, I sure do anticipate hearing what Farrell has to say about certain matters....
THE REMOTE CONTROL-OF-AIRCRAFT-WITHOUT-PILOT-CONSENT CAT IS OUT OF THE BAG…
What’s new in this patent, and its relevancy both to the 9/11 storyline and the developing storyline to the Flight 370 affair is simply the statement that a system has been developed to override cockpit decisions remotely.
Joseph FarrellBoeing wins patent on uninterruptible autopilot system
Published 4 December 2006
New technology can be activated by the pilots, government agencies, even on-board sensors; not even a tortured pilot can give up control; dedicated electrical circuits ensure the system’s total independence
http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire....topilot-system
If "someone" could take this jet over remotely and render the pilots useless/irrelevant, to steal this jet or even to crash it in the Southern Indian Ocean, wouldn't it also make sense that if a terrorist or suicidal pilot went rogue and was on a death wish, flying this plane around for 7+ hrs, that a Government/Military etc., could of easily found this plane via radar-satellite,(or other technology) within that 7+ hour window and remotely take the plane away from this terrorist or "suicidal pilot" and land it somewhere.?????????????
The question would be, who has the capability (access-codes-software) to "remotely" take over a Boeing 777? To make it "disappear"???? The Boeing 777 must have a very extreme security and firewall system to say the least.
A well experienced pilot could do what was done initially IMO, but to continue on for 7+ hours unchallenged is beyond logic and common sense, beyond belief.




Reply With Quote